
e/acc swe
3.4K posts

e/acc swe
@eaccswe
You can probably guess who I am. 🇺🇸
San Francisco, CA เข้าร่วม Ağustos 2024
379 กำลังติดตาม445 ผู้ติดตาม
ทวีตที่ปักหมุด

We are all robots. I mean this in a literal sense. What we call biology is nanorobotics so advanced we still have not fully embraced this reality.
Seriously. Look at this thing. This is clearly a robot. Really hard to argue it isn't. We call this life, yet this part of it, in isolation, we could not consider alive. It is clearly a very small advanced mechanical device. It is observably guided by logic to perform its duty and is undeniably an exercise in molecule-scale robotics.
We struggle to conceptualize ourselves this way. We think of robots as being made of advanced metals and composite materials with electromagnetic actuators and gears for movement and batteries for energy storage. Beep boop stuff. Life, on the other hand, we think of as wet and squishy, soft and throbbing, pulsing with fluids. Zoom in, though. Up close, it’s all electrochemical and chemical/mechanical nanoscale robotics.
Robotics too small to see optically. There is no camera which can take detailed images of these things nor is there even a theoretical possibility we could ever create a camera to observe them directly in detail. We are often talking sub-nanometer mechanical devices. For hundreds of years we used optical magnification microscopes to document biological life processes. But that is way too zoomed-out to be really insightful. It would be like looking at a car factory on the ground from ten thousand feet in the air and observing trucks with car parts going in and finished cars coming out and not knowing anything but ‘this is a car making thing’.
But we have the digital blueprints. We have the DNA which creates protein chains which can fold into these tiny robots. And we have spent the past several decades, mostly by and large unsuccessfully, trying to figure out how to simulate the physics for manufacturing these nanoscale robots directly from the DNA blueprints. And this is the only reason we have been able to construct visualizations like this one. We only just now have a notion of what these devices actually look like because we had to build an entire constellation of physics simulation software and AI prediction models which directly interpret DNA instructions to fold proteins to construct these robots in a virtual environment.
Now we know.
The entire notion of dividing biology and nanorobotics into independent fields of study is probably misguided.
GIF
English


@powerbottomdad1 Working with you has been one of the highlights of my career, and the team wishes you the best of luck on all of your future endeavors.
English

@geofflul @ItIsHoeMath If that’s you in your profile, you totally pass.
English

I’m mixed
I’m on team white 100% because I actually understand the racial mechanics and what is at stake
Unfortunately my skin is brown
Nonetheless I am fervently anti-brown
Not least because I will inevitably be lumped in with the retards who have worn out their welcome with whites, who are rightfully angry about the endless push to erase them and destroy what they built with hordes of low IQ third world brownoids
A tragedy, truly
English

100% of brown skins feel this way about you
The ones who deny it will openly tell you that they think their people should come to your country infinitely, and if they outnumber you, you shouldn't care because it's "racist"
It is all of them
Blonde Bigot@BlondeBigot11
If you have Canadian children, you better get real racist, real fast.
English

The number of people I encounter who can’t explain their (generally “good”) jobs and/or what their spouses do is staggering. I’d love to see people try to describe what they actually do for a living in a single 280 character tweet in a way that the average person can understand.
Susannah Black Roberts@suzania
There’s like maybe a maximum of 8 jobs where I understand what the job is. Shopkeeper. Farmer. Teacher of some kind. Priest. Novelist. Journalist. Private detective. Chef. That’s it. What is a data engineer. I don’t know.
English

@esrtweet @walterkirn Only a little dangerous. Most of us. Plus sometimes the dangerousness is useful.
English

@walterkirn This is not true.
We believe that you believe. And that your belief makes you dangerously crazy.
English

@Luciu_satrninus @christopherrufo You’re right. Needs to be more like 15%.
English

@christopherrufo 5% of adult men in jail would be rough on the economy. That would be double Cuba and tied with El Salvador for top in the world.
English

@ThePrimeagen Convenience so you don't have to go all the way to the bedroom/sex dungeon. You can just turn upside and down and keep prompting claw.
English

@barneyxbt They want underprivileged people from oppressive regimes who are thankful for the scraps they are given.
They don’t want a thriving middle class with a strong sense of self-direction and agency.
English

why have white people stopped having kids?
something we seriously need to talk about
somewhere along the way we were convinced that going to the bar every weekend was living and that we simply can’t afford a family anymore.
meanwhile other cultures are having 4+ kids on lower wages than you and making it work because family is still the priority
the government is literally incentivizing illegal immigrants to have more children by increasing their monthly assistance with every kid they have.
think about that.
they’re being rewarded for growing their families while you’re being priced out of starting yours
we are becoming minorities in our own country by design.
this isn’t an accident it’s policy. import a dependent class, subsidize their growth, and price out the middle class from reproducing
the only way to fight back is to return to tradition. get married. have kids. reject the modernist lie that freedom means being alone with money in your 30s wondering what the point of it all is
they don’t want you to have a family
because families are harder to control than individuals
English

I'm one of those people who created the commons. What reality is trying to tell you is that when you need to produce things at scale, a shortage of creativity isn't the limiting factor. Capital concentration is.
Yes, it feels deeply wrong that reality is like this. It would be absolutely wonderful if people like me could be rich just because we have lots of good ideas that other people benefit from.
But I'm not stupid, and I can't help noticing why it doesn't work that way. If people like me were the bottleneck resource, we'd all be rich. We're not, so we're not.
I try to pay attention to what is, not what I'd like to be true. I recommend you do likewise.
northStar0x7@khaaleel0001
The feeling that “something’s off” is legitimate. It's not about expecting royalties from MIT/BSD/Apache licensed code it's about the massive asymmetry of capture: the people who created the commons rarely capture proportional economic upside, while the best-capitalized players almost always do.
Malvern, PA 🇺🇸 English














