Ann O'Leary 🙄🤬

17.6K posts

Ann O'Leary 🙄🤬 banner
Ann O'Leary 🙄🤬

Ann O'Leary 🙄🤬

@Panda6

Tweeter extraordinaire... In my mind. Happily liking and retweeting to my heart’s content. Not in market for loving Christian single men but thank you.

United States เข้าร่วม Mart 2009
198 กำลังติดตาม334 ผู้ติดตาม
Ann O'Leary 🙄🤬 รีทวีตแล้ว
Sarah Kendzior
Sarah Kendzior@sarahkendzior·
"The absence of authority in the face of obscene criminality prompts delusions that noble actors are fighting the good fight but Must Keep Silent for Reasons You Will Understand in Time." amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B09NJ4…
Sarah Kendzior tweet mediaSarah Kendzior tweet mediaSarah Kendzior tweet media
English
43
633
1.4K
0
Ann O'Leary 🙄🤬 รีทวีตแล้ว
Gary Koepnick
Gary Koepnick@garykoepnick·
Just going to keep posting this to counter the ridiculous bullshit until someone makes me stop. The Special Counsel investigation uncovered extensive criminal activity •The investigation produced 37 indictments; seven guilty pleas or convictions; and compelling evidence that the president obstructed justice on multiple occasions. Mueller also uncovered and referred 14 criminal matters to other components of the Department of Justice. •Trump associates repeatedly lied to investigators about their contacts with Russians, and President Trump refused to answer questions about his efforts to impede federal proceedings and influence the testimony of witnesses. •A statement signed by over 1,000 former federal prosecutors concluded that if any other American engaged in the same efforts to impede federal proceedings the way Trump did, they would likely be indicted for multiple charges of obstruction of justice.   Russia engaged in extensive attacks on the U.S. election system in 2016 •Russian interference in the 2016 election was “sweeping and systemic.”[1] •Major attack avenues included a social media “information warfare” campaign that “favored” candidate Trump[2] and the hacking of Clinton campaign-related databases and release of stolen materials through Russian-created entities and Wikileaks.[3] •Russia also targeted databases in many states related to administering elections gaining access to information for millions of registered voters.[4]   The investigation “identified numerous links between the Russian government and the Trump Campaign” and established that the Trump Campaign “showed interest in WikiLeaks's releases of documents and welcomed their potential to damage candidate Clinton”  •In 2015 and 2016, Michael Cohen pursued a hotel/residence project in Moscow on behalf of Trump while he was campaigning for President.[5]Then-candidate Trump personally signed a letter of intent. •Senior members of the Trump campaign, including Paul Manafort, Donald Trump, Jr., and Jared Kushner took a June 9, 2016, meeting with Russian nationals at Trump Tower, New York, after outreach from an intermediary informed Trump, Jr., that the Russians had derogatory information on Clinton that was “part of Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump.”[6] •Beginning in June 2016, a Trump associate “forecast to senior [Trump] Campaign officials that WikiLeaks would release information damaging to candidate Clinton.”[7] A section of the Report that remains heavily redacted suggests that Roger Stone was this associate and that he had significant contacts with the campaign about Wikileaks.[8] •The Report described multiple occasions where Trump associates lied to investigators about Trump associate contacts with Russia. Trump associates George Papadopoulos, Rick Gates, Michael Flynn, and Michael Cohen all admitted that they made false statements to federal investigators or to Congress about their contacts. In addition, Roger Stone faces trial this fall for obstruction of justice, five counts of making false statements, and one count of witness tampering. •The Report contains no evidence that any Trump campaign official reported their contacts with Russia or WikiLeaks to U.S. law enforcement authorities during the campaign or presidential transition, despite public reports on Russian hacking starting in June 2016 and candidate Trump’s August 2016 intelligence briefing warning him that Russia was seeking to interfere in the election. •The Report raised questions about why Trump associates and then-candidate Trump repeatedly asserted Trump had no connections to Russia.[9]
English
51
1.3K
2.7K
133.2K
F. A. Hayek Quotes
F. A. Hayek Quotes@FAHayekSays·
George Orwell on The Road to Serfdom: “Hayek’s thesis is that socialism inevitably leads to despotism, and that the Nazis were able to succeed because socialists had already done most of their work for them, especially the intellectual work of weakening the desire for liberty.”
F. A. Hayek Quotes tweet mediaF. A. Hayek Quotes tweet media
English
34
579
2.1K
77K
Ann O'Leary 🙄🤬 รีทวีตแล้ว
Garry Kasparov
Garry Kasparov@Kasparov63·
Anyone repeating the propagandist deflection of "Russia hoax" either never read the Mueller reports or didn’t understand them.
Gary Koepnick@garykoepnick

Just going to keep posting this to counter the ridiculous bullshit until someone makes me stop. The Special Counsel investigation uncovered extensive criminal activity •The investigation produced 37 indictments; seven guilty pleas or convictions; and compelling evidence that the president obstructed justice on multiple occasions. Mueller also uncovered and referred 14 criminal matters to other components of the Department of Justice. •Trump associates repeatedly lied to investigators about their contacts with Russians, and President Trump refused to answer questions about his efforts to impede federal proceedings and influence the testimony of witnesses. •A statement signed by over 1,000 former federal prosecutors concluded that if any other American engaged in the same efforts to impede federal proceedings the way Trump did, they would likely be indicted for multiple charges of obstruction of justice.   Russia engaged in extensive attacks on the U.S. election system in 2016 •Russian interference in the 2016 election was “sweeping and systemic.”[1] •Major attack avenues included a social media “information warfare” campaign that “favored” candidate Trump[2] and the hacking of Clinton campaign-related databases and release of stolen materials through Russian-created entities and Wikileaks.[3] •Russia also targeted databases in many states related to administering elections gaining access to information for millions of registered voters.[4]   The investigation “identified numerous links between the Russian government and the Trump Campaign” and established that the Trump Campaign “showed interest in WikiLeaks's releases of documents and welcomed their potential to damage candidate Clinton”  •In 2015 and 2016, Michael Cohen pursued a hotel/residence project in Moscow on behalf of Trump while he was campaigning for President.[5]Then-candidate Trump personally signed a letter of intent. •Senior members of the Trump campaign, including Paul Manafort, Donald Trump, Jr., and Jared Kushner took a June 9, 2016, meeting with Russian nationals at Trump Tower, New York, after outreach from an intermediary informed Trump, Jr., that the Russians had derogatory information on Clinton that was “part of Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump.”[6] •Beginning in June 2016, a Trump associate “forecast to senior [Trump] Campaign officials that WikiLeaks would release information damaging to candidate Clinton.”[7] A section of the Report that remains heavily redacted suggests that Roger Stone was this associate and that he had significant contacts with the campaign about Wikileaks.[8] •The Report described multiple occasions where Trump associates lied to investigators about Trump associate contacts with Russia. Trump associates George Papadopoulos, Rick Gates, Michael Flynn, and Michael Cohen all admitted that they made false statements to federal investigators or to Congress about their contacts. In addition, Roger Stone faces trial this fall for obstruction of justice, five counts of making false statements, and one count of witness tampering. •The Report contains no evidence that any Trump campaign official reported their contacts with Russia or WikiLeaks to U.S. law enforcement authorities during the campaign or presidential transition, despite public reports on Russian hacking starting in June 2016 and candidate Trump’s August 2016 intelligence briefing warning him that Russia was seeking to interfere in the election. •The Report raised questions about why Trump associates and then-candidate Trump repeatedly asserted Trump had no connections to Russia.[9]

English
52
552
2.4K
116.5K
Ann O'Leary 🙄🤬 รีทวีตแล้ว
Michael Weiss
Michael Weiss@michaeldweiss·
People easily forget what Robert Mueller was tasked with investigating: evidence of conspiracy and obstruction of justice. In the course of that investigation, a dozen GRU officers attached to Unit 26165 were indicted, as were Yevgeny Prigozhin, two of his shell companies, and a dozen of his troll farm employees. The charges leveled against these Russians were conspiracy to commit offenses against, or defraud, the United States, identity theft, money laundering and wire and bank fraud. The Mueller investigation wasn't, properly speaking, a counterintelligence investigation. That work fell to the Republican-led Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI), which released its conclusions in five different volumes beginning in July 2019, far more comprehensive and detailed than the Mueller Report, although they individually and collectively garnered a fraction of the attention. "No probe into this matter has been more exhaustive," said the acting SSCI head in August 2020, when the fifth and final volume was released. He was right and deserves a lot of credit in getting to the bottom of Russian active measures and election interference in the 2016 presidential contest. His name was Marco Rubio.
English
66
1.2K
3.4K
119.3K
U.S. Senator Mitch McConnell
The Department of Homeland Security has now been shut down for 35 days. Senate Democrats just blocked Republicans from funding DHS for a fifth time. I’ve reminded my colleagues countless times that no one benefits from government shutdowns. For the sake of America’s national security and the well-being of so many government employees not receiving a paycheck, I hope Democrats will end this partisan endeavor soon.
English
603
126
704
36.6K
Ann O'Leary 🙄🤬 รีทวีตแล้ว
Senator Mark Kelly
Senator Mark Kelly@SenMarkKelly·
How does this make any sense? Trump is gifting billions of dollars to Iran while they’re attacking our servicemembers. Doing this now only puts servicemembers in more danger and threatens to drag this war out even longer. He has no idea what he’s doing.
Barak Ravid@BarakRavid

🚨U.S. to allow Iran to get ~14 billion dollars (!!!) in oil revenue 🚨This is a huge financial concession to Iran by the U.S. 🚨It is the first time U.S. is buying Iranian oil since 1996 🚨It's all happening in the middle of a war against...Iran

English
300
707
2.2K
66.1K
Ann O'Leary 🙄🤬 รีทวีตแล้ว
Rich Logis, Founder of Leaving MAGA 🇺🇸
This Trump post is the least surprising Trump news of the day. The acceptance of avoidable deaths and trauma, and the indifference to suffering, were two betrayals that led me to leave MAGA. If you're in MAGA, deep down, you know this is abhorrent; listen to your doubts and confusion. Your doubts and confusion are what will lead you to eventually leave MAGA.
The Bulwark@BulwarkOnline

Yes, this is real

English
5
14
57
1.6K
Ann O'Leary 🙄🤬 รีทวีตแล้ว
Jay Nordlinger
Jay Nordlinger@jaynordlinger·
The Kremlin and the White House are doing everything possible to reelect Viktor Orbán to a sixth term as prime minister. This is sinister stuff -- and a sign of the new alignment. Americans ought to retch in disgust. washingtonpost.com/world/2026/03/…
English
100
1.2K
2.6K
66.5K
Ann O'Leary 🙄🤬 รีทวีตแล้ว
Mark Warner
Mark Warner@MarkWarner·
I remember when my Republican colleagues blasted Barack Obama over $400M tied to hostages and an old debt with Iran. Now, under Donald Trump, sanctions relief on 140M barrels of Iranian oil could net Tehran up to $15 BILLION — while the U.S. is at war. Where’s the outrage now?
English
1.1K
3.5K
12.1K
400K
Ann O'Leary 🙄🤬 รีทวีตแล้ว
Garry Kasparov
Garry Kasparov@Kasparov63·
🤷‍♂️ Trump has the strategic sense of an out of control bulldozer. Occasionally, he will crush something you didn’t like, but he will also crush many good things, and anything in his way. And there is never any semblance of strategic planning or national interests.
Brian Allen@allenanalysis

🚨 The United States is allowing Iran to collect $14 billion in oil revenue. The first time America has bought Iranian oil since 1996. In the middle of a war against Iran.

English
29
306
1.4K
44.2K
Ann O'Leary 🙄🤬 รีทวีตแล้ว
Zachary Foster
Zachary Foster@_ZachFoster·
This is wild. The @WhiteHouse plagiarized its reason for launching a war on Iran from @FDD, a cutout of Israeli intelligence. Side-by-side screenshots in the 🧵
Zachary Foster tweet mediaZachary Foster tweet media
Stephen McIntyre@ClimateAudit

The most definitive White House statement purporting to justify the Israel-US war on Iran was its March 2, 2026 statement entitled "The Iranian Regime's Decades of Terrorism against American Citizens". whitehouse.gov/articles/2026/… After a brief editorial opening, the article lists 44 incidents with a total of 992 US deaths. The source of the data wasn't given. Where did it come from? Unlike the Iraq war or the Russia collusion allegation, the reporting didn't come from an intelligence assessment, flawed or otherwise. It turns out that the list was plagiarized by the White House from a June 19, 2025 list (fdd.org/analysis/2025/…) prepared by a former AIPAC employee (Tzvi Kahn) for a think tank (FDD) founded "to provide education to enhance Israel's image in North America". The think tank's original identity was "EMET (Hebrew for 'truth')". The June 19, 2025 publication was literally on the eve of the first US bombing of Iran on June 21, 2025. In this thread, I'll compare each and every item in the White House statement to the corresponding item in the original list by the former AIPAC employee. The list is virtually identical. Any slight changes are always in the change of ratcheting up the underlying allegation.

English
471
12.7K
30K
2.4M
Ann O'Leary 🙄🤬 รีทวีตแล้ว