
the surveillance video shows a man that has not been proven to be TR
easily explainable, the gun has not been tied to the bullet
thats hearsay and doesnt reflect statements the parents have made to reporters at trial claiming their sons innocence
these have not been proven to be real or typed by him physically, in a court of law
what investigation to gain evidence on hiring accomplices or terror organizations ties has been done? was Erikas phone and computer searched for messages?
Joe Kent who was with the NCTC at the time does not call him a lone actor, thats a false statement
English









