Futures only
896 posts








@SullyCNBC I made a post with the math. 100 ships per day, $2m per ship, is handing Iran over $70B per year.






$EOSE A few thoughts. 1. If this new design drives down cycle time, increases throughput, supports redundancies etc., why is it still rated at 2 GWh/yr? 2. If they ramp to a combined 4GWh/yr run rate by EOY, in no world can they make only $300-400m. How do you reconcile this? Significant idle time in one or more lines from time to time? 3. When will the company be requesting an approximately $117M disbursement for this line? 4. Is the company still planning on following through on the DOE Project Amaze? Lines 3 and 4 would need substantial completion by December to qualify for reimbursement. That's $84M of efficient capital on the table. Is the plan that between the improved throughput of Lines 2 and 3, Line 4 is not needed to complete Project Amaze? Go back to question #1.














