Mark

58.8K posts

Mark banner
Mark

Mark

@Rubble2012

High finance, low politics and rogue archaeology. British Gaullist. “This is a niche and disturbing take”

Nearby เข้าร่วม Şubat 2012
659 กำลังติดตาม666 ผู้ติดตาม
Howell Harris
Howell Harris@trefeca·
@Rubble2012 Absolutely crap representation of the decaying old **** too. They couldn’t find a decent die engraver.
English
1
0
1
3
Mark รีทวีตแล้ว
Bill Sweetman
Bill Sweetman@ValkStrategy·
@gregbagwell This is red meat to the Quisling Right, in accordance with US strategy that calls for subversion of European governments.
Bill Sweetman tweet media
English
0
2
5
236
Carl 📷
Carl 📷@carl_thompson70·
Around Strangeways Manchester
Carl 📷 tweet mediaCarl 📷 tweet mediaCarl 📷 tweet mediaCarl 📷 tweet media
English
5
1
39
2.6K
Mark
Mark@Rubble2012·
@DespoticInroad This. Fighting the wrong battle at the wrong time. Desperate
English
0
0
1
307
Mark รีทวีตแล้ว
Despotic Inroad
Despotic Inroad@DespoticInroad·
The BoE will inevitably respond to an inflationary supply shock by raising interest %. Engineering a recession, making people poorer to quash demand will have ~0/negative effect on the fundamental cause of the problem – UK dependence on volatile international energy markets. Instead, BoE should halt QT, easing pressure on government borrowing costs + facilitate new bond issuance for GB Energy/NWF, focusing on a breakneck move towards UK energy independence/ abundance/ resilience through public-private investment in: 👉new N. Sea O&G extraction (the "there's none left" crowd should back themselves & lift the ban on new licenses if they actually believe their own claims – see @EdConwaySky's excellent vid.) 👉British nuclear/SMR rollout 👉British renewable tech supply chains/grid upgrades 👉Onshore shale gas exploration No Truss-style £150BN bills subsidy. Instead, a £150BN investment in the next half century of homemade energy production.
Despotic Inroad tweet media
Polemic Paine@PolemicTMM

How the heck can BoE turn hawkish? Does switching off the economy stop the prices of imports from going up? If my family goes bankrupt the supermarket doesn't lower its prices. Fiscal plus monetary squeeze is on just when we don't need it.

English
16
30
175
48.6K
Mark รีทวีตแล้ว
Simon French
Simon French@Frencheconomics·
The OBR is not the arbiter here, it will be Gilt markets. If Rayner wants to expand capital spending (for social housing) she will need to show a simultaneous liberation of the supply side of the economy to avoid bond markets pricing in a higher UK inflation premium (notwithstanding the lower clearing price for more Gilt issuance) as it runs into capacity constraints. The problem she has is she is associated with policies that have made the supply side less flexible (Employee Rights Act, Renters Rights Act) - albeit her approach to migration looks more liberal. OBR scoring only holds if creditors believe it.
Steven Swinford@Steven_Swinford

Exclusive from @breeallegretti Angela Rayner has privately criticised the OBR and suggested that Labour has 'over-corrected' in the wake of the Tories In a private call with City investors organised by BNP Paribas she said that the official forecaster had failed to recognise the benefits of increased public spending Rayner attacked the scoring methodology used by the OBR, which measures the expected cost and growth gains of government policies to calculate the amount of fiscal headroom, based on the chancellor’s rules She said that the government's drive to build more social housing was considered a cost without any recognition of the social benefits She argued that the OBR is 'preventing' the government from greater public spending because it 'doesn't account for the returns' properly Expect this to be a growing fault line as the elections in May approach thetimes.com/uk/politics/ar…

English
11
15
56
10.3K
Malcontent News
Malcontent News@MalcontentmentT·
Correct - and it kind of sucked in its first iterations. And I love me the F-111 Aardvark. Fun fact: Originally meant for the Navy, the landing gear door/speed break combo, size, and forward visibility were issues. Some of the first production USAF planes were delivered with functional arresting hooks.
English
1
0
1
48
Mark
Mark@Rubble2012·
@SkyNews Oh another ban, of course
English
0
0
1
102
Mark รีทวีตแล้ว
Hassan I. Hassan
Hassan I. Hassan@hxhassan·
I’m convinced most officials & specialists are too immersed in the moment to realize a certain basic fact about why Iran is striking the Gulf. When Iran was fighting in Syria & Iraq, its field commanders & their proxies (and their ecosystems in countries of Iranian influence) always promised that the next battle would be in the Gulf. This was conveyed, explicitly or otherwise, by Qassem Soleimani and allies like Abu Mahdi Al-Muhandis, Hassan Nasrallah and the Assad regime. It was part of a doctrine guiding Iran’s regional strategy, not mere passing comments. (The same language that Israel began using against regional countries only recently. “Qatar is next” or “Turkey is the new Iran” etc. Iran has used that language for many years.) Now, Gulf countries look at Iran and wonder: Why is Iran hitting us when we tried to talk Trump out of striking it? Iran knows we tried our best. Iran’s action is understandable if it targeted the UAE and Saudi Arabia, but why mediators like Qatar? Yes we have US bases, yes we can scream at the US, but it still makes little sense, even from a basic divide-and-conquer strategy. But Iran sees this war as having begun at least a decade or so ago, and the Gulf states played a vital role in getting Iran to where it is today. The Gulf is the problem, not just Israel or the US. Strategically reckless, but that is the plain IRGC logic. This is clear if those officials had followed the rhetoric over the last 1-2 decades and the nitty-gritty behavior of Iran on a ground level outside Iran.
English
64
148
470
167K