Objective Christian

Here's a song I wrote with my old band back in high school and college. This arrangement is new 2026. Song: Wings of Steel youtu.be/AJVebChSr3Q?si…

@KingDawah1 No they aren't. Without lies Islam dies.

CHRISTIANS ARE GETTING MAJOR DOUBTS BECAUSE OF THE MUSTARD SEED DILEMMA SPREAD THE WORD.

@CanyonMimbs There is nothing logical about the Quran. There is no valid reason to trust anything it says.

You can be presented with something that's completely logical and still reject it without even hearing it. That right there proves Islam is true.

You have no clue what you're talking about. YOU MADE THE CLAIM. It's on YOU to prove it. It is I who doesn't have to do anything. It's illogical to disprove a negative. That's not how burden of proof works I refuted your idiotic "evidence". You have NOTHING. Islam is a lie. Game over. You lose.

@ObjectChristian @nomak98799870 @abierkhatib That’s exactly how the burden of proof works. I voice my opinion, you disagreed, so now you have to back up your disagreement with solid proof. I don’t have to do shit. If you don’t like what I say, stop talking.

The perfect response to those calling Prophet Muhammad, a pedophile

@CustomDollar @abierkhatib A number is irrelevant. The Bible doesn't say. The passage I showed proves she was older than 3 since it's NOT a birth announcement. Those who claim she was three have the burden of truth.

@ObjectChristian @abierkhatib Nah I just expected a number not a whole essay. Save that shit for your job.

FURTHERMORE, the Quran claims to be the guardian over the previous scriptures, and claims to fully confirm it. So if the Bible is TRUE, the Quran is FALSE for contradicting it. If the Bible is FALSE the Quran is FALSE for claiming to fully confirm it. There is no valid reason to trust the Quran.

"Unanimous" You don't know what that word means, do you? Textual criticism demonstrates excellent preservation of the Bible. Scholar Bruce Metzger stated the Bible is so well preserved, that if every copy were somehow lost, we could reconstruct it almost perfectly based on the written testimonies of early eyewitnesses. More 👇

Happy to debate Muslims on whether Jesus was a Muslim! Any takers?

@CanyonMimbs I'm pretty sure "intellectually" isn't quite the right word for you. Quite sure in fact.

Once I was intellectually convinced of Islam, there was nothing anyone could do. You can't convince someone to carry on with something they know doesn't make sense.

@catvon0 @Kryptotajeer I made this for just that purpose

@ObjectChristian @Kryptotajeer Islam is reliant on selecting a few verses and using those as an argument

Paul teaches that Jesus received divinity at His resurrection. Paul teaches that his gospel is of divine origin, not human, and that anyone who preaches a gospel contrary to his should be cursed (Galatians 1:8). Since his gospel is (A) of divine origin and (B) teaches that Jesus became divine temporally, Paul states that anyone who preaches a gospel contrary or opposite to this should be accursed. The Gospels are of human origin and preach that Jesus was divine before His resurrection—therefore, they contradict Paul’s message. Therefore, Paul is cursing the four Gospels because they are a gospel contrary to his. Source: @SeerahDawah

Now THAT'S IRONY!!! The whole Quran is one giant "trust me bro". He's such a hypocrite. By the way, Luke and Peter corroborated Paul's story, so he's wrong. There is no valid reason to trust anything the Quran says. Absolutely none.

I love "Muslim Live Stream Theater". The "christian" called into Black Ninja Itachi's live stream. His immediate conclusions are hilarously scripted. C'mon slimmies...you can do better than this. I could not have said it better than how @John316apologia puts it. Great break down brother!

@John316apologia @dawahxdialogues Ahhhh yes....the black ninja Itochi. She and her red ninja sister Korra are ridiculous. If they're talking you can know they're lying. Without lies Islam dies.

This how deceptive ISLAM is! Watch this Muslima @dawahxdialogues try to FORCE their FALSE prophet into the BIBLE. ISLAM and DAWAH are deception. Christian apologist with the help of the HOLY SPIRIT annihilated HER satanic assertion. Glory to Hod for his Devine wisdom.

@KingDawah1 It's not remotely a dilemma you fool. At least learn what the word means before you go brandishing it around. Islam is for weak-minded men, and you just proved it.

There is no escape.

@catvon0 @Kryptotajeer He thinks Romans 1:3-4 is that silver bullet. All he does is use it to shoot himself in the foot though

@Kryptotajeer You never cited a teaching in which St. Paul taught Christ receiving his divinity at the Resurrection.

@RojanDominic @Kryptotajeer Muhammad isn't even a match for Muhammad.

@Kryptotajeer Muhammad’s real competition was with Paul. Paul testified that he was caught up to the third heaven, Muhammad claimed that he traveled to the seventh heaven on a horse. The difference is that Paul had true experience, whereas Muhammad was lying. Muhammad is no match for Paul.

This is not the "gotcha" you think it is. Paul's statement is not based on a single prophecy, but rather the overall testimony of scripture. These accumulated testimony of scriptural prophecies teach the Messiah is divine, that he will be "God with us", born of a virgin, will suffer for the sins of Israel and the nations, and will rise again from the dead (as well as many other things) Specifically the 3rd day aspect comes from Jesus' own proclamation regarding the "sign of Jonah", which according to the scriptures (book of Jonah) was a span of 3 days, which serves as forshadowing of Jesus' resurrection. "On the third day" aligns perfectly with all of this. This challenge is resolved. Biblical integrity remains solid.

This is not the "gotcha" you think it is. Paul's statement is not based on a single prophecy, but rather the overall testimony of scripture. These accumulated testimony of scriptural prophecies teach the Messiah is divine, that he will be "God with us", born of a virgin, will suffer for the sins of Israel and the nations, and will rise again from the dead (as well as many other things) Specifically the 3rd day aspect comes from Jesus' own proclamation regarding the "sign of Jonah", which according to the scriptures (book of Jonah) was a span of 3 days, which serves as forshadowing of Jesus' resurrection. "On the third day" aligns perfectly with all of this. This challenge is resolved. Biblical integrity remains solid.

@Kryptotajeer The whole edifice of Trinitarian belief rests on 1 Corinthians 15. According to Paul. Jesus died and rose on the 3rd Day. " According to the Scriptures" Not a single, clear explicit prophecy exists anywhere in the Old Testament. Amazing.

@Kluelessmedia1 @Kryptotajeer These slimwits are climbing over each other Kaaba style in a mad race to the bottom. Disastrous argument after another from these guys.

@Kryptotajeer These arguments are just getting worse. Is there like a Muslim bingo game going on behind the scene to see who can get the most dumbfoundingly stupid argument to the forefront of apologetics?

@Defender1914 @Kryptotajeer Let's be honest. @kryptotajeer's argument fails one one overarching level, that he tried to formulate an argument at all. Krypie here is wrong about everything. He's got the theological depth of thimble.

This argument fails on multiple levels. First, Paul never teaches that Jesus became divine at his resurrection. Paul teaches that Jesus was God’s Son before coming to earth. Galatians 4:4 “God sent forth his Son.” You cannot send someone who does not already exist. Philippians 2:5-7 “Although he was existing in God’s form… he emptied himself and took a slave’s form.” Even from a non-Trinitarian perspective, Paul believed Christ existed before becoming human. Second, Paul’s gospel was not different from the gospel preached by Jesus or the apostles. 1 Corinthians 15:11 “Whether it is I or they, this is what we are preaching, and this is what you have believed.” Paul explicitly says his message and the other apostles’ message were the same. Third, the resurrection did not make Jesus divine. It publicly vindicated and exalted him. Romans 1:4 “Who was declared God’s Son with power… by means of resurrection from the dead.” Declared God’s Son is not the same thing as becoming God’s Son. Fourth, the four Gospels do not teach a different gospel than Paul. Both teach that Jesus is the Messiah, the Son of God, died for our sins, was raised from the dead, and was exalted by God. Finally, Galatians 1:8 is aimed at those corrupting the Christian message, not at Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, who were recognized by the early Christian congregation as faithful witnesses of Christ. The real contradiction is claiming Paul taught Jesus became divine at the resurrection when Paul repeatedly speaks of Christ as God’s prehuman Son who was sent into the world and later exalted by God after his faithful course. @Kryptotajeer

You couldn't even make it one sentence without lying. Paul does NOT teach Jesus "received divinity" at his resurrection. Paul taught the same as the other apostles, that Jesus existed before the world began. Paul taught Jesus "emptied" himself and took on the nature of a servant. Upon his resurrection his glory was restored. He never stopped being divine. If you can't get this opening statement right then nothing else you said here matters. @Kryptotajeer don't you get tired of being wrong ALL THE TIME???