حمزة الحنفي

@Jdxdd1356 arabs are still superior

1) Boasting about lineage is a trait of Jahliyya polytheists. There are many evidences on nationalism being discouraged and kufr. This is the Persian Hujjat Al-Islam, saying it's a despicable trait that is ingrained in his (ugly) soul.

@thelifeoffneeha nope, the scholars say the ones born upon the haqq and remain on it are better than those who joined later. an example is taken in the superiority of the sahabah. the further their islam was from the first revelation, the lower their rank went if not accompanied by other traits

Reverts are better muslims than us.

@mk_muwahid just shows the ignorance of yahya in ‘Ilm al hadīṯh

𝗞𝗵𝗮𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗿𝗮𝗵 (84) The Claim That Shaykh Al-Albani Was Overly Lenient and Shaykh Muqbil Overly Strict in Hadith Grading Question: It is said about Shaykh Nasir Ad-Din Al-Albani that he was lenient in his authentication and weakening of hadiths, and about Shaykh Muqbil that he was overly severe. How true are these statements? Sheikh Yahya Al-Hajoori As for the claim that Shaykh Al-Albani was lenient in authentication and weakening—this is incorrect. How could that be? He never weakened a hadith without providing clear evidence for its weakness. He was extremely meticulous in weakening hadiths. His book Silsilah Adh-Da’ifah (The Chain of Weak Hadiths) stands as a testament to this, showing his great precision. Regarding authentication, he would sometimes exercise his own reasoning (ijtihad) on certain hadiths, citing various chains and applying his own methodological principles. He might say, "This hadith, through these chains, is hasan in my view." This is similar to what Al-Hafidh Ibn Hajar does in Bulugh Al-Maram, where he says, "This hadith is hasan," even though some other hadith masters or researchers may disagree. The same can be said for Az-Zayla’i and other scholars—this is a normal matter of scholarly difference. It is true that some hadiths in Silsilah As-Sahihah (The Chain of Authentic Hadiths) which he deemed authentic are not accepted by some other scholars. However, in reality, his ijtihad was very strong, and he provided the Muslim Ummah with an immense treasure that neither a scholar nor a student can do without. He remains a mujtahid, like other mujtahids in the field of hadith. A student of knowledge should still examine the hadiths, even those found in Silsilah As-Sahihah or Irwa’ Al-Ghalil, and form their own conclusion based on what they see, even if it aligns with Shaykh Al-Albani’s ruling. If a student feels they have not reached the level to judge a hadith as hasan or sahih as the Shaykh did, they can simply hold their own informed opinion. And all praise is due to Allah, the Lord of the worlds. As for the claim that Shaykh Muqbil was severe in authentication and weakening—there is no doubt that he was extremely meticulous. The "severity" here simply refers to his rigorous precision. Shaykh Muqbil would scrutinise many hadiths in light of hidden defects (‘ilal). I once asked him directly: "O Shaykh, the hadiths you included in As-Sahih Al-Musnad, did you examine them for hidden defects?" He replied, "I mostly examine them for hidden defects." He continued this practice throughout his life, constantly reviewing As-Sahih Al-Musnad against books of ‘ilal. If Al-Hafidh Ad-Daraqutni, Abu Hatim, Abu Zur’ah, Al-Hafidh Ibn Hajar, or any of the hadith masters stated that a hadith had a defect, Shaykh Muqbil would either remove it from his collection or keep it with a note indicating its defect. In my observation, the criticisms regarding authentication directed at our Shaykh (Muqbil), may Allah have mercy on him, are far fewer than those directed at Shaykh Al-Albani. This is worth noting, considering the vast number of hadiths that Shaykh Al-Albani ruled upon compared to the number that our Shaykh ruled upon. إجابات الشيخ على الاسئلة الجزائرية مستلة من رسالته الإفتاء على أسئلة واردة من دول شتى t.me/khawaaaaatir/1…

@ahadsoab @CSKified @Uqasha_08 yes some people have permitted what is haram and vice versa under the name of fiqh, that isn’t incorrect and even us hanafis from our scholars like al sakhawi say this in relative to those who permitted anal under the guise of fiqh and how sakhawi viewed that to be kufr

@CSKified @Uqasha_08 (They have taken their scholars and monks as lords besides Allah ) The Messenger of Allah ﷺ and the Imams after him interpreted this verse as what you call 'Fiqh', and it is what Allah called shirk.

To those that oppose the da’wah of Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhab and accuse him of being a “takfiri”, know this: 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗮ʿ𝘄𝗮𝗵 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗿𝗲𝗰𝘁, 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗳𝗹𝗼𝘄𝗲𝗱 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝗶𝘁 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗿𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗷𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗲𝗱!

@Deenresponds hey donkey, there’s only one goalpost and it hasn’t moved from being up your ass 😂

@paleohanafi Look at how you shifted the goal post like the little dog you are stay down little dog i know it hurts.

Yes like how ibn kathir says so as well and his teacher and many other classical scholars. Life has you guys regurgitating 2020 slop

@Deenresponds hey twink, fix your your tone with me before you get pressed again for getting embarrassed by daniel haqiqajew on matters of shirk 😭😭 you don’t know what is and isn’t shirk and have the audacity to speak? you tiktok christian debaters are the biggest juhal, very embarrassing😂

Hey doughnut if you knew the context of the convo you would know that i said that 10 times in my discussion with life yesterday and ive mentioned it countless times in my videos. unless you have been living under a rock for the past 3 years you would know that i don’t believe you can use that language today

@off_by_one_ @travelingflying not possible cause Vishnu doesn’t exist, unless you can prove that to me?

@paleohanafi @travelingflying everytime a muslim speaks against vishnu, a baby in gaza gets sniped. please stop 😐

Japanese politician says that Muslims shouldn’t be buried in Japan. ”Japan is a cremation country. Allocating land for Muslim burials is not appropriate. If they want burial, it should be done in their home countries at their own expense.”

@Laptusk @off_by_one_ @travelingflying the entire madhab takes its aqwal from ahmed and his ashaab, and it’s taken from ahmeds own words as he called the jews muwahidin i forgot where and I can’t be asked to open up his athar, maybe later i will

@paleohanafi @off_by_one_ @travelingflying wdym ahmad own statement this al buhutis words, but in its context it makes sense, just saying jews are muwahidin looks bad

@meowbundi there’s a plethora of athar of sahabah and tabi’n drinking it, even in the story of laylat al jinn, ibn mas’ud was carrying a fermented nabidh (date) thingy or whatever it was called. abu hanifah in his first opinion used that to permit wudu using date wine btw, pretty cool

Shaykh al Islām Ibn Taymiyyah رحمه الله stated, “The scholars are agreed that Muʿāwiyah (رضي الله عنه) is the best of the kings of this Ummah.” ● [مجموع الفتاوى ٤\٤٧٨]

@saanyaww and lastly, why the hell are you quoting shaykh ibn uthaymin رحمه الله in a topic of fiqh when he’s a mujtahid who leaves the hanbali madhab on numerous occasions? he even calls some of the mu’tamam positions disgusting in his ta’liqat upon al kafi, don’t quote him next time…

@saanyaww but all 4 of the madahib permit a man to force himself on his female sex slave. the hanafiyyah have also permitted a woman to force her husband into intercourse if need so require. the scholars also mention the permissibility of beating your wife if she doesn’t let you have sex-

Forcing is oppression and people should not post such things in the name of Islam. It is not permissible for the husband to force his wife in a way that harms her, because Allah says: ‘Do not harm them’… and harming is prohibited in all situations. “He should approach her in a manner of kindness and mutual agreement. — Ibn Uthaymeen Source: Sharh al-Mumti‘ ‘ala Zad al-Mustaqni‘

@Reze2qm irdc for these gay ass race talks but an iranian can’t be talking about ugly when we all know shaving sticks don’t exist in iran, neither does deodorant

Saudi Arabia is an incel country with coping with sharia. If they abducted sharia, half of Saudi men couldn’t even reach sex. Saudis think they are masculine and all foreigner women fetishize them even tho they are short, zesty, brown and weak desert creatures.

@hashimiyy_ @AndaluciMaliki1 what book is this

Interestingly, the Zaydis who considered Sayyidunā Muʿāwiyah (رضي الله عنه) a disbeliever did not base this judgment on his war against Sayyidunā ʿAlī (رضي الله عنه). Rather, their accusation stemmed from claims that he held the doctrine of jabr. In reality, however, what they were objecting to was the doctrine later articulated by Ahl al-Sunnah, namely that Allāh predetermines the actions of His servants and creates them, while the servant acquires the act (kasb).

@ojora literally don’t associate this donkey with the maktabah 😂

@off_by_one_ @travelingflying every second my uber driver (you) comes late, i impregnate a petite hindiyyah vishnu worshipper

@paleohanafi @travelingflying everytime a muslim is bigoted on the internet, god orphans yet another baby in gaza. what have you done 😐

@ojora idk what the maktabah has to do with this, stop throwing their name and associating it with the maktabah as this is the same thing sufis do with da’esh and salafiyyah

@off_by_one_ @travelingflying you gonna engineer a scam business and finance your cow breeding farm with the earnings aren’t you, silly little cow diddler

@paleohanafi @travelingflying ^this quality of argument is a good reminder of why you guys aren't the engineers or finance kids 😐