DrDarkMatch
9K posts

DrDarkMatch
@Addkell
Reads the the comments


These verdicts rest on a premise that is fundamentally flawed: that social media is just like any other product. It is not. No one would use an app that endlessly scrolls through blank pages or sends empty notifications, much less get “addicted” to it. The “product” in these “product design” cases is First Amendment protected expression. Speech does not and cannot exist in a vacuum. It is expressed in a particular way, at a particular time, using particular mechanisms to communicate it to others. The curation and presentation of speech is inherently interwoven with its very expression. Once you understand that, you realize that you cannot regulate “product design” without also regulating First Amendment protected expression.








BREAKING: New Mexico jury finds that Facebook, Instagram, and Whatsapp are harmful to children's mental health and orders Meta to pay a $375 million penalty.







How Conservative Women in America act 😂🇺🇸





US jury finds Meta and YouTube liable for woman's childhood social media addiction in landmark trial bbc.in/47nqXq0







🚨| NEW: The NFL released another angle of Speed hitting a spin move on real pro athletes and getting past the entire defense 🤯🔥 Do you think Speed could easily make it to the NFL? 👀👇




Congress will probably make this illegal.







