jake barnes รีทวีตแล้ว
jake barnes
1.5K posts

jake barnes รีทวีตแล้ว

Chappell Roan and her security guard
caroline ౨ৎ ☘︎@MIN0RLYSTUCK
you would think chappell roan fucking killed a child based on how twitter users are reacting oh my god
English

@MTrucksa @gotrice2024 Of course I dont get your point, that's why I've asked multiple times what it is!! Chipotle ran a promotion to get more customers, customers showed up, you called that scamming. How could the customers use the promotion without showing up??
English

@smushmachine @gotrice2024 you dont get my point, along with some others. Im trying tomake a point, but im getting more nays than yays.. but i as an adult will own my comments.
English

Chipotle announced they were having a buy one get one free deal between 3p-4p for a day. People started lining p around 2:00 to participate in the promotion. At about 2:40pm the manager at the Bronx chipotle shut down the store and did not open again until 4p.
The manager then told the people who have been waiting in line for 2 hours that the promotion was over and they were not doing the buy one get one deal. What’s messed up is they knew they weren’t going to participate yet they did not tell anyone nor did they have a sign saying they weren’t doing it either. Since the kids have been waiting there patiently, shouldn’t they honor it anyways?
English

@MTrucksa @gotrice2024 I'll ask again what you are talking about?? The business came up with a promotion to get more people, and it got more people.
English

Red Lobster had the same issue. they lost a ton of $$ when they did the "all you can eat shrimp" deal. So many people came in and they suffered, i cant remember if it was bankruptcy or a huge financial loss.
Same with people coming in and spending 5 hours at the "all you can eat" buffet.
People ruin businesses. Im on the side of the business.
English

@MTrucksa @gotrice2024 What are you talking about? Its meant to attract more people. The people attracted by the thing intended to attract them arent scamming/taking advantage.
English

Hmmm possibly this context - if a store says they will sell a meal deal between 3 and 4:00.. they figure, that will be maybe 10 customers. but if you get a long line of 200 people , if they honor that meal deal, then they are gonna get 200 people getting free food.
Because the owner surveyed this, the line of people was in a way scamming/taking advantage of the store. They were not honoring it as it was meant to be.
English

@RotoWire How does Skenes get projected for more K's than Crochet?
English
jake barnes รีทวีตแล้ว

If the GODFATHER were made today it would NOT be eligible for an Oscar unless he transitioned to the Godmother and made someone an offer they couldn’t HEAR. You could still leave the gun but you couldn’t take the cannoli unless the baker supports gay marriage. RIP Hollywood.
End Wokeness@EndWokeness
In order to compete at the Oscars for Best Picture, all films must meet the "diversity inclusion" quota. Here are those rules. Yes, this is real.
English

@SportsAndTrash @YardsPerGretch What is your standard for "close" pitch? That missed by almost 4 inches.
English

@YardsPerGretch Pete Rose swings at that pitch and likely fouls it off. Why? Because he would have known to not allow the ump to decide his fate on a close pitch.
That’s the difference. It was a fantastic slider, which he had not been getting over up until then.
English
jake barnes รีทวีตแล้ว

@Gelandin1 @LisaBritton The point isnt the songs, its the headline. For those songs it would be something like "A wave of misogynistic classic rock songs attack strong independent women."
English

@LisaBritton There are many songs from the classic rock era about the perfidy of women. And it doesn’t bother me much. Romantic griping is perfectly fine for a pop song.
English

Could you imagine a headline that said “A wave of songs is taking aim at substandard women.”
The Economist@TheEconomist
A wave of songs is taking aim at substandard men. We explain how it reflects a gulf between young men and women economist.com/culture/2025/0…
English

@AZPhilliesFan @JStapleton0 @jayhaykid No, they didn't all fail because it wasn't their job, it was his. Lets agree on firing the most incompetent manager ever before we start looking at other people, or was your point with that to change the subject?
English

@smushmachine @JStapleton0 @jayhaykid I’m not buying that. They all failed then. Plus, should we be mad at the manager or at the person/group who appointed a manager with no real experience.
English

@AZPhilliesFan @JStapleton0 @jayhaykid Lol, the coaches and players didnt know because he told them their ticket was punched. Of course its off, no other manager ever has been incompetent enough to do it.
English

@smushmachine @JStapleton0 @jayhaykid I agree with that but this I feel isn’t one of those. Plus none of the coaches or players spoke up or knew. Sounds off to me.
English

@AZPhilliesFan @JStapleton0 @jayhaykid The nature of the mistake is what's significant, not the amount. There are countless "one mistakes" that would get CEO's fired.
English

@JStapleton0 @jayhaykid So, wouldn’t this be the same as a high level company manager or CEO making one mistake? We all make mistakes. Be accountable and move on.
English
jake barnes รีทวีตแล้ว

@Okagain6 @ThomasSowell I'll bet they arent worse than the long term effects of being morbidly obese.
English

@ThomasSowell Anyone taking bets on the long term effects of Ozempic?
English
jake barnes รีทวีตแล้ว

"No new wars" may become a "Read my lips: no new taxes" moment politically
Rep. Malcolm Kenyatta@malcolmkenyatta
Trump promised Americans no new wars. Every word out of his damn mouth is a lie.
English

@LouisAnalysis Probably a lot harder against LHP in the regular season when they are only thinking about getting him out, vs in spring training when they are working on their own stuff and barley thinking about him at all.
English

@JeffKnolls Trump is the person most mentioned by your X account, that means he's your best friend?
English

@thevivafrei @mtracey Lets start with how many times they are mentioned in the files release so far. Trump = 37,000 vs Clinton 500. Is that the kinda metrics you're looking for?
English

“Objectively”?
By what metrics, @mtracey?
Clinton flew with Epstein at least 26 times, 4 to 6 of which were extended trips.
Epstein visited Clinton in the White House 17 times.
There is a picture of Clinton getting a deep tissue back massage by one of Epstein‘s sex-trafficking victims.
By what metrics do you assert that Trump “objectively” have a much closer long-term relationship with Epstein?
Please explain.
Michael Tracey@mtracey
Epstein objectively had a much closer long-term relationship with Donald Trump than he did with Bill Clinton. If Bill, and even Hillary, have to give depositions, why the hell shouldn't Trump?
English











