Jim Lakely

47.1K posts

Jim Lakely banner
Jim Lakely

Jim Lakely

@jlakely

EVP @HeartlandInst, EP @InTheTankPod, Host: The Climate Realism Show. Love liberty, Steelers, Pens, #H2P. Ex-DC Journo. "Climate hero" says @junkscience

Lake Zurich, IL เข้าร่วม Aralık 2008
2.3K กำลังติดตาม3.5K ผู้ติดตาม
Jim Lakely รีทวีตแล้ว
John Steigerwald
John Steigerwald@Steigerworld2·
I was told many stories by people who worked at the PG about so many union “workers” who abused the job security that comes with union membership and all but refused to work. PG might be one more example of a union putting a company out of business. Happens a lot.
Colin Dunlap@colin_dunlap

An incredible man — and super music critic — Scott Mervis was told yesterday by new owners of Post-Gazette he was no longer needed after 41 years. This is the response by former Union president Zack Tanner. Tanner is a big reason for the paper’s demise. And a piece of garbage.

English
9
7
72
11.7K
Jim Lakely รีทวีตแล้ว
Linnea Lueken
Linnea Lueken@LinneaLueken·
Great post by @HeartlandInst President James Taylor in the @realDailyWire today: "Lee Zeldin is unquestionably the greatest conservative administrator the E.P.A. has ever had. The New Yorker can’t stand that, and its amateurish hit job on a very competent and effective Zeldin only makes them look more toxic." dailywire.com/news/the-lefts…
English
2
6
14
1.1K
Jim Lakely รีทวีตแล้ว
Watts Up With That
Watts Up With That@wattsupwiththat·
𝗥𝗜𝗣 𝗗𝗼𝗼𝗺𝘀𝗱𝗮𝘆 𝗠𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹 𝗥𝗖𝗣𝟴.𝟱 - 𝗔 𝗤𝘂𝗶𝗲𝘁 𝗯𝘂𝘁 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗳𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱 𝗦𝗵𝗶𝗳𝘁 𝗶𝗻 𝗖𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗦𝗰𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 Climate alarmists got it wrong for years: the doomsday model RCP8.5, peddled as "business-as-usual," is now officially dead. Scientists admit it was an extreme what-if scenario, not a likely future. Yet it drove headlines about 4.4°C warming and economic collapse. Now, new projections cut peak emissions by 45% and warming by up to 1.4°C. Why the sudden shift? And how much damage did the misinformation cause? You need to see this. Read the full article: wattsupwiththat.com/2026/04/30/rip…
Watts Up With That tweet media
English
6
73
204
4.8K
Jim Lakely รีทวีตแล้ว
C3
C3@C_3C_3·
This explains everything.👇
C3 tweet media
English
38
139
769
37.2K
Jim Lakely
Jim Lakely@jlakely·
@greggnunziata Cathy's notion that Obama is capable of feeling regret is adorable.
English
1
0
11
300
Jim Lakely
Jim Lakely@jlakely·
@1992Pirates And all many fans remember is him dropping a routine grounder that gave the Braves an extra out in the 9th inning of Game 7 of the NLCS.
English
0
0
0
12
Jim Lakely
Jim Lakely@jlakely·
@Mappy6984 If they started calling traveling, today’s players would adjust and the game would’ve better. Simple as that. Won’t happen, though. A damn shame.
English
1
0
22
1.1K
NRM84
NRM84@Mappy6984·
They get away with everything. Pretty much talentless at this point. Just theatrics
English
544
1.7K
25K
5.1M
Jim Lakely รีทวีตแล้ว
Steve Milloy
Steve Milloy@JunkScience·
The nation's largest Green New Scam project, courtesy of @DominionEnergy.👇 @CFACT and @HeartlandInst have an ongoing lawsuit to stop it, but of course the federal court system is so corrupt the project will be complete before the merits of the lawsuit are finally adjudicated.
Governor Abigail Spanberger@GovernorVA

Off the coast of Virginia, we are building what will be the nation’s largest offshore wind project.   This project will power hundreds of thousands of homes and generate hundreds of new jobs — good jobs, skilled jobs, jobs that can support a family right here in the Commonwealth.   Thank you @MikeFeggans for your leadership on advancing workforce development in the offshore wind industry. It is my pleasure to sign this legislation into law.

English
4
11
38
2.3K
Jim Lakely รีทวีตแล้ว
Anika
Anika@anika_climate·
🚨BREAKING!!! 46 IPCC Scientists REBEL: The Climate Narrative is Crumbling from Within!🚨 Forty-six scientists tied to the IPCC have stepped away or spoken out because their evidence-based views clashed with the official alarmist script. They weren’t “listened to.” Their data didn’t fit the doom-and-gloom story pushed in the Summaries for Policymakers. Don’t trust me, read their own words here! ⬇️ Dr. Robert Balling: “The IPCC notes that ‘No significant acceleration in the rate of sea level rise during the 20th century has been detected.’ This did not appear in the IPCC Summary for Policymakers.” Dr. Lucka Bogataj: “Rising levels of airborne carbon dioxide don’t cause global temperatures to rise…. temperature changed first and some 700 years later a change in aerial content of carbon dioxide followed.” Dr. John Christy: “Little known to the public is the fact that most of the scientists involved with the IPCC do not agree that global warming is occurring. Its findings have been consistently misrepresented and/or politicized with each succeeding report.” Dr. Rosa Compagnucci: “Humans have only contributed a few tenths of a degree to warming on Earth. Solar activity is a key driver of climate.” Dr. Richard Courtney: “The empirical evidence strongly indicates that the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis is wrong.” Dr. Judith Curry: “I’m not going to just spout off and endorse the IPCC because I don’t have confidence in the process.” Dr. Robert Davis: “Global temperatures have not been changing as state of the art climate models predicted they would. Not a single mention of satellite temperature observations appears in the IPCC Summary for Policymakers.” Dr. Willem de Lange: “In 1996 the IPCC listed me as one of approximately 3000 ‘scientists’ who agreed that there was a discernible human influence on climate. I didn’t. There is no evidence to support the hypothesis that runaway catastrophic climate change is due to human activities.” Dr. Chris de Freitas: “Government decision-makers should have heard by now that the basis for the long-standing claim that carbon dioxide is a major driver of global climate is being questioned; along with it the hitherto assumed need for costly measures to restrict carbon dioxide emissions. If they have not heard, it is because of the din of global warming hysteria that relies on the logical fallacy of ‘argument from ignorance’ and predictions of computer models.” Dr. Oliver Frauenfeld: “Much more progress is necessary regarding our current understanding of climate and our abilities to model it.” Dr. Peter Dietze: “Using a flawed eddy diffusion model, the IPCC has grossly underestimated the future oceanic carbon dioxide uptake.” Dr. John Everett: “It is time for a reality check. The oceans and coastal zones have been far warmer and colder than is projected in the present scenarios of climate change. I have reviewed the IPCC and more recent scientific literature and believe that there is not a problem with increased acidification, even up to the unlikely levels in the most-used IPCC scenarios.” Dr. Eigil Friis-Christensen: “The IPCC refused to consider the sun’s effect on the Earth’s climate as a topic worthy of investigation. The IPCC conceived its task only as investigating potential human causes of climate change.” Yet the grift rolls on. New grads, indoctrinated in universities, keep repackaging the same scares for the next generation. “Consensus!” “The Science says!” Endless control through manufactured ignorance. Meanwhile, nature doesn’t care about the narrative. Natural forcings rule. The Sun is cooling. Jet stream gone meridional. Cosmic rays surging, seeding clouds. Result? Wild swings, then global cooling. The emperor has no clothes, and the scientists who know it are finally speaking up. 🔥 Original work from The Dragons Breathe Substack: open.substack.com/pub/thedragons…
Anika tweet media
English
192
2.9K
5K
89.3K
Jim Lakely รีทวีตแล้ว
Sassafrass84
Sassafrass84@Sassafrass_84·
THIS WAS SAID SO PERFECTLY ON FB THAT I HAD TO SHARE. 👇👇👇 “They arrested the President of the United States four times, hit him with 91 charges, indicted him on four separate cases, spied on his campaign, sabotaged his first term, jailed his supporters, raided his private residence, censored and gagged him, tried to bankrupt him, and attempted to remove him from state ballots. When none of that worked, they tried to assassinate him—not once, but three times. And yet they still go on national television demanding we vote for them to ‘save democracy.’ 🤔 The WHCA alleged shooter wasn’t some nut job lurking on the fringes of society, forgotten by the system. He was well-educated, credentialed, employed, and institutionally formed. That’s what makes this so disturbing. At first glance, this doesn’t look like a breakdown of the system, it looks more like a product of it. Academia, media, and politics helped build the moral permission structure. While neither ‘side’ is perfect, all I know is this: I’m on the side that doesn’t kill people, celebrate their deaths, or fantasize about killing them just to win an election. That’s the side I’m on. 🇺🇸” PC: Lance Smith
English
192
2.4K
6.1K
71.5K