AppropriateWeapon4
409 posts

AppropriateWeapon4
@SinwarTactical
dont feel obligated to follow back backup to @ProtoSinwarism





Did you know the founder of "pro-Palestinian" activism in Ireland was, in fact, a Nazi sympathizer? William James Brennan-Whitmore (1886-1977) was an Irish revolutionary who fought against the British In 1940, he founded Clann na Saoirse, a pro-Nazi political party which called for an Irish military takeover of Northern Ireland and a ban on emigration He became the first chairman of the Irish-Arab society, an antizionist group, after the Six-Day War. Another pro-Nazi figure, Colm Tarrant of the National Socialist Irish Workers Party (NSIWP) became secretary of the Society in 1980. These were the first "Paddystinians"


@ConceptualJames Jews invented communism you fucking retard



Holocaust denial is obviously deeply offensive, and also impressively dumb. (Deniers pretend the Nazis 'didn't commit genocide' against the Jews, when it was likely the most extreme case of genocide ever.*) But Tucker's right here. It's morally worse to advocate initiating a war of aggression, like @tedcruz did/does vis Iran, as the latter leads to the unnecessary death of thousands of innocent people, whereas engaging in Holocaust denial, 81 years after the Holocaust ended, does not. It's also strange how the norm against denying genocide isn't consistently applied. Take the Armenian Genocide (also one of the most extreme cases of genocide ever, in terms of rate of attrition of Armenians within Anatolia, which amounted the large majority). Whereas engaging in Holocaust denial destroys people's careers, and completely marginalizes a nation politically (like Iran under Ahmedinejad), states or individuals who (absurdly) deny the Armenian Genocide are not stigmatized in the West. * Literally the Babi Yar massacre by itself, or 48 hours of "operations" in Auschwitz-Birkenau, Kulmhof, or one of the Reinhardt Camps, would've uncontroversially constituted a genocide by itself, even if, hypothetically, the Nazis had done nothing else to Jews in WWII.) Yet, of course, the massacres and extermination factories operated for literal years.

fuck this. if the palestinian delegate complies, he validates his oppressor for the comfort of the room. if the palestinian delegate (rightly) refuses, he’s framed as the reason for tension (the tension exists because apartheid israel’s genocide of palestinians).

Am I crazy or is the New York Times podcast lady actually trying to argue that insulting Jewish people is worse than the mass murder of children?



I mean...duh.



המתנחלים ביקשו, אז החיילים הגיעו חמושים לעצור ילדים שקטפו צמחים, גררו אותם בכוח והכניסו אותם לניידת הצבאית. צפו בווידאו הזה שצולם אתמול בגדה המערבית, שם חיים מיליוני בני אדם ללא זכויות תחת השליטה הצבאית הישראלית מדינה שמפעילה אלימות על ילדים של אחרים - לעולם לא תהיה טובה לילדיה

The whole "omg someone doesn't believe the holocaust numbers!" bit is so played out. Its also really weird in general when you think about it. There are so many worse atrocities in history and people are allowed to question and look into those. Also, everything zionists support and do is worse than doing a wrongthink.







سُبْحَانَ الَّذِي أَسْرَىٰ بِعَبْدِهِ لَيْلًا مِنَ الْمَسْجِدِ الْحَرَامِ إِلَى الْمَسْجِدِ الْأَقْصَى الَّذِي بَارَكْنَا حَوْلَهُ لِنُرِيَهُ مِنْ آيَاتِنَا ۚ إِنَّهُ هُوَ السَّمِيعُ الْبَصِيرُ








