sam waters

@NFLFrascella Is the power point being presented tomorrow?

The 49ers took running back Kaelon Black - who wasn’t even invited to The Combine! - and Kyle Shanahan appeared to be in stunned disbelief, frozen in time

@OleTimeHardball How did Ron Guidry 1978 season not make this list?

Top 10 Pitching seasons (last 50 years)

@DreKnott what did we all miss?

@jeffMLBdraft He has that Naylor speed

Can someone please explain to Rocchio that he is SLOW

@rashi__pandey_ Hunters

I need a Netflix series so addictive that I completely forget the outside world exists. Hit me with your best recommendations.

@_BigBen7 Name them Browns

@PJStarlissimo What’s your point ? The NFL has a hidden agenda and are using discriminatory practices? Because I call BS The NFL is all about bottom line like I said you need a new narrative I’m done with this and you

@hawk1228 The fact that the price was lower means it's more attractive for more teams to submit an offer. You're completely confused right now lol

Of course there was a reason why Shedeur Sanders dropped . Because he doesn't have an agent and his success (sans agent) could break the whole parasitic system - if a player of that magnitude had gone high without representation. But make no mistake - he was going 1 or 2 overall.

@PJStarlissimo Not really if Watson got 3 number 1s why would Baltimore refuse to match for less draft picks than what Watson brought You need a new narrative

@hawk1228 Even more reason why it's insane that nobody made a qualifying offer LMAO

@PJStarlissimo You have zero credibility when you talk like that 1 Baltimore has the right of first refusal to any offer made to Lamar 2 if Baltimore declined it would have cost 2 first rounders not 3 Obviously teams knew Baltimore would match that offer get real dude

@hawk1228 Obviously he was restricted. And not a single offer sheet. Trey Lance cost the 49ers three first rounders but nobody was going to give up three first rounders for Lamar Jackson lol You're being silly

@PJStarlissimo He was RESTRICTED

@hawk1228 Yeah, the two time MVP was available for three first round draft picks but nobody made an offer, organically 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

@PJStarlissimo @NoPedestalsHQ Lamar? Check your stats dude sports-reference.com/cfb/players/la…

@hawk1228 @NoPedestalsHQ He had a 70% completion percentage in college LMAO

@PJStarlissimo That’s because it fits your narrative

@hawk1228 But I already saw him as an RFA. Two time MVP couldn't get a single offer sheet? Give me a break.

@NoPedestalsHQ @PJStarlissimo Was he really? 57 percent completion percentage doesn’t make him the best qb out of college I can think of one Qb in that class that won a Super Bowl Using the race card is weak

@hawk1228 @PJStarlissimo Lamar was the best QB in the draft and was passed up by every team - if not for a black GM who knows how far he would’ve fell.

@PJStarlissimo No team would make an offer that Baltimore would have matched It was not unrestricted it was Restricted Put him as unrestricted you would see different results

@hawk1228 And I said that he couldn't find a team in the NFL to submit an offer sheet to him when he became an RFA so save the bullshit about the teams not working together 😂😂😂😂😂 Yah, the 2 time MVP to be couldn't find anyone who liked him LMAO

@PJStarlissimo So how does what you posted have anything to do with Sanders and no agent ? I just pointed out Lamar had his mom as an agent and he went round 1 Your point about not having an agent is pointless

@hawk1228 We're talking about Lamar

@PJStarlissimo Excited? No just pointing out saying him not having an agent is ridiculous for his fall Maybe him telling teams not to draft him and not reading the room properly by not doing anything at the combine Obviously teams had questions

@hawk1228 Couldn't even get a team to extend an offer sheet in RFA. And 30th overall is not a high pick. He has won two MVPs and you're excited that he went 30th overall?

@GenoVeno73 @MeidasTouch @grok is this true?

Courtesy of @MeidasTouch Found in the Epstein Files: It appears the FBI Child Exploitation and Human Trafficking Task Force put together this presentation to explain the various investigations surrounding Jeffrey Epstein. This page, titled 'PROMINENT NAMES,' features the names and accusations regarding well-known figures including Donald Trump, Harvey Weinstein, former Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Howard Lutnick, Bill Clinton, Bill Barr, and others. 👇👇👇👇

@princess_kim_k @grok is this true

President Trump ordered the murder of Epstein.

This video should unsettle anyone who takes the United States seriously as a nation. Because it exposes something dangerous: the trivialization of the world's most consequential office. It shows how carelessly the power, credibility, and accumulated moral authority of a superpower can be squandered for a few seconds of viral attention. In any other major democracy, this behavior from a head of state would trigger a constitutional crisis. Paris would burn. Berlin would convene emergency sessions. In the Nordic countries, resignation would follow within hours. Across functioning democracies, the public, institutions, and political class would recognize this for what it is: an assault on the dignity of the state itself. Leaders are not free to perform as entertainers without consequence. National honor is not personal property, it's held in trust. But the United States is not just another country with a provocateur in charge. It is the linchpin of global order. It maintains formal alliances and security guarantees with forty to fifty nations. It underwrites the financial architecture, trade systems, and diplomatic frameworks that billions of people depend on daily. When the American president speaks—or posts—it doesn't land as satire, meme, or personal whim. It reads as a signal about what the country is becoming. American power has never relied solely on carrier strike groups or economic output. It has rested on something more fragile and more valuable: trust. The belief that beneath domestic turbulence lies institutional seriousness, predictability, and a baseline commitment to dignity. That belief is now disintegrating in real time. Millions of American companies operate globally. They negotiate multibillion-dollar contracts in environments where reputation is currency. Boardrooms in Frankfurt, Singapore, and Dubai aren't debating whether a post was clever—they're asking whether the United States remains a reliable partner. Whether agreements signed today will be honored tomorrow. Whether American leadership has devolved from institutional to purely theatrical. Consider tourism, which sustains millions of American jobs—airlines, hotels, restaurants, museums, entire regional economies. Soft power isn't an abstraction. It materializes in flight bookings, conference locations, study-abroad programs, and decades of accumulated goodwill. A quiet, decentralized boycott doesn't require government action—only a collective sense that a nation no longer respects itself. Now picture this image being studied by foreign ministers, central bank governors, defense strategists, and sovereign wealth fund managers. Picture them asking a coldly rational question: How do we write binding thirty-year agreements with a country whose public face will be this, relentlessly, for years to come? How do we plan for the long term when the tone is impulsive, mocking, and unbound by the gravity of office? This is where the real calculus begins. Trillions in foreign capital depend on confidence that America is stable, credible, and rule-governed. That confidence is now being traded for what, exactly? Applause from an online mob? A dopamine rush from manufactured outrage? Content designed to dominate the news cycle rather than serve the national interest? Every serious nation eventually confronts this choice: burn long-term credibility for short-term spectacle, or safeguard the reputation previous generations bled to build. The United States spent eighty years constructing an image of reliability, restraint, and leadership under pressure. That image wasn't born from perfection—it came from a visible commitment to standards that transcended impulse. This isn't a partisan issue. Europeans who value democratic norms recognize something ominously familiar here. Americans—Democrat and Republican alike—who believe in responsibility and restraint should see it too. Power attracts scrutiny. Leadership demands discipline. A superpower cannot behave like a reality TV contestant without paying a price. The presidency is not a personal broadcast channel. It's a symbol carried on behalf of 330 million people and countless international partners who never voted but whose lives are shaped by American decisions anyway. Every post either reinforces or erodes the idea that America can be counted on when it matters most. So the question is no longer whether this is offensive. The question is whether this is who America chooses to be: a nation that trades a century of hard-won reputation for viral moments. A country that replaces statecraft with content creation. A republic governed like a season of reality television. History offers a harsh lesson here. Great powers don't fall because enemies mock them. They collapse when they begin mocking themselves—publicly, proudly, and without grasping the cost until it's far too late. Stay connected, Follow Gandalv @Microinteracti1