Roland Six

When American POWs tried to sneak her notes with their personal information to tell their families they were still alive, she gave them to the North Vietnamese. Some of them were beaten to death. You are both commies and you can both fuck off.

Massachusetts Democrat Caitlyn Aguiar, who in a video cheered on Pam Bondi’s cancer diagnosis and said she hopes she dies a painful death, has been fired from her job at Jeanne D’Arc just a day after we made the company aware of her rhetoric.

Graham Platner keeps bleating that Susan Collins “voted to send me to Iraq.” There’s just one problem with that entire victimhood grift. The calendar laughs in his face. Susan Collins voted for the Iraq War resolution in 2002. The war launched in March 2003. Platner didn’t enlist in the Marines until later that same year ... after he finished high school. Then he volunteered again in 2009 for the Army. He wasn’t drafted. He signed up. Twice. But sure, tell us again how one Maine senator personally shipped you off to war six months after it started, tough guy. Platner rolled out this same tired line in his mid-May New York Times interview and has been riding it like a crutch ever since. When Collins finally clapped back at a Maine groundbreaking, she didn’t trash his service ... she nuked his narrative with cold, hard facts: “He not only enlisted twice, after the war was started… but the fact is, that was Platner’s decision to serve. He was not drafted.” Instead of owning the L, Platner immediately threw a tantrum and pretended Collins had attacked every veteran alive. Classic move from the same guy whose old Reddit posts show him wishing fellow troops had died horrible deaths and taking shots at Navy SEAL Chris Kyle. The socialist wing’s shiny new “honorable veteran” candidate just had his big military attack on Susan Collins obliterated by… his own enlistment papers. You literally cannot make this level of self-own up. Peak Democrat 2026, folks. (article below)

Unelected Judge Ignores Supreme Court to Strike Down Election Integrity Law CONCORD, NH – House Election Law Chairman Ross Berry (R-Weare) responded to today's federal court decision striking down HB 1569: "I am not surprised that an unelected judge 'appointed' by the autopen in 2021 would push far-left Democratic policies on the people of New Hampshire. The vast majority of Granite Staters support common sense election integrity laws. HB 1569 required voters to prove their citizenship prior to casting a ballot,” Chairman Berry began. “This isn't the first time a progressive judge has ignored the law and precedent to push a political agenda. It's a pattern. Democrats know their policies are deeply unpopular in the Granite State. That is why they must rely on unelected far-left judges to force their ideology onto voters. They tried this same trick with their vehicle inspection sticker scheme. Their racket failed then, and it will fail now,” he continued. Chairman Berry has also provided the following background: “Here’s what matters legally: Judge Elliott's decision is wrong on the law itself. In Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee (2021) the United States Supreme Court was clear that states may act against election fraud ‘without waiting for it to occur and be detected within its own borders.” Yet Judge Elliott demanded ‘concrete evidence’ of noncitizen voting before letting New Hampshire verify citizenship. That approach conflicts with the Supreme Court’s recognition that states may act proactively to protect election integrity. She also applied the wrong standard of review. Under Burdick v. Takushi (1992), strict scrutiny applies only when a law ‘severely’ restricts the right to vote, and laws imposing ‘reasonable, nondiscriminatory restrictions’ are justified by the state's important regulatory interests. Asking a voter to prove citizenship is exactly that kind of reasonable requirement. In Crawford v. Marion County Election Board (2008), the Supreme Court upheld a voter ID law even though the record contained no evidence of in-person voter impersonation fraud in Indiana. Judge Elliott flipped that framework on its head. Plus, in Purcell v. Gonzalez (2006), the Supreme Court reaffirmed that ‘a State indisputably has a compelling interest in preserving the integrity of its election process. Judge Elliott invented a requirement the Constitution does not impose,” Chairman Berry explained. “This decision contradicts Supreme Court precedent. I urge the state to appeal this ruling. House Republicans will continue the fight for free and secure elections, in spite of what a far-left radical judge may try to force down our throat,” he concluded ###

What’s missing from the equation is time. According to Brown University, the Global War on Terror produced 940,000 direct combat casualties and an estimated 3.6 to 3.8 million indirect deaths from collapsed economies, broken healthcare systems, and destroyed infrastructure. I don’t trust liberal statistics, and Brown is as liberal as they get. But the number is directionally correct, and the direction is the point. Every JAG officer who told a serviceman to hold fire is responsible for thousands of those deaths. Thousands. Read that again: every JAG who enforced an ROE short of war crime is responsible for thousands of deaths. The killer wasn’t the intensity of the campaign. It was the duration. Twenty years of presence patrols, half-measures, and lawyer-approved rules of engagement bled the region dry on a slow drip. We didn’t lose because we were too brutal. We lost because we built a war machine designed to manage a problem instead of finish one. Yes, a faster and harder campaign that killed tens of thousands would have triggered massive blowback. Blowback at home. Blowback in theater. International media and “allies” dragging America over the coals. That was happening anyway. It is still happening. And guess what? There SHOULD be massive blowback when the Army is deployed. That is the entire point. If a war is worth fighting, it is worth ending. If it is not worth ending fast, it was not worth starting. A shorter, harder campaign would have left the survivors with economies to return to. Healthcare systems intact. Infrastructure standing. The enemy mostly dead. The region able to rebuild instead of bleeding out for two decades and exporting a migration crisis that is still devastating Europe. Instead, JAGs enabled Bush and Obama to bleed the region dry very slowly. Both presided over strategy without war aims. Both substituted process for victory. Both should have faced impeachment. Neither did, because the slow drip never produced a single moment ugly enough to force accountability. That was the design. JAGs did not prevent death and suffering, they expanded it, and they allowed Bush and Obama to avoid the impeachment hearings they deserved. The military exists to win wars. Not to occupy them. Not to manage them. Not to perform them for the cameras. The military should be KILLERS. Deterrence, the actual reason to spend this much on a military, only works when adversaries believe the response to attacking Americans will be fast, disproportionate, and final. Twenty years in Afghanistan taught every adversary on earth the opposite lesson: hit America slowly, wait us out, watch the lawyers do the rest. The next time the Army is let off the leash, the world should be afraid. Whoever sits in the White House should fear blowback and accountability. That fear is the deterrent. We gave it away one ROE memo at a time.

Growing up in an LA ghetto I learned about poor culture by living through it. As an adult I have studied it against the backdrop of the world I grew up in. I had already come to the conclusion in this article long ago. But I have never seen a better declaration of the topic than what I just read.

The E. Jean Carroll case against President Trump is one of the strangest civil cases in American history. The foundational problem is this: Carroll could not identify when the alleged incident occurred — not even the year with any precision. That should have killed the case as dead as a skunk on the road right there. Without a temporal anchor, no defendant — regardless of guilt or innocence — can mount an alibi defense. Trump, who has maintained detailed calendars and staff records for decades, was denied the most basic tool of self-defense: the ability to establish where he was. That is not a technicality. It is a due process violation at the constitutional level. Then Carroll produced the one piece of physical evidence she claimed corroborated her account — the dress she wore during the alleged incident. It was subsequently established that the dress was designed after the incident could have occurred. The sole corroborating evidence falsified her timeline. The case proceeded anyway. The resulting verdict was then weaponized in a defamation suit — where Trump was held liable for denying the allegation, while being procedurally barred from defending against it, because it was already "proven" in another court, regardless how flawed the procedure was. He was punished, in effect, for asserting his own innocence. Compounding everything: coordinated professional and physical threats so thoroughly intimidated the legal community that attorneys refused these cases regardless of available fees. When you systematically destroy a defendant's ability to retain counsel of choice, you forfeit the right to a legitimate verdict. An allegation is not evidence. Process without substance is not law. And a verdict produced under these conditions carries no legitimate authority — whatever its formal status. Not only is it the right move to investigate Carroll, but every other person involved as well. Trump is owed serious damages here, and there may be a few people who belong in prison for their roles in the case.

our knee can heal itself. It just needed Germany to hand it the blueprint. Doctors in Stuttgart did something quietly radical. They built a gel that lets damaged joint cartilage rebuild itself, no implants, no metal, no major reconstruction. It's called ChondroFiller liquid. Here's how it works. A surgeon injects the liquid into the damaged spot during a single minimally invasive arthroscopic procedure. Within 3 to 5 minutes, it hardens into a stable matrix, molding perfectly to the exact shape of the lesion. Then the real magic starts. That matrix becomes a scaffold. Your own repair cells migrate in from the surrounding tissue, multiply, and slowly transform into chondrocytes, the cells that actually build cartilage. Over the following months, your body replaces the gel with brand-new tissue grown from you. No fibrin glue. No drilling into the bone. This isn't a fringe experiment, either. The device is made by Meidrix Biomedicals, developed alongside scientists at the Fraunhofer Institute for Interfacial Engineering and Biotechnology in Stuttgart. It's been CE-certified since its market launch in 2013 and has already been implanted in more than 20,000 patients worldwide. The numbers back it up. In one study of 26 patients with hip cartilage defects larger than 2 cm², 81% achieved good or excellent results. MRI scans confirmed significant healing in over 90% of cases. One important caveat: it's built for small, focal cartilage defects, not advanced arthritis. Patients with severe osteoarthritis saw weaker results. But for the right injury, this flips the script entirely. Instead of replacing the joint, you give it the tools to repair itself. Source: Meidrix Biomedicals / Fraunhofer Institute IGB, Stuttgart; clinical data via Kazinform News Agency

A Massachusetts Democrat who cheered on Pam Bondi’s cancer diagnosis, stating she hopes she has the “worst case of cancer ever” and that she “suffers,” has been identified as Caitlyn Aguiar, who works at Jeanne D’Arc. Call and ask if this behavior fits their company standards.

What if - just like NATO - the CIA isn't really what you've been told it is? They've told you all your life it's an 'intelligence agency' that 'works for the American government' and therefore 'works for the American people.' What if - radical thought experiment here, I know, but just go with me for a minute... What if...NONE of that is true? What if it's not really an 'intelligence agency' that 'works for the American government' and 'the American people'? What if it's actually a mercenary-for-hire group that's been chiefly working for a hostile foreign entity some people call 'The City of London Conglomerate', or what I've been referring to for a year now as 'The Transnational Crime Syndicate of Big Club Oligarch Family Pirates' ? Would this help explain a lot of the shit the CIA has been caught doing around the world over the years? And what their about to be exposed for doing right here in the USA? Using their front companies like Dominion, ES&S, Smartmatic, etc. to rig United States elections in the service of a foreign crime syndicate? To help create the US Senate and House of Representatives to their liking? And thereby in a more indirect way, control who gets nominated to the judiciary? What if many of the oligarch families around the world that the CIA actually works for are not Americans? Would this change the picture of how you view that agency in any significant way? If so, how would it change the way you view the CIA? Tell me in the comments.

🚨 Nobody should have Type 2 Diabetes. NOBODY. It’s not a “chronic disease.” It’s a dietary disease: Preventable and completely reversible. Prevention is easier. Reversing it takes discipline, but it works. If you have it, here’s exactly how you reverse it: 1. Quit sugar and carbs completely. 2. Prioritize animal protein and fat. 3. Stop snacking. 4. Build muscle. Your body will heal. The results will be dramatic. I’ve taken patients off insulin and other diabetes meds with 8 weeks doing exactly this. I label people “no longer diabetic” every week. Most people aren’t ready to do what it takes. Are you?

I’ve been radio silent today...not because the fire in my chest has dimmed, but because every syllable I want to spit into the void would get this account torched under the current Thoughtcrime Enforcement Protocol they call “TOS.” The republic isn’t merely broken; it’s in full metastatic collapse, a Stage-IV malignancy with both parties proudly holding the scalpel, and sucking each others cocks. The Democrats have completed their transformation into a frothing cult of performative sadism...violent, unhinged, and pathologically convinced that their imagined moral monopoly grants them divine license for every form of coercion, cancellation, economic sabotage, and street-level thuggery. Their psychology is textbook projection on industrial scale: they shriek “fascism” while building the very surveillance-and-punishment apparatus Orwell warned us about, then pat themselves on the back for “punching Nazis." They don’t debate ideas; they excommunicate heretics. Their entire operating system is envy dressed up as justice, nihilism wrapped in rainbows, and a deep, clinical inability to tolerate any reality that refuses to kneel. And the Republicans? Sweet bleeding Christ. They are the textbook battered spouses of the American political marriage...eyes downcast, voice trembling, murmuring scripted apologies for existing while the house burns down around them. They roll over, they signal, they “reach across the aisle” with the desperate, learned helplessness of someone who’s internalized the abuser’s frame so completely they believe decorum is a higher virtue than survival. One or two actual lions in Congress still possess a vertebrate column, but the rest are invertebrate careerists who’ve spent decades proving they’d rather lose with polite press releases than win with the raw, unapologetic ferocity the moment demands. Their pathology is cowardice elevated to sacrament: Stockholm syndrome in Brooks Brothers suits, convinced that if they just apologize harder, the left will eventually stop hating them for the crime of winning elections. Meanwhile President Trump is out there executing the popular mandate single-handedly...draining the swamp with one arm while the other fends off lawfare, media assassination, and the quiet knives of his own supposed allies. Zero meaningful support from the party that swore it was on his side. Just polite hand-wringing, performative concern, and the occasional “we support the President but…” qualifier that might as well be a white flag. The psychological disconnect is goddamn staggering: tens of millions of Americans voted to reject the regime in the clearest voice possible, and their elected representatives treat that verdict like an embarrassing family secret they hope will quietly expire if they just keep governing “responsibly” and “bipartisanly.” I am fucking disgusted...bone-deep, soul-weary disgusted...by the cultivated, weaponized ignorance on both sides. By the ruling class that has deliberately, willfully forgotten the single non-negotiable clause in the social contract: they are servants, not masters. Locke warned us. Hobbes laid out the alternative. The consent of the governed is being replaced, in real time, by the sneering contempt of the governors. Our so-called representatives have internalized the view that We the People are an unruly mob to be managed, not the sovereign source of their authority. And the worst part...the part that keeps me clenching my jaw until my teeth ache...is that half of what I actually think would get this account memory-holed in a heartbeat. So I’m forced to speak in this coded, throttled register while the country circles the drain in 8K resolution. This isn’t politics anymore. It’s a slow-motion autopsy of a republic that still believes it’s breathing. The body is twitching on the table, the organs are being harvested in broad daylight, and both parties are arguing over who gets to keep the scalpels sharper. I’m tired of pretending otherwise. I’m tired of watching the slow suicide of the greatest experiment in human liberty while the participants congratulate themselves on their “nuance.” The venom isn’t optional. It’s the only honest response left. And if that makes me radioactive under their rules, then so be it. Better to burn with truth than rot in comfortable silence.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ ​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​💀🔪🩸