Entais Athinais

Judges in USA are blackmailing their citizens. You have to choose between staying silent or speak up and be called racist or islamophobe.

🚨#BREAKING: Father of 22-year-old Logan Federico is screaming at Democrats in Congress after his daughter was dragged from bed, forced on her knees, and executed... ...by a man arrested 39 TIMES with 25 FELONIES!!! We need to hold judges & DAs responsible for releasing vicious murderers on innocent victims. Everyone who let this demon walk freely, should be in prison.

Such a stupid statement. Your statement is also fallacious 'either-or choice' because reality isn't binary. By your logic, food is either spicy or not spicy and can't be mildly spicy, moderately spicy or very spicy. 😂 I don't understand what is so hard to understand, the Cyrillic alphabet is created based on Greek, however there are additional letters added. Therefore, your statement is wrong.

@hqs652 @Hephzibah_SCA @RealHellenist You wrote "not fully based". It either is or it is not. If it isn't based on Greek, what is that it is based on? You also wrote "add letters for specific sounds instead of combining letters like the greeks do."

Every European language writes with Greek-derived Script and Alphabetic system. Latin = the Cumaean Greek alphabet. Cyrillic = a script created by Greek monks, Saints Cyril and Methodios, directly from the Greek alphabet. Europe’s writing systems are Greek in origin. The whole continent writes with the Alphabet born from Greeks.

I don't think you understand the word 'finalised', they didn't finalise the alphabet since St. Cyril wasn't alive when they began creating the alphabet. St. Cyril died in 869 AD while the alphabet began its creation around 890-900s. His work inspired his desciples, therefore the claim in the post that St. Cyril and St. Methodius created the alphabet is wrong. The word finalised does not fit since he didn't start it to be finalised.

@hqs652 @RealHellenist I said that THE CYRILLIC ALPHABET IS EVEN MORE BASED IN GREEK And it was FINALISED by Cyril and Methodius disciples Not created Thus the name Cyrilic You understand Cyril - Cyrilic connection Knowing to read (first) is important in order to understand everything

@Domitoro @RealHellenist Of course I will focus on details, small details make the difference. When you are reading a book you don't try and remember the references, right? Nobody has argued otherwise, again you are fighting with a wall.

@hqs652 @RealHellenist Well, you are focusing on the details, when main idea of the tweet was origin of all of the European alphabets. Even if Cyril and Methodius weren’t Greek themselves or if the other people invented Cyrillic alphabet, it still means any of them have used the basis from Greek.

@toKatoptro @RealHellenist You might want to focus more on reading.

@hqs652 @RealHellenist You wrote a whole article for proving nothing. What Hellenistic claims is historical and scientifically fact! You can find proves in museums, archaeological studies etc. We can’t create rumours as history, because we like it. Relax and accept truth. Is calmer.

@Periandros3000 @Hephzibah_SCA @RealHellenist Did you even read what I said? Where did I say Greeks don't have compound sounds presented as letters? Where did I say that the Cyrillic alphabet is not derived from Greek?

@hqs652 @Hephzibah_SCA @RealHellenist Obviously more letters would have had to be made up or old ones adjusted. It doesn't change the fact of the Greek origin. It is not Chinese. The Greeks also use single letters for compound sounds like ξ and ψ. It wasn't something new to them.

I never said that Cyrillic was not based of the Greek. I'm aiming to respond to the claim that Greek monks created the Cyrillic alphabet, which is not true even according to your own screenshots from AI. The Cyrillic can not be fully based of the Greek simply because the Slavic languages (especially the Bulgarian language at that time which was the closest in proximity to the Byzantines) have more sounds, therefore they had to create more letters for those sounds (like your screenshots also confirm), or even add letters for specific sounds instead of combining letters like the greeks do. For example: ια - я - ia μπ - б - b Letters: Glagolic - 41 Cyrillic - 33 Greek - 24 Also, instead of using AI for everything, you can look up all of the three scripts. Not all the letters are adopted from Greek.

@hqs652 @RealHellenist That makes it even more directly based on the Greek Accepting it is the right attitude of anyone that passed in adulthood successfully:

@Domitoro @RealHellenist It doesn't, because that's not my point. He claims that Greeks invented the Cyrillic alphabet. Which is not true. I never argued what you are saying.

@hqs652 @RealHellenist That’s kinda true, but how that beats the fact, that we all use alphabets of Greek origin in Europe ?

They are mostly black. Even though these kids are born and raised in the UK, they still did not integrate properly.

I read how a failed Pakistani 'asylum seeker' who repeatedly abused and raped an eight year old girl has been jailed for 15 years. He abused her in her own home and bedroom. She was told that if she told anyone, she would die. I wouldn't deport him. Under a Restore Britain Government, with the British people's approval, the death penalty would be reintroduced for such evil and undeniable crimes. He would be put to death. If you rape a young child, you do not deserve to live. It's that simple.

I'm not against the Greeks, I do not deny their Greek ancestry, I simply point out that there is no definitive answer of what their parents were. If we have concrete evidence that they were fully Greeks I wouldn't have an issue with that. St. Cyril and St. Methodius are venerated and respected saints in the Orthodox Church. The reason why St. Clement of Ohrid named the alphabet Cyrillic is in honour of St. Cyril who invented the Glagolica script. Both scripts are influenced by Greek, I have no issue with that. However, to say that Cyrillic comes exclusively from the Greeks is just ridiculous and untrue.

@hqs652 @RealHellenist Μάλλον έχεις κάποιο ψυχολογικό πρόβλημα το οποίο σε στρέφει εναντίον των Ελλήνων 😂🤣😂. Οι Κύριλλος και Μεθόδιος ήταν αναμφισβήτητα Έλληνες. Πράγματι δημιούργησαν το γλαγολιτικο αλφάβητο. Το κυριλλικό αλφάβητο είναι μια παραλλαγή του, την οποία έκαναν αργότερα οι Σλάβοι. Και οι

Greeks🇬🇷 -build Hagia Sophia as a Church✝️ Greeks🇬🇷 -built Constantinople turks🇹🇷 -destroyed Hagia Sophia and turned it into a terrorist base. turks🇹🇷 -destroyed Constantinople and massacred the Greeks in it. Bottom line -turkey needs to be dismantled

My mother used to warn me how hot the stove was, but my father would always say, "if he is not listening, let him burn himself, he won't touch it again". Germans are like I was a kid, but I didn't touch the stove after I burned myself.

You can't even read. Grok is affirming that Mycenaeans are descendants of Neolithic Anatolians. However, its making a distinction in the cultures of the direct descendants on mainland Anatolia and the tribes outside. Every European has Anatolian because Anatolians are ancient Europeans. However, Turkey is a descendant of the Ottoman Empire which was established by Asiatic people crom central asia. If you have majority Anatolian, that shows European ancestry instead of asiatic one. This is the genetic closeness of Hatties.

@hqs652 @kurdX_ Todays Turks are Anatolians mixed with Turks by DNA. Period. Cry harder. Amost whole Europe have "Anatolien DNA" it doesn't make todays Türkiye's citizen to ethnicity of all European countries. Sardiniens have even more. Doesn't make Turks Sardinians!👇 x.com/i/status/20303…

Recai İskender: Half of Turkey's 84 million people are Kurds, and most of the other half are Armenians. The rest consist of Greeks and other minorities. A fake "Turk" has been created; there is no such thing as a Turk, they are all devshirme (converts/assimilated).

@WesleyLHuff Wes Huff: Talmud is a great source. Wes Huff: Church fathers are not a reliable source. LOL dude you’re a joke

@___I_o_o_I___ @albanianflower False. I'm not grik

@hqs652 @albanianflower If a German, a Frenchman, or an Englishman had ruled you for 450 years, you would be no different from them today! You owe being Greek to the Turks! 😆

Everyone should keep their religion to themselves. You can’t just talk like that and put labels on us. We are NOT your “Muslim brothers.” We are Albanians, with our own identity and history that don’t revolve around religion. Don’t box us into a religion,respect our identity.

If you carefully read your own reasoning you will see that both men and women exhibit both romantic and pragmatic traits, but expressed differently. For the successful man is more pragmatic to marry less successful woman, since she will be more focused on him compared to a woman on his level. Since they both have to work. In most of the cases, men don't need women's money since on average they make more and since that void is filled they are looking for something more romantic. Its also worth mentioning, that your analysis in places is not accurate, if you spend time with educated and well read women, you will see that they need their intellectual void to be filled, they often fall in love with writers, poets and artists in general. Therefore, the level of education in a society plays a crucial role as well. But lets make something clear, in Europe lawyers, doctors, engineers etc. marry other people with good education, often similar salaries. This theory successful men marrying cashiers doesn't exist in the real world, they sleep with cashiers, not marry them.

The biggest lie society sells us is that women are the "emotional" gender and men are the "logical" ones. When you actually look at the dating market, the reality is the exact opposite. Men are the true romantics. Women are the pragmatists. A successful man, a CEO, a lawyer, a doctor will happily marry a woman who works as a cashier, a waitress, or is completely unemployed. He doesn't care about her status, her network, or her bank account. He marries her simply because she brings him peace, she is kind, and she makes him smile. He loves her for who she is, not what she can do for him. Now flip it. Ask a successful woman to marry a kind, loving, loyal man who works as a cashier. The answer is almost always a hard "No." Suddenly, "love" isn't enough. Suddenly, she needs "ambition." She needs "security." She needs a man on her level or higher. A woman rarely falls in love with a man’s soul; she falls in love with his trajectory. She loves what he can provide, where he can take her, and the lifestyle he unlocks. Men grow up thinking love is a fairy tale. They project their own capacity for unconditional love onto women. They think, "If I give her my heart, she will have my back." They learn the hard way that female love is performance-based. The moment he loses the job, the moment the confidence wavers, or the moment he stops being "useful," the "romance" evaporates. We call men "dogs" and "players," but men are the only ones willing to bet their entire lives on a partner who brings nothing to the table but her presence. Women love with a calculator in their hand. Men love with their eyes closed. And that is exactly why men are the ones who get destroyed they are trying to play a game of hearts with a gender that is playing a game of chess.

@emirhanglcml @albanianflower I'm not grik

@hqs652 @albanianflower okay grik.