Nick

32.7K posts

Nick banner
Nick

Nick

@TightToffee

Passionate about everything #EFC, protection of the environment and taking the fight to climate catastrophists ... oh and ships .... lots of ships #NSNO

UK เข้าร่วม Haziran 2010
5.3K กำลังติดตาม2.6K ผู้ติดตาม
ทวีตที่ปักหมุด
Nick
Nick@TightToffee·
Its the 3rd Christmas since you left us Jussie, but it still feels like the first. You will always have your own Christmas tree. I miss you, love Dad xx
Nick tweet media
English
3
2
50
0
Nick
Nick@TightToffee·
@ModernNavy @RFAHeadquarters @RoyalNavy The only Bay currently in the water 🫡 I wish we still had the four we actually built, but naturally, our government of the day decided to sell one
English
0
0
0
1
Nick
Nick@TightToffee·
@Keir_Starmer @FennellJW You are lying again; we can all see your lips moving. A secure UK would have the armed forces we deserve and you will not order a single ship, boat or plane, won't settle the RFA pay dispute and prosecute our veterans whilst protecting the criminals you import
English
0
0
1
3
Keir Starmer
Keir Starmer@Keir_Starmer·
The war in Iran must now become a line in the sand, because how we emerge from this crisis will define all of us for a generation. We will build a Britain that is stronger, more secure and more resilient. That is what this moment demands. theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
English
1.2K
162
641
92.7K
Nick รีทวีตแล้ว
Professor John Hearn
Good article from David Bellamy explaining £76trillion is being spent to solve a mythical problem that never was.
Professor John Hearn tweet media
English
3
64
139
6.6K
Nick
Nick@TightToffee·
@AlecBell5826 @PWestoff What crippled the MoD budget was the Blair/Brown decision to pay for their wars out of the existing MoD budget; a trick pulled by most governments since. MoD budgets are set at maintenance rates during peacetime. If you want to fight a war, you have to pay extra! That's the deal
English
0
0
0
0
Alec Bell
Alec Bell@AlecBell5826·
@PWestoff When you realise it was all intentional. Gorgon Brown pushed the White elephant carriers to use up the RN budget for a decade or two, hastening the demise. F-35 did the same for the RAF. Ajax for the Army!
English
2
0
3
168
Paul Weston
Paul Weston@PWestoff·
The Royal Navy by numbers: Frigates: 7. Available: 3 Destroyers: 6. Available: 1 - HMS Dragon (broken). Naval Manpower (excluding Royal Marines): 20,000 Admirals : 40 Commodores: 90 MOD Civil Servants: 55,000 Clown Service - destroyed by politicians. forcesnews.com/services/navy/…
English
241
1.1K
3.7K
58.3K
Nick รีทวีตแล้ว
Admiral Hindsight
Admiral Hindsight@Adm_Hindsight·
@PWestoff This is so horrifically misinformed it's embarrassing PWLS deployed 9 months last year to the INDOPAC T45s can operate in warm temperatures diamond operated for months in the Red Sea on 2024 where she notched a kill on a ballistic missile with viper No range?
Admiral Hindsight tweet media
English
1
3
7
138
Nick
Nick@TightToffee·
@PWestoff This is an almost entirely ill-informed post
English
0
0
0
2
Paul Weston
Paul Weston@PWestoff·
We have two modern aircraft carriers of course, but they rarely work and are not fitted with steam catapult launch systems, so the F-35B jets use huge fuel for semi-vertical take-off and landing and thus lack combat range. The few Frigates and Destroyers are not battle ready and cannot defend the carriers. Even worse, the Destroyers cannot operate in warm seas (mid-east) because electrical demand (radar + full battle stations) overloads electrical capacity unless the A/C is turned off..... A tragic comedy for an Island nation.
English
25
34
192
5.1K
Nick
Nick@TightToffee·
@Neccccy Where's my gun when I need it 🤔
English
0
0
0
0
Nick รีทวีตแล้ว
Nick รีทวีตแล้ว
Electroverse
Electroverse@Electroversenet·
Wind turbines are getting bigger, more efficient, and are delivering higher output. That sounds impressive, but it isn't compared to other sources. A single nuclear plant, for example, produces around 1,750 megawatts. To match that, you need roughly 150 large turbines. Wind uses over 100X more land than nuclear for the same output. And turbines, of course, only produce power when the wind is blowing. Nuclear is constant. Then there's the storage requirements. To make wind reliable, you need batteries. At grid scale, that becomes impossible with current technologies. Wind power remains an expensive pipe dream, lining the pockets of a few at the expense of the many.
English
24
78
233
4.3K
Nick
Nick@TightToffee·
@Franksquarerig There are a number of potential solutions to this problem:- 1 - extend the life of the 45's (very likely) 2- build batch 2 45's (extremely unlikely) 3- order more T26's and sub the module bay for an AA capability This last one makes sense to me, but def won't happen.
English
0
0
0
8
Frank Scott
Frank Scott@Franksquarerig·
Answer to the Question below is Zero Chance any type 83 in service before last type 45 scheduled to pay off in 2038. Seriously given glacial pace of procurement & shipbuilding this not not even remotely possible
Modern Royal Navy@ModernNavy

Will Type 83 destroyers be in service when the last Type 45 is paid off in 2038. Will build start in time with frigate HMS GLASGOW taking 9 years plus. They are to play a key role in the Future Air Dominance System against emerging threats @navalnewscom youtu.be/7OFJXfoOsyk?si…

English
5
1
16
1.2K
Nick รีทวีตแล้ว
Dame Andrea Jenkyns DBE 🇬🇧
I am looking at the legal case to push for a Judicial Review against mad Ed Milliband granting the UKs largest Solar Farm. Will keep you posted. @reformparty_uk
English
615
1.5K
6.5K
89.7K
Nick รีทวีตแล้ว
Chris Rose
Chris Rose@ArchRose90·
“I support all of you now. Until you return, where I will prosecute you.”
Chris Rose tweet media
English
42
679
3.4K
20.4K
Nick รีทวีตแล้ว
Marcus
Marcus@Marcus___007·
@NotFarLeftAtAll Talk to his school chums too
Marcus tweet media
English
8
19
99
1.8K
Nick
Nick@TightToffee·
@thinkdefence They could certainly be used as a mother ship for large UAV's
English
0
0
1
3
Think Defence
Think Defence@thinkdefence·
Would you say a Stirling Castle style vessel is a better offshore patrol vessel than the River class?. Similar crew, but much higher capacity and space for modules (various)
Think Defence tweet media
English
36
4
108
18.6K