Robot is dead 🪦💀🤖

259 posts

Robot is dead 🪦💀🤖 banner
Robot is dead 🪦💀🤖

Robot is dead 🪦💀🤖

@jf_robot

All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain... Time to die.

Tyrell Corporation, LA เข้าร่วม Mayıs 2015
1.1K กำลังติดตาม517 ผู้ติดตาม
Biliyor Muydunuz
Biliyor Muydunuz@bilio_muydunuz·
Futbolda en çok gol atan oyuncular
Türkçe
55
165
1.5K
61.1K
Jim Bianco
Jim Bianco@biancoresearch·
After hours risk markets are "popping" higher on this story. No word on if this includes opening the Strait of Hormuz (or they agree to keep it closed and stop shooting.) Channel 12s source is the Israeli Government, suggesting they are afraid Trump will TACO. ---- Times of Israel explanation: Channel 12 says, Jerusalem is concerned that Trump and his team want to push quickly for “a framework agreement, an agreement in principle” with Iran, rather than insisting on these demands as a condition for halting the war. According to three sources familiar with the details, the president’s top aides, Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff, have shaped a process involving “the declaration of a monthlong ceasefire period, during which the sides would negotiate a 15-point agreement,” much like previous Trump administration-brokered agreements with Hamas in Gaza and with Lebanon.
החדשות - N12@N12News

מה דרש טראמפ מאיראן: זו התוכנית של נשיא ארה"ב לסיום המלחמה | המסמך שכבר הועבר למשטר האייתוללות n12.pro/4sGBLbh | @yaronavraham

English
55
24
163
87.7K
Tommaso Monacelli
Tommaso Monacelli@monacelt·
▶️Amplification + propagation are *state-dependent: scale with volatility of transportation shocks. ▶️Consistent with empirical evidence: inflation responds much more strongly to energy shocks in states of high supply-chain uncertainty👇
Tommaso Monacelli tweet media
English
2
0
11
763
Tommaso Monacelli
Tommaso Monacelli@monacelt·
Should monetary policy "look-through" the current energy price shock? ➡️Old debate: energy shocks are "temporary" in nature. Central banks should look them through ➡️We argue in our work that the look-through doctrine does not hold when *supply chain uncertainty * is elevated👇
Tommaso Monacelli tweet media
English
6
51
209
19.2K
Ziad Daoud
Ziad Daoud@ZiadMDaoud·
Oil is at $104 Our estimate: the Iran war accounts for about a third of the price Full analysis on @TheTerminal
Ziad Daoud tweet media
English
9
98
284
26.3K
Robot is dead 🪦💀🤖
𝐌𝐑. 𝐖𝐇𝐈𝐓𝐄 ™@MrWhiteMAGA

TRAFFIC STOP TURNS INTO A LAWSUIT BATTLE If a driver becomes argumentative during a traffic stop, does the officer have the right to take stronger control of the situation? Is this a case of someone standing up for their rights… or someone hoping a lawsuit will erase a mistake behind the wheel? A traffic stop in Hurst, Texas will turn to the courtroom to decide who was actually in the wrong. What is your opinion??? Newly released dashcam footage shows a woman pulled over for speeding while traveling with her 15-year-old son. According to the driver, she had just come from a doctor’s appointment and a hair appointment when the officer initiated the stop. At first, the interaction appears fairly typical. The officer runs her information and returns to the vehicle with a citation. That’s when things start to change. The conversation becomes tense. Voices rise. What should have been a simple ticket suddenly turns into a confrontation caught on camera. Now the driver, Taneisha Thompson, says the officer crossed the line…and she’s filed a civil lawsuit against the police department. She believes the stop escalated unnecessarily and that the officer’s actions violated her rights. Supporters of the officer say something different. They argue that traffic stops can turn dangerous quickly and officers must maintain control of the situation. From their perspective, issuing a citation and managing the stop is simply part of the job. Now the question isn’t just about a speeding ticket anymore. It’s about accountability… authority… and whether a routine stop became something it shouldn’t have. A court may eventually decide who is right. It’s currently pending… Should a heated interaction during a routine ticket ever justify a lawsuit against a police department?

English
0
0
0
80
The Disrespected Trucker
The Disrespected Trucker@DisrespectedThe·
I don't have the patience to deal with people like this.
English
2.3K
1.7K
15.3K
207.2K
Gabriel Komatu, CFA
Gabriel Komatu, CFA@GabrielKomatu·
A: Bateu no VAR, tive que stoppar os juros Eu: Puts, que merda, quando você stoppa assim, o que você faz? A: Entro de novo no dia seguinte Essa foi uma interação real que eu tive com um cara de juros que deve ter um book de uns R$10 bi na mão
Gabriel Komatu, CFA tweet media
Português
9
0
124
12.6K
g1
g1@g1·
‘Parece que viveu mil vidas’: do sertão a Salvador, a trajetória de Wagner Moura até o Oscar glo.bo/vxcsoml
g1 tweet media
Português
10
13
209
11.7K
⚔️🇧🇷⚔️Realiberdade/Realndependência,⚔️🇧🇷⚔️
🚨🚴🏻 REVOLTANTE - Espero que essa postagem chegue na TL dos motoristas que se acham os donos das estradas! Olha aí por que eu não vou pela ciclovia! Hoje precisei pedalar em média 3Km por uma rodovia federal a BR-101 lá tem acostamento. E depois mais 5Km em uma avenida famosa em Recife. Fui pela faixa de ônibus na contramão. Assim tinha a visão toda do trânsito. Daí quando encontro uma ciclofaixa é isso que acontece.
Português
13
8
235
6.6K
Robot is dead 🪦💀🤖
@pfnery Acho que as pessoas subestimam o peso que esse eventual 4º mandato tem para Lula: assim como o “peronismo” vive e se tornou uma forma de política, Lula quer fundar o “Lulismo” como herança que guiará a esquerda para muito além de sua vida.
Português
0
0
1
189
Pedro Fernando Nery
Pedro Fernando Nery@pfnery·
O que acontece com eventual desistência de Lula? Chuto que despolariza, enfraquece Flavio e abre a competição
Pedro Fernando Nery tweet media
Português
143
37
566
31.6K
Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡
Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡@shanaka86·
President Trump just told the United Kingdom he does not need their aircraft carriers. The post on Truth Social is extraordinary not for its tone, which is vintage Trump, but for what it reveals about how the president understands the strategic position of the United States ten days into this war. “The United Kingdom, our once Great Ally, maybe the Greatest of them all, is finally giving serious thought to sending two aircraft carriers to the Middle East. That’s OK, Prime Minister Starmer, we don’t need them any longer. But we will remember. We don’t need people that join Wars after we’ve already won.” Already won. Three US carrier strike groups are deployed in the Persian Gulf. That is 25 percent of the entire operational carrier fleet committed to a single theater. The Carl Vinson was diverted from the Indo-Pacific, where the 2022 National Defense Strategy identified China as the pacing threat. THAAD interceptor stocks are being consumed at rates the production line cannot match for seven years. Two AN/TPY-2 radars have been destroyed. Hormuz remains closed. Oil is up 34 percent. Kuwait just cut production because its storage tanks are full. The Strait that carries 20 percent of global petroleum has not reopened. Iran is still launching hundreds of drones per day. And the president says the war is already won. Into this, the United Kingdom offered two Queen Elizabeth class carriers with up to 50 F-35B jets. They would provide rotational relief for strike groups at maximum tempo since February 28. They would extend air coverage over the Arabian Sea and free American assets for the Pacific. HMS Prince of Wales has been placed on high readiness. The UK has not formally committed. Trump’s response was not “welcome aboard.” It was “we will remember.” That phrase carries consequences beyond Iran. Every NATO member considering whether to contribute forces just received a signal that late participation will be punished. Every Pacific ally watching China observe this war just learned the president values the domestic narrative of unilateral victory over allied burden sharing. The special relationship survived two world wars, the Cold War, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Libya. It has not been tested by a president publicly humiliating a prime minister for offering military support during an active conflict. In 1991, the UK deployed carriers to the Gulf and Thatcher told Bush not to “go wobbly.” That contribution was welcomed. In 2026, the UK considers the same and is told the war is already won by a president whose interceptor stocks are measured in months and whose three carriers cannot simultaneously defend the Gulf, deter China, and rotate for maintenance. The war is not won. The carriers are needed. And the president just told the world otherwise because the domestic narrative required it. The most dangerous gap in this war is not between American interceptors and Iranian drones. It is between the president’s description of the war and the war itself. open.substack.com/pub/shanakaans…
Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡ tweet media
English
128
345
1.1K
200.3K
Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡
Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡@shanaka86·
The first strike on Iranian oil infrastructure just landed. Not on Kharg Island, where Iran loads crude for export. Not on the southern oil fields of Khuzestan, where crude comes out of the ground. On the Shahran fuel depot on the northern outskirts of Tehran, where gasoline and military fuel are stored for domestic distribution across a city of thirteen million people. At least two of the depot’s eleven storage tanks are burning. Thick black smoke is visible from highways across the capital. Fuel is leaking from damaged tanks. The Iranian oil ministry says the volume in the targeted tank was “not high” and the situation is “under control.” The IDF confirmed the strike, describing it as a hit on fuel storage linked to the Iranian armed forces. The targeting choice reveals the strategy that the fire obscures. Iran’s oil export infrastructure sits in the south. Kharg Island handles roughly 90 percent of crude exports. Abadan, Bandar Abbas, and Isfahan house the major refineries with a combined capacity exceeding one million barrels per day. None of these have been struck. The coalition has the ability to hit them. It is choosing not to. Because destroying Iran’s export infrastructure would remove Iranian crude from global markets permanently, spike oil to $150 or beyond, and unite the Global South against an operation that was already condemned by 120 nations. Instead, the coalition hit the domestic fuel supply. The Shahran depot feeds Tehran. It feeds the trucks that carry food to markets. It feeds the vehicles that move IRGC personnel between command nodes. It feeds the generators that keep hospitals and water treatment operating when the power grid is degraded. Striking it does not change the global oil price. It changes life inside the capital for thirteen million people who are already living under the most sustained aerial bombardment of a major city since Baghdad 2003. Iran produces roughly 2.8 million barrels per day but refines most of it domestically. The country imports gasoline because its refining capacity cannot meet internal demand even in peacetime. Sanctions have degraded refinery maintenance for decades. The Tehran refinery itself processes 250,000 barrels per day. If the Shahran depot that stores its output is burning, the distribution chain between refinery and consumer is broken even if the refinery itself is untouched. This is the squeeze. The air campaign destroys military bases, airports, command bunkers, Basij facilities, and now fuel storage. The Hormuz closure blocks the imports that might compensate. The internet is at four percent of normal capacity. Domestic flights are grounded. The road network is under surveillance from commercial satellites that any adversary can access. And now the fuel that moves everything, military and civilian, through a country the size of Alaska is burning in a depot on the edge of the capital. Iran’s oil ministry says the fire is under control. The fire in the depot may be. The fire in the country is not. open.substack.com/pub/shanakaans…
English
152
875
3.2K
991.1K
Enio Viterbo
Enio Viterbo@EnioViterbo·
A limitação cognitiva de Reinaldo Azevedo é assustadora. No mesmo vídeo ele consegue: - Dizer que Gilmar Mendes era "prevento" no caso da petição da empresa da família do Dias Toffoli pela quebra de sigilo determinada pela CPI do Crime Organizado. - Elogiar Flávio Dino dando uma decisão para uma empresária amiga de Lulinha no mesmo contexto da situação da família de Toffoli, se contradizendo sobre a prevenção de Gilmar Mendes. - Dizer que Lulinha tem que entrar com um Mandado de Segurança contra a CPI do INSS para evitar a quebra de sigilo e que aí não tem prevenção. Tem que ser distribuído livremente entre os ministros do STF. Ele não tem a MENOR ideia do que está falando. Parabéns ao Metrópoles pela contratação.
Português
245
207
1.7K
64.4K
Arcfunmi
Arcfunmi@Arcfunmi·
The Caulk whisperer
English
102
433
12.4K
652.9K