Quoit ⚔

Emotional trauma Symptoms (do you have these?) You have emotional flashbacks. You feel worthless and unworthy (Toxic shame) Suffer from social anxiety. You have a vicious inner voice (Inner critic) You can be overly critical of others (outer critic) 1/2

@Babygravy9 They could flick you and send you flying.

I always love it when people say sumo wrestlers are just huge fat guys with no athleticism whatsoever. Imagine being so stupid.

@MuscularEnglish People still trying to push restore? Move on that's so last month.

Why should Restore care about diversity in it's ranks? Do you know the last time a mainstream political party actively stood for native Brits? That's right. Never. Every group has their pressure groups, their movements within parties and in leadership roles. We have nothing similar. To even try was to be called racist yet this is a land of the native English. Why should we not have our own voices acting for us?

@connorabruce @SamanthaTaghoy Not white you pillock.

@SamanthaTaghoy Jesus was white; he probably wasn't North European, pale skinned, white, but Mediterranean white. It's still white. People in the West confuse those that migrated into the area, with those that lived there originally - whites. medium.com/east-med-proje…

“JESUS WASN’T WHITE!” Duh. He also wasn’t Chinese, Indian, or Armenian. But those communities have still made Jesus look like them. Christians around the world have ALWAYS created depictions of Jesus to mirror their own communities. Jesus IS mankind. All of mankind. The entire point is that Jesus lives in and represents all of us. White Jesus isn’t some reflection of an outmoded Eurocentric view. It isn’t a case of “whitewashing”. Since the 2nd century, societies have been moulding Jesus’ image to reflect their own. The ancient Romans made him beardless and dressed him in the clothing of a Roman rustic, to represent his eternal youth. Egyptians in the 6th century depicted Jesus with a long beard and distinctively Semitic facial features — the strong nose, the dark hair, the olive skin. Early Ethiopian carvings show a dark-skinned Jesus with Afro-textured hair and dressed often in a tribal-printed loincloth. Armenians in the 14th century favoured a traditional “father figure” — a stockily built man with bushy eyebrows, eye bags, and a considerably aged face. We live in the West. In a society grounded in European culture and heritage. Of course, Jesus was depicted in the image of European people. That doesn’t make it “racist” or “ahistorical”. It is a reflection of the theology behind His existence. He is all of us. He looks like all of us. Until recently, his “historically accurate” appearance has been immaterial around the world. Only now are we constraining centuries old religious practices to the modern social construct of “racism”. Jesus is God made Flesh. Black, white, and brown. He is all of us.

@GrantGHurst Jesus was Indian , so the that would be the most accurate one.

Christian artists always depict Jesus in the image of their communities. This isn't a uniquely European or American thing. I present to you Indian and Japanese Jesus.

@2147mill Being dumb and simplistic is not controversial.

Controversial opinion: The UK should have no NHS. We should take responsibly for our own health, our own emergency savings and not be so reliant on the state.

@antmiddleton Who would in a fight between you and Sadiq Khan? I got you in a close fight.

HAPPY EASTER! A message to all in the UK. Enjoy our traditions and culture on such a British day! 🫡🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

@Gavin_McInnes Troll!!!

Japan needs Catholicism. They would thrive.

@JackPosobiec How's Bannon and those Esptein files?

The image on the Shroud of Turin is nearly identical to Byzantine icons of Christ from hundreds of years ago

@replayfaktor especially so called christians.

The world truly has no clue what Christianity is

@bennyjohnson Don't be silly.

Muhammad is dead. Krishna is dead. Buddah is dead. Confucius is dead. Jesus Christ is alive. That is the truth that has remade the world. Glory to God.

@ubiquitousnewt Do you agree or disagree with what they are saying?

This is called "The Great British Debate". Which is quite fitting because this is the future trajectory of the UK. Foreign nationals and descendents of immigrants aka non British ancestral populations, telling everyone what it means to be British. Precisely none of these people have descended from ancestral populations within Britain or north western Europe. On a DNA basis, none of them are British or English. Legally, two of them are British citizens. Amandeep Singh Bhogal was not born in the UK and obviously comes from Punjab, India. He came to the UK when he was 8 y/o. He is legally a British citizen. Stella Tsantekidou is obviously Greek. She was born in Thessaloniki and has lived in thr UK for 13.5 years. She is not legally a British citizen, therefore she is a foreign national. Why she took offence to this fact in the debate, I have no clue. Nana Akua is a daughter of Ghanian immigrants but she was born in Newcastle. She is legally a British citizen. It is correct Miss Tsantekidou should not get any sickness or out of work benefits if she is not a British citizen. She says "I am not a British citizen because applying for the British citizenship costs £2,000. I did not have £2,000 lying around". Which is terrible. If one can't save £2k over the course of 13.5 years, especially if she is increasingly in more high profile, better paid positions, it makes me question her economic value to Britain. But yeah. The country is doomed if no one can turn off the welfare tap asap. It attracts low human captial from 3rd world countries as well as perpetuating social dysfunction of the native underclass.

@ClearReason Jews chose the criminal over Jesus. They hated Jesus and believe he is drowning in excrement for eternity. If you love Jesus then...

You cannot claim Jesus and hate the people He came from.

@ClearReason People can do what they want.

@wil_da_beast630 People clearly do as they often post something similar to the second that the first.

Who cares?

@Karl_Downey @Nanaakua1 This is how it's always been. Some idiots starting to use "English" detached from ethnicity and now others responded to that by saying British only means white. Dumb fkucks on both sides.

I mean this with no hate. I believe anyone of any race can adopt a British identity. The empire exported the British identity. I don't believe a black person can ever be English. English and British are different. English people are white Europeans of Anglo-Saxon or Celtic origin. If two white English people had a baby in Ghana, that child wouldn't be Ghanaian.

I find it interesting reading some of the comments that some people think you can only be white and British 🙄

@randyjo93598077 Most Indians did not become Muslims. Least of all those of the north, Punjab. Sikh Punjabis would have none of it.