NonnasBack

@MGill_APG @lionlineage @ItsDeanBlundell Prove it.

@NonnasBack @lionlineage @ItsDeanBlundell Time spent: 1. You can spend time convincing yourself that nothing is real. Or 2. You can follow the truth and see just how real it is. The rest is up to you. But I stand before you not asking for trust, but through faith telling you… it is very real! ❤️ 🙏

😂😂😂😂😂 Psychos.

@AdaLluch Never happened. You dumb little Cum-Dumpster

I hope you spent a beautiful Holy Week. This text is so beautiful I wanted to share it with you. Christ is Risen! ✝️

@FiggyEnjoyer_ @1whocs @SensibleFascist Yes. Because when you repeat FACTS, they don't change. Unlike your desperately clawed out fragments of an argument for the case of a 1st century Palestinian burial shroud. Remember, 95% proof its from the 13-14th century.

@NonnasBack @1whocs @SensibleFascist sigh, with replies like this make me question why im debating you in the first place.. anyways im finished here, you are just replying with the same crap again and again. Cya

It’s genuinely mind boggling to me that we literally have the shroud JESUS CHRIST himself was wrapped in when he was put in the tomb for three days, that has his whole body and even blood engraved on it for all to see… And most Christian’s don’t even know it exists.

@FiggyEnjoyer_ @1whocs @SensibleFascist So you are a student of medieval textile manufacture now too. At this stage you're just inventing arguments. I presented the facts as they are widely known. The fact is, after decades of trying, noone could actually connect the shroud to any person. Fact!

@NonnasBack @1whocs @SensibleFascist a professional Syrian technique—isn't found in a single medieval European textile. A forger can't "copy" a method that’s currently 10 feet underground in a different continent.

@FiggyEnjoyer_ @1whocs @SensibleFascist Again - it wasn't a rediscovered technique because it was never undiscovered!!

@NonnasBack @1whocs @SensibleFascist Typical isn't exclusive. 3:1 twill has been found in 1st-century luxury textiles like those at Palmyra. You still haven't explained the side-stitch match to 1st-century Masada—a Syrian technique unknown to medieval Europe. How does a forger fake a technique not yet rediscovered?

@FiggyEnjoyer_ @1whocs @SensibleFascist It wasn't rediscovered. It was never undiscovered!!

@NonnasBack @1whocs @SensibleFascist Typical doesn't mean "only." High-status 3:1 twill exists in 1st-century finds like Palmyra. You’re still dodging the side-stitch "fingerprint"—an obscure Syrian technique from 1st-century Masada unknown to medieval Europe. How does a forger fake a technique not yet rediscovered?

@AngelaBelcamino The solution to #DipshitDonny is to immediately invoke the 25th and have the senile old fool removed from the White House right now!

I can’t express this enough—if you’re a Democrat and think the solution to Trump is voting for whatever Democrat wins the presidential nomination—you are completely clueless.

@FiggyEnjoyer_ @1whocs @SensibleFascist It doesn't. I have explained the weave technique several times already as being typical of medieval European manufacturing and not 1st century Palestinian technique.

@NonnasBack @1whocs @SensibleFascist That "95%" refers to a single 1988 Carbon-14 test that has since been challenged by peer-reviewed studies in journals like Archaeometry. If it’s a "fact," why does the side-stitch match 1st-century Masada and not 14th-century Europe?

@FiggyEnjoyer_ @1whocs @SensibleFascist The "3:1 herringbone" weave is considered by textile experts to be characteristic of medieval manufacturing rather than 1st-century Palestinian weaving, which was typically 1:1 or 2:2. That's a fact you can't deny!

@NonnasBack @1whocs @SensibleFascist "Typical" medieval linen was a 1:1 weave, not a 3:1 twill, which remains rare for that period. More importantly, the side-strip stitch is an exact "fingerprint" of 1st-century Masada—a Syrian technique unknown to medieval Europe and only rediscovered by modern archaeology.

@FiggyEnjoyer_ @1whocs @SensibleFascist 95% scientific agreement on the fabric dating from between 1290 and 1360 is pretty comprehensive. But the religious types don't like to admit facts that could lead to them losing revenue.

@NonnasBack @1whocs @SensibleFascist Laughter isn't an argument. You claimed it was "priest data," I showed it’s secular physics from the CNR. If you can’t dispute the peer-reviewed WAXS study or the Masada textile matches, the 1st-century evidence remains on the table.

@FiggyEnjoyer_ @1whocs @SensibleFascist The forger was using typical weave patterning for the Medieval period - which is when the shroud was produced. Scientists are agreed on that to 95%. 5% doubt is the result of insufficient handling.

@NonnasBack @1whocs @SensibleFascist typical medieval production was simple 1:1 weave, not luxury 3:1 twill. More importantly, the side-strip stitch is a specific technical match to 1st-century Masada—a Syrian method unknown to medieval Europe and only rediscovered in the 1900s. Why would a forger use it?

@FiggyEnjoyer_ @1whocs @SensibleFascist 😂😂😂😂😂😂

@NonnasBack @1whocs @SensibleFascist Actually, the lead researcher is a physicist at Italy's National Research Council a secular, government funded body, not a religious one. The study was peer reviewed by independent scientists, and the Masada date is a standard archaeological fact, not "adjusted" data.

@FiggyEnjoyer_ @1whocs @SensibleFascist Because the cloth is a Medieval fake using typical production methods for the period of its manufacture - between 1290 and 1360.

@NonnasBack @1whocs @SensibleFascist The 3:1 herringbone was a luxury weave rare in both eras, but the side-strip stitch is a technical "fingerprint" identical to 1st-century Masada textiles. Why would a medieval forger use an obscure, professional Syrian sewing technique that wasn't even rediscovered until the 1900

@FiggyEnjoyer_ @1whocs @SensibleFascist Totally laughable. But you keep trying to convince yourself with data adjusted to suit the Catholic Church. I have presented data from actual scientists and not selected priests.

@NonnasBack @1whocs @SensibleFascist This Masada sample is historically dated to 55–74 AD because that is when the siege occurred and the fortress was occupied.

@GuntherEagleman No, that's very true. Donny is about 100 IQ points behind the great president Obama.

They chose to learn the hard way.

@GuntherEagleman You're a fucking idiot

🚨 Tick tock…

@catturd2 @jonfavs Actually, most of the vaginas #DipshitDonny has broken were about 13 years old.

Our president is a deranged lunatic and should clearly be removed from office. He’s only there because of Republican Members of Congress.

@JoeyMannarino No empty threats????? You're a pathetic fucking retard!

Trump makes no empty threats. He has made that clear enough times. Many jihadis are about to meet their 72 virgins very soon if they don’t open the strait. I’m starting to prefer that they FO and go to meet their prophet.

@FiggyEnjoyer_ @1whocs @SensibleFascist So, from over 20 years after your Jesus character is supposed to have died? N9w you're just tying yourself in knots.

@NonnasBack @1whocs @SensibleFascist : A 2022 study used Wide-Angle X-ray Scattering (WAXS) to measure the natural degradation of the linen fibers. The results suggested the fabric's structural state is compatible with linen samples dated to approximately 55–74 CE.

@FiggyEnjoyer_ @1whocs @SensibleFascist Again: Textile Weave: The "3:1 herringbone" weave is considered by some textile experts to be characteristic of medieval manufacturing rather than 1st-century Palestinian weaving, which was typically 1:1 or 2:2.

@NonnasBack @1whocs @SensibleFascist A side-strip stitch on the shroud is noted to be identical to professional stitching found on textiles from Masada dating to the first century.