Duke of Abuja
2.4K posts
Duke of Abuja
@realPeterInyang
CEO Pe-Point Legacy | Brand Manager and Strategist | Content Creator | Digital Marketer | Writer | Editor | Online Influencer.
Abuja, Nigeria เข้าร่วม Aralık 2015
716 กำลังติดตาม182 ผู้ติดตาม
The network is very poor within the venue.
Tinubu's APC probably directed telecommunications companies to weaken the network around the Rainbow Events Center.
They have no idea we have installed STARLINK hours before the convention started.
English
@BashirAhmaad Pope is not a Christian Spiritual Leader. He is the head of Roman Catholic Church.
Let that sink.
English
It is surprising to see some Christians aligning with Donald Trump in opposition to their spiritual leader, Pope Leo. It shouldn’t be so. 🫢
English
The right to fair hearing is a constitutional right and where a person alleged that their rights (under any circumstances) has been violated, those individuals have the right to fair hearings or right to seek redress in court.
Relying on section 83 of the Electoral Act, without taking cognizance of section 36(1) of 1999 Constitution is completely absurd, in my opinion. No law or authority is superior to the constitution. To think that any law will be made to oust the jurisdiction of a Court that has been conferred by the constitution or the prevent a right of someone that the constitution has already guaranteed is laughable.
While it is wrong to use the court to prevent the flow democratic activities, it is particularly important to always ensure that rights of individuals who belong to an organization is still protected and where there is a violation or an alleged violation of a person’s rights, then the court cannot by any other law be prevented from exercising it judicial power to remedy the wrong.
In my submission, Section 83 of the Electoral Act, 2026, is inconsistent with section 36(1) of the 1999 Constitution that guarantee the Right of fair hearing of everyone, therefore to the extent that it prevents the right of an individual to apply to court for redress on a wrong done to them, it is void for it inconsistency.
Notwithstanding the above, I do agree that, interlocutory Orders, especially those that seeks to stall a democratic process should be sparingly granted and on a very strong grounds. The court should not be readily available to grant interim Orders, or allow parties to use frivolous applications to obtain orders that stalls due democratic processes.
Finally, threatening lawyers or judges in statements, is on its own totally unacceptable. The NBA is not a political party to make statements, advising parties or INEC on matters pending before the Court, also, the NBA and its leadership, cannot constitute itself to a Court to give a conclusive interpretation of the law or give verdict based on what the leadership believes is the true position of the law, no matter how persuasive the facts appears before it.
Best Regards.
E. O. Ogar, Esq.
Nigerian Bar Association@NigBarAssoc
OUR LAWS AND DEMOCRACY MUST BE PROTECTED AT ALL TIMES The Nigerian Bar Association has closely monitored recent political and legal developments as the nation gradually approaches the 2027 General Elections. These developments, particularly those arising from the interpretation and potential application of provisions of the Electoral Act 2026, raise serious constitutional, democratic, and rule-of-law concerns that require immediate intervention. We particularly deprecate the disturbing involvement by lawyers and courts in the internal affairs of political parties despite the clear provisions of the Electoral Act, 2026, which stipulates in Section 83 of the Act that “No court in Nigeria shall entertain jurisdiction over any suit or matter pertaining to the internal affairs of a political party.” Not only are courts denied jurisdiction to entertain any matter pertaining to the internal affairs of a political party, but they are also precluded from granting any interim or interlocutory injunction even where any action has been brought in violation of the Act. The section further provides that “Where such an action is brought in negation of this provision, no interim or interlocutory injunction shall be entertained by the Court, but the Court shall suspend its ruling and deliver it at the stage of final judgment and shall give accelerated hearing to the matter”. What we now see are situations where actions are not only instituted in Courts by lawyers in clear violation of the Act, but Courts purportedly grant interim and/or interlocutory injunctions in clear contempt of statutory provisions of the law. This does not augur well for our democracy. Democracy will not thrive in a situation where lawyers and courts take actions and decisions that not only negate our laws but also do violence to them. This emerging trend of subverting the clear letters of the Electoral Act and dragging courts into the internal affairs of political parties through disingenuous litigation, forum shopping, and malafide applications designed to secure undemocratic political advantage, bodes no good for our democracy. Such practices, if not immediately curbed, would directly contradict the clear intendment of the Electoral Act and risk transforming the judicial processes into avenues for political score-settling or electoral manipulation. We must reiterate that these provisions were clearly designed to curb abuse of court processes and discourage forum shopping in political disputes. This is therefore why the NBA is concerned that the abuse, misapplication, or selective deployment of these provisions may create opportunities for manipulation capable of undermining democratic competition and shrinking the political space. Members of the Bar are reminded that they are Ministers in the Temple of Justice and not political agents seeking judicial endorsement of partisan objectives. The filing of actions intended to draw courts into internal political party disputes, particularly where jurisdiction is expressly excluded, constitutes an abuse of court process and a violation of professional responsibility. The NBA will take firm steps to deter such conduct. Lawyers who deliberately file actions aimed at procuring judicial interference in intra-party affairs, or who seek ex parte or interlocutory orders in clear violation of statutory provisions, risk facing disciplinary proceedings. We will not hesitate to present petitions before the Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Committee (LPDC) against any Legal Practitioner found to be engaging in such conduct. This will be pursued decisively to serve as a deterrent and to preserve the sanctity of the judicial process. The Nigerian judiciary must stay vigilant and resist being drawn into political theatrics. Courts should firmly decline invitations, no matter how artfully crafted, to intervene in matters the law explicitly bars them from.
English
@NigBarAssoc The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria is Supreme.
Any provision of the Electoral Act that is inconsistent with the Constitution is null and void. You can't trample upon someone's right in the guise of internal affairs of the party and expect the Court to keep quiet.
English
OUR LAWS AND DEMOCRACY MUST BE PROTECTED AT ALL TIMES
The Nigerian Bar Association has closely monitored recent political and legal developments as the nation gradually approaches the 2027 General Elections. These developments, particularly those arising from the interpretation and potential application of provisions of the Electoral Act 2026, raise serious constitutional, democratic, and rule-of-law concerns that require immediate intervention.
We particularly deprecate the disturbing involvement by lawyers and courts in the internal affairs of political parties despite the clear provisions of the Electoral Act, 2026, which stipulates in Section 83 of the Act that “No court in Nigeria shall entertain jurisdiction over any suit or matter pertaining to the internal affairs of a political party.”
Not only are courts denied jurisdiction to entertain any matter pertaining to the internal affairs of a political party, but they are also precluded from granting any interim or interlocutory injunction even where any action has been brought in violation of the Act. The section further provides that “Where such an action is brought in negation of this provision, no interim or interlocutory injunction shall be entertained by the Court, but the Court shall suspend its ruling and deliver it at the stage of final judgment and shall give accelerated hearing to the matter”.
What we now see are situations where actions are not only instituted in Courts by lawyers in clear violation of the Act, but Courts purportedly grant interim and/or interlocutory injunctions in clear contempt of statutory provisions of the law. This does not augur well for our democracy. Democracy will not thrive in a situation where lawyers and courts take actions and decisions that not only negate our laws but also do violence to them. This emerging trend of subverting the clear letters of the Electoral Act and dragging courts into the internal affairs of political parties through disingenuous litigation, forum shopping, and malafide applications designed to secure undemocratic political advantage, bodes no good for our democracy. Such practices, if not immediately curbed, would directly contradict the clear intendment of the Electoral Act and risk transforming the judicial processes into avenues for political score-settling or electoral manipulation.
We must reiterate that these provisions were clearly designed to curb abuse of court processes and discourage forum shopping in political disputes. This is therefore why the NBA is concerned that the abuse, misapplication, or selective deployment of these provisions may create opportunities for manipulation capable of undermining democratic competition and shrinking the political space.
Members of the Bar are reminded that they are Ministers in the Temple of Justice and not political agents seeking judicial endorsement of partisan objectives. The filing of actions intended to draw courts into internal political party disputes, particularly where jurisdiction is expressly excluded, constitutes an abuse of court process and a violation of professional responsibility.
The NBA will take firm steps to deter such conduct. Lawyers who deliberately file actions aimed at procuring judicial interference in intra-party affairs, or who seek ex parte or interlocutory orders in clear violation of statutory provisions, risk facing disciplinary proceedings. We will not hesitate to present petitions before the Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Committee (LPDC) against any Legal Practitioner found to be engaging in such conduct. This will be pursued decisively to serve as a deterrent and to preserve the sanctity of the judicial process.
The Nigerian judiciary must stay vigilant and resist being drawn into political theatrics. Courts should firmly decline invitations, no matter how artfully crafted, to intervene in matters the law explicitly bars them from.
English
@vanguardngrnews Still a way of incurring additional costs.
English
FG reroutes Lagos-Calabar coastal highway through Ogoniland to honour late Mpigi
The federal government has approved the rerouting of the Lagos-Calabar Coastal Highway to pass through Ogoniland in honour of the late Senator Mpigi Barinada Barry.
Speaking at a Night of Tribute in Abuja yesterday, Umahi described Mprigi’s death as a profound loss to the nation and recalled his unwavering commitment to national development, integrity, and bridge-building in the Senate.
vanguardngr.com/2026/04/fg-rer…
English
He climbed a ridge. That is where the story turns. When the F-15E was hit on Friday morning, both crew members ejected over the mountains of Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad Province in southwestern Iran. The pilot was located first and extracted by HH-60 rescue helicopters within hours, under small arms fire that wounded crew aboard the recovery aircraft. The weapons systems officer landed deeper in hostile terrain. He was alone on the ground in a country where state television was broadcasting a bounty for his capture and Basij militia were flooding the mountain roads below.
According to reports now confirmed by Fox News citing two senior US officials, the WSO used his SERE training, the survival, evasion, resistance, and escape doctrine drilled into every American combat aircrew. He moved on foot through rugged terrain. He climbed to an elevated ridge near the city of Dehdasht. He activated his encrypted emergency beacon. And he waited.
The beacon was the thread. Everything that followed pulled on it.
US Joint Special Operations Command launched a night extraction package. Reports indicate Delta Force operators and Pararescuemen from the 24th Special Tactics Squadron inserted via helicopters from the 160th Special Operations Aviation Regiment, the Night Stalkers, the unit that flew the Bin Laden raid. A-10 Warthogs from the 355th Wing provided close air support, running gun passes on IRGC and Basij convoys advancing toward the WSO’s position. HC-130J tankers kept the package airborne. Multiple aircraft were dispatched to establish a temporary fire zone around Dehdasht, a no-entry perimeter enforced with precision strikes on a telecommunications tower and approaching vehicles. Iranian local officials reported at least four killed and several wounded from the strikes.
Then the operation went sideways. According to reports corroborated by Fox News’s confirmation that US forces destroyed “aircraft which have sensitive equipment,” two C-130 transports landed at a remote forward arming and refuelling point inside Iran to support the extraction. Both became stuck. Rather than allow the aircraft and their classified systems to fall into IRGC hands, American forces destroyed both planes on the ground. The deliberate destruction of two US military aircraft inside Iran to deny equipment to the enemy is the detail that separates a clean extraction from an operation that nearly failed before it succeeded.
Additional transports arrived under A-10 cover. The Delta operators and Pararescuemen who were now themselves stranded at the destroyed landing zone loaded the WSO and extracted under ongoing fire. Fox News reported that the WSO “and the members of the rescue team are all safely out of Iran.” Zero American casualties.
Desert One in 1980 ended when a helicopter collided with a C-130 on a remote Iranian airstrip, killing eight Americans before the mission reached Tehran. Forty-six years later, C-130s were destroyed on Iranian soil again. This time the destruction was deliberate. This time the team got out. This time the man they came for came with them.
The operation confirms two truths that cannot be separated. American special operations forces can penetrate, fight inside, and extract from Iran. And the war that was supposed to be over required the most elite soldiers in the US military to fight a ground battle in Iranian mountains to recover one man from a country with no air defences. Both statements are true. The rescue proves American capability. The need for the rescue proves Iranian capability. And the 48-hour countdown is still running.
open.substack.com/pub/shanakaans…
Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡@shanaka86
BREAKING: The missing American weapons systems officer is alive and out of Iran. Fox News, citing two senior US officials, reports that US special operations forces extracted the downed F-15E crew member after a massive firefight with IRGC and Basij forces in the mountains of southwestern Iran. The Pentagon has not officially confirmed. If the reports hold, the United States just pulled off the first successful combat rescue from inside Iranian territory in American military history. Desert One failed in 1980. Dehdasht did not. The WSO ejected over Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad Province on Friday when Iranian air defences shot down his F-15E Strike Eagle, the first manned American aircraft lost to enemy fire since 2003. He spent approximately 24 hours evading capture on the ground while Iranian state television broadcast a bounty for his capture alive, Basij militia flooded the mountains, and armed civilians fired automatic rifles at American rescue helicopters overhead. NBC News verified the footage. The IRGC warned residents to stay away. Tasnim, the semi-official news agency, said Iran would “not announce whether the pilot is in our custody.” Then the operators came. Reports describe a JSOC-led night extraction supported by A-10 Warthog gun runs on IRGC convoys and a telecommunications tower in Dehdasht to suppress the Iranian response. Iranian local officials reported at least four killed and several wounded. Unverified social media reports described “large numbers” of IRGC and Basij casualties transferred from Black Mountain to Dehdasht Hospital. Crowds gathered outside. The US struck Basij convoys advancing on the WSO’s position with close air support while ground teams moved in for the extraction. Fox News reported that the WSO “and the members of the rescue team are all safely out of Iran.” This happened 48 hours after the President told the nation that Iran’s radar was “100 percent annihilated” and that there was “not a thing” Iran could do. Iran shot down the jet. Iran mobilised thousands to hunt the crew. Iran offered a bounty on state television. And America sent its most classified soldiers into the Iranian mountains, fought the IRGC on the ground, and brought their man home. The gap between the political narrative and the operational reality has never been wider or more consequential. The rescue, if confirmed, changes the war’s trajectory in ways that transcend the survival of one airman. It demonstrates that American special operations forces can insert into, fight inside, and extract from Iran. It proves that the IRGC’s ground control in its own provinces is penetrable. It removes the immediate hostage leverage that would have paralysed American decision-making heading into the April 6 deadline. And it shifts the psychological balance: the country that was hunting the pilot is now absorbing the fact that the hunters were outfought by a force that came and left before dawn. But it also confirms what the shootdown already proved. Iran is not finished. A country with “no anti-aircraft equipment” brought down a $100 million fighter. A country whose radar was “annihilated” forced the most expensive rescue operation of the war. A country that was supposed to be “decimated” mobilised fast enough to require A-10 gun runs and a ground battle to recover one man. The WSO is alive because the operators were extraordinary. The operators were needed because the war is not what the President says it is. The man is out. The war is not over. And the 48-hour clock is still running. open.substack.com/pub/shanakaans…
English
@BolajiADC Say politicians who started the destruction of Nigeria when they held sway in power.
English
BREAKING
ADC is taking its fight for democracy global.
As part of our efforts to strengthen international engagement, we are establishing a Special Representatives Network across key global capitals to engage foreign governments, amplify credible information about Nigeria’s political environment, and counter one-sided government narratives.
This comes amid growing attacks on our members, attempts to undermine our leadership, and efforts to restrict political participation ahead of the 2027 General Elections.
Our representatives will engage foreign governments, international media, democracy institutions, and the Nigerian diaspora, providing regular briefings on political developments, human rights concerns, and electoral integrity.
We are also launching a National Documentation Initiative to systematically track and report incidents affecting political participation across Nigeria.
From Washington DC to London, Brussels to Addis Ababa, ADC is building a global platform for accountability.
Nigeria’s democracy must be seen, heard, and defended everywhere.
English
@BolajiADC Call Ibadan faction of PDP and ask how far. They towed this same path
English
The African Democratic Congress (ADC) has carefully reviewed the recent interview granted by the Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Professor Joash Amupitan, and finds it necessary to respond, in order to correct several legal and factual misrepresentations. While the Commission seeks to present its position as one anchored in law and neutrality, the substance of the Chairman’s own statements reveals a fundamental misapplication of both constitutional principles and judicial directives.
First, the Chairman’s repeated assertion that INEC is merely acting within the confines of a “multi-party constitutional order” is, with respect, a deflection from the central issue. The question before Nigerians is not whether Nigeria remains a multi-party state in theory, but whether the actions of INEC in practice are undermining the ability of opposition parties to freely organize and function. The ADC has not alleged the abolition of multi-party democracy in form; rather, it has raised concerns about actions that, in effect, weaken it. The Chairman’s reliance on the existence of multiple parties as proof of neutrality does not address the specific conduct under scrutiny.
On the issue of the Court of Appeal’s order, the Chairman places heavy reliance on the doctrine of status quo ante bellum, suggesting that it requires a rollback to a particular point in time and a suspension of party activities. This interpretation is both selective and legally flawed. The preservation order, by its nature, is intended to prevent actions that would irreversibly alter the subject matter of litigation, not to paralyze the internal functioning of a political party. The Chairman’s attempt to define the “status quo” by tracing the controversy to internal party developments in July 2025 is an administrative interpretation that INEC is not empowered to make. That determination lies strictly within the jurisdiction of the courts, not the Commission.
Furthermore, the Chairman’s claim that holding congresses or conventions would “render proceedings nugatory” is an overreach. Internal party processes, conducted in line with the party’s constitution and the Electoral Act, do not extinguish or prejudice pending judicial proceedings. On the contrary, democratic continuity within a political party is presumed under the law unless expressly restrained by a competent court. No such explicit order prohibiting congresses or conventions has been cited. What exists are general preservation directives, which cannot be expanded into a blanket prohibition on party governance.
The assertion that INEC is restrained from monitoring congresses due to an injunction equally exposes a critical misunderstanding of its role. INEC’s duty to monitor is statutory and triggered upon proper notification. A party’s decision to proceed with its internal processes does not depend on INEC’s participation. By conflating its monitoring function with the validity of the processes themselves, INEC effectively places itself above the law, assuming a veto power it does not possess.
The Chairman also references conflicting communications from different factions within the ADC as justification for inaction. However, the existence of internal disputes does not suspend a political party’s constitutional rights. Indeed, such disputes are commonplace in democratic systems and are routinely resolved without administrative paralysis. INEC’s role is not to arbitrate these disputes or to freeze party activities pending their resolution, but to maintain neutrality and allow due process to run its course.
1/2
English
@BolajiADC @inecnigeria You will suffer the same fate Makinde's faction suffered. Defy court order and go ahead with the convention
English
This is to notify all members of the ADC that despite the illegal actions of @inecnigeria, the ADC congresses will continue as follows:
English
My message is clear:
To the USA & Israel:
It is high time to stop the war that is inflicting immense human suffering & triggering devastating economic consequences.
To Iran:
Stop attacking your neighbours.
Conflicts end when leaders choose dialogue over destruction.
That choice still exists.
And it must be made now.
English
@RepRileyMoore @nytimes @UBACares @UBACares there's a deposit made into my account, but you're yet to credit me.
Can you explain why?
English
This is disgusting. A new low, even for the @NYTimes. It’s been barely a day since Jos was rocked by this horrific attack by radical Islamic terrorists against peaceful Christians, and the Times couldn’t bother to ask for comment before running this anti-Christian hit.
Here’s what I would have said if you asked for comment:
"How many more Christians need to be slaughtered by Muslims, particularly on holy days, before the failing New York Times acknowledges that Christians in Nigeria are being massacred for their faith in our Lord and Savior? It’s pretty obvious if you aren’t trying to pass your radical political agenda off as news."
English
@UBACares there is a deposit made into my account, but you are yet to credit me.
Can you explain why?
English
@shanaka86 How does that bother you? Last I checked, they prepared for this war. Don't be mischievous
English
JUST IN: The United States has fired 2,400 Patriot interceptors in 31 days. It manufactures 650 per year. Replenishment at current production takes three and a half years. It has consumed 40 percent of its global THAAD inventory. It produces fewer than 100 THAAD interceptors annually. Full replenishment takes four to five years. Each interceptor contains neodymium and samarium-cobalt magnets sourced from Chinese-controlled supply chains. The US defence rare earth stockpile has approximately two months remaining.
Read those numbers again. The US military has consumed more precision weapons in one month than it can manufacture in three years, using materials it can only source from the country it may need to fight next.
Every Patriot fired at an Iranian Fattah-2 over Riyadh is a Patriot that does not exist for a Chinese DF-21 over the Taiwan Strait. Every rare earth magnet consumed in Gulf interceptors is a magnet that cannot be installed in a replacement built for the Pacific. The Iran war is not just depleting American arsenals. It is depleting American deterrence against China. And the country counting the interceptors from both sides of the table, as supplier and as future adversary, is the same country hosting peace talks in Beijing right now.
China controls 90 percent of rare earth refining. China produces 90 percent of the world’s high-performance magnets. China buys 80 to 91 percent of Iran’s oil exports. China provides BeiDou navigation and ammonium perchlorate propellant to the Iranian missiles that are forcing the US to burn through its interceptor stockpile. China is simultaneously the supplier of the weapons America is using, the supplier of the weapons Iran is using, the primary customer of the oil the war is disrupting, and the only country with the leverage to end the disruption.
The arithmetic of the grand bargain is not complicated. The US needs Chinese rare earths to rebuild its interceptor inventory. China needs Hormuz open to receive Iranian oil. The US needs the war to end before its stockpiles hit zero. China needs tariff relief, semiconductor export control rollbacks, and Taiwan arms-sale restraint. Both sides need something only the other can provide. The question is not whether a deal happens. The question is how much of America’s strategic position in the Pacific gets traded for the minerals needed to survive the Gulf.
RAND estimated that 78 percent of US defence contractors would face production shutdowns within 90 days of a Chinese rare earth cutoff. The 2027 deadline to ban Chinese-sourced magnets from Pentagon procurement is nine months away with no domestic alternative at scale. MP Materials operates the only US rare earth mine and ships its concentrate to China for processing. The mine-to-magnet supply chain that the Pentagon needs to survive a Taiwan contingency runs through the country the Taiwan contingency is designed to deter.
This is not a supply chain problem. This is a civilisational dependency. The United States built the most advanced military in human history on materials processed by its principal strategic competitor. It is now fighting a war that burns through those materials at a rate that makes replenishment impossible without the competitor’s cooperation. And the competitor is sitting in a conference room in Beijing today, across the table from Pakistan’s foreign minister, calculating exactly how much of America’s future it can extract in exchange for the minerals America needs to have a future at all.
The deal of the century is not a choice. It is arithmetic. And the arithmetic leads to Beijing.
open.substack.com/pub/shanakaans…
English
Me all I want is NNPC when you succeed, Imran. And just one small contract on the side to be the sole provider of all your government vehicles, Mr. President.
Mal. Imran U. Wakili (PULLO) 👑@IU_Wakilii
At this point I am convinced that the North will vote anything against Tinubu, even if it is Mallam Imran Wakili.
English
@Waspapping_ All of you are not mentally okay.
How will he throw Nigeria into chaos? Is asking for an end to killings now a sin?
I don't know what is wrong with you people. You have left the barbaric act committed in Jos to talk about Alex. God pvnish all of you
English
The behaviour of Alex Barbir makes him a suspect unless proven otherwise. His arrival at the crime scene in such a short period, coupled with his inciting speech, necessitates his immediate arrest.
We are calling on the Nigerian government to, as a matter of urgency, arrest this man on two counts:
1. Defamation and Abuse: Publicly abusing and threatening our President, Bola Ahmed Tinubu.
2. Incitement to Violence: Delivering an inciting speech that triggered youths to block roads and attack innocent passerby, rather than allowing the relevant authorities to investigate and reveal the true culprits.
Nigeria is not a lawless state, we are a sovereign nation, and he needs to be made aware of that. It is now up to the authorities to do the needful to avoid further escalation of this matter.
Lastly, we call on security agencies to identify the actual culprits and pursue them immediately, especially as the scene is being given a religious perspective. Acting fast will save many innocent souls.
By: Abu Muh’d
English
@sentdefender Israel will join in the ground iinvasion. I don't know how you usually analyse your things
English
Quick reminder that none of these countries, nor Israel, is going to provide significant, if any, troops towards an Invasion of Iran. The only ones dying will be Americans.
OSINTdefender@sentdefender
The United Arab Emirates, supported by Bahrain and Kuwait, is pushing hard for U.S. President Donald J. Trump to order a ground invasion of Iran, as officials from many Gulf allies of the United States, including Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Kuwait, and the UAE, have conveyed in private conversations that they do not want the ongoing military operation to end until there are significant changes in the Iranian leadership or there’s a dramatic shift in Iran’s behavior, diplomatic officials tell the Associated Press.
English
@alouibrahim92 No go face terrorists and bandits. Is Alex your problem? Is he the creator of insecurity in Nigeria?
English
Alex Babir, assuming that is his real name, should be investigated and held accountable if any of his actions, directly or indirectly; directly and indirectly, causes any breach of Law and Order. Who gave him the clearance to move around spewing hatred and calling for anarchy?
English