Slowjoggs

@welshphoton @Cath0378 @JeremyVineOn5 @thecarolemalone @ayeshahazarika @theJeremyVine Collecting methadone from a pharmacy isn't working in medicine. There isn't new evidence. The CCRC are going to reject an appeal. They do not agree with expert shopping. Maybe brush up on some legal basics when you are not busy with medicine....

"Seven very experienced consultants gave evidence." "They know a lot more than a bloke who lives in Canada." @thecarolemalone disputes Jackie's claims there was no evidence to convict Lucy Letby and questions Dr Shoo Lee's credentials. @ayeshahazarika | @theJeremyVine

@welshphoton @Cath0378 @JeremyVineOn5 @thecarolemalone @ayeshahazarika @theJeremyVine If you followed the trial, you would know this.

@welshphoton @Cath0378 @JeremyVineOn5 @thecarolemalone @ayeshahazarika @theJeremyVine Because they were born premature, it does not mean they were at deaths door. Most just needed some assistance with feeding and breathing for a short time. Room 1, is high dependency. Rooms 2,3,4 were low dependency. Multiple babies were being prepared to go home.

@welshphoton @Cath0378 @JeremyVineOn5 @thecarolemalone @ayeshahazarika @theJeremyVine Air embolism was not diagnosed solely by skin discolouration. The actual research into this in neonates is also limited for ethical reasons And Shoo Lee's paper stated that the amount of cases in the paper was so small that conclusions should not be drawn from it

@Cath0378 @JeremyVineOn5 @thecarolemalone @ayeshahazarika @theJeremyVine Some of the babies didn't have anything wrong with them, they were being prepared to go home. The pattern is always the same. Letby appears and is alone with the baby immediately before a sudden unexpected collapse. Repeat this scenario 30x

@Cath0378 @JeremyVineOn5 @thecarolemalone @ayeshahazarika @theJeremyVine Did you follow the trial? There was a fair few examples of sub-standard care (it's a common occurrence) sub-standard care did not explain the collapses and deaths. Not by a long shot.

@Cath0378 @JeremyVineOn5 @thecarolemalone @ayeshahazarika @theJeremyVine Much of what they said has actually already been rebuffed at trial. Its almost like they aren't familiar with the details of that. Its misinformation. Probably why they are not even referring to the babies as A-Q. More confusion. Also not mentioning certain babies at all.

@Cath0378 @JeremyVineOn5 @thecarolemalone @ayeshahazarika @theJeremyVine The panel of experts "hand picked" by the defence and Dr Lee. You do realise that they will not possibly have started from a neutral viewpoint. Some of the explanations for the deaths are almost comical. they would be laughed out of court in all honesty.

@Cath0378 @JeremyVineOn5 @thecarolemalone @ayeshahazarika @theJeremyVine Is this the Dr Lee that modified his paper after he was approached by the defence and after it was rejected at the appeal? Air embolism was diagnosed through more than skin discolouration btw.

@JeremyVineOn5 @thecarolemalone @ayeshahazarika @theJeremyVine Oh dear Carol, eminent neonatologist and not just a bloke from Canada. Did Carol actually watch what Dr Shoo Lee said or does she simply not understand medical evidence?

@littlegurrier @sarahknapton I'lle take the word of the people that saw this happen first hand, such as the mother of baby E, over some random dickhead on the internet. You should familiarise with their statements made at thirlwall.

@Slowjog @sarahknapton Not everything; just the Letby conviction, for the time being. Anything but simple-minded Slo Jo, it's only those who still think this case is 100% tickety-boo and above board who are of questionable mental capacity.

Charity refused to engage with Lucy Letby whistleblowers over ‘red flags’ in testimony telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/02/0…

@littlegurrier @sarahknapton It makes perfect sense that you believe everything to be some sort of conspiracy, you simple-minded flat earther.

@Slowjog @sarahknapton Only a bot, an idiot, or someone carrying water for the stitch-up would say such a thing. Which one are you Slow Jo?

@littlegurrier @sarahknapton "only a matter of time" "Miscarriage of justice" Letby will never be getting out. Enjoy your little hobby though, you deluded freak.

@Slowjog @sarahknapton You lot wouldn't be on here arguing with everyone who thinks Letby is a miscarriage of justice if public opinion made no difference. You've done yourself up like a kipper there, it's only a matter of time now. Only those with a vested interest, or utter cretins say otherwise.

@perera_siri Look at these deluded fuckers, spending their lives cheerleading for the baby murdering pos Letby. Absolute freaks.

Nurse Letby hang on in there - the Universe is on your side: Dr Shoo Lee agreed to give evidence for Letby’s appeal, which was not allowed to go ahead Letby prosecutors misinterpreted my research, doctor claims

@JohnAspinall4 @guyrowlanduk Whats that got to do with physic parents that don't need to be psychic to know when someone is telling bare faced lies about their interactions and discussions. The parents aren't liars or incorrect. Its amazing how random arseholes on twitter think they know better...

@Slowjog @guyrowlanduk I already made my point mate on why people, like you, *want* her to be guilty. 👍

It's time to re-think "think of the parents". At the second meeting between police and hospital bosses in May 17, the bosses reinforced that they had found no evidence against Lucy Letby, despite the doctors insisting she must be investigated. (1/9)

@littlegurrier @sarahknapton You keep telling yourself that. Back on planet Earth, the wheels of justice turn as normal. This is why courts are courts of law and not courts of public opinion. Public opinion might be loud and persistent but plays no part in a court’s decision.

@Slowjog @sarahknapton I'm getting sick of accounts set up at key dates relevant to the trial process (in your case June 24) who only exist to shout down MoJ talk. The cat's out of the bag, there's only one direction of travel on this now; only question is how much time it will take to exonerate her.

@Positively4thS @MySweetLandlord @PJackso09105554 Yes, absolutely hilarious...

@Slowjog @MySweetLandlord @PJackso09105554 Dream on. 🤣🤣🤣

From the very start of the Lucy Letby case, I've been saying 'not guilty'. The prosecution made her guilt appear before the jury in the same way a skilled illusionist can make the Statue of Liberty DISappear – misdirection, smoke and mirrors! FFS, set this poor woman free! 🙏

@Positively4thS @evenhanded909 @PJackso09105554 This little fantasy world you live in, on twitter, it's not real you know. Carry on though, you deluded weirdo

@Slowjog @evenhanded909 @PJackso09105554 Thirlwall? That was like Hitler and the Nazi High Command getting together to discuss the Chief Rabbi. 🤣🤣🤣

@Positively4thS @MySweetLandlord @PJackso09105554 Being stretched has nothing to do with it. If there is evidence to suggest Letby has harmed further children and the threshold for the CPS is reached, there will be new charges. The parents deserve answers.

@Slowjog @MySweetLandlord @PJackso09105554 Our judicial system is already stretched. People are appearing in court today, pleading not guilty and being told their trial will take place sometime in the middle of 2026. I do not foresee a single penny or a single minute being invested in any new charges against Lucy.

@Positively4thS @evenhanded909 @PJackso09105554 Yes, absolutely hilarious. Go and read the parents statements for thirlwall, I'm sure you will get a good laugh out of those as well.

@Slowjog @evenhanded909 @PJackso09105554 🤣🤣🤣