
پلیس پیشگیری رو نگاه کن جیگرت حال بیاد میدونی چند نفر بیگناه اینجا شکنجه و کشته شدن!
Nima
3K posts

@NimaCivil
Ex- humanitarian/UN/journo… with past lives in 🇮🇷🇮🇶🇨🇿🇾🇪🇹🇳🇱🇾🇶🇦🇺🇦🇳🇬🇹🇭🇧🇩

پلیس پیشگیری رو نگاه کن جیگرت حال بیاد میدونی چند نفر بیگناه اینجا شکنجه و کشته شدن!





I get the point Pete Hegseth is making about dynamic targeting (being able to update targets in real time is obviously a huge operational advantage).. But if that’s the case, it feels like there’s a missing layer here. If we think of “dynamic targeting” as adapting to evolving threats, then there’s also an argument for what you could call aesthetic targeting (going after how the regime presents itself and communicates). Leaving propaganda channels like their messaging and outlets such as IRIB or their activity on X untouched arguably undermines the broader objective. If the goal is to disrupt capability and influence, it’s not just about physical or tactical targets, it’s also about blinding the narrative infrastructure that sustains them. Interestingly, addressing the narrative side doesn’t necessarily mean physical strikes. Disrupting or limiting the ability of outlets like IRIB to broadcast, or constraining how groups like the IRGC use platforms such as X, could achieve part of that effect without escalation. If dynamic targeting is about precision in the physical domain, then applying similar precision to information channels (reducing reach, interrupting distribution, and challenging messaging) seems just as important to the overall objective.


Pete Hegseth said this morning that U.S. is doing dynamic targeting. In other words, that U.S. has infiltrated the regime so much and so fast that they can update their list of targets in real time. IRGC can come on X and make posts about how smart they are all they want, but military situation doesn’t lie.




🚨 Massive explosions and secondary explosions in Isfahan, Iran from U.S./Israeli airstrikes

Marco Rubio’s 2015 denunciation of Obama’s JCPOA was prophetic.



Iran’s foreign ministry said on Monday that the positions of Russia and China on US and Israeli attacks on Iran would affect future relations. Foreign ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei said, “We are monitoring countries’ positions and their approaches will certainly have a reciprocal impact on our policy.” He added, “Indifference toward this war will have consequences for everyone.” iranintl.com/en/202603308314




