Timen

4.8K posts

Timen banner
Timen

Timen

@TimenBaart

GTM. Complete noob with GenAI, CV, LLM, generation and evals

dublin เข้าร่วม Ocak 2013
669 กำลังติดตาม710 ผู้ติดตาม
Timen
Timen@TimenBaart·
@jasonlk which sales agent vendors are your favourite today?
English
0
0
0
8
Timen รีทวีตแล้ว
Aviv Shaham
Aviv Shaham@avivs·
@kevinrose The idea of maxing out a Claude plan is flawed. You just need to buy another one and use two now. It’s like saying you maxed out employee #1. Great - time to hire another one.
English
0
1
16
1.9K
Timen
Timen@TimenBaart·
@levie I believe a successful transition into the ‘new optimal’ requires an intensity beyond what most orgs can sustain
English
0
0
3
213
Aaron Levie
Aaron Levie@levie·
We dramatically underestimate how much change management it is going to take to automate most knowledge worker tasks. Between data being in legacy environments or systems or without good APIs, context missing for doing the task, teams that are less technical, and other factors, there’s still a lot of work to drive real AI transformation in an enterprise. This is actually great news if you’re building right now because the opportunity is to build the software bridges to make this easier, or to build new services firms to help with this change management. Opportunity is all around for those looking.
Jason Shuman@JasonrShuman

Silicon Valley thinks AI agents are a $20/mo self-serve subscription. Main Street is paying local agencies $10,000 just to turn them on. Everyone assumes AI will be bought primarily online like Slack or Zoom. I think they are wrong. Some of the biggest winners in the AI boom won't be the software vendors. It will be the humans installing it. Here is the reality of SMBs right now: • 54% lack internal AI expertise. • 41% have data quality too poor for AI to even work. • 41% already prefer buying AI through a local IT provider. You cannot "1-click install" a genius AI into a messy CRM or a 15-year-old server. It will just execute the wrong tasks at the speed of light. The AI software will be cheap and a lot will absolutely be bought online. Making it actually work for a messy, real-world business will be expensive. Very bullish on the "Do It For Me" economy being back.

English
121
123
1.2K
265.7K
Timen รีทวีตแล้ว
Rohan Paul
Rohan Paul@rohanpaul_ai·
Wharton’s latest AI study points to a hard truth: “AI writes, humans review” model is breaking down Why "just review the AI output" doesn't work anymore, our brains literally give up. We have started doing "Cognitive Surrender" to AI - Wharton’s latest AI study points to a hard truth: reviewing AI output is not a reliable safeguard when cognition itself starts to defer to the machine.when you stop verifying what the AI tells you, and you don't even realize you stopped. It's different from offloading, like using a calculator. With offloading you know the tool did the work. With surrender, your brain recodes the AI's answer as YOUR judgment. You genuinely believe you thought it through yourself. Says AI is becoming a 3rd thinking system, and people often trust it too easily. You know Kahneman's System 1 (fast intuition) and System 2 (slow analysis)? They're saying AI is now System 3, an external cognitive system that operates outside your brain. And when you use it enough, something happens that they call Cognitive Surrender. Cognitive surrender is trickier: AI gives an answer, you stop really questioning it, and your brain starts treating that output as your own conclusion. It does not feel outsourced. It feels self-generated. The data makes it hard to brush off. Across 3 preregistered studies with 1,372 participants and 9,593 trials, people turned to AI on over 50% of questions. In Study 1, when AI was correct, people followed it 92.7% of the time. When it was wrong, they still followed it 79.8% of the time. Without AI, baseline accuracy was 45.8%. With correct AI, it jumped to 71.0%. With incorrect AI, it dropped to 31.5%, worse than having no AI. Access to AI also boosted confidence by 11.7 percentage points, even when the answers were wrong. Human review is supposed to be the safety net. But this research suggests the safety net has a hole in it: people do not just miss bad AI output; they become more confident in it. Time pressure did not eliminate the effect. Incentives and feedback reduced it but did not remove it. And the people most resistant tended to score higher on fluid intelligence and need for cognition. That makes this feel less like a laziness problem and more like a cognitive architecture problem.
Rohan Paul tweet mediaRohan Paul tweet media
English
174
727
3K
290.7K
Timen รีทวีตแล้ว
Qadi
Qadi@Bigqadi·
Absolutely outrageous from Gout Gout. 10.04 at the age of 16. Speechless.
English
1.8K
9.1K
99.1K
25.9M
Timen รีทวีตแล้ว
Aakash Gupta
Aakash Gupta@aakashgupta·
Cursor is raising at a $50 billion valuation on the claim that its “in-house models generate more code than almost any other LLMs in the world.” Less than 24 hours after launching Composer 2, a developer found the model ID in the API response: kimi-k2p5-rl-0317-s515-fast. That’s Moonshot AI’s Kimi K2.5 with reinforcement learning appended. A developer named Fynn was testing Cursor’s OpenAI-compatible base URL when the identifier leaked through the response headers. Moonshot’s head of pretraining, Yulun Du, confirmed on X that the tokenizer is identical to Kimi’s and questioned Cursor’s license compliance. Two other Moonshot employees posted confirmations. All three posts have since been deleted. This is the second time. When Cursor launched Composer 1 in October 2025, users across multiple countries reported the model spontaneously switching its inner monologue to Chinese mid-session. Kenneth Auchenberg, a partner at Alley Corp, posted a screenshot calling it a smoking gun. KR-Asia and 36Kr confirmed both Cursor and Windsurf were running fine-tuned Chinese open-weight models underneath. Cursor never disclosed what Composer 1 was built on. They shipped Composer 1.5 in February and moved on. The pattern: take a Chinese open-weight model, run RL on coding tasks, ship it as a proprietary breakthrough, publish a cost-performance chart comparing yourself against Opus 4.6 and GPT-5.4 without disclosing that your base model was free, then raise another round. That chart from the Composer 2 announcement deserves its own paragraph. Cursor plotted Composer 2 against frontier models on a price-vs-quality axis to argue they’d hit a superior tradeoff. What the chart doesn’t show is that Anthropic and OpenAI trained their models from scratch. Cursor took an open-weight model that Moonshot spent hundreds of millions developing, ran RL on top, and presented the output as evidence of in-house research. That’s margin arbitrage on someone else’s R&D dressed up as a benchmark slide. The license makes this more than an attribution oversight. Kimi K2.5 ships under a Modified MIT License with one clause designed for exactly this scenario: if your product exceeds $20 million in monthly revenue, you must prominently display “Kimi K2.5” on the user interface. Cursor’s ARR crossed $2 billion in February. That’s roughly $167 million per month, 8x the threshold. The clause covers derivative works explicitly. Cursor is valued at $29.3 billion and raising at $50 billion. Moonshot’s last reported valuation was $4.3 billion. The company worth 12x more took the smaller company’s model and shipped it as proprietary technology to justify a valuation built on the frontier lab narrative. Three Composer releases in five months. Composer 1 caught speaking Chinese. Composer 2 caught with a Kimi model ID in the API. A P0 incident this year. And a benchmark chart that compares an RL fine-tune against models requiring billions in training compute without disclosing the base was free. The question for investors in the $50 billion round: what exactly are you buying? A VS Code fork with strong distribution, or a frontier research lab? The model ID in the API answers that. If Moonshot doesn’t enforce this license against a company generating $2 billion annually from a derivative of their model, the attribution clause becomes decoration for every future open-weight release. Every AI lab watching this is running the same math: why open-source your model if companies with better distribution can strip attribution, call it proprietary, and raise at 12x your valuation? kimi-k2p5-rl-0317-s515-fast is the most expensive model ID leak in the history of AI licensing.
Harveen Singh Chadha@HarveenChadha

things are about to get interesting from here on

English
249
552
4.4K
1.4M
Timen
Timen@TimenBaart·
@TimurNegru 50km to Volterra, meaning you’re in Siena? Or South? Very appealing listing
English
0
0
3
1.5K
Tim
Tim@TimurNegru·
69 acres of private Tuscany for €690k ($797k). The land includes an olive grove, a fruit orchard, a cork oak grove and 20 hectares of woodland. A natural spring produces 3,000 litres of water a day, solar panels cover the electricity and yes, it does have wifi. It's also been renovated, 370m² (3,983 sq ft) across 3 floors, 3 beds, 3 baths, with a pool and a sauna. 50 km to Volterra. Off-grid, self-sufficient, sauna, pool..what's missing here?
Tim tweet mediaTim tweet mediaTim tweet mediaTim tweet media
English
779
488
11.6K
1.8M
Timen
Timen@TimenBaart·
@BieriePSV “Ik ben de broer van Geert den Ouden”
Nederlands
0
0
0
454
Byron
Byron@BieriePSV·
Hebben jullie ooit wel eens de broer van een Eredivisie speler in je DM gehad omdat je kritiek hebt op zijn broertje? 😂
Nederlands
27
0
67
52.3K
Timen
Timen@TimenBaart·
👇
Balaji@balajis

I'm going to make some obvious points. (1) Blowing up all the oil infrastructure in the Middle East is an insane idea, and may well result in a global economic crash and humanitarian crisis unrivaled in the lives of those now living. We're talking about the price of everything everywhere rising, from food to gas, at a moment when inflation was already high. All of that will be laid at the feet of the authors of this war. (2) The antebellum status quo of Feb 27, 2026 was just not that bad, but we're unlikely to return to it. Expect indefinite, long-term, ongoing disruptions to everything out of the Middle East. (3) Also assume tech financing crashes for the indefinite future. The genius plan to get the Gulf states caught in the crossfire has incinerated much of the funding for LPs, for datacenters, and for IPOs. Anyone in tech who supported this war may soon learn the meaning of "force majeure" as funding gets yanked. (4) Many capital allocators will instead be allocating much further down Maslow's hierarchy of needs, towards useful basic things like food and energy. (5) It's fortunate that all those progressives yelled about the "climate crisis." Yes, their reasoning about timelines was wrong, and much of the money was wasted in graft, but the result was right: we all need energy independence from the Middle East, pronto. It's also fortunate that Elon and China autistically took climate seriously. Now they're going to need to ship a billion solar panels, electric vehicles, batteries, nuclear power plants, and the like to get everyone off oil, immediately. (6) It's not just an oil and gas problem, of course. It's also a fertilizer problem, and a chemical precursor problem. Maybe some new sources will come online at the new prices, but it takes time to dial stuff up, particularly at this scale, so shortages are almost a certainty. That said, China has actually scaled up coal-to-chemicals[a,c] (C2C), and there's also something more sci-fi called Power-to-X[b] which turns arbitrary power + water + air into hydrocarbons. But all of that will need to get accelerated. I have a background in chemical engineering so may start funding things in this area. (7) Ultimately, this war is going to result in tremendous blame for anyone associated with it. It's a no-win scenario to blow up this much infrastructure for so many people. Simply not worth it for whatever objective they thought they were going to attain. But unless you're actually in a position to stop the madness, the pragmatic thing to do is: scramble to mitigate the fallout to yourself, your business, and your people. [a]: reuters.com/business/energ… [b]: alfalaval.com/industries/ene… [c]: reuters.com/sustainability…

ART
0
0
1
62
Timen
Timen@TimenBaart·
@iconawrites Unfortunately we, the Dutch, curse with diseases
English
0
0
1
72
Icona
Icona@iconawrites·
I am Italian. I have been living in the UK for many years, but I still swear only in Italian. The British swear like innocent teens who’ve just discovered sex, whereas even the mildest Italian insult will make the receiving person feel humiliated for existing and having heard it.
Burak 🏺🏛@bvrakvs

Japanese swear words are so childish "pig", "shit", "idiot", "die"... compared to the ruthless Mediterranean style that attacks at sexuality, honor, and the very existence of your entire family, nation, and God. Rarely does one hit you like a piece of genius literature.

English
209
395
6.6K
568.3K
Timen
Timen@TimenBaart·
@andreasklinger @itsolelehmann There will still be room for large scale low value apps, especially since enterprise requires SOCIItype2, pen tests and ISO. Buying journey same as DTC. Just the buying journey for mid prices tools will go tits up.
English
0
0
0
21
Ole Lehmann
Ole Lehmann@itsolelehmann·
very bearish on ai outreach companies every channel will be spammed to death in the next months they might work right now but the game will completely change as everyones automates their outreach
English
41
4
97
9.2K
Timen
Timen@TimenBaart·
@andreasklinger @itsolelehmann That’s only viable for large enterprise pricing segments - which most are not. Even mid-market sales, say up to 50-100k arr are going to struggle. Very bullish on great customer success though
English
1
0
0
63
Andreas Klinger 🦾
Andreas Klinger 🦾@andreasklinger·
100% i assume that the next wave will be fat sales (unsure how the industry calls it i call it like that) - basically "only go for the most likely to convert, best fit, best paying customers" - with golf, sport, dinners, whatever it takes before i focused on robotics i invested in this area eg kernel to figure out who those companies would be ( kernel.ai - their gtm hook is crm cleanup, the real value is ranking )
English
4
0
14
1.9K
Timen
Timen@TimenBaart·
@donwinslow We’re seeing a lot of news that we SHOULD NOT be seeing
English
0
0
0
516
Don Winslow
Don Winslow@donwinslow·
YOU are not seeing A LOT of news you should be seeing.
English
363
2.5K
17.3K
400.9K
Timen รีทวีตแล้ว
Harry Stebbings
Harry Stebbings@HarryStebbings·
If you do not believe in European tech at this stage, you just have bad dealflow. At this stage, it’s a you problem.
English
39
19
281
23.6K
Timen รีทวีตแล้ว
Timen
Timen@TimenBaart·
Claude Cowork is as if ChatGPT had an older, smarter brother who did actually go to college.
English
0
0
0
17
Timen รีทวีตแล้ว
Alexander Long
Alexander Long@AlexanderLong·
insane sequence of statements buried in an Alibaba tech report
Alexander Long tweet media
English
231
934
6.9K
2.9M
unusual_whales
unusual_whales@unusual_whales·
BREAKING: Jim Cramer says the oil market is signaling the Iran war won't spiral, and that's bullish for stocks, per CNBC
English
1.7K
568
8K
4.3M
Timen
Timen@TimenBaart·
@ianbremmer @OutFrontCNN Ian, what are your thoughts about the duration of this thing? Trump thinking max a few weeks?
English
0
0
0
333
ian bremmer
ian bremmer@ianbremmer·
trump says he wants regime change in iran. that’s more hope than strategy. discussed this and more on @outfrontcnn
English
33
27
331
65.3K
Timen
Timen@TimenBaart·
This political system is not fit for the power it contains
English
0
0
0
13