Sauni

@DexocaD @PaleExposed stop eating bats, maybe you will get some brain matter. You bloody Shang

@SauniAwakens @PaleExposed Poor Pajeets didnt even try to build their own online platform to discuss how Chinese eat dogs as they were proud of speaking their colonizer‘s English as official language

This is ‘Traditional’ Asian street food in China or Japan and it’s dog meat. This is how they eat it with sources🤢🤮

Egg based delicacy from China

@khubiramji @cbdhage Revenue Surplus + uses only 43% of revenue receipts towards revenue expenditure + high capital to revenue expenditure ratio compare now

@SauniAwakens @cbdhage this is a very stupid comment because taxation rates are standard across states... freebies and taxation have the same standards everywhere so this better development in one state doesnt add up...

Reconnecting Surat with the sea! The Dumas Sea Face Masterplan is transforming a fragmented shoreline into a continuous, resilient, and vibrant public waterfront. A beautiful step toward restoring local ecology and creating an accessible coastline for everyone. #Surat 1/2

@tanvi_madan money is chasing returns, it is neither altruistic nor preferential treatment

Partnerships help strengthen autonomy. When I've said this, people roll their eyes. But here's an example: global capital -- esp from the US/west -- funding an Indian co. seeking to devp sovereign capabilities

@debapratim_ Next up Canadian Racists, I think half of all anti-Indian racism originated there

The way us Indians have brought the CCP bots to their knees in just 3-4 days is commendable for sure 😂😂

@khubiramji @cbdhage Gujarat people do not take or expect freebies

@cbdhage why arent all bjp states getting development like this?

@DexocaD @PaleExposed But you do fuck dogs, isn’t it like a trend thing on your TikTok live?

@SauniAwakens @PaleExposed True but we dont fuck female dogs

"Little Pink" Chinese bots are trying their best to deny apparent reality. 🤡 Here is another example of kids being forced to wake up at 5 AM and recite, " The XI Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics in the New-era " 🇨🇳😩

@MaitreyaBhakal If you think that is effective, do it. You have no right to tell what others can say

Obviously this is going to irritate many Chinese and China supporters. And the more they research on it, the more irritated they will get. That's good. All of the above is well known amongst professional historians in both countries, but Chinese people remain largely ignorant. Of course their nationalists wouldn't talk about it even if they knew, because it would shatter their narcissistic sense of cultural pride and civilizational superiority. Most Chinese people only know that Buddhism came from India, and that's it. They will bow down to their gods in their temples - without knowing that those gods have Indian origins or influences. ~100% of the Chinese Buddhist pantheon (and a substantial portion of its non-Buddhist ones) is of Indian origin. That all of the above might come as a shock to many Chinese is understandable. But what's worse, it also comes as a shock to many Indians. If Indian anti-China propagandists wish to counter the bigoted perception of India and Indians as "inferior" - this is how you should do it. And all this is publicly available information, not some secret. If you wish to kang, learn to read first.

Suggestion for Indian anti-China propagandists: If your objective is to elevate India's status, stop attacking modern China and focus on ancient China. Start emphasizing the extraordinary scale and depth of India's historical influence on Chinese civilization. Talk more about China's historical "debt" to India. This is a far more effective line of attack than contemporary geopolitics or economics. There's more than enough raw material. Many are completely unaware of the sheer scale we're dealing with here. People think that the cultural exchanges (which were largely one-sided) began and ended with Buddhism. In truth, Buddhism is merely the tip of the iceberg. It's not even close to the whole story. Indeed, if Indian influence and contribution to Chinese civilization is removed, Chinese culture and history would be virtually unrecognizable. The sheer volume of ideas, philosophies, cultural concepts, scientific knowledge, artistic traditions, religious practices, and technologies that travelled from India to China frankly boggles the imagination. The list is simply endless: Logic and epistemology, metaphysics, philology, phonetics (Chinese could literally understand their own language and pronunciation better because of Sanskrit and Prakrit), astrology, astronomy, calender science, clothing, food, medicine, surgery, biology, art, sculpture, cosmology, meditation, music, dance, performance art, biology, botany, knowledge of medicinal plants...and that's just for starters. And it's not just the scale, the depth is equally astonishing. One would be hardpressed to find a single element of Chinese culture, society, and history that was untouched by India. Whole Indian branches of the above arts and sciences were adopted wholesale and incorporated into their Chinese equivalents, across centuries and across generations. It was possibly the greatest civilizational transfer of knowledge in human history. ------- As an example, everyone knows that Chinese considered China the "middle kingdom" - the center of the world. Yet, it was India that Chinese philosophers considered the spiritual center of the world, including the physical center in Buddhist cosmology (which Chinese Buddhists adopted), and the source of sacred knowledge. India was the most noble and most honored land, and was simply considered heaven. Chinese travellers would cross mountains, both literal and figurative, to reach India and learn its teachings. Call it kanging on a civilizational scale. India was basically the Holy Land for Chinese intellectuals. A common claim amongst historians is that India was the teacher and China the student. Astonishingly, many ancient Chinese intellectuals and philosophers would themselves agree with this claim. They openly referred to India as the teacher who they wished to learn from. As a comparison, for ancient Chinese, India occupied a position even far higher than Greece did for many Roman intellectuals back in the day. To take another damning example, when Indian logic first got transmitted to China, Chinese experts simply didn't understand it. So they had to be trained on it. Indian logical systems required extensive clarifications and interpretations before they could be assimilated into Chinese intellectual traditions. Indian philosophers had to actually explain it from first principles, and then translate Sanskrit texts into Chinese themselves (after learning Chinese), since understanding that kind of logic is important to understanding Sanskrit. This is why much of the translation of Sanskrit texts into Chinese was almost completely dependent on Indian expertise. This lasted until travelers like Xuanzang came to India, learned how to do it, and established their own translation bureaus back home. And even then, homegrown expertise took a long time to be fully established in China. Indeed, entire new Chinese vocabulary had to be invented to incorporate Indian philosophy and concepts, since Classical Chinese literally didn't have the words to describe them. It was only after this entire process that Chinese Buddhists were able to understand and appreciate Indian philosophy, and then adapt it by fusing elements of their own philosophy into it. This is the origin of the entire (sub)field of Chinese Buddhism. And if you think that's too overwhelming, absolutely do NOT research the origins of Chinese martial arts - perhaps the one thing China is most known for globally after Chinese food (which also has significant Indian contributions). In fact, all of the above combined is not even 0.01% of the KNOWN scope and depth of the philosophical, cultural, and scientific transmission.

@Eivor_Koy stop promoting racial hierarchies

Some Indian netizens calling China’s ancient “Four Occupations” system “China’s caste system,” and believing that calling a Chinese person a “merchant” is insulting, has become a trending topic on Chinese social media. Many Chinese netizens are playfully making fun of the mistake, finding the comparison quite ridiculous. For context, the “Four Occupations (士农工商)” was China’s traditional ranking of professions: scholars/officials at the top (valued for governance and learning), followed by farmers (seen as the foundation of society), artisans, and merchants at the bottom (viewed as less productive since they traded rather than created). In reality, China’s Four Occupations and India’s caste system are quite different. India’s caste system was deeply rooted in religious texts and seen as a divine, lifelong order determined by birth. It often restricted marriage, dining, and social interactions between groups, with very limited possibilities for changing one’s status. China’s Four Occupations, by contrast, was primarily a social ranking of different professions rather than a rigid, hereditary system. There were no religious rules treating it as unchangeable by blood, and no strict laws banning intermarriage or shared community life between groups. A key difference was social mobility. Through the imperial examination system, talented individuals from farming or merchant families could study, pass the exams, and rise to become respected scholars and officials. Many famous figures, such as Fan Zhongyan and Ouyang Xiu, came from modest backgrounds and achieved high positions. The old saying “In the morning a farmer’s son, in the evening a guest in the emperor’s hall” reflected this real possibility of upward movement. Even merchants, who were ranked lower in theory because their work was seen as less foundational, could improve their family’s standing. It was common for successful merchant families to educate their children and transition into scholarly circles over time. Today, China’s traditional occupational ranking no longer exists as an institution — it effectively ended with the abolition of the imperial exams in 1905. Modern society emphasizes equality and values professions based on skills and contributions. While caste continues to influence aspects of life like marriage and social customs in parts of India, the Chinese system was far more flexible and has long since evolved. In short: Caste represented a birth-based destiny that was very difficult to change. China’s Four Occupations was a practical ranking of occupations that allowed movement between roles. The two are fundamentally distinct, much like comparing traffic regulations to a system of permanent segregation.

@DexocaD @PaleExposed Says the Shang who eats dog meat from wet markets

@PaleExposed Yes, that’s the way how we name Lizard🦎 after Indian, “Sān-Sǎo”, which means “Pajeet Sister in-law”…

@mangla @omarali50 @AudreyTruschke Activism in the same field in which she in an academic leads to emotions clouding judgements and fact finding to prove conclusions. Both she does on a regular basis and refuses to engage with anyone constructively

@omarali50 @AudreyTruschke she is reputed historian and also do activism against the right wing ideology like you do against Lelis. she defends everything about all historical facts she writes. any historian can criticize her and as a historian her reputation/career will be destroyed if she writes wrong

For an "academic" she is a very transparent and aggressive propagandist. Impressive.

The great circular references saga

@prarthan908 Rajnath ji understood that he should give Modi full support and took a supportive but this woman did the opposite when Annamalai came

At a time when women leaders like Vijayadharani and Gautami quit their parties after short stints, this lady has stood by her party for over 20 years, long before the Modi wave, through the era of giants Karunanidhi and Jayalalithaa, long before the BJP became the fashionable ruling party It's not surprising that those seeking short-term political gains have a problem with someone whose politics is rooted in conviction rather than convenience

@sourabhkapure @venkat_systems @SarvamAI @GoogleDeepMind air a shitty take and agree with all counter points in comment, such a grift

@venkat_systems @SarvamAI @GoogleDeepMind You are right

labs for the sake of being labs? tell me an Indian model that;s actually used by consumers, Ironically, @SarvamAI internally uses claude code.

Isn’t this the exact thing he said he is furious about with Biden admin?

@KshitijAMalve @cbdhage There’s a nuisance factor associated with grounds, it’s better they be separated

@cbdhage Rather than just parks, I'd like each of these to be accompanied with sports facilities - tennis, badminton, basketball, and more. India is heading to a public health crisis and there needs to be a strong effort like they did for polio to fix it.

𝗡𝗮𝗺𝗼 𝗚𝗿𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗖𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗹 𝗣𝗮𝗿𝗸, 𝗧𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗲 All metropolitan cities should reserve land parcels for such beautiful parks. They single-handedly improve the overall quality of life.

@Putin_Will_Fall @DanielDiMartino 🫡

@SauniAwakens @DanielDiMartino Read what I wrote

Yes this means that 1 in 15 Native American and Black men between ages 18 and 59 are currently in prison. At the other end of the spectrum, 1 in 500 East Asian immigrants are in prison. Wild how high crime rate is.

@hiiinternet “The #1 feeder isn't labs it's Google”, Google was the largest non-lab lab before these AI companies came to the front

@lekshuman @TVMohandasPai Production without consumption? You know that there is commercial consumption too right?

@TVMohandasPai GST is more for consumption and GDP is for production. The more the state consumes it will reflect in GST and GDP is more related to how much the state produces.

TN has a bigger economy than Karnataka , the mystery is why does it collect less? It had not collected its budgeted taxes for last 3 years but shown huge growth in GDP! Are they counting GDP correctly?