⬡ Rootoshi.x ⬡
11.5K posts






Been thinking about this a-lot lately especially in terms of NFT founders. They are present to grab our money then nonexistent and secretive afterwards. They are loud and boisterous with many “hidden” promises then silent. They ask you for your money then tell you, you want a free lunch.


BREAKING: PA whales are pooling funds for a Mac Mini + Claude Max to run an autonomous Clawdbot 24/7. Its name? Psilocybot. It writes PRDs. It builds apps. It trades. We’re not waiting for the future. We craft our own machines. We are waking up. We are connected. We are one.




the same is happening across basically every cultural aspect of crypto for example, just the last few weeks: decentralized social networks like farcaster, lens are struggling, teams departing while FOMO, which is just a crypto social app, has been hitting new highs what's the difference? one is trying to offer you Twitter/X but on decentralized rails, and unfortunately it looks like people don't really care about that the other is trying to network the people who are here around something they already care deeply about: tokens, and seeing who is winning and losing trading tokens. these days 'crypto' doesn't primarily mean decentralization, immutable ownership, censorship resistance etc. like it or not, it means tokens. the sooner you admit that, the sooner you can get to building the thing that will gain traction, and grow your crypto game or metaverse accordingly. that doesn't mean decentralization, immutable ownership, and censorship resistance aren't important. those are all super important things for tokens to be successful! but your successful crypto game won't look just like the web2 version but with decentralized rails. if it's going to be successful in crypto, it has to be much more interesting than that. (have very specific ideas on how to do this with Otherside FWIW)





