eCommKen

4.6K posts

eCommKen banner
eCommKen

eCommKen

@eCommKen

$Billions in CPG Sales | Hundreds of Millions in profits negotiated | Results guaranteed | HMU at https://t.co/HbSVd6PRUh to see how I can help.

Omaha, NE เข้าร่วม Ağustos 2023
312 กำลังติดตาม343 ผู้ติดตาม
ทวีตที่ปักหมุด
eCommKen
eCommKen@eCommKen·
My top 13 tips for negotiating. I've managed P&Ls exceeding $500M, and I've negotiated many, many 7-8 figure deals in ecommerce. These points come from my experience. 1. You don't get what you don't ask for. 2. Always be willing to walk away. 3. Negotiate from a position of strength. If you don't know what your position of strength is, step back until you find it. 4. Anchor carefully. Once YOU provide a number, it's very difficult to make large adjustments. 5. It's easier to move the other party's anchor than it is to move your own. 6. Always let the other party anchor first. 7. Practice the art of the eyebrow raise (or the "oh, wow" if you're on the phone). When the other party shares their number, raise your eyebrows (or say "oh wow") as if surprised at how far off it is from your expectations. You'd be amazed at how often people will concede immediately just from this tiny act. 8. Bracket. If they want to sell you a widget for $100, and you want to buy that widget for $90, then you offer $80. People naturally want to meet in the middle, so make sure the middle is the number you want. 9. Nibble. Like little kids going to bed who just want a story, then a drink of water, then to be tucked in. Every ask is reasonable by itself, until you realize that bed time was 30 minutes ago. Nibble for the little stuff. If you're buying a car, AS you're signing paperwork, look up and say, "You'll fill the tank up for me too, right?" No car salesman in the history of car selling would ever tell you no to that if it means they might miss the sale. Nibble, nibble, nibble. 10. Only concede if it means more to the other party than it does to you. 11. Ultimatums rarely work. Most of the time, they just kill the deal. Only use them as a last resort when you're ready to walk away from the deal. 12. If you can identify the REAL value the other party is looking for (beyond the ask they present to you), you can frame the negotiation around their goals. This makes your ask much more compelling because you've appealed to what they're really after. 13. Negotiate EVERYTHING. See point 1. Bonus story: I was negotiating with a children's toy/furniture vendor who wanted my team to make a $4M buy of inventory (no small investment). We were confident we could be profitable with about $3.4M of this inventory, but we would be taking a risk on the remaining $600k. But it was a package deal. All or nothing. We could have just taken the deal and probably been fine. But probably isn't a very good business strategy. I came back to the vendor with a very specific ask: I wanted exclusive access to a high velocity product to offset the risk of taking that $600k of questionable inventory. After some back and forth, the vendor agreed. That product alone ended up being a $15M+ product that first year, and it added millions in net profits while we had exclusivity (before it was eventually discontinued). I used most of the tips I outlined above in that negotiation, but first and foremost was point 1. We never would have landed that exclusive product had we not simply asked for it. What are your favorite negotiation tips and tools? 👇
GIF
English
6
2
26
3.6K
eCommKen
eCommKen@eCommKen·
@theisaacmed I specialize in B2B negotiations, and I gotta say it's bonkers to me just how often I see people (including agencies) sabotage a deal because they don't really understand power and leverage. What a shame. Sorry your deal fell apart, but clearly you have options. 👍
English
0
0
0
40
isaac
isaac@theisaacmed·
Here is a story that just happened to me: 1. I approach an influencer with a big project. 25k. 6 month engagement. 2. They loop in their agency. Okay. Fine. 3. We send an agreement. 4. They redline it. They ask for a lot more money. Okay. We are now 1 week in. 5. We send a redline back. We also ask to push the price down because they want the right to remove posts (from profiles) after the campaign is done. 6. They send a redline back after legal reviews it for ‘5 days.’ 7. We send them an email saying ‘wtf you pushed the price back up and added even more restrictions and redline.’ 8. They don’t reply for 3 days. They ask us to send them another redline set with our best and final offer. 9. We do that. I also tell my team to find other creators because we are 3 weeks into this negotiation. 10. They send back MORE redline. And push back again. This is now week 4. 11. I stop replying because I found 2 other people that are better fits that agreed to everything in 1~ week. Mind you this wasn’t a celebrity. This was someone with 50k followers who was a highly qualified fit for a specific thing. They have now followed up 5 times via email trying to get us to reply with made up deadlines. Lesson? If someone offers you a good deal, move fast.
English
38
0
204
18.8K
eCommKen
eCommKen@eCommKen·
Yeah, that's fair. And I don't... I'm super happy with my results overall since I started lifting consistently 4+years ago. But I'm definitely tapering off. Been trying to hit that 315 on the bench, and it's just going super slow. I lift heavy 3x a week because when I was doing 5x a week I was just exhausted all the time. 3x a week is better, but it's like I'm just barely recovering enough for my next gym session and I'm far from "energetic" all the time. Anyway, you're def not wrong, it's just a challenge.
English
0
0
1
16
Jason Helmes
Jason Helmes@anymanfitness·
@eCommKen 🤷‍♂️ I’d also say not to use it as an excuse. You can still get quality results.
English
1
0
0
16
Jason Helmes
Jason Helmes@anymanfitness·
From 206 pounds and no muscle to 230 pounds and jacked. If you want to make a REAL transformation you need to be on a REAL program. The Push-Pull-Legs Program is the BEST mass gaining program I've ever done. You can have it free in the next tweet
Jason Helmes tweet media
English
4
3
13
3.6K
eCommKen
eCommKen@eCommKen·
@shannonodell @benellsworth038 We don't claim he was born in Jerusalem. The text you're referring to says "at" Jerusalem. As in "in the area of". We know he was born in Bethlehem. Which, to a people half a world away, was more or less "at" Jerusalem.
English
0
0
1
8
Shannon O'Dell
Shannon O'Dell@shannonodell·
No, the Mormon Church is NOT Christian. Why Pastor…that is so mean and non inclusive? Christianity is built on The Holy Scriptures, which are 66 books, inspired, inerrant, and infallible. 👉🏻If you add “inspired testaments” because you believe The Bible is incomplete and partially corrupted you are NO LONGER Christian. Incorrect LDS doctrine and textual criticism: —God was a man. —Humans can become Gods. —Jesus and Satan are spirit brothers. —Baptism for the dead. —Temple endowments. —God’s throne is near Kolob. —Plural marriages eternally. —Native Americans are the true Israelites. —Holy Handshakes, Underwear, and “Anointing’s”. —Archeology Zarahemla, Bountiful (New World), Cumorah, Nephi, or the Land of Desolation remain unidentified on ANY modern maps 🌎. —Since 1830 The Book of Mormon has had 4,000+ revisions (mostly spelling and grammatical errors). IMO: 🤟🏼Mormons are loved by God. 🚨Mormons are more passionate about a lie than most Christians are about The Truth.
Shannon O'Dell tweet media
English
111
23
125
6.3K
eCommKen
eCommKen@eCommKen·
@shannonodell It never ceases to amaze me that people get so worked up about the Book of Mormon while clinging desperately to the Nicene Creeds as a foundation of their belief. "But that's totally different!" Ok. 🙄
English
0
0
0
5
eCommKen
eCommKen@eCommKen·
@realDrTT You've been a bright spot on X the last few days for me, and I've been really glad to find your account. You're one of the good ones sir. I think God is probably pretty pleased with your good intentions and desire. Thank you.
English
0
0
5
113
Trevor Tomesh ☕
Trevor Tomesh ☕@realDrTT·
Feeling a bit down tonight. I’ve caught a lot of flak for defending the dignity and humanity of members of other faiths. I expected some of that. I can handle the troll accounts spewing bile; that is just the nature of this hellsite. What has surprised me, though, is that a few large and influential accounts on my own “team” — people I have respected — have left me feeling ashamed and embarrassed in a way I have not felt in quite some time. I have only been a revert to the faith for a few years, so maybe I am naive. Maybe I should keep my mouth shut. But tonight I spent an hour and a half talking with LDS members about Jesus. They even sat through the Sorrowful Mysteries of the Rosary with me. I thought that was a win. I am not pretending our theological differences are small. They are not. I am not saying truth does not matter. It does. But surely the first step in evangelization is to see the person in front of you as someone loved by God, not as an enemy to be humiliated. Is that not what we are meant to do? To my Catholic family: am I in the wrong here? Anyhow, I look forward to daily Mass in the morning. I know Christ in the Blessed Sacrament will mend this weary heart. And yes, I know I will probably be mocked for this post too, or accused of engagement farming. Whatever. God bless you all. Good night.
English
129
13
543
11.8K
eCommKen รีทวีตแล้ว
Trevor Tomesh ☕
Trevor Tomesh ☕@realDrTT·
I try my hardest to be as charitable as possible with people online. I know it can be difficult to take people at their word—especially on X, given that this place is an absolute hellscape—but I hope I come across as genuine. I am a professor of cyber ethics (my views are my own and do not represent those of my university), and one thing I have been working on for the better part of a year—at least since the assassination of Charlie Kirk—is finding ways to rehumanize people online. If there’s one thing that most high-profile assassination attempts and mass murders in recent years have had in common, it’s that they often involve young people who were radicalized online. With all the anti-LDS rhetoric I have seen over the last few days, I fear that their community may be at risk. That is one of the reasons I have decided to stand up for them and to spend some time exploring what they actually believe. Now, that is not to say that I agree with them theologically. I do not. However, my goal remains the same: to show everyone the charity that Christ has commanded us to show. And no, I am not a kumbaya Catholic. I’m actually rather conservative by nature. In fact, I serve as the faculty advisor for several conservative student organizations on my campus. But if we are going to take the Great Commission seriously, we have to start talking to people—even, and especially, people whom we might not otherwise invite to our table.
English
32
8
281
3.9K
eCommKen
eCommKen@eCommKen·
@johnddavidson Welp, I guess Jesus was a heretic. Peter and Paul, too. I could be in worse company, though, I suppose.
English
0
0
0
12
eCommKen
eCommKen@eCommKen·
@PopePiusIXStan Yeah, the post you're quoting feels like they really want to have a "gotcha" here, but it's just...not. Don't get me wrong, I have a great respect for Joseph Smith as a prophet, but it's the same respect I have for Moses, Abraham, Isaiah, Peter, etc. And they're not God.
English
0
0
4
349
Darrell Aden
Darrell Aden@darrelltalksfi·
"401ks are a scam.“ Wrong. Your 401k is one of the best ways to build wealth. Here's how:
English
39
9
98
31.3K
eCommKen รีทวีตแล้ว
FischerKing
FischerKing@FischerKing64·
I spent a chunk of my early years around Mormons and they were in general exemplary people. Solid families, friendly and open. If I had one complaint it would be aggressive proselytizing - which even happened on the school bus. But that is also a healthy sign of confidence in their way of life. Exact discussions of their theology strike me as beside the point when they frequently live more ‘Christian lives’ than men serving as Jesuit priests or leaders of prosperity gospel megachurches - which are basically a Sunday infomercial.
English
242
127
2.8K
133.9K
eCommKen
eCommKen@eCommKen·
@KSpikefish Heyo! That's where I grew up! Awesome that he gets to serve there.
English
0
0
1
5
Grandpa Spikefish
Grandpa Spikefish@KSpikefish·
Guys, I'm super excited to share that my son just got his mission call! He'll be serving in the Washington, Tacoma mission. Super proud dad moment.
English
22
1
307
2.5K
eCommKen
eCommKen@eCommKen·
Great, thank you. The short version of my question is how you interpret or understand the Intercessory Prayer in John chapter 17, where Christ is praying to His Father on behalf of His disciples. The language that I have in my KJV of the NT, says: 20 Neither pray I for these alone, but for them also which shall believe on me through their word; 21 That they all may be one; as thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee, that they also may be one in us: that the world may believe that thou hast sent me. 22 And the glory which thou gavest me have I given them; that they may be one, even as we are one: 23 I in them, and thou in me, that they may be made perfect in one... (I hand typed that, so any typos are mine) So in essence, how I read this is that we can be one in Christ as He is one with the Father. And to me, this indicates a oneness of purpose, not substance - otherwise we would be one in substance with Christ as Christ is one with the Father. But again, I do really want to understand how you view this, and I'm happy to accept your response at face value (with appreciation for the dialogue). And if you want the somewhat longer version of my question, that includes other instances in the NT that (in my mind at least) seem to contradict the trinitarian view, you can find that in the attached comment to TheMuppetPastor.
eCommKen@eCommKen

I appreciate the kind words. Our hearts are also filled with love for those honestly seeking Jesus Christ and His gospel. So I'm going to ask this with all sincerity because I would genuinely like to know how you understand these NT verses that seem so clear to me to be at odds with the concept of the trinity. First off, my understanding of the Trinity in modern Christendom is that there are 3... aspects? of a single Being, who is God. They share the same essence/substance. (Please correct me if I have misrepresented that definition). But in the great intercessory prayer of John 17 (I'm quoting from KJV, btw), Christ is praying to the father (verse 1). "Glorify thy Son", he says, "that thy Son also may glorify thee." And then he continues in this discussion, speaking with the Father and seeming to identify the Son as a distinct personage, separate from the Father. If they are not 2 distinct people, this seems to me to be both a confusing and unnecessary dialogue with...himself? And I could almost buy into the idea of the trinity and sort of overlook this clear communication between two people, except that Christ then begins to speak of those that the Father gave to Him from "out of the world" (vs. 6). And then he says: 18. As thou hast sent me into the world, even so have I also sent them into the world. 19. And for their sakes I sanctify myself, that they also might be sanctified through the truth. 20. Neither pray I for these alone, but for them also which shall believe on me through their word; 21. THAT THEY ALL MAY BE ONE; AS THOU, FATHER, ART IN ME, AND I IN THEE, THAT THEY ALSO MAY BE ONE IN US: THAT THE WORLD MAY BELIEVE THAT THOU HAST SENT ME. [emphasis added] 22. And the glory which thou gavest me I have given them; that they may be one, even as we are one: 23. I in them, and thou in me... I just don't see any other way to read this than as a symbolic "one", meaning a "one in purpose", or a "one in symbolic unity"....because there's no way that I can *literally* be the same person as Christ when he says "as thou, Father, art in me, and I in Thee, that they also may be one in us..." And then you have the baptism of Christ, where the Father literally speaks from Heaven in Matthew 3:17, "And lo a voice from heaven, saying, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased." Was Christ speaking to/about himself from the heavens? Why? And what about "the Spirit of God descending like a dove, and lighting upon him" (vs. 16)? We have an actual manifestation of all 3 members of the godhead in distinct form in these verses. And then again at the mount of transfiguration in Matthew 17, "...and behold, a voice out of the cloud, which said, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased; hear ye him." (vs. 5). Why does he need to speak in the 3rd person to refer to himself? The prophecies of the Old Testament being fulfilled should be sufficient if he's truly the Messiah. And yet we have multiple instances of him praying to....himself? And hearing himself speak from heaven to himself? Why? I would much rather take the scriptures at their word to the best of my understanding. Christ has a Father. It's the same Father as our Father. Christ Himself said so: "Jesus saith unto her, Touch me not; for I am not yet ascended to my Father: but go to my brethren, and say unto them, I ASCEND UNTO MY FATHER, AND YOUR FATHER; AND TO MY GOD, AND YOUR GOD." (John 20:17). Again I'm genuinely trying to understand. And I hope you can appreciate how challenging it can be for me to sit here and read the ACTUAL WORDS OF CHRIST, and draw a very direct and clear conclusion from these words....only to be told I'm not Christian because other "Christians" point to words that were not Christ's and came hundreds of years after he Preached to his disciples. I'm not here to debate this, and I'm not trying to play games. But how can you read those verses above and interpret it any other way than the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost as being 3 distinct beings who are unified in PURPOSE for the eternal salvation of mankind?

English
1
0
0
14
Jennifer Greenberg 🕊️
Jennifer Greenberg 🕊️@JennMGreenberg·
If you're confused about the Christian vs. Mormon vs. Jehovah's Witness Debate sparked by Mike Lee & Co, here's a brief rundown of why this issue matters to Christians. Back in 325 AD, our early Christian fathers sat down to establish a basic outline of our faith's tenets. At that time, quite a few oddball ideas had arisen which were contrary to the teachings of Jesus. They composed the Nicene Creed. You can think of it kind of like the Christian Declaration of Independence. It's essentially a "this-is-who-we-are-and-what-we-believe-in-a-nutshell" kind of document. In particular, the Nicene Creed documents the traditional Christian understanding of the Trinity; the idea that God is One God in three persons; the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. These three are one God, the same in substance, equal in power and glory, and all three have eternally existed since before the creation of the universe. And this isn't just a weird idea some ancient theologians made up in 325 AD. We get it straight from Jesus. For example, in Matthew 28:19, Jesus tells the apostles to baptize new believers "in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit." Pretty clear, right? When Jesus himself is baptized in Matthew 3:13-17, the Holy Spirit descends on him like a dove, and the voice of the Father says, "This is my beloved Son." In John 10:30 & 38, Jesus says, "I and the Father are one ... know and understand that the Father is in me and I am in the Father.” In John 8:58, Jesus claimed to be eternal, saying, "before Abraham was, I am.” When he said that, some Jews who heard him picked up stones to kill him, because they fully understood that Jesus was claiming to be our eternal God, without beginning or end. He was very, very clear. This is why Christians believe that Jesus is fully God; that he has always existed, just as the Father and the Spirit have existed. He became human (while remaining fully God) when he was born of Mary, but he was not created by God or a new being or a new aspect of God. In Revelation 1:8 Jesus says, “I am the Alpha and the Omega, who is and who was and who is to come, the Almighty.” In 22:13 he reiterates, "I am the Alpha and the Omega, the first and the last, the beginning and the end." In Colossians 1:16, Paul confirms that Jesus was present with the Father when the universe was created, saying, "For by him all things were created, in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible ... all things were created through him and for him." And these examples are just off the top of my head. The term "Holy Spirit" is mentioned over 100 times in the New Testament alone. The first mention in the Bible is clear back in Genesis 1 which tells us "The Spirit of God was hovering above the waters." So, the Trinity isn't some quirky idea someone pulled out of a hat. It's ingrained throughout Scripture. It is how God describes himself, and how he wants us to understand him. Obviously, the idea of God being One God yet three persons who are equal in power, holiness, and glory is hard for us humans to wrap our heads around. Nobody entirely understands how the Trinity works, we just know that this is how God has explained himself to us. But, if God were easy for people to understand, that would probably be a big red flag that he wasn't really God, wouldn't it? We humans can't understand God anymore than an ant can understand Einstein. He's so high above us, we cannot comprehend him. Nevertheless, we have to honor and adhere to how he's described himself and what he's told us about him. There are many doctrines in the Bible that are tertiary (lesser issues / up for debate). For example, Baptism. A Reformed Presbyterian will think we should baptize new believers as well as babies. A Baptist will think we should only baptize new believers and children once they're old enough to articulate their faith. And of course, some Christians prefer full-body dunking, while others think a simple anointing is adequate. Yet both Baptists and Presbyterians can worship together, and consider each other to be Christians. That's because, while we disagree on some side issues, we agree on the major foundational pillars of our faith. And the Trinity is one of those pillars. If you don't believe that Jesus "was and is and is to come," then you don't believe that Jesus is who he said he is. If Jesus is not our eternal God, then he cannot forgive for your sins, Christianity is pointless, and all of humanity is lost. So, the eternal deity of Jesus is a foundational, pivotal, incremental doctrine of the Christian faith, and without it, Christianity does not exist.
English
95
80
446
27.2K
eCommKen
eCommKen@eCommKen·
@anandnagu Or a bump on their forehead if they slip. 👀
English
0
0
0
20
Anand Nagu
Anand Nagu@anandnagu·
If you see someone doing these in your gym just bet money on the fact that they have or will soon have ROCK HARD ABS
English
33
81
1.6K
361.9K
eCommKen
eCommKen@eCommKen·
Fwiw, Ben, I felt that in our dialogue (you and me, that is) you were respectful in your disagreement and I had to check myself because I was letting broader frustrations into my tone and language. So thank you for that. I don't suspect we will agree on theology, but I can do better at being respectful to those who do the same. I do have a genuine theological question which - to me - clearly contradicts the creedal/trinitarian beliefs from the New Testament, and I'd be glad for your take on how you would reconcile the verses in question if you're willing. And I promise I'm asking from a genuine desire to know, and not to play the gotcha games.
English
1
0
1
18
Ben Aksar (My Pronouns? I Trust You)
@NoahMiller14792 @eCommKen @JennMGreenberg So you are unable to point to any of my posts in which I have smeared or hated Mormons. You choose, instead, to include me in some "smear campaign". All I have done is to point out that Mormons do not believe what I do about the nature of God & Jesus. They don't, do they?
English
2
0
0
11
AppalachianBeard
AppalachianBeard@AppyBeard·
mormons just finding out we don’t consider them christian is kind of surprising. i always thought they knew this.
English
287
200
8.7K
165.7K
Jon Elder
Jon Elder@BlackLabelAdvsr·
So, great question. The Bible teaches that you and anyone unsaved are already condemned. It also teaches that we, true Christians saved by grace, are called to call out your satanic religion and share the truth of the gospel with you. It's the most loving thing we could do because if we don't, you will end up in Hell forever.
English
1
0
0
10