No Activity

17.1K posts

No Activity banner
No Activity

No Activity

@activity_no

The name is an inside joke. if you get it, you probably know me. I practice mutual blocking.

United States (IN, KY, OH) เข้าร่วม Eylül 2019
197 กำลังติดตาม520 ผู้ติดตาม
No Activity
No Activity@activity_no·
@jesterofroanoke @LibertyCappy We never got the chance to see Segal in his prime, when he was still living in Japan. By all accounts he was pretty good then. We saw him after he washed up and started acting.
English
0
0
0
2
Blue Jester
Blue Jester@jesterofroanoke·
@LibertyCappy Chuck Norris was the real deal. Not just the memes. He would beat them all. Segal in particular would not have even been more than a warm up.
English
1
0
2
64
No Activity
No Activity@activity_no·
@CamHMcConnell @LibertyCappy I hate to break it to you, but Lee and Segal had martial arts training, Van Damme was a professional kickboxer, and Johnson was a pro "wrestler". While I agree that they aren't all equally experienced, only two were just actors.
English
0
0
0
5
C. Hunter McConnell 🇺🇲 (This Is/Ridiculous)
I am assuming this is a free for all? If so, there are only 3 actual fighters here so we can elimiate the rest. It's either Ali, Tyson or Chuck. While I am attempted to go with Norris, unfortunately he was a middle weight and assuming he just dealt with two or three guys to get it down to him, Mike and Ali, he's gonna be exausted and these other guys are heavyweights. Chuck is a badass and while I truly think he could take either one of them individually, he cant beat both. As for the rest, Ali vs Tyson in their primes is a wash. People will debate that one till the end of time.
English
1
0
2
208
No Activity
No Activity@activity_no·
@LibertyCappy 1. Lee 2. Tyson 3. Ali 4. Norris 5. Van Damme 6. Segal 7. Johnson 8. Schwarzenegger/Stallone tie.
Deutsch
0
0
0
6
The Redheaded libertarian
The Redheaded libertarian@TRHLofficial·
While you were sleeping, Senators Thune (R), Schmitt (R), Moreno (presiding) (R), Schatz (D), and Kim (D) passed the amended DHS funding bill (TSA, FEMA, etc.) by voice vote while setting new FY2026 appropriations to $0 for key enforcement pieces: mainly ICE's Enforcement and Removal Operations and CBP's "Border Security Operations" under U.S. Customs and Border Protection. They removed key parts of the border patrol funding, focusing on stripping “between ports of entry”, which is the heart of CBP enforcement. This includes overtime, between ports of entry, patrols, interdictions, field operations, related surveillance & response activities, on top of just shredding ICE. The amendment explicitly makes the entire contents printed under the heading “U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement” in the explanatory statement table have no force or effect. (The Big Beautiful Bill will cover some of this through 2029.) You might be thinking “but Josie, five senators is not a quorum, that sounds unconstitutional!” Correct. The Senate acts under the presumption of quorum unless somebody specifically “raises a point of no quorum”. Obviously, they can count and 5 is nowhere near 51. They knew they were acting in bad faith when they weakened enforcement funding and refused to provide the new top-up for the guys arresting the foreign pedophiles. Five senators sacrificed our country’s security to the alter of Democrat Wokeness, in hopes that none of them may have to miss their spring holiday. We all Schoolhouse Rock. The amended Senate bill goes back to the House, to either be passed (and sent to the President) or amended again (and sent back to the Senate). What a shitshow. Their vacation isn’t set the start until Monday. Have they adjourned early without passing The SAVE America Act? Who the hell knows at this point. I guess we’ll find out today. But now, I’m more worried than ever that The Senate will betray us again in the dead of night with a bipartisan knock off quorum, but this time, with the SAVE America Act.
English
183
1K
3.6K
48.3K
Yoḥanan
Yoḥanan@YahwehGraced·
@kangminlee That and they act like becoming new in Yeshua is somehow nullifying all of the consequences of their past actions and somehow they are better than the ones who did not sin
English
3
0
12
372
Kangmin Lee | 이강민
Kangmin Lee | 이강민@kangminlee·
Look I don't believe in denigrating and being purposefully cruel to women because I believe in chivalry. But Scripture itself calls a promiscuous woman a whore, and it is an accurate description of one. It also even identifies previous prostitutes as prostitutes (Rahab in Hebrews 11). We've softened language to satiate female sensibilities, excusing sin and downplaying its harm. Words are symbols that shape how we see the world. They matter. Continue to wrap everything in nice packaging and people will not understand the depth and severity of sin. Today, niceness has become the supreme virtue not only in politics and but in the Church. It neuters young men, effeminizes the Church, and renders it toothless. If women want to continue participating in politics and theology (traditionally men's domain) they must stop hiding behind fragility and offense at mean words. Argue the actual points of contention, or maybe consider stepping out of the arena.
English
64
68
946
16.5K
TheHeretic
TheHeretic@EthosHeretica·
@KatyinIndy We should use AI to reverse engineer the genome of the disease killing the oranges, then use AI and genetic engineering to make them all immune.
English
1
0
1
165
KatyinIndy
KatyinIndy@KatyinIndy·
The orange trees were destroyed by a Communist Chinese…. who brought in a virus to kill all the orange trees….and you can’t plant more orange trees in the same soil. This was after they killed all of the chestnut trees in the USA. Couple months ago, Feds caught a Communist Chinese with the bioengineered substance to destroy all wheat crops in the USA. AND WE KEEP EDUCATING THE DAMN COMMUNIST CHINESE….GRANTING THEM WORK AND STUDENT VISAS!
DK🇺🇸🦅🇺🇸@1Nicdar

🍊 😢 Thirty years ago, 225 million boxes of oranges were picked in Florida groves. This year, the forecast from the U.S. Agriculture Department is 12 million boxes, a drop of 95% in one generation. I’ve seen this with my own eyes. Orange groves have been replaced with vast expanses of tract house communities, built for the constant stream of new Florida transplants.

English
274
4K
16.8K
553.5K
Rooster Cogburn
Rooster Cogburn@Jeff_Miller_CO·
@ReviewsPossum And the one man that stayed true to his values throughout the book. Mind you, I said the book and not the film.
Rooster Cogburn tweet media
English
2
0
185
6.5K
Possum Reviews
Possum Reviews@ReviewsPossum·
Dude who wanted to take the Ring for himself to save his kingdom but decided the mission to destroy it was more important because it would save the world, and died for that cause. King who initially refused to aid another kingdom because they didn't help when they needed it, but ultimately decided fighting evil and saving their civilization was more important than his petty grudge, and died for that cause. Guy who lived a life of cruelty and greed who got corrupted by a quasi-demonic force that turned him into a monster and made him suffer in loneliness for hundreds of years until given the chance to redeem himself and genuinely tried but ultimately failed by giving into temptation and betraying the only person who could bring him salvation. "No moral complexity."
Possum Reviews tweet mediaPossum Reviews tweet mediaPossum Reviews tweet media
Susannah Black Roberts@suzania

presented without comment

English
132
1.1K
12.1K
327.3K
Mr. Edgar Friendly
Mr. Edgar Friendly@JoyJoyFeelings·
...and that minority of men who specifically don't want their wife to be a virgin is (apparently) around 1/3. So, unless we're talking about professional harlots (i.e. prostitutes), and not speaking euphemistically, that is a large number of men who actively prefer harlotry. At least, in the euphemistic sense (which is what I took it to mean).
English
1
0
0
73
No Activity
No Activity@activity_no·
Trevor Sheatz@TrevorSheatz

My wife was formerly promiscuous. I was a virgin. She was then radically born-again. Committed to church, evangelized constantly, Puritan books in her bedroom, prayer journals, grief over past sexual sin, etc. We got to know each other well for over a year, dated for four months, engaged for two and a half, and didn't sin sexually with one another. Our first kiss with each other was at the altar on our wedding day (reaction pic attached!). We've been married for over five years now, and she's been the most wonderful and godly wife, mother to our three children, and homemaker you could imagine. She's more pure than most virgins, as biblical purity has less to with past sins (though they certainly matter) and more to do with one's current posture of the heart and daily decisions to honor the Lord (Matt. 5:8). We're far too quick to forget the story of the woman labeled as a known "sinner" (likely a prostitute) in Luke 7:36-50 who was washing Jesus' feet with her tears while kissing them too. The Pharisees were shocked that Jesus let a public sinner do this. Jesus responded with a parable about debts being forgiven and ended with this powerful conclusion: "Her many sins have been forgiven; that’s why she loved much. But the one who is forgiven little, loves little" (Luke 7:47). Everyone seems to highlight the benefits of virginity, and it certainly is a blessing. But we forget to highlight the benefits of being forgiven much as well. My wife knows the depths of Jesus' forgiveness more than most people, enabling her to more easily live out a life of passionate love for her Savior. A woman or man's past sexual sin matters. But what matters far more when it comes to deciding who to marry is if the person is truly born again, if their repentance is real, if they truly have a heart for Christ, if they truly follow Jesus and obey his commands. "God has chosen what is foolish in the world to shame the wise, and God has chosen what is weak in the world to shame the strong. God has chosen what is insignificant and despised in the world ​— ​what is viewed as nothing ​— ​to bring to nothing what is viewed as something, so that no one may boast in his presence. It is from him that you are in Christ Jesus, who became wisdom from God for us ​— ​our righteousness, sanctification, and redemption, — in order that, as it is written: 'Let the one who boasts, boast in the Lord.'" (1 Cor. 1:27-31) "Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; the old has passed away, and see, the new has come!" (2 Cor. 5:17)

English
0
0
1
8
Waheed Henry
Waheed Henry@RodneyAber51705·
@activity_no @RationalMale Nah she was just a slut. She didn't monetize being a hoe like Nala. Apparently b4 she retired into Christianity she was very sexually promiscuous she was a whore but she wasn't a cyber prostitute like Nala. I get limiting your risk report but you can say prostitute on here
English
1
0
2
17
No Activity
No Activity@activity_no·
@SeamorButsxx @Vicar1973 May God convict you and save your soul, but if you refuse the conviction, may God prove to the world that He is not mocked. Enjoy your block.
English
0
0
0
12
Seamor Buts
Seamor Buts@SeamorButsxx·
@activity_no @Vicar1973 It says nothing about the heretic’s action or refusal. The clause is: “…if it would not be within God’s will to do so…” You can keep lobbing random attacks instead of trying to actually argue the point buddy, it doesn’t look great.
English
1
0
0
14
Pastor Rich Lusk
Pastor Rich Lusk@Vicar1973·
This is either incredibly dishonest or wildly ignorant. Obviously, non-Christians are not going to know all the biblical jargon Christians use. But journalists (or should I say “journalists”?) who report on Christians have at least some obligation to understand what Christians are actually saying. It’s really not hard to grasp what Pastor Potteiger is talking about here. The suggestion that he is advocating violence is insane. He’s actually hoping Talarico would be converted to genuine faith in Christ. He wants to see Talarico saved. Every Christian has been crucified with Christ (Galatians 2:20). Every Christian is called to die to himself, to take up his cross, to deny himself, to put his flesh (fallenness) to death. One of Satan’s tactics is false accusation. Early Christians were accused of cannibalism and atheism. Some things never change. Satanic slander of good men is one of them.
AF Post@AFpost

Brooks Potteiger, a spiritual advisor of Pete Hegseth, said he wants the transgender-loving “pastor” James Talarico to be “crucified” with Christ. Potteiger added that he prays that God “kills” the anti-White Talarico who is running for Texas’ Senate seat. Follow: @AFpost

English
46
35
362
18.3K
No Activity
No Activity@activity_no·
@RodneyAber51705 @RationalMale My point is that the girl on the top right wasn't just a carousel rider. BOTH were involved with the same type of online pornography. Nala was more monetarily successful, but both engaged in the same actions. BTW, I try to choose my language to limit my report risk.
English
1
0
1
25
Waheed Henry
Waheed Henry@RodneyAber51705·
@activity_no @RationalMale No I mean they are both former whores but the one on the top right is a slut who used to ride the carousel and get ran through, formally sexually promiscuous and the other one is an online PROSTITUTE. Stop using their language. Pornography is a form of prostitution.
English
1
0
2
42
No Activity
No Activity@activity_no·
@SeamorButsxx @Vicar1973 It's if the heretic refuses the conviction of God. Again, this isn't difficult to understand, which means that you are severely limited in cognitive ability or you are lying.
English
1
0
0
23
Seamor Buts
Seamor Buts@SeamorButsxx·
@activity_no @Vicar1973 The first part of the quote is establishing a conditional circumstance where God cannot or will not stop the “heretic”.
English
1
0
0
22
Seamor Buts
Seamor Buts@SeamorButsxx·
@activity_no @Vicar1973 What I posted was a DIRECT QUOTE from the pastor: “And if it would not be within God’s will to do so, stop him by any means necessary” Please interpret this quote instead of dodging and citing random scripture.
English
1
0
0
20
No Activity
No Activity@activity_no·
@godlywomanhood @JoyJoyFeelings There are a minority of men who don't want virgins, mostly men who prefer one night stands and get annoyed when virgins pair bond with them.
English
1
0
2
88
harim
harim@5megmaflickr·
@CompositeGuy_ Public school teachers are likely worse.
English
1
0
5
263
The Composite Guy
The Composite Guy@CompositeGuy_·
If you had actually looked at the churches and chapels, then you'd realise that the people who were abusing minors were homosexual men. By the 1980s, the proportion of homosexual men in the priesthood was eight times higher than in the general population. 81% of the Catholic Church victims were post-pubescent males. Take away these homosexual priests, and the Church would have no higher rate of child sexual abuse than any other institution.
The Composite Guy tweet media
Scottish democrat@imprisonedinuk

@MrNChance @JohnSwinney You don’t seem to mind Brits raping Brit kids. Have you ever looked at your churches and chapels and their centuries of raping native kids ?

English
13
73
614
12.2K
No Activity
No Activity@activity_no·
@SeamorButsxx @Vicar1973 Your claim of B) is EXPLICITLY 100% wrong. When Herod chose to try to kill Christ instead of worshipping Him, God did "whatever was necessary" to punish him. Again, you are either lying or lack cognitive ability.
English
1
0
0
31
Seamor Buts
Seamor Buts@SeamorButsxx·
@activity_no @Vicar1973 That statement is: A) If God won’t or can’t convert Talarico THEN B) We should do anything to stop him Do you disagree with this interpretation?
English
2
0
0
21
SmittyD
SmittyD@smitty300·
@TugboatPhil Very much. In fact, you still can't buy hard liquor in Texas on Sundays.
English
2
0
5
285
TugboatPhil
TugboatPhil@TugboatPhil·
Just curious how many of "you people" remember living with Blue Laws on most store goods. If you have to look that up you probably didn't. West Virginia still had them when I left home in 1975 and Virginia didn't get rid of them until the early 80s if I remember right.
English
460
26
824
37.1K
Waheed Henry
Waheed Henry@RodneyAber51705·
@RationalMale There's almost completely no difference. Two simps who married ex whores. One is a simp who married an ex slut and the other is a simp who married an ex only fans whore.
English
1
0
16
292
Lucas U. Curcio
Lucas U. Curcio@MethodMinistry·
There’s nothing wrong with what he said. If you hate that God can redeem fornicators then you hate the Gospel.
Trevor Sheatz@TrevorSheatz

My wife was formerly promiscuous. I was a virgin. She was then radically born-again. Committed to church, evangelized constantly, Puritan books in her bedroom, prayer journals, grief over past sexual sin, etc. We got to know each other well for over a year, dated for four months, engaged for two and a half, and didn't sin sexually with one another. Our first kiss with each other was at the altar on our wedding day (reaction pic attached!). We've been married for over five years now, and she's been the most wonderful and godly wife, mother to our three children, and homemaker you could imagine. She's more pure than most virgins, as biblical purity has less to with past sins (though they certainly matter) and more to do with one's current posture of the heart and daily decisions to honor the Lord (Matt. 5:8). We're far too quick to forget the story of the woman labeled as a known "sinner" (likely a prostitute) in Luke 7:36-50 who was washing Jesus' feet with her tears while kissing them too. The Pharisees were shocked that Jesus let a public sinner do this. Jesus responded with a parable about debts being forgiven and ended with this powerful conclusion: "Her many sins have been forgiven; that’s why she loved much. But the one who is forgiven little, loves little" (Luke 7:47). Everyone seems to highlight the benefits of virginity, and it certainly is a blessing. But we forget to highlight the benefits of being forgiven much as well. My wife knows the depths of Jesus' forgiveness more than most people, enabling her to more easily live out a life of passionate love for her Savior. A woman or man's past sexual sin matters. But what matters far more when it comes to deciding who to marry is if the person is truly born again, if their repentance is real, if they truly have a heart for Christ, if they truly follow Jesus and obey his commands. "God has chosen what is foolish in the world to shame the wise, and God has chosen what is weak in the world to shame the strong. God has chosen what is insignificant and despised in the world ​— ​what is viewed as nothing ​— ​to bring to nothing what is viewed as something, so that no one may boast in his presence. It is from him that you are in Christ Jesus, who became wisdom from God for us ​— ​our righteousness, sanctification, and redemption, — in order that, as it is written: 'Let the one who boasts, boast in the Lord.'" (1 Cor. 1:27-31) "Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; the old has passed away, and see, the new has come!" (2 Cor. 5:17)

English
101
30
429
14.5K