ทวีตที่ปักหมุด
Christian L. Macías Dove ⳩
5K posts

Christian L. Macías Dove ⳩
@RevDove
☧rotestant Catholic Priest, Church Reunionist, Free-Royalist, Peacemaker, Medievalist, Educator. Married w/ Offspring. UECNA.
Leesburg, Florida เข้าร่วม Mayıs 2024
228 กำลังติดตาม1.1K ผู้ติดตาม

@Meadein95 Not a Christian Nation, whatever else it may have been.
English

@Xtopher_Uzo "Protestants"
Yet exclusively describes Post-Revivalist 20th Century American Evangelicalism.
English

@Rog973521 I composed this with a mind to cover all the bases because of these types of quips.
x.com/RevDove/status…
Christian L. Macías Dove ⳩@RevDove
@JohnHMcCallum1 It isn't complicated. The form/system of governance we currently operate under is fundamentally antithetical to the Christian religion. It cannot be redeemed. The modern state cannot be "Christian" at all, and therefore cannot be a means of organizing a Christian Nation.
English

@RevDove The fever is strong with this one.
Can you explain which definition of Christian Nationalism you are using?
English

@JohnHMcCallum1 Just because it was architected by Christian men doesn't make it compatible with Christian civil theology. The form of government in the USA is rooted in Enlightenment modernity and religious pluralism. It is fundamentally incompatible with true Christian governance.
English

@RevDove Not antithetical. 'Twas devised by an (overwhelmingly majority Christian Continental Congress and made the law is the land in a majority Christian Country.
Also: the establishment clause isn't the only clause in the 1st amendment about religion. There's a Free exercise clause too
English

@JohnHMcCallum1 It isn't complicated. The form/system of governance we currently operate under is fundamentally antithetical to the Christian religion. It cannot be redeemed. The modern state cannot be "Christian" at all, and therefore cannot be a means of organizing a Christian Nation.
English

@RevDove How can you even say that when everyone who uses the term "Christian Nationalism," whether supporting it or opposing it, means something different from everyone else who uses it. You can't make blanket statements against something that is so vaguely defined in the first place.
English

@EthelflaedAegis Many do adapt well, but it is a function of humility and the causal process of the departure from baptist/evangelical into a more catholic tradition. For those highly visible online (the terminally online ones) this typically applies.
English

As a former Baptist, is it always that obvious? Lol. Yes, sometimes. I've found the Protestant world in America is full of former Baptists and I've found that most of them make better confessional Protestants than anyone who grew up in it, often knowing the theology and understanding why it's important far, far better.
English

@KCPayTreeIt It is notable that the older folks give lower ratings than the younger folks. I would imagine it demonstrates the difference in severity of genuine racism and vitriol they have have encountered in their lifetimes.
English

@eval_hub It isn't the new child they are afraid of.
English

@AnonClaaaa What are you talking about? Who is "you" here? I didn't kiss my wife until a month before our wedding. 🤣
English

People are talking about the Didache. It is available via my parish website. Read it before commenting.
drive.google.com/file/d/1tAHIO9…
English

@RyanMReeves A big part of this is the lack of general awareness (across all gens) as to what qualifies as AI. For example, many young people have very strong opinions about generative AI (which is the primary AI in focus at the moment), but are perfectly fine with AI in "smart" technology.
English

@RyanMReeves What I am seeing is scrupulous vs. unscrupulous adoption. The younger generations are adopting AI only in areas within which their ethical sensibilities allow and are rejecting when it does not. The older generations are adopting it largely devoid of scruples.
English







