guardidoc

238 posts

guardidoc banner
guardidoc

guardidoc

@guardidoc

Dad, BYU fanatic, Air Force Veteran, and optometrist. Nothing special, but really important to a few people

Highland, UT เข้าร่วม Temmuz 2024
193 กำลังติดตาม55 ผู้ติดตาม
guardidoc
guardidoc@guardidoc·
From Grok: Texas Tech has faced NCAA scrutiny in the past (e.g., a major 1999 infractions case involving multiple sports, ineligible athletes, and probation), leading to self-enforcement and compliance rather than prolonged fights. They have also denied or accepted NCAA decisions on transfers/eligibility in other cases without court battles. Key pattern: Support often appears stronger for high-visibility football stars or transfers who can impact winning (like Sorsby), while non-stars, non-football athletes, or those involved in clear misconduct (violence, repeated violations) faced quicker dismissal or acceptance of penalties. Mental health/repentance arguments aren’t unique to Sorsby but were not always leveraged to the same degree (e.g., no major injunction fights in the examples above). This doesn’t mean Texas Tech never supports athletes—many programs prioritize stars—but the record shows selective enforcement, aligning with the criticism that the Sorsby case reflects competitive priorities more than universal “care about goals and repentance.” Public backlash in the current case (e.g., scheduling boycotts from other schools) highlights how this stance stands out.
English
0
0
0
57
Texas Tech Red Raiders
Texas Tech Red Raiders@TechAthletics·
A message to the Texas Tech community from our leadership.
English
2.5K
275
2.6K
3.2M
guardidoc
guardidoc@guardidoc·
@bmarcello @CriddleBenjamin Which team should replace TTU? Wait for the ACC to implode and grab Miami or FSU? Or get WSU and let TTU take their place in the PAC 12?
English
2
0
2
2.2K
Brandon Marcello
Brandon Marcello@bmarcello·
BREAKING: Noted attorney Jeffrey Kessler has sent a letter on behalf of Brendan Sorsby to the Big 12, warning of potential litigation if Texas Tech or Sorsby is sanctioned by the Big 12. "What does it say about the Big 12 if it decides to lawlessly violate a court order?"
English
161
19
232
162.9K
guardidoc
guardidoc@guardidoc·
@TortillaSniper @CFB_Signals If playing him violates Big 12 bylaws, then they can sanction Tech. Why die on this hill? He’s not THAT good. Must be Cody Campbell threatening to shut off the spigot I guess
English
0
0
15
192
#5 TortillaSniper
#5 TortillaSniper@TortillaSniper·
@guardidoc @CFB_Signals You’re right it was stated he has eligibility so why would tech not play him? Spare me with the higher ground shit
English
4
0
0
274
Christopher Lambert
Christopher Lambert@CFB_Signals·
Big 12 is seriously considering declaring TTU conf games were Sorsby participates as forfeits. Sorsby can be on the roster. He just can't play. Conf assumes a TTU lawsuit. Big 12 likely to be the first to file to control venue.
English
57
95
2.4K
155.8K
guardidoc
guardidoc@guardidoc·
@TortillaSniper @CFB_Signals Court didn’t order them to play him. Big 12 has bylaws that are enforceable because Tech agreed to them. Court ruled against NCAA not Big 12
English
1
0
23
269
#5 TortillaSniper
#5 TortillaSniper@TortillaSniper·
@CFB_Signals Lmao Big12 does that and Tech will sue the Big12 up the wall. Tech has done nothing wrong they are following a court order
English
6
0
5
1.9K
guardidoc
guardidoc@guardidoc·
@STXAmbassador Just curious. If UC knew, why would they not support TTU? 15-1 against TTU from all reports
English
4
0
3
481
guardidoc
guardidoc@guardidoc·
@TTU11wreckem @MountMamaLiving They just need to enforce team rules. You gamble on your own sport and team, you don’t get to be on ours. Good luck at your new school
English
2
0
0
40
TTU’11WreckEm
TTU’11WreckEm@TTU11wreckem·
@guardidoc @MountMamaLiving Why would TTU be sanctioned when Sorsby has literally never played a down for TTU? How can TTU go against a court of law and say Sorsby is not eligible?
English
1
0
0
45
Mountain Mama Living
Mountain Mama Living@MountMamaLiving·
I can't stand Texas Tech... but that started way before Sorsby 🤣. But I think I am on Tech's side with this situation. Why? Sorsby is the Villian here and Cincinnati is the enabler. UC knew about the gambling in 2024 and didn't report it to the NCAA. Read the court docs if you haven't. There is also no evidence that says TTU or IU knew anything about the gambling until March when the world found out. At that point he was already at Tech. Now, should they play him? No. The game is bigger than one, above average but not quite elite QB that they'll have for only one year. Will they play him? Yes. Can I blame them? No. Why is it their responsibilty to not play him, regardless of if it is the right thing to do for the collective sport or not, when the courts have said he cannot be impeded from playing until the temporary injunction is over in February? In case no one has been paying attention, amatuerism is over in college athletics. It's been over for years. Especially since 2021 when NIL started. Every college has been essentially forced to become extremely selfish if they ever want to win, and that is what Texas Tech is trying to do. So who is the villian behind the villian? Who is the real enemy? The NCAA. They have refused to update their governance since NIL (which they also screwed up mind you) which is why they continue to lose court case after court case. They are still trying to enforce an amatuer model in a NIL world. They can't have their cake and eat it too. That is the message the judicial system has been send to them for years. College and Pro-levels are basically the same now, except for one MAJOR issue... Pros have structured rules through collective bargaining (which is exactly what college athletics needs), and Pro Organizations have shields that the NCAA does not have. The NCAA has to change their governance soon or they will become obsolete and left in the dust. Also, the "Protect College Sports Act" is not going to do it, in case anyone is wondering. So, it's easy to be mad at Texas Tech right now. But ask yourself; Big picture, where should our anger really be directed?
English
84
64
571
32.7K
guardidoc
guardidoc@guardidoc·
Tech is playing with fire. Keep it up and they will find themselves outside the P4
English
0
0
0
37
guardidoc
guardidoc@guardidoc·
@DanWetzel @jlkurtz @espn Forget the hypothetical. Name the teams that have done this. UC? Indiana? Still need an investigation to prove those beyond allegation
English
0
0
1
295
Dan Wetzel
Dan Wetzel@DanWetzel·
Everyone wants Texas Tech to “do the right thing.” This is college sports, when has that ever been a thing? Focus on ending judicial interference rather than bash the Red Raiders for doing what almost everyone else would do (or has done). Column for @espn espn.com/college-footba…
English
166
130
610
141.1K
guardidoc
guardidoc@guardidoc·
Games are about competition. Outcomes are uncertain. There is great interest in this and it drives wagering. A player that wagers on his own team distorts the uncertainty and makes it unfair for everyone. It’s not about the gravity of the sin, it’s about killing the golden goose. Avoiding that requires a high level of deterrence, hence a declaration of ineligibility or an outright ban. Sure there are more grave sins in the eyes of God than gambling, but in terms of preserving the expectation of fair competition it’s hard to imagine any greater than wagering on your own team. Think about it from that perspective
English
0
0
3
109
Flatland Sports🌵
Flatland Sports🌵@flatland_sports·
My honest answer as a Texas Tech fan. At this point I would be defending the this player like I am Sorsby because the mob mentality is just stupid. I would be relentlessly making fun of them I would still believe that a 2-4 game suspension is fair and the crime does not warrant a full season ban. I would still advocate that the idea that placing a bet on your team to win a game that you did not play in should not be considered a worse crime than actual felonies.
Andrew Brandt@AndrewBrandt

Honest question for Texas Tech: "Would they feel the same way if it was someone else's star quarterback?" Honest question for those criticizing Texas Tech: "Would they feel the same way if it was their team's star quarterback?" Those answers would tell a lot. #Sorsby

English
55
4
59
8.2K
guardidoc
guardidoc@guardidoc·
@Williams_Justin @jlkurtz @TheAthletic Fine let him play…then vacate every win and any championship after they lose in appeal. And severely damage their reputation. This won’t be forgotten
English
1
0
0
258
Justin Williams
Justin Williams@Williams_Justin·
The office of Texas AG Ken Paxton sent a letter to the Big 12 on behalf of Texas Tech, warning the conference that any sanctions over Brendan Sorsby would be treated as "unlawful" and met with legal action by TTU. Details, free to read via @TheAthletic. nytimes.com/athletic/73515…
English
13
5
19
9.3K
guardidoc
guardidoc@guardidoc·
I keep wondering what I would do if it were my school. I’m a BYU fan. A school with a track record of dismissing star players for lesser infractions. I’m pretty certain Kalani would stand on principle. That said, I suspect Cody Campbell has an outsized influence on TTU’s decision-making. Principles be damned if the sugar daddy has none and threatens to turn of the spigot, either directly or implied
English
6
0
16
2.3K
Danny Kanell
Danny Kanell@dannykanell·
I know Texas Tech is in a spot no school wants to be in but I'm genuinely surprised at how poorly they have handled this. With the money they have this might be the worst PR campaign we have seen
English
197
301
6.1K
222.5K
Bobby
Bobby@BobbyWilson1004·
OK we’ve heard from the Chairman of the TT Board of Regents @CodyC64 & from the AD @kirbyhocutt & now from the HC Joey McGuire. None of them see a problem with players gambling on their sport or team because it’s an addiction. Wow…
Paul Finebaum@finebaum

"It's crazy...because it's not murder, it's not beating somebody..." Texas Tech head coach Joey McGuire defends his QB Brendan Sorsby, who's under fire for gambling on his own team's football games:

English
20
6
88
12.8K
Trey Wallace
Trey Wallace@TreyWallace·
Texas Tech booster Cody Campbell to @dandakich, on why Big 12 ADs and others are coming at Texas Tech because of Brendan Sorsby ordeal "Of course ADs in the Big 12 are saying crazy things and, you know, saying they don't want to play as well. They don't want to play us because they know he's good and they don't want us to be as competitive. They want to have a better chance at winning the conference. So they're, inherently conflicted in their opinion..." youtube.com/watch?v=q84i8Y…
YouTube video
YouTube
English
99
17
112
189.5K
guardidoc
guardidoc@guardidoc·
This kills me because I like Joey a lot! It’s hard for me to understand why he doesn’t see why he thinks it’s appropriate to let Sorsby play. I can only think that his bias and desire to win is clouding his judgement. I’m glad he loves his players but I wonder how much love he’d have for him if he knew Sorsby had this problem before he recruited him
English
23
1
54
7.4K
Paul Finebaum
Paul Finebaum@finebaum·
"It's crazy...because it's not murder, it's not beating somebody..." Texas Tech head coach Joey McGuire defends his QB Brendan Sorsby, who's under fire for gambling on his own team's football games:
English
1.3K
175
1.7K
3M
guardidoc
guardidoc@guardidoc·
@Barsotta Seems like you can come up with a compromise such as benching him for at least 6 games
English
0
0
1
38
Barsotta 🌵
Barsotta 🌵@Barsotta·
@guardidoc I’m gonna assume McGuire and everyone else feel obligated to the kid. He’s a member of the team.
English
1
0
0
73
Barsotta 🌵
Barsotta 🌵@Barsotta·
This is really well said. Sorsby shouldn’t play but it’s not as simple as “you’re off the team” if the coaches truly care about him and his well being. Happy compromise, he stays on the team. He gets the help, the scholarship, the money, practice. He just doesn’t play.
Nate Longshore@mrlongshore

I understand why people are uncomfortable with the Brendan Sorsby situation. Betting on sports as a college athlete is serious. Betting connected to your own team creates an obvious integrity concern. Nobody has to minimize that. But there is another side to this that college football people should at least be honest enough to acknowledge. When a player becomes part of your program, he becomes part of your football family. That does not mean you excuse everything. It does not mean accountability disappears. It means you do not abandon him the second the situation becomes difficult, public, or uncomfortable. There is a difference between defending the person and defending the mistake. Texas Tech is in an impossible spot. Deep down, they may have hoped the final ruling would remove the decision from their hands. Exhaust every option, support the player, let the process play out, and if he is ruled ineligible, accept it. That is the cleanest outcome for a program trying to balance loyalty, discipline, public pressure, and competitive integrity. But now the court has ruled that he is legally allowed to play. That changes the structure of the decision. If Texas Tech turns its back on him now, what message does that send to every player and family they recruit? That we will fight for you until the pressure gets too loud? That we will call you family when you are producing, but distance ourselves when standing beside you becomes inconvenient? If I were recruiting against Texas Tech and they abandoned him after he was legally cleared to play, I would use that every time. Not because the mistake does not matter, but because trust matters. Families want to know what happens when their son is injured, struggling, accused, embarrassed, or sitting in the middle of a situation nobody wants attached to the program. Accountability and loyalty are not opposites. You can believe justice should be served. You can believe the integrity of the game matters. You can believe gambling violations deserve real consequence. You can also believe that a program should stand by its people through the full process, not just through the easy parts. That is the hard part of family. You do not only fight for your people when the optics are clean. You fight for them through the good and the bad, while still demanding accountability, treatment, discipline, and truth. Texas Tech may not like the position it is in. Most programs would not. But once he is legally allowed to play and remains part of the Red Raider family, abandoning him strictly because of social pressure would send its own message. And that message may be harder to overcome than the controversy itself.

English
61
3
101
117.2K
guardidoc
guardidoc@guardidoc·
@chris_kratovil Why is TTU not worried that they would likely vacate their wins if he is eventually ruled ineligible on appeal? Why take the chance?
English
0
0
1
280
Christopher Kratovil
Christopher Kratovil@chris_kratovil·
Texas litigator here. Unless and until the Amarillo Court of Appeals or the Texas Supreme Court stays or dissolves the valid temporary injunction obtained by Brandon Sorsby, Texas Tech would be well within its right to take legal action against any entity—the Big XII Conference, the CFP, other universities—that attempts to “punish” Tech for complying with with the controversial-but-lawful TI. Sorsby has been reinstated by a lawful order from court of competent jurisdiction, and while Tech is not obligated to play Sorsby, it currently has the right to do so. And the NCAA’s interlocutory appeal of the TI order is unlikely to be resolved prior to the end of the college football season. Against this backdrop, any organization that attempts to step in for the NCAA to exclude Sorsby is inviting a lawsuit from Sorsby and/or Tech, with Tech taking the position that it is merely complying with the TI order and that it can’t be punished for doing so.
Brandon Marcello@bmarcello

I'm told Texas Tech would consider legal action if athletic programs and/or conferences try to exclude them from competition or hinder their scheduling.

English
476
175
959
361.6K