Nash

3.5K posts

Nash

Nash

@NashForge

Flame Haze in training.

เข้าร่วม Haziran 2021
95 กำลังติดตาม43 ผู้ติดตาม
Viking
Viking@VikingMelon·
@NashForge @yoursunnyescape @ChadNotChud If I knew I couldn’t convince over half I might have to change my approach. But I have an 18mo son. I’m doing everything I can to make sure he’s OK. The most likely outcome in which I save him is blue. You don’t get to change the phrasing in accordance with your preferred button
English
1
0
0
8
Nash
Nash@NashForge·
@TBYSTweet idk but libtards are very desperate to justify violence, murder, theft, etc. lately.
English
0
0
0
3
Think Before You Sleep
Think Before You Sleep@TBYSTweet·
This has to be the worst trope in media. "No Vash the Stampede! Don't kill the guy who was torturing and experimenting on children! He was really sad and lonely so what he did was ok." I hate these stories.
Think Before You Sleep tweet media
English
101
112
1.6K
133.4K
Nash
Nash@NashForge·
@hell_line0 Well, giving women rights only managed to kill the birth rates to the point that the human race is collapsing, so now they have to be reversed as an existential matter.
English
0
0
0
2
Maryam
Maryam@hell_line0·
2022: “Stop overreacting, they won’t overturn Roe.” They did. 2023: “Stop overreacting, they won’t let women die rather than get an abortion.” They did. 2024: “Stop overreacting, they won’t arrest women for miscarriages.” They did. 2025: “Stop overreacting, they won’t turn women into incubators.” They did. 2026: “Stop overreacting, they won’t attack mifepristone.” They did, today. Now: “Stop overreacting, they won’t go after birth control next.” They will.
English
1.6K
18.2K
62K
1.2M
Nash
Nash@NashForge·
@LilithLovett The human body already does its own gene editing, it's far more advanced than we are, presently. In fact, to edit the genes, we have to first disable all the gene repair systems the body has to restore itself.
English
0
0
1
248
Nash
Nash@NashForge·
@micah_erfan You're obfuscating the true issue, which is you systemically targeting White people with your psychotic genocidal rage.
English
0
0
0
27
Nash
Nash@NashForge·
@VikingMelon @yoursunnyescape @ChadNotChud No, I'm not. If it's worded in a way that makes Blue sound bad, Blue loses. That's the reality. Will you continue to press Blue, knowing it will kill you because NPCs won't consistently press Blue?
English
1
0
0
9
Viking
Viking@VikingMelon·
@NashForge @yoursunnyescape @ChadNotChud You’re just saying a bunch of words Poll and poll again blue is winning. There is a decent level of trust in society. You break it by selecting red. That is antisocial. It’s like you’re implying a realtiy where you have to vote red, but you’re still in the minority.
English
1
0
0
12
Nash
Nash@NashForge·
@RTSG_Main No, they're all fat fucks.
English
0
0
0
2
Nash
Nash@NashForge·
@VikingMelon @yoursunnyescape @ChadNotChud Hence why it isn't antisocial to pick Red. Sometimes it's just the better answer, you just have to weigh how likely everyone is to pick Red or Blue based on their NPC minds being manipulated by emotional language.
English
1
0
0
12
Viking
Viking@VikingMelon·
@NashForge @yoursunnyescape @ChadNotChud Games of estimates and risks can have better and worse answers People might behave emotionally, but we have that knowledge. We don’t have to blanket emotion as random output, because it isn’t
English
1
0
0
11
Nash
Nash@NashForge·
@Atomsmade I do think abortion needs to be pushed on non-Whites since they are breeding out of control and not taking care of their children.
English
1
0
0
4
Ola 🧑🏿‍💻
Ola 🧑🏿‍💻@Atomsmade·
Birth isn’t a victory when this is the life that follows. Abortion saves lives from this kind of suffering. Children are not blessings, they are natural responsibilities that should be deliberately planned for.
Ola 🧑🏿‍💻 tweet media
English
446
244
1.1K
94.2K
Nash
Nash@NashForge·
@VikingMelon @yoursunnyescape @ChadNotChud I am proving everything. The wording will change the result. Therefore, the vote is based on emotional interpretation of the words, or expectation of how the wording will manipulate others, and there's no "right" answer, it's merely a game of estimates and risk.
English
1
0
0
11
Nash
Nash@NashForge·
@discordspies The fact that the wording shifts a lot of votes one way or the other shows that many people are emotionally manipulated and aren't viewing it as a logic puzzle.
English
0
0
0
1.5K
Nash
Nash@NashForge·
@VikingMelon @yoursunnyescape @ChadNotChud Not at all. Your framing would influence people to change their vote, even though it's the same scenario. This works both ways, convincing people to choose Red more or Blue more. That reveals that many people don't have a real principal, it's an emotional reaction to framing.
English
1
0
0
11
Viking
Viking@VikingMelon·
@NashForge @yoursunnyescape @ChadNotChud Oh well then it is my opinion that the framing is ”everyone has to get off of the train tracks and everyone who doesn’t gets ran over, unless >50% agree to stay, then nothing happens.” You see how silly and pointless this is?
English
1
0
0
17
Nash
Nash@NashForge·
@VikingMelon @yoursunnyescape @ChadNotChud No, the scenario is the same. 50%+ Blue saves everyone who jumped into the blender. The wording emotionally manipulates people into thinking jumping into the blender is worse than pressing a button. You should be able to identify it as the same scenario.
English
1
0
0
15
Viking
Viking@VikingMelon·
@NashForge @yoursunnyescape @ChadNotChud Yeah but the scenario wasn’t a giant blender, it was two buttons. ”Look, if we change the scenario the outcome changes” isn’t some own There are babies and retards in this world. I don’t think they deserve to die. Especially not when we can prevent it at only 50,01% blue.
English
1
0
0
18
Nash
Nash@NashForge·
@VikingMelon @yoursunnyescape @ChadNotChud Not true. When the question is explained as Blue jumping into a blender, and if enough people jump in the blender jams and doesn't kill everyone who jumped in, Red wins, even though it's the exact same scenario. The wording matters. But that isn't logical.
English
1
0
0
17
Nash
Nash@NashForge·
@campaignist1 @ChadNotChud That's not what the meme says. It says it's only because of the 5-yr-old. But we could address that issue by having the kids' guardian pick for them. Where does that leave us? At what point is there insufficient reason to pick Blue?
English
0
0
1
14
Nash
Nash@NashForge·
@keyokkud You're just upset that your Blue button doesn't kill the Reds.
English
0
0
2
23
emi エミ 🗝️🫟 (not my main)
the red blue button arguments are still going the logical disconnect and mental gymnastics red people are doing to justify it is so absolutely ridiculous and lacking iq
English
156
26
800
13.4K
Nash
Nash@NashForge·
@QuartzN1nja Blues claim their choice is selfless, but it doesn't seem selfless to scream at Reds to risk their lives to save you because you pressed Blue.
English
0
0
3
26
Nash
Nash@NashForge·
@NBinted Is the unifying leftist ideology Islamist terrorism? Cuz they dropped Occupy Wall Street 15 years ago.
English
0
0
0
58
bint ♨️🐧
bint ♨️🐧@NBinted·
It's easy to trace a lot of Hasan's ideas and statements to a cohesive leftist view of political action and power. Whether or not you like it or think he fully embodies it. On the flipside, it's easy to pinpoint where Shoe's ideas are only consistent with who she's dating.
yeet@Awk20000

Shoe0nHead reacts to Hasan going viral for reading Lenin “they’re calling him the corniest man alive. the final boss of performative male feminist. the human brian griffin”

English
85
216
4.7K
94.8K
Nash
Nash@NashForge·
@NotThatHughes Pretty soon, only billionaires will be able to afford running a business.
English
0
0
0
6
Hughes-on-the-Wold
Hughes-on-the-Wold@NotThatHughes·
My business is only viable if I underpay my workers
Hughes-on-the-Wold tweet media
Peter McCormack 🏴‍☠️🇬🇧🇮🇪@PeterMcCormack

A minimum wage of £15 would end my coffee shop, it would have to close, as would many other businesses. I’ll explain for the economically illiterate. Staff costs are currently half our costs, a £15 minimum wage is actually more than £15 an hour for the company, because you have to add: - 12.07% holiday - Sick pay - Maternity pay if and when required - National insurance - Pension contributions These costs would mean the shop loses money because remember, energy costs are up, rates are up, regulations are up. Now you can pass these costs onto the consumer - that would mean charging a lot more for coffee, people won’t pay it. The likes of Starbucks and Costa can, because they have economies of scale. The independent doesn’t. Now the little socialist will say well this is your fault, if you can’t run a business that can afford to pay its staff properly, but the little socialist has never run a business and does not understand the dynamics. Now I could pay some staff off and fill those hours myself or reduce us to one staff member during certain periods - but this proves the point that a minimum wage costs jobs. There was a time when these jobs were done by kids, perhaps on the weekend, paid a lower wage, no holiday and no silly employment rights. Perhaps they were even paid cash. The dynamic worked and small businesses like this could operate. It was also a great first job. Sadly now it isn’t worth employing entitlement youngsters at this level of pay. So alas, I don’t need the stress, the business would close, a number of jobs would be lost. Economics is about understanding these dynamics, no vibes. The cost of living is not solved through passing on inflation to the business, it is solved by ending high inflation and creating prosperity. This is what socialists don’t understand, they can’t create prosperity, they can only destroy it.

English
1K
6.4K
76.4K
1.5M