Tejas Sanghavi

@somethingco_ol Can I get a code pls

🔐 Registration is code-gated Leave a comment to get the code in your DMs Grab your own code after signing up and share it with friends to get something.cool on launch day.

Introducing something.cool Game changer memecoin platform on Solami Coolchain Register early: something.cool

@wytemajekk Too good

MAGA $BTW

@CullenHoback How likely is it that the name will be accepted by the Bitcoin community?

And seeing as there’s now a market involved, I will avoid providing any spoilers. Release is just a few days away.

For all you gamblers out there: I’m not entering this betting pool on #MoneyElectric: The Bitcoin Mystery, but I will confirm—we land on a specific name. cryptobriefing.com/satoshi-nakamo…

@lensassaman Gn1haSB4Jkh3E9PXSC2BRYrh97ReruvTqf13jd5Jpump. First and original crypto twitter dog before doge

The House Gargoyle (an all-black, tiny French Bulldog) has adopted me. I miss having a dog.

@ibuymemecoins @MkaizerCrypto Look at sasseman tweet - it refers to gargoyle, it is the oldest

@stejas @MkaizerCrypto You’re stupid af The gargoyle coin has this as their DEX banner and then changed the Wikipedia page to remove $remus

🚨 SCAM ALERT 🚨 $Remus , Remus Gargoyle, a wallet (probably the dev) sniped around 13% of total supply and split it into many wallets. This will rug. ⚠️Please stay away⚠️

@MkaizerCrypto People just changing wiki to pump their coin

@MkaizerCrypto Also gargoyle was referred in his tweet not Remus

@ibuymemecoins @lensassaman Wrong, Remus was added only today on wiki

@lensassaman He describes $remus as the house gargoyle. His name isn’t actually gargoyle, that’s the description of his personality as being like a gargoyle. The pups name is $Remus

@WagieCapital @zerohedge 2.5% I think is within the range 2% +- 0.5%. Direction is important too

@zerohedge The 2% inflation target is a distant memory at this point The Fed has given up and it seems we’re going to be stuck at 3% going forward

CPI 0.2% MoM, Exp. 0.2% CPI Core 0.3% MoM, Exp. 0.2% CPI 2.5% YoY, Exp. 2.5% CPI Core 3.2% YoY, Exp. 3.2%

@AndrewCapasso_ @VitalikButerin @0xstrobe @llamaonthebrink Gaming, cross border transfers, RWAs are legit use cases. Let's not say that they don't require Defi. All these use cases will require Defi. If you think ETH network only has speculative use cases, you need to be bearish on ETH

@stejas @VitalikButerin @0xstrobe @llamaonthebrink Yes but traditional finance is rooted in real businesses that produce goods and services over vehicles that enhance speculation on random tokens

I watched the recent SteadyLads episode with Kain and I have to admit I had no idea that vitamin and the EF dislike DeFi… It almost feels hard to believe in a sense. The overwhelming majority of ETH’s value comes from its use as collateral in DeFi, why on earth would you want to see fewer DeFi protocols being built? I honestly hope it’s not true. I would feel a bit jaded tbh since I see vitamin praising USDC all the time which I find to be a very unimpressive use of crypto. It’s almost ironic to shill something like USDC (which literally undermines ETH as an SoV and the neutrality of the chain) and ask for less DeFi (the thing that lends the most value to ETH) in the same breath. If I had to sympathize with the view I would say maybe vitamin is a purist who thinks much of our defi isn’t really defi due to the reliance on trusted oracles and multisigs (which to be fair is a valid criticism) and that he would encourage more “pure defi” with no external dependencies like Uniswap. But I can’t read Vitalik’s mind so I don’t know what he really thinks. I just find it hard to believe that his views of defi are really that pitiful, if so, that would be very discouraging to all of us who are defending ETH on the timeline and using the chain while attention migrates else where. If you have a line to vitamin I request that you send him this, I still don’t really believe the assertion that he doesn’t like defi but I’d prefer to hear it from the horse’s mouth.

@VitalikButerin @0xstrobe @llamaonthebrink Lending, borrowing, insurance, betting are part of any financial ecosystem because they fulfill inherent needs. Excess of anything is bad, whether excess goods manufactured or excess leverage. I don't think the creators should not favoring one type of use case over others

@VitalikButerin @0xstrobe @llamaonthebrink Isn't that how traditional finance also works? People trying to earn more than the rate at which they borrow. Fulfils the capital requirement for those who don't have the capital. Those who don't have capital get access to it, that's Defi. We should separate Ponzinomics from Defi

@Louie_XBT Genuine question - why is the TVL so low?

$SHEZMU is the most capital efficient *𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐬𝐚𝐟𝐞𝐬𝐭* lending platform in crypto — think $AAVE or $MKR with some major upgrades: ✅ 𝐍𝐨 𝐥𝐢𝐪𝐮𝐢𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 on $ETH-pegged assets ✅ 𝐙𝐞𝐫𝐨 𝐭𝐨 𝐧𝐞𝐠𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞 interest rates on loans (get paid to leverage)

@elonmusk when can I translate an entire thread and not have to click the translate button 15 times?

@pydono @PrimordialAA Same here. Main report got en-masse targeted by sybils and seems like the team's effort was diverted and they ended up focusing on poor reports with low acceptance rate. Laughable if you say that only 10 M sybils were found out of 85 or 95 M. Waste of effort

Yeah, I’m guessing this happened because my initial report was dismissed. It is really unfortunate that I don’t get any credit for the identified sybils even when Nansen (and other hunters) confirmed them to be true positives. The review process seemed to be somewhat arbitrary in terms of drawing the line between dismissal and approval and my report apparently landed on the wrong side of that line despite evidentially catching a lot of sybils. And my revised report which would definitely have been approved was never even reviewed. If my original reports had been included with their original timestamps I would have gotten over 14000 ZRO based on the current fcfs list, which would have made me a top 8 hunter. If the addresses from my report that were attributed to Nansen were also attributed to me I would probably have been in the top 5. I was so incredibly close to a significant bounty, but instead I ended up getting absolutely nothing. Needless to say I do not feel great about this right now.

FCFS list is up for feedback and review

@zachxbt @deltaxbt @ArkhamIntel yeah true. Only if the hacker has used real identity then it is useful... Doesn't seem like it here

@stejas @deltaxbt @ArkhamIntel Yes but KYC means nothing as KYC verified accounts can be easily purchased online for <$100

New Intel Exchange Bounty: $235M WazirX Hack This morning, WazirX experienced a security breach in one of their holding wallets. The incident resulted in over $235 million in funds lost. Addresses associated with the hacker include: 0x6EeDF92Fb92Dd68a270c3205e96DCCc527728066 0x04b21735E93Fa3f8df70e2Da89e6922616891a88 0x35febC10112302e0d69F35F42cCe85816f8745CA 0x90ca792206eD7Ee9bc9da0d0dF981FC5619F91Fd 0x361384e2761150170D349924A28d965f0Dd3F092 This bounty will reward any of the following: - Identifying a KYC centralized exchange deposit - Revealing the identity of the exploiter - Successful effort to return funds Any information submitted will be shared with the WazirX team. Link to Bounty: platform.arkhamintelligence.com/exchange/bount… Cc @WazirXIndia

@zachxbt @deltaxbt @ArkhamIntel Does this mean you identified a centralized KYC deposit of the hacker?

@deltaxbt @ArkhamIntel was already tracking this so just exported my docs lol

@omeragoldberg @chaoslabs Totally agree, incentive mechanisms have to catch up. While figuring out Layerzero sybils, I found ~100K sybils. I would say that 60-80% of users are not real. Outsized returns on airdrops causes this and is a problem the industry has to solve.

1/15 How many web3 users are **real**? Spoiler: Not nearly as many as we'd like to believe. **note**: The analysis and graphics presented in this thread are on protocols that are **not** @chaoslabs partners