Saul March

848 posts

Saul March

Saul March

@SaulMarch

Questions claims and looks for evidence and facts. Skeptical of religious teachers and celebrity worship. Prefers arguments that hold up under scrutiny. 🇺🇸

เข้าร่วม Nisan 2026
9 กำลังติดตาม10 ผู้ติดตาม
ทวีตที่ปักหมุด
Saul March
Saul March@SaulMarch·
@RaspberryR3d Your conclusion that Jordan Chandler received approximately $9.3 million remains the final conclusion of our debate. You solved it and know better than The Associated Pres (AP), LA Times, CBS News etc. Thank you for your contribution and insight @RaspberryR3d! 🤡
Saul March tweet media
English
1
0
1
326
Saul March
Saul March@SaulMarch·
@musicmadnessme ? Nothing I said was misleading. I am sure you have listened to the Faking Michael podcast: the whole masquerade play the Estate orchestrated shows clearly. Right in the middle of the process they ask for demo’s? Lol, it’s totally against protocol. Another revealing fact is ⬇️
English
0
0
0
1
Tasha
Tasha@musicmadnessme·
@SaulMarch I’m so tired of you morons constantly using misleading, cherry picked or blatantly false statements and presenting it as a validation for the mental gymnastics you’ve had to do to sound like you know what you’re talking about to unsuspected public. TIRED 👌🏼
English
1
0
0
5
Tasha
Tasha@musicmadnessme·
Dear Cascio Family, If we don’t go see the movie, the estate won’t have any money. And all you’re likely to get from your lawsuit is wisdom and consequences. You can’t have it both ways! Signed The general public who are sick of your shit!
Brandon Penny@MJJsourceEU

The Cascio family has launched a brutal counterattack in response to the success of the film *Michael* and Michael’s global fame. On Sunday, Australia’s ABC will air its tabloid show 60 Minutes, featuring the most toxic individuals who have openly bashed Michael. Now the Cascio family has prepared tears, drama, and memories of all the bad things that supposedly happened to them in some parallel universe. It’s strange that in the U.S. they’re banned from publicly commenting on anything, yet in the rest of the world, tabloids have free rein to spread their dirt.

English
10
20
170
4.3K
Saul March
Saul March@SaulMarch·
@musicmadnessme off the songs. Look at the credits. The songs were finalized by producers the Estate hired. So you are claiming the Estate and Sony went on to produce these songs without the demo, rough mix, stems, or multitracks? Now that’s totally ludicrous!
English
0
0
0
6
Saul March
Saul March@SaulMarch·
@musicmadnessme It’s a industry protocol to ask for these BEFORE a project gets green lighted. Not in the middle of it, or afterwards. It’s more insulting to your intelligence that Sony/The Estate didn’t have the proper source material when they actually hired their own producers to finish ⬇️
English
1
0
0
5
Saul March
Saul March@SaulMarch·
@musicmadnessme There is a big difference to make money with honest intentions versus making money dishonestly off somebody’s name. The 3 songs on the Michael album: Who’s to blame here becomes clear when you actually look at all the facts. Everything points towards the Estate orchestrating it:
Saul March tweet media
English
1
0
0
14
Tasha
Tasha@musicmadnessme·
@SaulMarch His first point is wrong. Imagine my shock 2012 - 2018 : Cascios did nothing to make money off their relationship with MJ And I’m supposed to take this guys research skills seriously? Er NOPE
English
1
0
0
24
Saul March
Saul March@SaulMarch·
@tooke_nik It’s funny that the word money isn’t mentioned once in the entire tape
English
1
0
0
11
nik tooke mj fan
nik tooke mj fan@tooke_nik·
@SaulMarch The father tape is well known did it for one purpose money mj had no victims
English
1
0
0
17
Saul March
Saul March@SaulMarch·
@tooke_nik DEBUNKED: It’s important to know that the tape used in that YouTube documentary Square One highlights a tape manipulated by private investigator Anthony Pellicano, who was involved in a major wiretapping scandal. He served jail time and was known for using illegal methods:👇
Saul March tweet mediaSaul March tweet media
English
1
0
0
12
Saul March
Saul March@SaulMarch·
@tooke_nik According to their new lawsuit they did visit him there. They have documentation too. Wait and see. The truth will prevail.
English
0
0
0
6
Saul March
Saul March@SaulMarch·
@tooke_nik If MJ stopped all contact then how did some of the Cascio siblings end up visiting him in Bahrain AFTER the trial?
English
2
0
0
43
nik tooke mj fan
nik tooke mj fan@tooke_nik·
@SaulMarch @musicmadnessme There skint hated it they wasn’t in the will Michael stopped all contact 2005 and Eddie created 3 fake songs and registered them 48 hrs after mj died !
English
1
0
0
32
Saul March
Saul March@SaulMarch·
@DarkAconite @1997Bababa @Blaketwp6 @prittinp1nk Sweetie, you need to understand that even Hitlers Mein Kampf and other even more controversial books are included in the library of congress selection. Having a book in the Library of Congress isn’t approval. Read more here: 👇
MJTruthSeeker@MJJTruthSeeker

The ULTIMATE thread 🧵 on the two controversial books found at Neverland during the 1993 police raid: Short background: During the 1993 investigation authorities seized two books from a locked cabinet in his BEDROOM: Boys Will Be Boys and The Boy: A Photographic Essay. ⬇️

English
1
0
2
71
Giosue Perine
Giosue Perine@GiosuePeri79589·
@SaulMarch I thought you were trying to say the estate didn’t buy rights to their story. What terrible hell these people and lawyers live in.
English
1
0
0
42
Saul March
Saul March@SaulMarch·
@visionary_uce @therealsamiyahh If you are going to use the "Chandler book" as a reference then you can’t cherry pick on its content. From the same guy who wrote that book; when talking about why Jordan didn’t want to give testify👇 - do you acknowledge this and believe this to be true? 👇
Saul March tweet media
English
0
0
0
5
Shield Supremacy
Shield Supremacy@visionary_uce·
@therealsamiyahh There are 3 things that will open anyone's eyes if they go into it with a truly open mind. 1. The 2005 trial (the lunacy of the Arvizo and Francia allegations, as well as the "witnesses") 2. The Chandlers' book 3. The lies and contradictions in LN and Wade and James' lawsuits
English
2
0
6
130
Shield Supremacy
Shield Supremacy@visionary_uce·
I find that the 2005 trial is the usual starting point for believing in his innocence. The transcripts are easily accessible and cast doubts over the credibility of 2 accusers, as well as the alleged "witnesses". Recognizing that opens the door for questioning the others.
Troy Miller@troymation

@mai74296 Has anyone here formerly believed the allegations but no longer do? If so…What was the most compelling piece of evidence/revelation that changed your mind and convinced you these people are lying grifters? …looking into the details of the Arvizo case was eye-opening for me.

English
1
6
73
2.1K
Saul March
Saul March@SaulMarch·
@GiosuePeri79589 This only confirms what I told you. Read this article and you will understand better: @gvwnwdkx/cascio-bombshell-timeline-in-latest-lawsuit-flips-the-script-on-the-estate-de1151a1df83" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">medium.com/@gvwnwdkx/casc…
English
2
0
1
73
Saul March
Saul March@SaulMarch·
@GiosuePeri79589 That isn’t true. You have no sources for your claims. Court documents on both sides shows the Cascio’s approached the Estate directly a few months after Leaving Neverland aired. Clearly you haven’t read the court documents or the linked article I posted.
English
3
0
1
73
Giosue Perine
Giosue Perine@GiosuePeri79589·
@SaulMarch @musicmadnessme Yes before you judge them you should know they shopped any story related to MJ to get the highest bid. Finally the estate bought the life rights to their stories so the bidding war would stop. Yet the Cascios want more. Only more extortionists will come if it’s very public. Gross
English
1
0
1
75
vi ☆ fan
vi ☆ fan@saycamore·
This is one of the most misunderstood aspects of the MJ case. Michael settled a CIVIL case, which had no impact on the criminal one. The investigation continued and a trial would have taken place if his accusers had testified or if evidence had been found for the state to indict him. The accusers had the opportunity to BOTH receive money and pursue criminal charges, but chose not to. He settled the civil case because it was scheduled before the criminal one, which violated his Fifth Amendment rights. The Chandlers admitted in their book that they intentionally created this situation to pressure him into settling. Regardless, this is not relevant to the criminal case itself.
vi ☆ fan tweet mediavi ☆ fan tweet mediavi ☆ fan tweet media
Slonk@Pies_of_Lee

the fact that michael jackson settled the case with jordan chandler for $23 million is possibly the biggest piece of evidence against him. $23 million in 1993 is about $53 million today. you're delusional if you think someone would settle for that much if they were innocent

English
16
328
1.4K
64.8K
Saul March
Saul March@SaulMarch·
@KatezRight @MJJTruthSeeker @KateK4870 365 days in that time period is factual. That was a court testimony from MJ’s own witness during the trial in 2005. You can look this up yourself. You are also very naive if you think denials means anything at this point, giving all the information we now know about hush-money.
Saul March tweet media
English
0
0
0
14
Kate Wright ❤️🇨🇦❤️
Kate Wright ❤️🇨🇦❤️@KatezRight·
@MJJTruthSeeker @KateK4870 365? Really? 🙄 Brett Barnes has consistently denied any wrongdoing or that abuse occurred during his time with Jackson, a stance he maintained during the 2005 trial and in subsequent public statements.
English
1
0
0
18
Kate K
Kate K@KateK4870·
People who have zero emotional intelligence just don't understand Michael Jackson & never have Michael is the most misunderstood person that lived in my lifetime. My wish is that each installment of the #MichaelMovie goes some way to people being able to educate themselves
Kate K tweet media
English
16
38
268
2.8K
Saul March
Saul March@SaulMarch·
@tib_calixto @RazorFist @alexwc1964 He regretted it so much he settled again long after this with Jason Francia? And the Estate did the same thing again in 2019/2020? I don`t buy the excuse of MJ regretting it.
English
0
0
0
17
Calixto_TIB
Calixto_TIB@tib_calixto·
@SaulMarch @RazorFist @alexwc1964 In fact, Michael remained silent in the civil case. And that was worse than if he had gone to court, in terms of media attention. He deeply regretted it, especially since he didn't want to.
English
1
0
0
39
RazörFist
RazörFist@RazorFist·
Just returned from the theater. It is my grim duty to report that 'Michael' isn't good. ...it's great.
RazörFist tweet media
English
166
353
4.2K
188K
ali
ali@HVST3RIA·
@1997Bababa @billiejeanse It's not a wrong case, dummy. Sneddon tried to enter Chandler's description as evidence in the 2005 trial but was denied. Sneddon himself gave different descriptions of the evidence in question. He was lying, and it wasn't a match.
English
2
0
0
57
ؘ
ؘ@billiejeanse·
they made michael UNDRESS in front of everybody to see if his skin matched the assaulted kids words and guess what his body wasnt as they described lol and in the big 2026 year people still call him bad names yall sick
English
19
1.4K
17.8K
226K

ค้นพบ

@musicmadnessme @tooke_nik @DarkAconite @1997Bababa @Blaketwp6 @prittinp1nk @GiosuePeri79589 @elonmusk