
Verisimilitude
2.3K posts

Verisimilitude
@MichaelEPerrone
“When an honest man discovers he is mistaken, he either ceases to be mistaken, or he ceases to be honest.” Climate Realism|Transcending left vs right


WHAT THE COURT OF APPEALS WALKED AROUND IN TINA PETERS APPEAL 🧵 The opinion issued by the Court of Appeals highlighted the clear and substantial violations of Tina Peters Constitutional First Amendment Rights by Judge Matthew Barrett when he sentenced her, quoting his own words when he said that Tina was "a danger to all of us." The COA used Judge Barrett's sentencing violations of Tina's free speech as the only real reasoning in their decision to remand her convictions to the district court for resentencing. Despite bringing up a number of additional issues during arguments for Tina's appeal, the court walked around rather serious ones that we well articulated in her case for appeal. This previously unreleased video highlights one such issue: BIASED JURORS. Bear in mind this recording took place after Tina Peters was found guilty with this woman being a member of the jury.









Now at number 9.


Oh look… Artemis II kept their promise and took a photo of the stars for the kid who asked where all the stars were. I’m trying hard not to laugh lol

















BREAKING: Abortionist Kermit Gosnell Dies in Prison After Killing Thousands of Babies lifenews.com/2026/03/23/lat…








As a former academic, it is physically painful to watch the "Gold Standard" of scientific publishing turn into a rubber-stamp factory for narrative-driven garbage. A recent paper published by Springer Nature on CO2 "toxicity" is the perfect case study in why institutional science is losing all credibility. The paper claims that rising atmospheric CO2 is on the verge of poisoning human blood and causing a "toxic threat" within decades. It sounds scary... until you apply five minutes of basic biological and historical literacy. 1. The Evolutionary Reality Check Mammals evolved roughly 225 million years ago. During that era, atmospheric CO2 wasn't just "high"—it was astronomical, estimated at 2,000 to 4,000 ppm. That is nearly 10X higher than current levels. If the human (mammalian) blood-gas exchange system were as fragile as these authors claim, our entire lineage would have been extinguished in the Triassic. We are the descendants of organisms that thrived in high CO2. 2. The Military "Living Laboratory" We don't have to guess how humans react to high CO2. The U.S. Navy and NASA have decades of data. Submariners routinely live and work in environments with CO2 levels maintained between 2,000 and 5,000 ppm for months at a time. If the "science" in this paper were remotely accurate, every nuclear sub crew in history would have been neurologically incapacitated. They aren't. They perform highly complex technical tasks at CO2 levels the authors of this paper would find "apocalyptic." 3. The Peer Review Scandal How does a paper that ignores the fossil record and existing physiological data get past the "gatekeepers"? When "Science" ignores the laws of biology and decades of human data to push a scary headline, it is no longer science... it is ideology. This is why the public is tuning out. When you trade your intellectual honesty for a "fashionable" conclusion, you don't just lose the argument; you lose the trust of the people. The "reproducibility crisis" was just the beginning; we are now facing a full-blown crisis of basic competence. When prestigious publishers like Springer Nature swap rigorous physiological data for "fashionable" alarmism, they aren't just publishing bad papers... they are actively dismantling the public's trust in the scientific method itself. Academia is burning its own house down, and until there is a reckoning with this institutional rot, nobody should blame the public for looking elsewhere for the truth. link.springer.com/article/10.100…













