J
7.5K posts
J
@jbartee
Technologist, a proud single father, nerd, and Politically Incorrect. *views my own Follow for hot takes and puns
US เข้าร่วม Nisan 2011
166 กำลังติดตาม177 ผู้ติดตาม
Artemis II is now entering a solar eclipse that will last for about an hour as Orion, the Moon and the Sun align. During this phase, the crew will see the Sun disappear behind a mostly darkened Moon.
English
Is it cheating if she knows and approves? I dunno if its true, but I know Bill did something with not-wife that involved something blue
Barry@BarryOnHere
Still together 50 years later. No scandals. No cheating. No drama. Just pure love.
English
@FloSpacenerd @NASA Could you cite where these graphics were from? This isn't from Artemis live.
English
#ArtemisII ℹ️
Falls euch die Bildqualität im Livestream der @NASA enttäuscht:
Hochauflösende Aufnahmen vom #Mond - Vorbeiflug werden in den nächsten Tagen folgen. (Bandbreite ist begrenzt)
⬇️Hier ein paar Beispiele von Artemis I ⬇️
Deutsch
English
So with all the thousands of data satellites orbiting the earth and with all the most modern day digital broadcasting transceiving equipment and with no line of sight problem at all and all that digital broadcasting technology that they "must" have fitted to the latest and furthest space craft to orbit the moon, they cannot do a live stream?
What utter bollox an a load of BS!
English
Teaching religions of the world, particularly in 7th grade history is typical. You cover the rise of Christianity, Islam, Buddhism and Hinduism. Why not introduce the bible? It's as valid as Harry Potter or To Kill a Mockingbird. Fiction from non-fiction with historical social impact....
English
this is literally UNCONSTITUTIONAL…..
Pop Base@PopBase
Oklahoma orders all public schools to teach the Bible, effectively immediately. Any teacher who refuses could lose their license.
English
@peterrhague There's only one Nasa feed.
Nasa.com/live with rebroadcast elsewhere.
Netflix could have offered a unique insight, graphic, pulled in Lunar geologists to explain in greater detail. But nope. Typical low-effort "catch it". I'm curious what they paid
English
Does the Netflix feed have any advantage over YouTube? Is it just the same?
Netflix@netflix
The moon is now on Netflix. Watch LIVE as the Artemis II crew travels farther from Earth than any human in history during their lunar flyby: netflix.com/title/82066548
English
@WhickTv @lydiabackagain @Timodc @TheOmniLiberal Did they though? There was fairly heavy support of Biden, but it was more "anti-trump". If a fair alternate were available, would the left have held Biden as their Beloved?
Look at the lack of support Kamala had.. until they needed her after their fearless leader flubbed
English
@lydiabackagain @Timodc @TheOmniLiberal Biden faced hate from the Left from day 1, with multiple democrats and leftists calling for him to step down. They pushed him out! WHAT?!
English
The craziest statement I have ever heard is @Timodc saying to @TheOmniLiberal that 'The Left was too sycophantic toward Biden'
WHAT?!
How does someone live in reality believing that?!?
English
This is the precise question before the courts - it was well understood foreign diplomats on official business and their children, as the "flag follows the father" - it was also understood Native tribes, who have a unique sovereignty with the US.
But this subject clause speaks to allegiance. As a natural born citizen, I have an expectation of allegiance to the US, but also, a duty - i.e. to serve in defense.
Is this true of a tourist? I cannot be expelled from the US. I can only be held in treason against and imprisoned. Others, though, could be deported - they have subjectation to OTHER sovereigns with NO expectation of or toward the US.
Similarly, would the parents of a child born on US soil, but living outside the US, expect US diplomacy or protection for their child whom has never resided in nor has ties to the US other than having been born physically within its territory
English
@jbartee Ok who is born or naturalized in and NOT subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, lmao.
English
Simple, precise.
It'll go 6-3 : Wong Kim Ark upheald. Citizenship is not simply birth on soil, the President was right in interpretation, but wrong in EO.
The Federalist@FDRLST
This Word In The 14th Amendment Bans Birthright Citizenship, And It’s Not ‘Jurisdiction’ thefederalist.com/2026/04/06/thi…
English
@danyakubson born or naturalized AND subject to the jurisdiction. See these qualifiers, they all mean MORE than born in the territory.
English
@jbartee All persons born or naturalized in the united states are citizens of the united states AND the state in which they reside. You literally cannot read. You should wear water wings AND a helmet.
English
These problems existed then, and in different fathoms. Women would bring children to work, for example. Often, children themselves did the work.
Men were often absent from the home, children "fearing" their father coming home. Alcoholism was abundant. Also, communication took longer. Days to travel across the US, now it's hours. You can literally round trip LA -> NY and still have ~ 8 hours of your day.
Or better, you can have live video feed with 4 people of your team 280,000 miles away and be productive. Insane, right?
English
@jbartee @chriswithans When the nuclear family was in tact none of these problems existed. Men provided resources, women utilize them. That was the deal since the dawn of human existence until feminists and progressives tried to re-engineer all of society.. to everybody's detriment
English
I’m serious about paid leave. Yeah, it’s fine for the public sector when the taxpayer pays the bill and most of the work is fake.
How do people think it works in the private sector? You have a team of six people. One person goes AWOL for six months. What do you think happens to the other five people?
English
@danyakubson You are. The clause does not say "are born" as a stand alone thought, clause, concept, etc.
Here let me demonstrate the qualifier:
English
@FTP_ACAB_ @chriswithans Bottom line - your business existed before they joined your team. It ought exist after they leave. You ought support their time while there as it directly benefits you and your bottom line. It encourages positive client relationships, improves productivity, etc.
English
@jbartee @chriswithans They're not sacrificing. It's a mutually beneficial arrangement. They provide labor and I provide Fair compensation. I'm not their caretaker.
And that's the Crux of my whole argument, your employer is not your caretaker, neither is the government.
English
@FTP_ACAB_ @chriswithans They aren't sacrificing? Seems like they are sacrificing the opportunity for fair compensation, or opportunities to start a family in fear of losing their job. No doubt, you'd expect - even if compensated - them to work extra or give up opportunities, like dance recitals, etc
English
@FTP_ACAB_ @chriswithans False. The father has all the same risk, sometimes more in need to care for existing children unrelated to the the new birth.
English
@jbartee @chriswithans One of these people doesn't come with the risk of taking 6 months off every few years
English
Hmm, except you cannot necessarily limit said risk. The man whose wife is having a child may need just as much time away as the woman herself would, especially if medical issues arise.
So then, why hire fertile men instead of sterile men? Or additionally, what about men who are single fathers , will you not hire them as well?
These are your choices, but you further limit your available workforce. And tell me, why should either a man or woman want to work for you when you would have all the expectations of them sacrificing for you and your business, but no expectation for the same in return.
English
@jbartee @chriswithans I can accomplish all of that and limit my risk by simply hiring men
English