Mikail

@JoeyWatcherElba @estherzelda0514 @EYakoby it’s literally not

@estherzelda0514 @EYakoby I mean its also supposed to be over a 75 year period

@EYakoby Because 250K is a ridiculous claim. The methodology is bullshit. The report is claiming that 1 in 24 women and girls aged 10 to 25 was raped by an Muslim gang. It's not credible.

@thomasknox @RichardHanania @alexeyguzey tell us how you came to 250 k since you’re hell bent on defending that?

@RichardHanania @alexeyguzey Tell us your number, then. Go on. If you know 250,000 is “totally fake” you must have a good idea of the TRUE number

@alexeyguzey @RichardHanania post proof yank

@RichardHanania Yes, it's likely much higher.

@LateForTea5 @estherzelda0514 please verify your claim that the pakistani community largely hates the white community

I half agree with you, but sorry, there's partisan racial hatred involved, coming from the direction of the Pakistani community. The institutional failure is due to pretending there's unity when there isn't. No one wanted to admit that the Pakistani community largely hates the white community and that's why it happened.

That UK Rape Gang report is so stupid. Obviously, immigrants from certain countries committed absolutely heinous amounts of sex crimes over a long period of time as the authorities failed to take it seriously from a combination of it being a sex crime and it not being PC to notice that the perpetrators were nearly all of the same background. Denying that at this juncture is foolish. But then it has to go and use just completely asinine methodology to project rape in particularly rape-prone areas across the entire UK, as if the level of car jackings you can expect in Chicago in a particularly bad year can just be extrapolated over the entire US without coming out with an absolutely bogus statistic based on pure nonsense. Not to mention that it obviously puts the most explicit, nearly pornographic, details of the individual crimes themselves with nowhere near as much myopic detail spent on how the authorities failed so badly. What is precise purpose of that? Coupled with the hyperbolic and absurd statistic of 250K gang rapes in the UK by these precise type of Pakistani gangs, it's obviously to whip up a partisan sense of racial fear and outrage, rather than a unified recognitions of institutional failure and a push towards nonpartisan reforms. This populist urge for outrage destroys everything it touches.

@uxm1ke @lthlnkso a zionist blatantly talking out of his ass, i’m shocked!

You probably need to look up what extrapolation means and what they knew and 2019. They are currently exposing is that 40% of the territory of United Kingdom is affected not just hot spots. The 250, 000 is an extremely conservative data from seven years ago when nobody had balls to look at this at scale.

250k victims is probably an extreme overestimate, but this is very bad.

@lthlnkso thanks for the comprehensive analysis

@theghosttweeter @Th_Angelopoulos that’s u

@MHConduit @Th_Angelopoulos

.@RupertLowe10 says 250,000 white girls were raped by "primarily Pakistani Muslim men". Here are the official numbers: Casey's national audit (2025): 700 recorded group-based CSE offences in 2023. Police chiefs (NPCC): Pakistani suspects 13.7% of group gangs, white suspects 63%. Run his claim. 700 a year, 13.7% Pakistani, is about 96. Over 25 years, 2,400. The data is under-reported, so I will be generous and multiply it by 10. That's 24,000. And I will double it again to 48,000. Still a fifth of his number, with every assumption stacked in his favour. So either the figure is wrong. Or it is real. And if it is real, it cuts the other way too. White suspects are 63% of group gangs, four and a half times the Pakistani share. On his own number that is more than a million white-gang victims. Lowe says nothing about. And Casey records 500,000 children sexually abused every year in total. The largest group of perpetrators are white men. Either way the headline collapses on its own arithmetic. And more importantly, he appears to be weaponising victims and survivors for political gain. Pathetic.

@Z0GB0T there are pakistani rape gangs* this is an issue, it’s only that the 250 k isn’t verifiable any way whatsoever and it’s a inaccurate data based on factual current stats and grossly overestimated

@MHConduit No way there could be Paki rape gangs when Pakis have been proven to be prolific rapists and sex traffickers. That's just crazy and I won't believe it until minors who have been subjected to sexual trafficking and assault are publicly identified!

great way to deflect the specific case at hand i can’t directly reply , im blocked any way, help me verify the 250k victims ty

@theghosttweeter @Th_Angelopoulos you are thick for correlating seeking factual numbers for defending mentally unwell people thank god imbecile like you aren’t in the legal system we’d have biased and unreliable outcomes

@MHConduit @Th_Angelopoulos I bet you’re white person doing your damned hardest to defend pakis racially raping white girls. I genuinely don’t think you realise how genuinely retarded you actually look honestly look at how hard you’re trying to soften the blow. Have to be a serious bootlicker for pakis.

@and_bean14603 @devilisblack666 yes

@MHConduit @devilisblack666 We're ALL black

Fuck all that when is your onlyfans dropping 🤣🤣

@devilisblack666 no offence *

@devilisblack666 not offensive intended hombre, i got black friends that like em on the thicker side. just pointing out a stereotype i find funny, it’s a high t trait , if you didn’t know

@pennequattro it’s a terrible application

instagram is literally promoting stalking lmao

@FatherOf40 @TakeThiamine americans generally love thinking this way, they’re not super bright. muslims are some big boogeyman to them , the indoctrination worked extremely well, that even unverifiable data wins them over and the only solution is genocide.

@TakeThiamine It’s funny seeing this level of disinfo I have to think you need Vit B1 to come up with such BS. You’re outraged because brown criminals are abusing young children instead of the regular native folk. You don’t really care about the victims.

“I’m Muslim and those Pakistani rape gangs were not Muslim. That is not my religion.” I’ve seen this response countless times today. Understand this: The only interpretation of Islam that matters is the one that has enabled the systematic rape of hundreds of thousands of White British girls. Your personal interpretation is irrelevant, as is mine. Below, I will outline the theological architecture behind these egregious crimes—and why Islam, in its classical and dominant readings, is fundamentally incompatible with Western society. الولاء والبراء Al-walā’ wa-l-barā’ (loyalty and disavowal): This is an Islamic principle rooted in Quranic verses and hadith. It calls for alliance with believers and disassociation from non-believers. Mainstream and especially Salafi/Wahhabi/Deobandi interpretations (common among some Pakistani communities) emphasize enmity or at least strict separation from kuffar (disbelievers). Reformist or Sufi readings soften it toward personal piety. It fosters "us vs. them" thinking that dehumanizes outsiders. دار الحرب Dār al-Ḥarb (House of War) vs. Dār al-Islām: Classical fiqh divides the world this way. In non-Muslim territory, rules for interaction differ; some historical and jihadist readings treat it as a zone where normal restraints are relaxed or jihad applies until Islamic dominance. Peaceful modern Muslims often reinterpret this as irrelevant to living in the West under secular law. Others (including some UK imams or online preachers) maintain harder lines. It provides theological framing for parallel societies or resentment. مَا مَلَكَتْ أَيْمَانُكُمْ Mā malakat aymānukum (milk al-yamīn in shortened form) translates to “those whom the right hand possesses” (or “what your right hands possess”). It appears in roughly 15 verses and is the Quran’s most frequent way of referring to slaves or war captives (male and female) in 7th-century Arabian society. Interpreted in a certain way, it permits the rape of captives. Aisha’s age The most authentic hadith collections (Sahih Bukhari and Muslim) state Muhammad married Aisha at 6 and consummated at 9. This is the orthodox Sunni position held for most of Islamic history. It has been used to justify child marriage in various Muslim societies. Modern apologists sometimes argue cultural context, different age calculations, or that it was normative then. Traditionalists defend it as the Prophet's example. This precedent weakens absolute age-of-consent arguments within strict Islamic frameworks. Combine al-walā’ wa-l-barā’ with dār al-ḥarb and milk al-yamīn. Now combine all of those with the belief that Aisha was 9 at the time of consummation. What do you get? • Moral and religious justification for enmity toward non-Muslims as a category. • License to operate with far fewer restraints inside non-Islamic societies, treating local laws and norms as non-binding. • Permission to dehumanize and sexually exploit non-Muslim females—including minors—once they are classified as captives or property. • No effective doctrinal floor on the age of sexual access, because the Prophet’s example overrides later, external standards of consent or maturity. “I’m Muslim and that’s not how we interpret those texts.” Doesn’t matter. This is how hundreds of thousands of South Asians interpret the Quran. Do you understand now why this must be purged from Western society by any means? I don’t care if you’re a peaceful 145 IQ Muslim scholar, we don’t have time to figure out who’s who here. There are 3.8 million Muslims in the United Kingdom. Hundreds of thousands of White British girls were raped. The perpetrators are overwhelmingly Pakistani Muslim. To the degree that if they didn’t directly participate, they knew someone who did, and did nothing to stop it. Get them out. Every last one.

@LeeThom22476727 @JRaymondPoetry @RichardHanania don’t deflect fuckwit, tell me where the data was extracted from. i’ll wait, answer me or fuck off lol

@MHConduit @JRaymondPoetry @RichardHanania Have you read it? Yes or no? Have you checked the sources? Its ok you can just admit you are pro grooming gang you fucking nonce.

“It has been previously established that, at the very least, 250,000 young white girls have been subjected to repeated rape, gang rape, trafficking, torture, pregnancy, forced Islamic conversion, and lifelong trauma.” That would be something like 1 in 40 women of reproductive age. It’s not credible and makes you wonder what kinds of standards these people are applying to establish truth.

@LeeThom22476727 @JRaymondPoetry @RichardHanania quoting something that’s literally unverifiable with a picture of a known retard you have shit for brains lol

@MHConduit @JRaymondPoetry @RichardHanania Besides a report that have been accumulated for you to read you fucking retard lol. Have you even read it?

@PhilomathArc @theghosttweeter @Th_Angelopoulos @RupertLowe10 he doesn’t know what do with this information

@theghosttweeter @Th_Angelopoulos @RupertLowe10 Rupert didn’t want a Asian girl on the report . She was raped by white English!!

@LeeThom22476727 @JRaymondPoetry @RichardHanania please provide something tangible to work with or stfu.

@MHConduit @JRaymondPoetry @RichardHanania The bottom line is you are an islamist sympathiser. You are running defence for Pakistani grooming gangs and are actively going against literally schoolgirls. You are part of the problem.