Tomanny

@goddtess @BenShindel It’s weakness

@BenShindel Sometimes being willing to change one’s mind, put aside ego in trade of striving and humility, is more impressive than having stumbled into the more prized response in the first place

Feeling unreasonably guilty about picking the red button in a poll. I've listened and learned. I think I'd pick the blue button now. People change.

@Gosleepriya It’s not hard. Liar

If you can solve this one, Your IQ is extremely appreciated. Difficulty- Harder⚠️

@bluewmist 13

at what age is considered embarrassing to still be living with your parents these days?

@jayroo69 The boy was really determined. How is that even possible

So the limit is 55 times...got it ✍️✍️✍️

@TheProjectUnity It’s a trap

If you see a light when you die are you planning to go towards it or avoid it?

@Dexerto Allow the Monks to smoke their weed in peace. Namaste

22 Buddhist monks have been detained after smuggling 243 lbs (110 kg) of cannabis through an airport in Sri Lanka

@UrantiaBookGems So loving and merciful that he will torture you in hell forever, if he doesn’t like you

Post 69 – The Mystery of Divine Indwelling Jesus tells us, “The kingdom of God is within you”. And that kingdom of God is an actual spiritual fragment of God, living within the mortal mind, there to guide the growth of the soul towards its eternal destiny. Of all the mysteries, none is deeper than this: that the Universal Father dwells within the mortal mind. The way God lives with the mortals of time is the mystery of mysteries. Paraphrasing The Urantia Book Paper 1:2.3 bit.ly/TheUrantiaBook…

@infodexx Bullshit. Seems you ran out of content to post

💰 Richest People to Ever Live on Earth 1. Mansa Musa — Immeasurable 2. Genghis Khan — $120 Trillion 3. Emperor Shenzong — $45 Trillion 4. Akbar I — $29 Trillion 5. Empress Wu Zetian — $25 Trillion 6. Joseph Stalin — $11 Trillion 7. Augustus Caesar — $5.8 Trillion 8. Catherine The Great — $2 Trillion 9. Elon Musk — $844 Billion 10. Andrew Carnegie — $667 Billion Source: Historical Wealth Estimates & Modern Value Conversions

@isaacrrr7 Pedophilia is not

En el Islam, todo es pecado. La música es pecado, pintar es pecado, cantar es pecado, bailar es pecado, tener un perro es pecado y reír a carcajadas es pecado (no bromeo, de verdad que lo es). ¿Qué NO es pecado en el Islam?

@Zamaniii0 It’s a low IQ question. The options are not challenging enough

This is hard but delete one forever 1. Money 2. Peace 3. Love 4. Fame

@Forbes Forbes posting like braindead toddlers! Shame on you @Forbes

Elon Musk is the planet’s richest person by far, worth $839 billion as of Forbes’ annual World’s Billionaires list. He also ranks among the least philanthropic billionaires. Sure, Musk has transferred $8.5 billion of Tesla stock to his charitable foundations (1% of his net worth)—but nearly all of it is still sitting there idle. Only an estimated $500 million, or 0.06% of Musk’s vast fortune, has ever been disbursed to those in need. His lack of giving raises a question: What would our billionaires ranking look like if the world’s most generous people had never donated a dollar to charity? forbes.com/sites/mattduro…

@CuriosityonX What’s heartbreaking about that?

This is one of the most incredible, yet heartbreaking, "photobombs" in the history of spaceflight. A frog accidentally photobombed a NASA rocket launch. Rocket launch was a success but the condition of the frog, however, "remains uncertain."

@martinnsSzn Arsenal

so if Manchester city wins the FA cup and the Premier League who do they play in the community shield?

@SimplyKatie___ Enjoy their brilliance

What’s the best way to handle someone who’s more knowledgeable or intelligent than you?

@Matt_Pinner Democrats

If humans suddenly lost the ability to lie, which industry would collapse first?

@Jennnyyyyyy 3

This one is actually challenging 😬 Difficulty - Hard 🤯

@aas_ker Same question everyday. Just shut up

without drugs... what is the greatest weapon against anxiety and depression????

@RoyCalbeck Yes I vote red to kill anyone stupid enough to vote blue. It’s simple, there’s no risk whatsoever, attached to red. It’s safe all day, for everyone to choose. Suicidal people should be culled anyway

Just to clarify for people who seem to be upset about my "pushing Blue" AND being willing to argue the point instead of accepting Red as The Given Wisdom: Pushing Blue is a vote not to kill anyone. Pushing Red is a vote to kill anyone who doesn't press Red. The entire argument for pressing Red, to date has been "but what if I press Blue and most people press Red? It's only self-preservation". Self-preservation alone is no justification, unless it's a GIVEN that you will die by pressing Blue. There is no "given" in the thought experiment on display, but proponents for pushing Red act like there is. Instead, to conclude that Red is the right and proper decision, one has to believe that there is a realistic chance that at least half of humanity is psychotic enough to kill everyone else just to save themselves. Let us apply that to a real-world situation: if you are drafted into military service, and there is a 100% chance you can escape and never be caught IF you murder the guy who shows up at your door to serve your papers, do you murder them merely because there is a "non-zero chance" you might die in the war you've been drafted into? Pressing Blue is the only moral choice. Pressing Red would have me trying to explain before God that I thought it was justified to vote in favor of mass-murder on the SLIGHTEST of possibilities that I would be murdered if I didn't. If you REALLY think this is what you want to terminate your relationship with me over, as one person has already done, there is the door, and I will thank you for dragging your thin skin after you as you depart.

@mentatbuilds @rand_longevity It’s not by force moron. Those who wish to die will die

@rand_longevity i have mixed feelings about immortality. on one end, conquering death finally would be peak. but who wants to live forever?

if you survive the next 10 years, you will be alive for the next 10000

@timsoret For me it’s a good opportunity to cull the weak

Assuming no possible coordination: If everybody was rational, we would all individually pick red & be safe without needing coordination, trusting that the sum of individual interests would lead to the most optimized outcome. Except that many humans are irrational & dogmatic, and driven by idealistic / empathetic concerns, would pick blue, even if that requires coordination which is not guaranteed & which puts them as risk. Knowing this, even if you’re initially inclined to vote red, the actual moral choice, to avoid the death of those willingly putting their lives at risk, is to vote blue to maximize the chances of saving everybody. In short, if you know that others are not perfectly rational agents, to save them you have to go along with their irrationality, which is counter intuitive.