Vixie

I put "I hate myself for buying this" in the message to seller section when I bought a poster and I had no idea I would get a personal message back. I'm laughing so hard

Liberals will literally look at you with a straight face and say "proletariat means poor"

@logicalityman @realsigridjin Like... for geolocation? I can't bring myself to believe that's much more of a problem than it already is, unless you're arguing the use of carrier grade NAT should be encouraged for security reasons

@VixieTSQ @realsigridjin Trace the route to it.

hmm finally admitted ipv6 is a mess and dropped an internet draft for ipv8 if an ipv4 address looks like 1.1.1.1, an ipv8 address looks like 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1 kinda wild it took 25 years to just suggest making the numbers longer haha

@logicalityman @realsigridjin Uhhhh technically? Uniquely identifiable, but that doesn't mean anyone knows anything about the device other than that it exists

@VixieTSQ @realsigridjin With no NAT every device on the internet is uniquely identifiable. Governments love this idea.

@Insanegame2025 @ozeniken @flano_yuki It is a thing! But ipv6 was still designed with a NATless focus

@VixieTSQ @ozeniken @flano_yuki IPv6 Nat is a thing and a standard there's two versions of it nat 66 and a stateless version that is one to one npt

『Internet Protocol Version 8 (IPv8)』 ietf.org/archive/id/dra… お、なんかIPv8という提案仕様がIETFに提出されてる

@463no 1. To hell with the end-user! 2. My point was that, relatively, the way that addresses are formatted in IPV6 is of very little consequence when compared to other more important aspects of IPV6

@VixieTSQ エンジニア以外の人間には、16進数は数字として認識できないものなのですよ。ネットワークのセッテングは、エンジニアじゃないユーザーが行うこともありますので…

@Insanegame2025 @realsigridjin exactly! The format that the spec specifies could basically just be swapped out for something else and it would still largely be ipv6 lol

@VixieTSQ @realsigridjin Technically you can do it in decimal it's worse because has 16 sections instead of eight this is what IPv6 looks like in decimal 128.255.12.192.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.1

@realsigridjin there're so many actual controversial technical differences you could argue about, but noooooo I don't like how the address looks when it's formatted into text it's the most consumer coded shit ever, it actually makes me way madder than it should

@realsigridjin is everyone's issue with ipv6 just that they don't like how the addresses are displayed? like a little bit of hexadecimal is that much of a deal breaker? it's quite petty

The pilot being your favorite episode in Murder Drones is a red flag

I still truly cannot comprehend why someone would want their integer width to be dependent on their compile target, other than for pointer sized integers

@rhozettes I'm so glad

i have decided

can someone tell HSVSphere to stop making rape jokes, thanks The world would be a considerably better place

@ozeniken @flano_yuki IPV6 isn't getting adopted because getting rid of NAT would put network engineers out of the job so obviously you gotta put NAT back in

@flano_yuki am i crazy or is this a straight up downgrade from ipv6, where before any 2 networks in the world, even intranets, didn't overlap. now they might so there's a reserved section for the NAT you'll have to do.

@pleasedburger @flano_yuki something about json being a normative reference in a IP layer standard just... hurts me inside

@VixieTSQ @flano_yuki this has to be some sort of elaborate evil prank

@kondonator I think odd numbered versions are reserved for experimental versions

7はどこに行った？

@flano_yuki maybe even D:

@flano_yuki just :(

@GooseworxMusic your reckoning is near

I had a dream where all my cherished belongings got covered in feces and sewage that spontaneously exploded from the ceiling. What could it mean? 🤔

@GAMERWOODSZ whole foods

Im working whole foods