John Behles

6.5K posts

John Behles banner
John Behles

John Behles

@jmbehles

Physicians Capital GP, Patent Attorney, M&A, IP Strategist, Futures Junkie Founder: https://t.co/EyIbsv3oL9, KAMBEH Innovations https://t.co/FtTfRk8rBc

เข้าร่วม Ekim 2022
338 กำลังติดตาม469 ผู้ติดตาม
Matt Margolis
Matt Margolis@ItsMattsLaw·
computer, what is sanctions
English
6
0
25
2.2K
John Behles
John Behles@jmbehles·
@welkerlaw @buccocapital Bro. I am not arguing with you about this. I don't give a shit. You know damned well this is going to clog the courts and there is zero chance judges are going to put up with it. Lack of knowledge of the law is no excuse. Paper pushing is the lowest level of legal practice.
English
1
0
1
9
David Welker
David Welker@welkerlaw·
@jmbehles @buccocapital A lot of pro se litigants have: 1) legitimate grievances, even if not framed correctly 2) are judgment proof LLMs will improve their success rates.
English
1
0
0
13
BuccoCapital Bloke
BuccoCapital Bloke@buccocapital·
We will have more lawyers because AI zeroes the friction of suing people It’s going to unambiguously bad for society and I don’t really know what the solution is
BuccoCapital Bloke tweet media
Aaron Levie@levie

We will likely have more lawyers in the future than today, because: 1) AI will cause so many more people to ask legal questions which will encourage them to need to verify or execute through an actual lawyer. 2) AI will cause an explosion of more and more exotic legal terms that lawyers will be spending even more time reviewing redlines or new cases around. 3) All the new areas of law that now are emerging around the use of AI itself in every single industry. AI introduces an explosion of IP, privacy, and regulatory compliance challenges across all verticals. This has historical precedent as well. Between the creation of the PC and the internet (both technologies that made the legal profession far more efficient), the ABA pegs active attorneys having gone from roughly 400,000 in 1975 to roughly 1,375,000 in 2025. When we make professions more efficient and automated, often demand for them goes up not down.

English
67
41
809
214.6K
John Behles
John Behles@jmbehles·
@SMB_Attorney That's the bitch of democratization. We are about to see the unleashing of massive amounts of frivolous lawsuits on the courts, the likes we have never seen before. Courts will have to be the gate keepers here.
English
0
1
2
172
SMB Attorney
SMB Attorney@SMB_Attorney·
If you think unprecedented access to legal tools will reduce your dependency on lawyers, you’re looking at it backwards. Guess who else has access? People who hate you and want to extract money from you. Are you going to DIY all of that while running a business and raising kids? Nope. You’re going to call your lawyer and say, “Deal with this, please? I don’t have time for this!” and they’re going to use the new tools. Costs will go down, but lawyer work will explode. Do you get it now??
BuccoCapital Bloke@buccocapital

We will have more lawyers because AI zeroes the friction of suing people It’s going to unambiguously bad for society and I don’t really know what the solution is

English
20
18
140
20.1K
andrew arruda
andrew arruda@andrewarruda·
that the full breadth and depth of citable, current law is not available by API is profoundly concerning
English
9
10
70
7.3K
John Behles
John Behles@jmbehles·
@tomweedlaw Some lawyers do not fit under this umbrella. Thank you for reminding me.
English
0
0
0
14
tom howard
tom howard@tomweedlaw·
@jmbehles not really, I never call my insurance policy names and say they suck. But lawyers got that scapegoat factor with an insurance wrapper for sure.
English
1
0
1
41
John Behles
John Behles@jmbehles·
People hire lawyers for the same reason they buy insurance policies.
GIF
English
2
0
2
673
JH
JH@writeclimbrun·
law math is telling myself that I billed several additional hours this weekend so I can buy myself a little toy.
English
3
1
116
4.4K
CoffeeBlackMD
CoffeeBlackMD@CoffeeBlackMD·
That's true but my comment was really more of people wouldn't want because of cost, but then would be also mad if you missed something that is a potential but low probability. So. We check every day for that reason. We do not live in a culture that will accept something missed that way.
English
1
0
1
34
Papa Heme
Papa Heme@Papa_Heme·
If patients had to pay out of pocket for all the bloodwork done during a hospital stay I’m pretty sure they would refuse over 90% of it. At least I would.
English
18
1
101
10.2K
CoffeeBlackMD
CoffeeBlackMD@CoffeeBlackMD·
@hubermanlab @TakeWeightOffMD @Brady_H It’s always checkmate man. You’re like an interested nerd (it’s a compliment) and you just post about things that you get into. And the cynics always project their stuff. It’s exhausting.
English
1
0
8
339
John Behles
John Behles@jmbehles·
@CoffeeBlackMD @Papa_Heme 99% of the issue is that the lab "prices" are not aligned with the actual COGs of the lab. $5 lipid panel you can get outpatient that supposedly costs the non-profit hospital $500 to run.
English
1
0
1
31
CoffeeBlackMD
CoffeeBlackMD@CoffeeBlackMD·
@Papa_Heme I’d be happy enough if the standard of care wasn’t daily labs but who’s going to be the brave souls to start that.
English
2
0
5
676
Nir Golan
Nir Golan@lawheroezV2·
We need to build an anti-tech bro “lawyers mark up NDA’s at $1000/hr “moron bot.
English
1
0
10
801
John Behles
John Behles@jmbehles·
@ckieser13 @mdwstfrontierAI LLMs cannot decipher dicta from holdings. Hell tons of human lawyers can't. The division between the two isn't even apparent to the judge sometimes
English
0
0
3
20
Chris Kieser
Chris Kieser@ckieser13·
@mdwstfrontierAI Unfortunately a big problem in law since opinions will often state three different positions and only one of them is the holding!
English
1
1
11
246
Chris Kieser
Chris Kieser@ckieser13·
Here's an example of a classic Westlaw AI hallucination. State v. Sweat doesn't actually hold that the Court of Appeals got it wrong by rendering a provision "meaningless surplusage." It affirmed the CoA. The quote appears in the Court's description of the state's arguments.
Chris Kieser tweet media
English
3
3
56
6.6K
SightBringer
SightBringer@_The_Prophet__·
⚡️A first year lawyer at a big firm bills $400 an hour to redline NDAs. That’s the first task you get as a junior associate. You sit in an office at 11pm marking up contracts, catching inconsistencies, flagging risk language, suggesting revisions. It’s tedious. It’s high volume. It’s how firms justify $200k starting salaries because clients pay the bill. Claude just did it in the sidebar. With tracked changes. In the format partners already review. At a cost of essentially nothing. The entire pyramid of professional services is built on junior people doing high volume routine cognitive work at high billing rates to fund the partnership structure above them. That pyramid just lost its base. If Claude can redline an NDA, it can redline a lease. A licensing agreement. An employment contract. A merger agreement. The complexity varies but the task structure is identical. Read the document. Identify risk. Suggest revisions. Show your work. Law is just the visible example. The same thing is happening to consulting. To accounting. To financial analysis. Every profession where junior people are paid to process documents, identify patterns, and produce written output just watched their entry level job description appear in a product demo. The tracked changes feature is what makes this irreversible. Anthropic didn’t build a tool that generates documents you then have to manually compare. They built a tool that edits your document and shows the diff. That’s the entire workflow of professional document review compressed into a sidebar interaction. The senior person doesn’t change their process at all. They still review tracked changes. They just don’t need the junior person to produce them anymore.
Claude@claudeai

Claude for Word is now in beta. Draft, edit, and revise documents directly from the sidebar. Claude preserves your formatting, and edits appear as tracked changes. Available on Team and Enterprise plans.

English
74
86
840
251.2K
John Behles
John Behles@jmbehles·
@RobertFreundLaw Just say "its market". Covers a multitude of sins. Hey why did you mark up this section that way? Uhhhh...it's market bro. Don't you use market provisions. But tell me why... It's market bro.
GIF
English
0
0
2
90
John Behles
John Behles@jmbehles·
@trq212 I don't want any more features. Fix basic shit.
John Behles tweet media
English
2
1
19
933
Thariq
Thariq@trq212·
New in Claude Code: /ultraplan Claude builds an implementation plan for you on the web. You can read it and edit it, then run the plan on the web or back in your terminal. Available now in preview for all users with CC on the web enabled.
English
522
662
10.3K
1.2M

ค้นพบ

@ItsMattsLaw @welkerlaw @buccocapital @SMB_Attorney @andrewarruda @tomweedlaw @writeclimbrun @CoffeeBlackMD