Sappercop

9.4K posts

Sappercop

Sappercop

@sappercop2003

Soldier; Patriot; American.

United States เข้าร่วม Ekim 2009
143 กำลังติดตาม404 ผู้ติดตาม
Sappercop
Sappercop@sappercop2003·
@MarioNawfal The NY Times hasn't told the truth in decades. Do not give them any credibility
English
0
0
0
55
Adam Schiff
Adam Schiff@SenAdamSchiff·
We need an Attorney General who knows their duty is to the people – not the President. That person is not Pam Bondi.
English
16.2K
3.6K
17K
1.2M
Sappercop
Sappercop@sappercop2003·
@CalltoActivism It's not terrifying at all. It's glorious, and cause for celebration.
English
0
0
0
21
CALL TO ACTIVISM
CALL TO ACTIVISM@CalltoActivism·
BREAKING NEWS: It is much worse than previously reported: Not only were at least 30 federal attorneys who worked on January 6 cases fired, but all six of the FBI's most senior executives and multiple heads of field offices have been escorted out. This is terrifying.
English
11.2K
12.1K
57.8K
3.2M
Sappercop
Sappercop@sappercop2003·
@ProjectLincoln Yes, you're watching because you're part of the party that lost. The rest of America who won is cheering it on, and they will all be confirmed. Cope and seethe cupcake.
English
0
0
0
19
The Lincoln Project
The Lincoln Project@ProjectLincoln·
A message to the US Senate: America is watching. Patel, Gabbard, and RFK are more than just unfit. They are a danger to our country, and to our people's safety. Use your vote to protect the people you represent. We're watching.
English
748
4.6K
11.9K
284.6K
Sappercop
Sappercop@sappercop2003·
@ChrisMurphyCT There are few Americans less qualified to be a congressman than you, yet there you are.
English
0
0
0
12
Chris Murphy 🟧
Chris Murphy 🟧@ChrisMurphyCT·
There are few Americans less qualified to be the Secretary of Health and Human Services than Robert Kennedy. Seems pretty simple to me - we do not want America's top health official to also be the nation's top medical conspiracy theory enthusiast.
English
5.4K
3.6K
13.8K
766.7K
Sappercop
Sappercop@sappercop2003·
@GovPritzker Good luck tubby. Clearly, the only thing you stand for is protecting criminals and murdering a buffet.
English
0
0
0
12
Sappercop
Sappercop@sappercop2003·
@SenSchumer Literally nothing you just said is true. Pretty pathetic...
English
0
0
0
10
Chuck Schumer
Chuck Schumer@SenSchumer·
Senators’ phones have been ringing off the hook with nonstop calls from hospitals, police departments, volunteer firefighters, food pantries, drug treatment centers, on and on and on. Americans are in panic mode trying to figure out how Trump’s lawless, destructive, cruel order to halt virtually all federal assistance affects them. If a Senator is going to say they’re getting no calls, then they’re just out of touch because it affects almost everything. If Trump doesn’t rescind it, Congress must act.
English
12.9K
4.5K
17.9K
1.4M
Republicans against Trump
Republicans against Trump@RpsAgainstTrump·
We now have a Secretary of Defense who, for the first time in history, got his job with a tie-breaking vote from the Vice President. He’s clearly unqualified for the position; even many who voted to confirm him know it. The Russians and Chinese can’t believe their luck.
English
2.4K
4.7K
32.1K
2M
Sappercop
Sappercop@sappercop2003·
@SenDuckworth And you just lost.... get used to it. You're going to be losing a lot the next 4 years. And, yes, you're still a fraud...
English
0
0
1
10
Tammy Duckworth
Tammy Duckworth@SenDuckworth·
Tomorrow, my Republican colleagues have a decision to make. Will they put our military and our country ahead of their loyalty to Donald Trump? We cannot afford to confirm someone as dangerously unqualified as Pete Hegseth to be Secretary of Defense.
English
1.6K
1.2K
4.3K
182.4K
Sappercop
Sappercop@sappercop2003·
@SenatorCollins We don't care. We already recognize that you are actually a Democrat and will betray your constituents and the rest of America at every turn.
English
0
0
0
9
Sen. Susan Collins
Sen. Susan Collins@SenatorCollins·
After careful consideration, I have decided to vote against Pete Hegseth’s nomination for Secretary of Defense. While I appreciate his courageous military service and his ongoing commitment to our servicemembers and their families, I am concerned that he does not have the experience and perspective necessary to succeed in the job. Our military is under tremendous pressure right now. Active conflicts in the Middle East and Europe combined with escalating threats in the Pacific, all against a backdrop of severe financial challenges and four years of ineffective leadership by the Biden Administration, make this an especially critical time for those who lead our military. The next Secretary of Defense will be responsible for managing a massive bureaucracy that includes nearly three million employees and a budget of nearly $850 billion. In addition, our next Secretary faces long-standing procurement and supply issues that continued to worsen under the Biden Administration. In sum, the Secretary is going to be facing a number of incredibly complex problems that are going to require highly skilled management ability. I am concerned that Mr. Hegseth does not have the management experience and background that he will need in order to tackle these difficulties. His limited managerial experience involved running two small non-profit organizations that had decidedly mixed results. I am also concerned about multiple statements, including some in the months just before he was nominated, that Mr. Hegseth has made about women serving in the military. He and I had a candid conversation in December about his past statements and apparently evolving views. I am not convinced that his position on women serving in combat roles has changed. Women comprise nearly 18 percent of our active-duty military. They continue to make critical and valuable contributions to our national defense. I have long advocated that women who wish to serve in and can meet the rigorous standards of combat roles should be able to do so. And numerous women have proved that they can accomplish this difficult feat. Currently, thousands of women are serving in combat roles and many others serve in non-combat functions. Their service is essential to the success of our military. Mr. Hegseth also appears to lack a sufficient appreciation for some of the policies that the military is required to follow because they are codified in the laws of the United States of America. While I understand his points on the importance of up-to-date and workable rules of engagement, our prohibitions against torture come from American laws and treaties ratified by the United States, including the Geneva Conventions. Therefore, I will vote against the nomination.
English
48.9K
5.2K
50.9K
6M
Sappercop
Sappercop@sappercop2003·
@JBPritzker Go eat a few more twinkies porky. The adults have this all well in hand.
English
0
0
0
14
JB Pritzker
JB Pritzker@JBPritzker·
The insurrectionists are not political prisoners, heroes, or martyrs. They assaulted law enforcement right before our eyes and put our democracy in peril. They deserve prosecution to the fullest extent of the law. npr.org/2025/01/21/nx-…
English
557
395
1.8K
35.4K
Sappercop
Sappercop@sappercop2003·
@AGRobBonta The good thing is, you get handed your ass at SCOTUS every time you go there, and this will be no different.
English
0
0
1
21
Rob Bonta
Rob Bonta@AGRobBonta·
#BREAKING: We’re suing President Trump over his unconstitutional, un-American executive order ending birthright citizenship. The President has overstepped his authority by a mile with this order, and we will hold him accountable. oag.ca.gov/news/press-rel…
Rob Bonta tweet media
English
7.7K
3.9K
20.2K
1.6M
Sappercop
Sappercop@sappercop2003·
@SenAdamSchiff Says the traitor who took a pardon when he claimed he committed no crimes. You are the epitome of hypocrisy. Cope and seethe traitor.
English
0
0
1
12
Adam Schiff
Adam Schiff@SenAdamSchiff·
Pam Bondi, last week on pardons for Jan 6 offenders: "I will look at every case on a case-by-case basis" Donald Trump, yesterday: "Full pardons" No review. No accountability. Nothing.
English
26.3K
7.6K
33K
4.1M
LiSA 🇦🇺
LiSA 🇦🇺@lisamt75·
@sappercop2003 @DrSilkman @DukeJuke11 @JohnWilliamFau2 @Presumed_Guilty @Jacks1961 @DriA652289 @MrPrecedent @a_meadowsweet @Case1034521625 @ClineSherwood @louisalong11873 @KratzUncanceled @Mysticjynx @HenburyAve @clancy_boom @AveryWave80194 @LaurasBlue @7pairsofpanties @OurKingWilliam @Filesxxx @Darksid12964881 @kmfbd1 @goldyfinchy @TB_Bucs_4Life @KellyPe44814546 @TManitowoc @foulplayteam @JButing @workwithkz @FBI @WisDOJ @GovEvers @netflix Oh ok. I’m not 100% up with how it all works. So what happens next if you don’t mind me asking? I’m at least hoping it all leads to an evidentiary hearing if that’s possible & I wouldn’t just let him out which there’s slim chance of.
English
1
0
0
95
Sappercop
Sappercop@sappercop2003·
English
1
0
1
85
Sappercop
Sappercop@sappercop2003·
@_NoseyRen Unfortunately, yes, there are bad apples. Far less than what the media would have us believe, but yes.
English
0
0
1
26
Nosey Ren
Nosey Ren@_NoseyRen·
@sappercop2003 I genuinely believe that too. I know there are bad apples but agree with that most would say this as well.
English
1
0
0
32
Nosey Ren
Nosey Ren@_NoseyRen·
To my cop friends, despite your training to shoot to kill, do you believe in that enough to abide by it regardless? @sappercop2003
English
1
0
2
335
Sappercop
Sappercop@sappercop2003·
@_NoseyRen You train to hit center mass, so i guess some may view that as shooting to kill, but it's a much simpler reason.
English
0
0
1
31
Nosey Ren
Nosey Ren@_NoseyRen·
@sappercop2003 That’s more understandable. My cousin who is a cop said she was trained shoot to kill and I was like Damn, like everytime?
English
1
0
0
36
Sappercop
Sappercop@sappercop2003·
@_NoseyRen I believe every cop would be quite content with going their entire career without ever drawing their sidearm.
English
1
0
0
29
Sappercop
Sappercop@sappercop2003·
@_NoseyRen I think that's a misnomer. You are trained to neutralize the threat, no matter how many rounds it may take to do that. The goal isn't death, but death may result.
English
2
0
1
61