Fishy Catfish

58.5K posts

Fishy Catfish banner
Fishy Catfish

Fishy Catfish

@CatfishFishy

Katılım Mayıs 2019
5.6K Takip Edilen14.5K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Fishy Catfish
Fishy Catfish@CatfishFishy·
CHAINLINK: Delivering Privacy’s End-Game @SergeyNazarov called lack of privacy "the greatest barrier holding back large-scale institutional adoption of onchain finance."
English
23
68
358
32.8K
Fishy Catfish
Fishy Catfish@CatfishFishy·
lmao who cares what features XRPL actually has or doesn't have? $XRP's price action isn't based on what's real; it's based on influencers amplifying lies to uninformed retail. Just say that the XRPL has 100,000 AI agents on its network, but they're all under NDA. EZPZ.
Jungle Inc Crypto News@jungleincxrp

Dear @MonicaLongSF, I hope this letter finds you well. My name is Jungle Inc. I am a content creator focused on the XRP Ledger ecosystem and institutional crypto adoption. I am writing today not to report on a crisis, but to sound an alarm about a generational opportunity that is actively slipping through our fingers. We are standing at the threshold of the most explosive wave of blockchain adoption in history and it will not be driven by human users. It will be driven by AI agents. The number of autonomous AI agents that will require on-chain payment rails in the next decade will dwarf the total number of human beings who will ever interacted with blockchain technology combined. These agents need to transact continuously, instantly and at fractions of a cent, without human oversight, without friction, and without failure. This is the micropayment moment. The XRP Ledger was purpose-built for exactly this. The history is right in front of us. Coil demonstrated that streaming micropayments worked. In less than a year of operation, Coil processed 10 billion payments to creators. Ten billion. The technology was proven. The infrastructure was real. When Coil sunset in 2023, it wasn't because micropayments failed, it was because the market wasn't ready. The market is now ready. The market is arriving faster than anyone anticipated and it is wearing the face of artificial intelligence. Every other major protocol will eventually attempt to claim this vertical. They always do. We have watched XRPL developers pioneer RWA tokenization, decentralized exchanges, and payment channel infrastructure, only to watch other chains scale those use cases while XRPL moved on. That pattern cannot repeat itself here. Micropayments are not one use case among many. They are the foundational primitive of the agentic economy. Whoever owns micropayments owns the settlement layer of AI. XRPL must own micropayments. The ledger's sub-second finality, near-zero transaction costs and proven payment channel architecture make it the only credible candidate to serve this demand at scale. This is not a future we need to build from scratch, it is a birthright we need to claim. @JoelKatz knows more about micropayments and the architecture of streaming value than perhaps anyone alive. Since stepping back from his CTO role, he has spoken publicly about returning to hands-on building, running his own XRPL node, researching use cases beyond Ripple's current focus, and coding again for the love of it. Tapping David Schwartz to lead a Coil 2.0 initiative, a next-generation micropayment and AI agent payment layer built natively on XRPL, would reunite the right mind with the right mission at the right moment in history. I also want to thank you for your thoughtful response to my last open letter on the XRPL Foundation. And to the teams at Ripple, XRPL Commons, XRPL Labs, and the XAO DAO: congratulations. The progress made in moving the XRP Ledger toward the most decentralized foundation model in blockchain is a testament to what principled, coordinated leadership can achieve. The window is open. It will not stay open forever. Let's press our greatest advantages. Sincerely, Jungle Inc.

English
3
1
17
895
Fishy Catfish
Fishy Catfish@CatfishFishy·
@jungleincxrp @MonicaLongSF lmao who cares what features XRPL actually has or doesn't have? XRP's price action isn't based on what's real; it's based on influencers amplifying lies to low information retail. Just say that the XRPL has 100,000 AI agents on its network, but they're all under NDA. EZPZ.
English
3
0
15
480
Jungle Inc Crypto News
Jungle Inc Crypto News@jungleincxrp·
Dear @MonicaLongSF, I hope this letter finds you well. My name is Jungle Inc. I am a content creator focused on the XRP Ledger ecosystem and institutional crypto adoption. I am writing today not to report on a crisis, but to sound an alarm about a generational opportunity that is actively slipping through our fingers. We are standing at the threshold of the most explosive wave of blockchain adoption in history and it will not be driven by human users. It will be driven by AI agents. The number of autonomous AI agents that will require on-chain payment rails in the next decade will dwarf the total number of human beings who will ever interacted with blockchain technology combined. These agents need to transact continuously, instantly and at fractions of a cent, without human oversight, without friction, and without failure. This is the micropayment moment. The XRP Ledger was purpose-built for exactly this. The history is right in front of us. Coil demonstrated that streaming micropayments worked. In less than a year of operation, Coil processed 10 billion payments to creators. Ten billion. The technology was proven. The infrastructure was real. When Coil sunset in 2023, it wasn't because micropayments failed, it was because the market wasn't ready. The market is now ready. The market is arriving faster than anyone anticipated and it is wearing the face of artificial intelligence. Every other major protocol will eventually attempt to claim this vertical. They always do. We have watched XRPL developers pioneer RWA tokenization, decentralized exchanges, and payment channel infrastructure, only to watch other chains scale those use cases while XRPL moved on. That pattern cannot repeat itself here. Micropayments are not one use case among many. They are the foundational primitive of the agentic economy. Whoever owns micropayments owns the settlement layer of AI. XRPL must own micropayments. The ledger's sub-second finality, near-zero transaction costs and proven payment channel architecture make it the only credible candidate to serve this demand at scale. This is not a future we need to build from scratch, it is a birthright we need to claim. @JoelKatz knows more about micropayments and the architecture of streaming value than perhaps anyone alive. Since stepping back from his CTO role, he has spoken publicly about returning to hands-on building, running his own XRPL node, researching use cases beyond Ripple's current focus, and coding again for the love of it. Tapping David Schwartz to lead a Coil 2.0 initiative, a next-generation micropayment and AI agent payment layer built natively on XRPL, would reunite the right mind with the right mission at the right moment in history. I also want to thank you for your thoughtful response to my last open letter on the XRPL Foundation. And to the teams at Ripple, XRPL Commons, XRPL Labs, and the XAO DAO: congratulations. The progress made in moving the XRP Ledger toward the most decentralized foundation model in blockchain is a testament to what principled, coordinated leadership can achieve. The window is open. It will not stay open forever. Let's press our greatest advantages. Sincerely, Jungle Inc.
English
20
58
274
14.6K
Fishy Catfish
Fishy Catfish@CatfishFishy·
@Darrenscot38022 @TimWarrenTrades x.com/ChainLinkGod/s… Read this post: "Onchain revenue from the usage of Chainlink services, as well as offchain revenue from Scale and enterprise deals, directly fuel $LINK token buybacks which grow the Chainlink Reserve"
Zach Rynes | CLG@ChainLinkGod

Most people's mental model of Chainlink $LINK is completely wrong Here's why👇 People often think of oracles as simple middleware bolted to the side of a blockchain, simply injecting price data In their mind, Chainlink is "just an oracle" so who cares right? A more complete mental model is that Chainlink is the global orchestration layer that sits above and across all blockchains and external systems A unified platform that enables organizations to create advanced business workflows spanning any number of blockchains, legacy systems, and oracle services, all powered by a decentralized runtime environment This matters now more than ever because we are entering a Cambrian explosion of blockchains of all kinds (public & private, L1 & L2, DeFi & TradFi, EVM & non-EVM) The cost and friction of launching a new blockchain network has never been lower And what we have seen historically is that in order for a blockchain to be successful, it needs critical oracle services: - Data oracles: DeFi needs market data to secure lending and derivatives, while TradFi needs NAV data for tokenized funds and corporate actions data for tokenized equities. Proof of Reserve provides public visibility into the reserves backing tokenized assets - Cross-chain oracles: Digital assets in both DeFi and TradFi need to be securely transferable across any public or private blockchain to access a greater pool of buyers, minimizing liquidity fragmentation and enabling advanced settlement workflows - Compliance oracles: Regulated tokenized assets need to comply with various regulations and internal business logic rules around identity verification and risk management to become adopted by institutions - Privacy oracles: Sensitive information needs to be made accessible to blockchain apps without revealing the underlying data, while private chains need to connect to public chains while only selectively revealing what is needed to complete transactions - Legacy-system oracles: Institutions want to access public and private blockchains using their existing infrastructure and messaging standards (Swift, FIX, DTCC) through a single integration gateway rather than manually integrating with thousands of chains individually - Orchestration oracles: Institutions need to be able to coordinate complex business workflows that span multiple blockchains, legacy systems, and oracle services through a simple API gateway Chainlink is the only unified platform that provides all of these solutions in a single offering, minimizing trust-assumptions and eliminating the complexity of using a patchwork of service providers This is how institutions adopt blockchains, not by betting on specific chains, but integrating with a unified platform that provides them access to any public or private chain While blockchains fiercely compete amongst each other to become the transactional database layer, Chainlink wins regardless of which chains are used For Chainlink, every new blockchain introduced to market is all the more justification for why organizations need a global orchestration layer to manage the complexity Financial market infrastructures like Swift, DTCC, and Euroclear understand this, which is why they have adopted Chainlink alongside J.P. Morgan, Mastercard, Central Bank of Brazil, UBS, SBI, Fidelity International, ANZ, and many others In addition to powering the DeFi economy (70%+ marketshare globally, 80%+ on Ethereum, and 90%+ on L2s), Chainlink directly monetizes the integration and deployment of its services on blockchains via the Scale program and enterprise deals Onchain revenue from the usage of Chainlink services, as well as offchain revenue from Scale and enterprise deals, directly fuel $LINK token buybacks which grow the Chainlink Reserve Chainlink services have already enabled $28+ trillion in transaction value across 77+ blockchain networks via 2,000+ oracle networks used by 500+ applications, with more public and private blockchains regularly integrated all the time Today, developers build on blockchains and plug into Chainlink In the future, developers will build on Chainlink and plug into blockchains The result is straight forward: More blockchains ↓ More Chainlink adoption ↓ More onchain & offchain revenue ↓ More $LINK token buybacks ↓ Chainlink's dominance compounds

English
0
0
1
104
Darren scott
Darren scott@Darrenscot38022·
@TimWarrenTrades Can you explain to me how the chain link token is valued ? My understanding is that the chain link ecosystem system does not need or use the token to operate which leads me to the question, what is the value of the token and why invest in something that is not useful/needed?
English
3
0
1
71
Tim Warren
Tim Warren@TimWarrenTrades·
🚨 BIG MOVE: Chainlink just scooped up 121.3k $LINK to beef up the Chainlink Reserve! -Total holdings now sitting pretty at 2.6m $LINK $GLNK and $CLNK are Chainlink Spot ETFs that are available to buy today through a 401k or brokerage account.
Tim Warren tweet mediaTim Warren tweet media
English
14
34
446
9.4K
Fishy Catfish
Fishy Catfish@CatfishFishy·
@digitalassetbuy XRP is literally none of that. It's just a gas token for a single chain, and it's a chain that has barely any use.
English
1
0
50
588
Digital Asset Investor
Digital Asset Investor@digitalassetbuy·
We weren't able to invest in the HTTP, TCP/IP , SMTP protocols from the internet of information. This time is different. We get to invest in the protocols of the internet of value. XRP is my choice. The value is in the protocol. This is what the normies don't understand yet....but they will. Hope they figure it out soon before it's too late. The network effects are coming...
English
36
89
633
16.8K
Fishy Catfish
Fishy Catfish@CatfishFishy·
@Pledditor @tether @circle x.com/EleanorTerrett… Circle price action has nothing to do with Tether getting an audit lol. It's because of the Clarity Act stablecoin yield details.
Eleanor Terrett@EleanorTerrett

🚨NEW: New details are emerging about the latest legislative text outlining a compromise on stablecoin yield and rewards, along with early reactions from crypto industry leaders who reviewed it today. According to an internal stakeholder email shared with me, the proposal would prohibit platforms from offering yield “directly or indirectly” for holding a stablecoin or in a manner that resembles a bank deposit. The restriction would apply broadly to digital asset service providers (exchanges, brokers, etc.) and their affiliates to limit workarounds, and would bar anything “economically or functionally equivalent” to interest. The proposal would also permit activity-based rewards tied to user activity, including loyalty, promotional, or subscription programs, provided they are not deemed economically or functionally equivalent to interest. It would also direct the @SECGov, @CFTC, and @USTreasury to jointly define permissible rewards and establish anti-evasion rules within one year. One industry leader who reviewed the text today tells me the draft is a “departure” from what had been previously discussed with the White House, warning the “economic equivalence” standard is vague and could be interpreted more restrictively by future regulators. They also point to limits on tying rewards to balances or transaction amounts, which could make incentives difficult to structure. “Overall, this is a more narrow and restrictive approach toward crypto,” they said. Another says the text is “largely in line with expectations” and reflects a balanced outcome, preserving transaction-based incentives while making clear stablecoins cannot function like interest-bearing deposit accounts. “This is the best possible result,” they said, noting that the text is broader than the initial Tillis-Alsobrooks proposal, which would have been more restrictive on crypto. Up next: Bank reps are set to review the text tomorrow.

English
3
0
11
2.3K
Fishy Catfish retweetledi
Zach Rynes | CLG
Zach Rynes | CLG@ChainLinkGod·
$LINK ETFs hold a higher percentage of LINK’s circulating supply (~1.4%) than $XRP ETFs hold of XRP’s circulating supply (~1.2%) When you adjust for market cap (mid cap vs large cap), LINK’s ~$97M in net inflows would be equivalent to ~$1.35B in inflows for an asset XRP’s size (13.8x market cap difference) LINK ETFs have never had a single day of outflows while XRP ETFs have had at least over a dozen days with net outflows The more you know
Zach Rynes | CLG tweet mediaZach Rynes | CLG tweet mediaZach Rynes | CLG tweet media
English
29
31
305
0
Fishy Catfish
Fishy Catfish@CatfishFishy·
I am launching a thread that's going to keep track of every single institution and app that chooses Chainlink over LZ. I am going to be tagging my favorite LZ frens who told me that I don't know what I am talking about, so that they don't miss these announcements. @MuteMastoor @rookie_of_Ph Here's the first to kick it off:
Lendr.fi (We're Hiring!)@lendrfi

We’re excited to announce that we’ve upgraded from LayerZero to the @chainlink interoperability protocol, expanding our reach across the multi-chain ecosystem. Via Chainlink CCIP, our users will be able to transfer RWAL across @avax, @BNBCHAIN, and @ethereum.

English
18
43
434
72K
Fishy Catfish retweetledi
ZachXBT
ZachXBT@zachxbt·
Update: It appears X just suspended all 16 accounts now.
English
198
57
2.1K
137K
Fishy Catfish retweetledi
Zach Rynes | CLG
Zach Rynes | CLG@ChainLinkGod·
Chainlink uses protocol revenue to fund $LINK buybacks Ripple sells $XRP to fund Ripple stock buybacks One flows value back to token holders The other extracts value from token holders to drive value to shareholders Notice the difference?
Zach Rynes | CLG tweet mediaZach Rynes | CLG tweet media
English
83
37
354
0
Fishy Catfish
Fishy Catfish@CatfishFishy·
RT @chainlink: 📂 CHAINLINK PLATFORM ┃ ┣ 📂 Orchestration ┃ ┗ 📂 Chainlink Runtime Environment (CRE) ┣ 📂 Data ┃ ┣ 📂 Data Streams ┃ ┣ 📂 Data Fe…
English
0
36
0
110
Fishy Catfish retweetledi
BSCN
BSCN@BSCNews·
📊DATA: NYSE-LISTED $LINK ETFS ACCUMULATE NEARLY 1.5% OF CIRCULATING SUPPLY WITH ZERO DAYS OF NET OUTFLOWS @Grayscale's $GLNK and @Bitwise's $CLNK have collectively absorbed nearly 1.5% of @Chainlink's entire circulating supply since launching last December, with ~$100M in total
English
5
28
268
0
Fishy Catfish retweetledi
Zach Rynes | CLG
Zach Rynes | CLG@ChainLinkGod·
🚨 NYSE-listed $LINK ETFs have accumulated nearly 1.5% of the $LINK circulating supply ~$100M in total net inflows since launch last December, with not a single day of net outflows @Grayscale GLNK holds 8,274,353 $LINK @Bitwise CLNK holds 1,748,050 $LINK
Zach Rynes | CLG tweet media
English
23
84
664
0
Fishy Catfish
Fishy Catfish@CatfishFishy·
@stfubuddy Products have names. Those names have letters in them. Those letters can be listed out as an acronym. What are you even saying? Stop making products? Stop giving names to those products, thus they won't have letters in them and can't create acronmys from them?
English
0
0
2
41
asjdiadsf
asjdiadsf@stfubuddy·
@CatfishFishy CALM , CCIP ,DECO, VRF, ACE, CTA, SVt's, CRE , CCRRO. LMAOP, CCFG , CLLG, ASJD, CCGD, CCT's, YDYY, CCKA, chainlink is the best at coming up with acronym jargon for years now. Lets name the future new ones together. CCGA, SLNN, HASG, NCJHD, CCYT CCAD , DVM's
English
2
0
0
45
CyrilXBT
CyrilXBT@cyrilXBT·
If you had to pick an AI crypto coin that will win the race what will you go for? $RENDER $TAO $FET
English
108
5
202
21.3K
Fishy Catfish
Fishy Catfish@CatfishFishy·
swift.com/news-events/ne… Wtf are you chirping about? What current initiatives are underway to improve the efficiency of corporate actions? At Swift, we're actively addressing the inefficiencies. We have a corporate actions programme that we have launched last year. This initiative focuses on critical areas such as integrating corporate actions with post-trade settlement to enhance risk management, supporting regulatory requirements like the ECB’s transition to ISO 20022, and exploring how emerging technologies can resolve long-standing challenges. One project we can mention here is Project CALM, which stands for Corporate Actions Life Cycle Management. We've been working in collaboration with Chainlink and other stakeholders in the industry, leveraging AI and blockchain in order to streamline corporate action processes, addressing issues like manual data handling and inefficiencies that's associated with it. In the first phase of phase of this POC, we have demonstrated how large language models and a decentralised network can revolutionise the corporate actions. We used AI to extract and standardise unstructured data directly from the issuer announcement and we made this data accessible on chain. So, it reduced the manual intervention. It ensures there's real time data availability and it also represents an advancement for the industry because it's more inclusive with digital and traditional assets. Another key focus area of CALM is solving the data fragmentation. By creating an interoperable, a unified record that can flow seamlessly in between traditional and blockchain networks, we're improving both data accuracy and timelines. As we move into the next phase of the project, the plan is to expand to other stakeholders and we also would like to address more complex corporate actions events. Our goal is to tackle inefficiencies across the entire value chain. We want to drive systemic transformation and we want to set a new standard for how corporate actions are managed.
English
1
1
2
62
asjdiadsf
asjdiadsf@stfubuddy·
@CatfishFishy @cyrilXBT blah blah blah , more fantasy pipedreams. how many more brilliant minds have been leaving chain link labs lately after realizing its impossible? haha. all the smart ones are abandoning ship. so good to see.
English
2
0
1
67
2xnmore
2xnmore@2xnmore·
Everyone is talking about AI coin prices. Nobody is talking about who is actually making money. Q1 2026 revenue — the real scoreboard: $TAO — $43.2M $VIRTUAL — $2.88M $LINK — $14.6M $RENDER — $1.2M $IO — $0.9M $AKT — $0.74M $FET — $0.6M $ICP — $0.3M $NEAR — $0.15M $QUBIC — $0.23M $TAO didn’t just win Q1. It made more than every other AI coin on this list COMBINED. Price follows revenue. Always has.
English
21
17
206
11.7K
Fishy Catfish
Fishy Catfish@CatfishFishy·
@2xnmore Stop posting this slop. 1. TAO's "revenue" is all from token emissions, which isn't revenue. They're simply dilution of non-stakers. 2. These are all made up numbers. Notice no data source even being cited.
English
0
0
40
836
Andy
Andy@andyyy·
Ethereum's revenue has been absolutely crushed since 2020 due to a lack of onchain activity. OR Ethereum's fees have gone down as the scaling efforts of the EF have worked tremendously. Which is the correct view???
Andy tweet media
English
42
5
94
11.6K
Fishy Catfish
Fishy Catfish@CatfishFishy·
@arcxXBT @Jeff_Zell @Laura__crypto It's literally the most adopted protocol in crypto with the biggest TAM. You're retweeting rube slop that is labeling token inflation as revenue. You can't decipher reality.
English
0
0
9
102
LλURA-VΞRSΞ
LλURA-VΞRSΞ@Laura__crypto·
Forget price. Look at who’s actually making money. Top AI coins by Q1 2026 revenue. $TAO — $43.2M $VIRTUAL — $2.87M $LINK — $2.1M $RENDER — $1.2M $IO — $0.9M $AKT — $0.74M $FET — $0.6M $PHA — $0.4M $ICP — $0.3M $NEAR — $0.15M $TAO isn’t just leading. It’s lapping the entire
LλURA-VΞRSΞ tweet media
English
88
82
426
26.5K
Fishy Catfish retweetledi
CRP CRE AI PRIVACY
CRP CRE AI PRIVACY@ChainlinkP·
Every spot crypto ETF in US history has bled capital within weeks of launch. $BTC made it 7 trading days. $ETH lasted 1. $LINK ETFs just crossed 75+ trading days with zero outflows. Not reduced outflows. Zero. The market is telling you something if you're paying attention.
CRP CRE AI PRIVACY tweet media
English
28
94
535
38.7K