Philip Sparrow #rEUnification #FBPE

@CollinsMorgreen @AliceTalksFooty Why the fuck would we be using euros?

@AliceTalksFooty €82 Euros Fixed for You..🫂

Mbeumo Deal Done! Why Man Utd fans should be very excited about this signing: He’s 25, entering his prime, and just delivered 27 G/A for Brentford last season. Not a one-season wonder: – 16 G/A in 22 starts (23/24) – 17 G/A in 22/23 – 27 G/A in 24/25 That’s three consistent Premier League seasons — no fluke. This past season alone: – 1st in xA (9.3) – Most crosses in the PL (202) – 3rd for ground covered – 10 PL goals in 2025 so far (only Salah and Isak have more) – 100+ take-ons and 15+ goals — only Palmer, Salah, Cunha match this last season. (Elite company). Football IQ + Work Rate + Output. He thrives in the right half-space, drifting inside, creating chaos. His profile is tailor-made for Amorim's R10 role — but he can also play CF, SS, or RWB. What he brings: – Strong ball carrying – Elite off-ball movement – Creative and clinical – A pressing machine – Smart runs Bruno would thrive feeding – Direct, efficient, and technical Pairing him with Cunha is 🔥: In 24/25 Mbeumo x Cunha combined: 71 matches 248 take-ons 189 shots 126 chances created 35 goals 13 assists This is a seismic upgrade to United’s attack. With Garnacho and Rashford’s future's uncertain, Mbeumo is the exact dynamic, fast, direct and output forward United needed, he is also very versatile — Premier League proven, entering his peak, and the perfect profile for Amorim. Cunha and Mbeumo being in their peak and Prem proven is the exact type of signings Man Utd should be making this summer.

@USA_Polling You live, laugh, love to see it

🍷 🍷 🍷 Suburban 🍷 Wine 🍷 Moms 🍷 🍷

The Queen is unwell with a chest infection and has withdrawn from her engagements this week, Buckingham Palace says bbc.in/3YS43mN

@CllrDavidTooke @SaulStaniforth @Dez45346395 It should be an actual graduate tax, meaning it applies to ALL graduates and not just people graduating in the last 15 years

@SaulStaniforth @Dez45346395 Though most student will never be asked to repay the lot. Regard it as a graduate tax No change to current repayment scheme so no change for students paying back.

Amount Keir Starmer paid in tuition fees studying law at Leeds: £0 Amount Keir Starmer thinks young people should pay from next year to study law at Leeds: £28,605

@Jeremy_Hunt Get it built and get in the bin

Take a look at my objection to the application for 54 houses next to historic Ash Manor 👇

@MajestictraderA @louisecoatesuk @MartinSLewis Do you think we have a choice?

@louisecoatesuk @MartinSLewis There's no point paying them back

This is oft said about student loans, yet I'm afraid it's in my view a misunderstanding. The system is designed that you contribute in proportion to your financial success after uni (how much is a Q?) Whether you pay in full though is purely arbitrary a function of the amount the govt wants to rake it - it cannot be used to judge value of a degree. Eg. We could increase the payback rate by cutting the interest rate to 0% (or less than 0%) rather than currently where it is set at the rate of inflation. Yet that means Treasury's income would be slashed. Or increase interest to, lets be extreme 100%, and almost no one would repay but Treasury would make far far more money as it would effectively be a graduate tax. Similar could be done by changing repayment thresholds or repayment term. These are just revenue raise functions, not degree value functions.

@MartinSLewis Then why not charge it for all graduates instead of just those graduating within the last 15 years?

@JHolmesSheff @georgeeaton All the more reason to implement a graduate tax

@georgeeaton Please do focus on tuition fees unless you want universities to go bankrupt. The whole system's a mess but it's a problem for universities as well as students.

Don’t focus on tuition fees, focus on the 37% marginal rate paid by graduates earning £27k and the 57% rate paid by those earning £50k (plus interest).

@JimDodgy @urbanSpaceXman @MartinSLewis Maybe they shouldn't

@PhilipJSparrow @urbanSpaceXman @MartinSLewis Age. More elderly people pay exclusively with cash.

Some asking me "isn't it illegal for places not to accept cash?". No it isn't. This is a common confusion because of a mis-undertanding over what 'legal tender' means. Legal tender simply means what can't be refused as payment in a court ordered debt. It doesn't impact day-to-day life. There are no rules on what payments type firms have to accept as long as they are not discriminating.

@heyiamherfhd @MartinSLewis If they don't have a card, how do they take cash out?

@MartinSLewis Maybe spend less time on your lecture about “legal tender” and more time understanding why people might want to use cash. Not everyone has a card ready for every transaction, and not everyone loves businesses deciding what’s convenient for them.

@urbanSpaceXman @MartinSLewis On what grounds?

@MartinSLewis So is it discriminating to not accept cash?

@MartinSLewis Phase it out. Certainly no business should be required to take it.

I know many are quite passionate about protecting access to paying in cash (me included - its needed by many vulnerable people), so thought some may be interested in this...

@RedEaglePatriot You're just underestimating the number of people too embarrassed to admit they voted for Trump

Mathematically, this result should be at least a Trump+7, the same as their 2016 and 2020 polls. Same crossover. Ann Selzer is throwing away her reputation for a suppression poll. I’ll delete my channel if this result is even within seven points of reality.

@yimbyalliance The building will continue until morale improves

NEW Keir Starmer: ‘I have spoken to hundreds of leading CEOs ... Homes, warehouses, labs, grid connections— billions of private investment in the infrastructure of tomorrow is held up or blocked outright in this way. We have ambitious plans to bulldoze through those barriers.’

@SAVEBrit You can make a comment in support of this development here: development.towerhamlets.gov.uk/online-applica…

Whitechapel is one of London’s most historic areas but its unique character is at risk of being overwhelmed by towers marching east from the City🏬 SAVE is strongly objecting to the latest plans for a 17-storey tower in a conservation area 📖bit.ly/4f3FvwR #Whitechapel

@BBCNews Truly the most entitled generation.

Waspi women criticise Budget compensation snub bbc.in/3NSQ4GM

@BBCNews How dumb are they? If they don't want to pay inheritance tax, they can just transfer the property now. Then they only have to live a few years and they're off scot-free.

Farmers mull selling or protests over tax change bbc.in/3Ux12pw

@Newsweek What the fuck is wrong with his face?

Donald Trump's aides told him garbage vest makes him 'look thinner' #Echobox=1730379148" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">newsweek.com/donald-trump-a…

@BBCNews That's just the price she has toupe

Shoplifter banned from wearing wigs in city shops bbc.in/3YKhh4P

I don’t really do endorsements. I’m not shy about sharing my views, but I hate politics and don’t trust most politicians. I also understand that people want to hear from me because I am not just a celebrity, I am a former Republican Governor. My time as Governor taught me to love policy and ignore politics. I’m proud of the work I did to help clean up our air, create jobs, balance the budget, make the biggest infrastructure investment in state history, and take power from the politicians and give it back to the people when it comes to our redistricting process and our primaries in California. That’s policy. It requires working with the other side, not insulting them to win your next election, and I know it isn’t sexy to most people, but I love it when I can help make people’s lives better with policies, like I still do through my institute at USC, where we fight for clean air and stripping the power from the politicians who rig the system against the people. Let me be honest with you: I don’t like either party right now. My Republicans have forgotten the beauty of the free market, driven up deficits, and rejected election results. Democrats aren’t any better at dealing with deficits, and I worry about their local policies hurting our cities with increased crime. It is probably not a surprise that I hate politics more than ever, which, if you are a normal person who isn’t addicted to this crap, you probably understand. I want to tune out. But I can’t. Because rejecting the results of an election is as un-American as it gets. To someone like me who talks to people all over the world and still knows America is the shining city on a hill, calling America is a trash can for the world is so unpatriotic, it makes me furious. And I will always be an American before I am a Republican. That’s why, this week, I am voting for Kamala Harris and Tim Walz. I’m sharing it with all of you because I think there are a lot of you who feel like I do. You don’t recognize our country. And you are right to be furious. For decades, we’ve talked about the national debt. For decades, we’ve talked about comprehensive immigration reform that secures the border while fixing our broken immigration system. And Washington does nothing. The problems just keep rolling, and we all keep getting angrier, because the only people that benefit from problems aren’t you, the people. The only people that benefit from this crap are the politicians who prefer having talking points to win elections to the public service that will make Americans’ lives better. It is a just game to them. But it is life for my fellow Americans. We should be pissed! But a candidate who won’t respect your vote unless it is for him, a candidate who will send his followers to storm the Capitol while he watches with a Diet Coke, a candidate who has shown no ability to work to pass any policy besides a tax cut that helped his donors and other rich people like me but helped no one else else, a candidate who thinks Americans who disagree with him are the bigger enemies than China, Russia, or North Korea - that won’t solve our problems. It will just be four more years of bullshit with no results that makes us angrier and angrier, more divided, and more hateful. We need to close the door on this chapter of American history, and I know that former President Trump won’t do that. He will divide, he will insult, he will find new ways to be more un-American than he already has been, and we, the people, will get nothing but more anger. That’s enough reason for me to share my vote with all of you. I want to move forward as a country, and even though I have plenty of disagreements with their platform, I think the only way to do that is with Harris and Walz. Vote this week. Turn the page and put this junk behind us. And even if you disagree with me, vote, because that’s what we do as Americans. vote.org