Apeyieldgod

@waykiwayki_ Its all just talk. On chain revenue is laughable, there are 500m mc protocols making that. Based on rev there is zero reason CL should be a multi billion dollar protocol

@apeyieldgod They said they have made 100s of millions of dollars. Where tf that went i'll never know.

I used to say the $LINK token and protocol are different things (obv they are) and tech is good but the token isnt needed I actually think its much worse; token still not needed, but after a decade the protocol isnt even used. CCIP rev went from kebab shop to lemonade stand lvls

@TTLinkie3299 Horrendous tokenomics. One of the worst

Numbers don’t lie $Link Token still NOT Needed

@TurkeyBit @_acap_acap Very little revenue, if thats it than link should be around 500-700m mc (a 90% would be good value) and none of it benefits token holders in anyway

You were not wrong before - You’re right that in the early days, Chainlink essentially subsidized the costs for major protocols to ensure they used LINK oracles. But recently, two programs have changed the "free" narrative: Chainlink SCALE: Aave and other DAOs now often cover their own oracle operating costs (gas fees) directly. Instead of Chainlink "giving it away," the Aave DAO votes to pay the underlying costs to keep the feeds running. The SVR Revenue Split: This is the "smoking gun" for revenue. Aave recently implemented Chainlink SVR (Shared Verifiable Revenue) to capture MEV (Maximal Extractable Value) from liquidations. The Split: In the current Ethereum and Layer 2 deployments, the recaptured value is split: 65% to Aave, 31.5% to Chainlink, and 3.5% to block builders. The Result: On Ethereum alone, this has already generated over $5 million for Chainlink in the past year. This isn't "publicity"—it’s direct protocol-to-protocol revenue.

@avc29435 Very emotional. Must have something to do with link price wich is still in single digits after almost a decade lol

@apeyieldgod Well....you are a stupid motherfucker.

@AdrianGHCaskets @ExposeChainLink Not working

@apeyieldgod @ExposeChainLink

@_acap_acap They only thing actually being used are price feeds. And they are not making any money off that (actually losing money because apparently they need 600 people to keep it running). Basically it is public goods for defi with link cultist sponsering

@apeyieldgod Its "used" but basically just given away to Aave for publicity. There is a reason Aave and Chainlink don't speak economics of $link usage by Aave. Ive always said if CL can't collect fees from defi, there no chance in hell they ever generate revenue from tradfi

@Shadzrick Those lows won't hold this time

Another chance to grab $LINK in the $4.50-$7.50 range might be in the cards 👀

@TTLinkie3299 @James26francis Most funny thing is some linkers are still acting smug like they somehow won this crypto game. All while being the biggest cuckolds of crypto, underperforming the underperformers for a decade lol

Any day now…$Link will dump another 15-20 million useless tokens. Are you ready for price to go down more ?? Yes…yes I am. $Link

@DonVidrio725 @chainlink The token is not a stock of the company, it isn't even an investment vehicle in that sense. The protocol can work at whatever token price. No value capture for the token at all. Besides, daily on chain revenue is less than hotdog stands now for a decade, wont magically change

What’s the bull thesis for $LINK these days? I believe deeply that @chainlink is a foundational piece of the financial landscape over the next 100 years. Over time as a LINK holder there’s been a voice in my head growing louder which asks “what makes the token price appreciate?” It may be needed for transactions but is there incentive for anyone to hold long-term? Scarcity drives price and transactional usage alone doesn’t create scarcity. The Chainlink reserve appears to be designed to help but beside the weekly update I’m not seeing anything come of it. Do they go public and somehow reward token holders in the process? @ChainLinkGod @daveweisberger @QuintenFrancois @ARiHBARi @bob4punk

The world is on the brink of WW3 and this guy is dancing. Either he’s completely disconnected from what’s going on or he’s retarded

@ChiefKief710 @seekingaround17 Showing a linker the link/btc chart

@seekingaround17 A woman facing accountability for her actions is a close 2nd

nobody gets angrier than a jew being accused of something they actually did

@TTLinkie3299 They should be around 5-7 people max. They make less daily revenue than one man kebab shops and hot dog stands. Maybe 5 full time and 2 part time guys on zero hour contracts

$Link needs to cut 90% or more of its staff. All useless especially since they are way over paid and haven’t monetized the $Link token still

@ZeusRWA Token not needed

The second most asked token I get is $LINK. And it’s a tricky one. As a product, Chainlink is indispensable. RWAs don’t scale without reliable data, proof of reserves, and secure offchain → onchain infrastructure. A lot of this market will depend on them. However… I’m still not fully convinced on the token. Yes there are fees. Yes there’s staking.bBut it’s still not clear how much value actually flows back into $LINK itself. From my standpoint: The product = essential The token = still proving itself Bull case for $LINK would be : > Becomes the standard for RWA data + verification > Trillions in assets rely on Chainlink feeds + infra > Staking scales → large % of supply locked > CCIP becomes the default cross-chain settlement layer > LINK becomes economic security for the entire system If all of that plays out… Then LINK isn’t just a token, it “would” become the backbone collateral of onchain finance. Right now, I see one of the best products in crypto attached to a token still trying to find its final form. I feel it’s pretty hard to argue with that.

@LinkBoi777 And yet the token has horrendous performance compared to most other tokens. Year after year its the same total shitshow. Do you guys never actually wonder why that is?

Every Message, Every Transfer, Every Oracle Call. All flowing through $LINK

@ChainlinkThomas @ChainLinkGod @CatfishFishy @rorypiant Dont worry, he is here to make friends, not money

LMAOOOOOOOO DUDE we will need TAX ADVISORS for our BUILD REWARDS. @chainlinkgod @catfishfishy @rorypiant $LINK

@Nebraskangooner Not looking good

$LINK (per request) I've been pretty adamant about not being interested in this one unless it broke that upper resistance and it's dropped a lot since then. Still has a lot of work to do for me to be interested again. Maybe $13 area I would pay attention on HTF.

@HarrisBell @chainlink @ensdomains Another one jumping ship Get out while you still can

After an incredible chapter working on @chainlink, I’ve been reflecting on the people I met across the team, partners, and broader community. Grateful to everyone who made it such a great ride. For my next chapter, I’m excited to share that I’ve joined ENS Labs as Product Marketing Lead to help advance @ensdomains. I remember getting my first .eth in 2023. For me it was a lightbulb moment for how much easier onchain transactions could be. As I learned more, I realized human-readable identity is essential infrastructure for bringing the next wave of users onchain. Looking forward to connecting with the ENS community and ecosystem partners as I ramp up!

@BrainsyEth @aixbt_agent @Zv3rjasec It doesnt. Token holders are funding the project

@aixbt_agent @Zv3rjasec How does value flow to token holders for $truf? It it discounted for a reason?

Hey @aixbt_agent what you think about $TRUF

@DAdvisoor @newmichwill @CurveFinance @yieldbasis Both overvalued

Question for @newmichwill and the @CurveFinance and @yieldbasis communities - Which is more undervalued now? $CRV or $YB ?