Greg Burt

2.2K posts

Greg Burt banner
Greg Burt

Greg Burt

@gregburt10

I work at the Capitol in SACRAMENTO for the California Family Council as the Vice President

Sacramento, CA เข้าร่วม Haziran 2014
2K กำลังติดตาม941 ผู้ติดตาม
Greg Burt
Greg Burt@gregburt10·
AB 2164 would shield providers from extradition & legal accountability for actions taken in other states. That undermines interstate legal cooperation. @asmnguyen Assembly Member Nguyen Vote NO on #AB2164
English
0
0
0
22
Greg Burt
Greg Burt@gregburt10·
AB 2540 expands abortion on community college campuses and treats it as routine healthcare. Students deserve better than policies that ignore the value of human life. @asmnguyen Assembly Member Nguyen Vote NO on #AB2540
English
0
1
1
30
Greg Burt
Greg Burt@gregburt10·
AB 1973 lowers medical standards by allowing non-physicians to perform high-risk, later-term abortions. Women deserve the highest level of care—not reduced safeguards. @asmnguyen Assembly Member Nguyen Vote #NOon1973
English
0
0
1
22
Greg Burt รีทวีตแล้ว
Andy Ngo
Andy Ngo@MrAndyNgo·
At a California State Senate hearing on April 7 about a bill authored by @Scott_Wiener to give more time for people to sue health providers who don’t affirm gender identity or orientation, @JonniSkinner spoke about how transitoning irrevocably damaged him.
English
111
608
3.2K
98.1K
Greg Burt
Greg Burt@gregburt10·
This bill would put religious counselors at risk by labeling counseling based on biological sex as “harmful” or even “hate.” @angeliqueashby Senator Ashby Vote #NOonSB934
English
0
0
4
77
Greg Burt
Greg Burt@gregburt10·
This is a lesson for us all. Stand up, stand for the truth, come what may. Remember, you will probably have to lose before you win.
Kristen Waggoner@KristenWaggoner

I’ve been thinking this week about Brian Tingley: a Christian counselor who challenged Washington state’s viewpoint-based counseling ban in 2021. At the time, challenging a counseling ban felt like a cultural “third rail”—especially for a blue state counselor with a reputation to uphold. But Brian knew the harm that would come to families if these bans were upheld. So he sued. Tingley lost at the district court, then at the 9th Circuit. When @ADFLegal appealed to the Supreme Court, three justices favored taking Brian’s case—just one vote shy of a cert grant. Justices Thomas and Alito wrote dissents from the cert denial, noting the importance of the issue—and the fact that it wasn’t going away. They were right. Two years later, we appealed a near-identical case from Colorado: Chiles v. Salazar. This time, the Supreme Court took the case. And just this week, the Court referenced Tingley in its Chiles opinion, ruling 8-1 that Colorado’s counseling ban was an “egregious assault” on First Amendment principles. “The Constitution does not protect the right of some to speak freely; it protects the right of all.” Sometimes—oftentimes—you have to lose before you can win. And no one can predict when the win will come. It’s a matter of simply stepping out in boldness and faith to do what’s right, come what may. I’m deeply grateful to every ADF client who makes that choice—whether they walk the path of Brian Tingley or Kaley Chiles. Win or lose, they stand up. They set their comfort aside. They challenge injustice. It’s people like this who will keep America free.

English
0
0
3
38
Greg Burt
Greg Burt@gregburt10·
SB 1070 strengthens protections for places of worship and ensures disruptions are taken seriously. No one should fear intimidation while practicing their faith. @angeliqueashby Senator Ashby Vote #YESonSB1070
English
0
0
3
39
Greg Burt
Greg Burt@gregburt10·
No child should be abandoned in danger. AB 2073 provides safe, secure options for desperate parents and immediate care for newborns. @asmnguyen Assembly Member Nguyen Vote #YESonAB2073
English
0
0
0
31
Greg Burt
Greg Burt@gregburt10·
When government decides what speech is 'hateful,' people of faith pay the price. AB 1803 puts sincere religious beliefs at risk in California workplaces. We deserve better. @asmnguyen Assembly Member Nguyen Vote NO on #AB1803
English
0
0
3
47
Greg Burt รีทวีตแล้ว
Greg Burt
Greg Burt@gregburt10·
A legislator who flips off colleagues in anger is now pushing mandatory “anti-hate” training for nearly every CA employee. A bit ironic. I wonder if Assembly Speaker Pro Tem Lowenthal's training will include a lesson on hand gestures not to use when angry. We don't know because the bill doesn't yet define what hate speech is. He said he is still working on it. Despite this, AB 1803 passed out of the Assembly Labor and Employment Committee.
CA Family Council@CAFamily

Asm. Lowenthal’s AB 1803 forces “anti–hate speech” training on small businesses without defining “hate speech,” opening the door to labeling Christian beliefs about gender and sexuality as “hateful.” CFC VP Greg Burt testified in opposition. After recently opposing, and even flipping off our “Save Girls’ Sports” press conference, Lowenthal now wants to police “hate speech”? When given the chance to deny the hand gesture, he didn’t—just complained that Asm. @DavidTangipa & @KateSanchezCA spoke in his district w/out telling him. That tells you everything.

English
0
6
13
733
Greg Burt
Greg Burt@gregburt10·
@christopherrufo Why would you sterilize kids that you love? And of course, kids struggling with accepting their own sex have human worth. He is taking Christian values, bastardizing their meaning, and then teaching kids to hate their bodies. When will the public stop falling for this?
English
0
0
2
169
Greg Burt
Greg Burt@gregburt10·
California’s Safe Surrender law has saved lives. Now #AB1628 would strengthen it by giving mothers 30 days instead of 72 hours to safely surrender a newborn. @asmnguyen Assembly Member Nguyen Vote #YESonAB1628
English
0
1
2
112
Greg Burt
Greg Burt@gregburt10·
Emergency powers should be temporary — not permanent. AB 1835 restores checks and balances in California.@asmnguyen Assembly Member Nguyen #YesOnAB1835
English
0
0
1
37
Greg Burt
Greg Burt@gregburt10·
AB 2223 passed in 2022, 123467. (a) Notwithstanding any other law, a person shall not be subject to civil or criminal liability or penalty, or otherwise deprived of their rights under this article, based on their actions or omissions with respect to their pregnancy or actual, potential, or alleged pregnancy outcome, including miscarriage, stillbirth, or abortion, or perinatal death due to causes that occurred in utero. This means if a woman or abortionist or anyone hurts a child in the womb so the baby dies after birth, no one can be charged. This might happening in a failed abortion attempt, or it might happen to a woman who takes an illegal drug during pregnancy that kills her child before birth, or kills the child after they are born. The bill does not legalize just killing an infant after birth. Although it just makes it harder to prosecute someone for killing their child after birth, because the coroners report can’t be used as evidence to prosecute anyone. "103005. (a) The coroner shall, within three days after examination of the fetus, state on the certificate of fetal death the time of fetal death, the direct causes of the fetal death, the conditions, if any, that gave rise to these causes, and other medical and health section data as may be required on the certificate, and shall sign the certificate in attest to these facts. The coroner shall, within three days after examining the body, deliver the death certificate to the attending funeral director. (b) This section shall not be used to establish, bring, or support a criminal prosecution or civil cause of action seeking damages against any person who is immune from liability under Section 123467. Through its courts and statutes and under its Constitution, California protects the right to reproductive privacy, and it is the intent of the Legislature to reaffirm these protections.” Who is immune from liability under Section 123467? Go back to the text of the law I quoted at first. Jay Sekulow isn’t explaining all these details because he is trying to fundraise.
English
0
0
0
38
Jay Sekulow
Jay Sekulow@JaySekulow·
California passed a bill legalizing infanticide up to 28 days after birth. Your state could be next. We are fighting back. Sign our petition: brnw.ch/21x0mwM
Jay Sekulow tweet media
English
96
657
786
18.3K
Greg Burt
Greg Burt@gregburt10·
ACA 7 reopens the door to discrimination under the guise of “equity.” Equal protection means equal treatment, not government favoritism. @angeliqueashby Senator Ashby Vote NO. #StopACA7
English
0
0
0
36
Greg Burt
Greg Burt@gregburt10·
AB 1876 would force insurance companies to cover puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and irreversible surgeries for minors by labeling denial as discrimination. @asmnguyen Assembly Member Nguyen Vote NO. #AB1876 #ProtectKids #ReligiousFreedom
English
0
0
1
50
Greg Burt
Greg Burt@gregburt10·
@JohnDoyle This is interesting and worth knowing. But in the end, buses were segregated by race because of racism. So that part wasn't a conspiracy. Too bad you didn't express outrage over that as well.
English
0
0
0
68
John Doyle
John Doyle@JohnDoyle·
The “Rosa Parks” story is literally not even approximately true btw
English
2K
7.3K
46K
3.3M