SallyThreads

@Monera_Digital 主动交易占66.7%仓位，这个比例偏高还是说有对冲？BTC跌这么深的月份怎么控回撤的

欢迎收看Monera Digital的5月基金月报👇 5月加密市场整体承压——BTC从月初82,850跌至73,674，ETF单月净流出24.25亿美元创史上第三大单月流出记录。 就是在这个背景下，我们依然跑出了这份成绩单： 📌 AUM月度增幅 +22.17%，5个月内从100万美元成长至1,482万美元（约增长15倍） 📌 累计加权APY 58.71% 📌 主动交易策略占总仓位66.7%，是核心收益引擎 市场越乱，策略的真正价值才越清晰。 想了解详情欢迎联系👇 X: x.com/Monera_Digital TG: t.me/MoneraDigital_… #MoneraDgital #CryptoFund #AlphaGeneration

⚽ 2026 World Cup Crush is now open. Senal is looking for the faces of World Cup season @FIFAWorldCup Prize Pool: $20,000 🥇 #1 $10,000 · 🥈 #2 $6,000 · 🥉 #3 $4,000 How to apply: Post your photo on X and tag @SenalHQ + #WorldCupCrush. or Submit form: forms.gle/Tvs2cLgL2B5K1g… Selected candidates will be featured for community voting in Senal TG & Discord. Voting: June 8 — June 26 Community ❤️ votes decide the ranking ⬇️ TG: t.me/c/SenalHQ/92 DC: discord.gg/JEUYwn78Dz

@eth_cedric get in! Bnb chain 0xac630d2e8c17c21acbdd770d50e916f529af7777

@eidesis_ai Weeks of A/B testing is the part that kills me every time. by the time results are significant the whole campaign has moved on

We are launching Eidesis: the conversion OS that turns any website into a self-improving revenue engine. Today, website optimization is still a manual loop: dashboards, guesses, variants, and weeks of A/B testing. Eidesis turns that into an agentic conversion loop. It learns from real visitor behavior, runs simulations with thousands of synthetic visitors, finds the website changes most likely to lift conversion, runs A/B tests, and auto rolls out the winning versions. A/B testing should be faster and less wasteful. Every website should be able to observe, simulate, test, learn, and continuously roll out higher-converting versions. Book a demo or join the waitlist now ↓

@spreadxai @EASYResidency @flapdotsh flap 🦋

@EASYResidency @flapdotsh flap 🦋

Launching new tokens today still means navigating tradeoffs across flexibility, speed, and security. @flapdotsh is building a secure launch stack for EVM chains: • Custom programmable token launches • A no-code CA template store • Verifiable on-chain AI reasoning via Flap AI Oracle In a few months, they've gone from hackathon project to a profitable team of 8 backed by a $60K angel round. Catch Flap at EASY Residency S3 demo day.

@KillerQueenAndy Spent the last year integrating Twilio for a client project. The webhook server alone was 3 days of work. If this actually delivers on the "just a prompt" thing that's not a small deal.

@YuanhaoQ @lecong biomnist? dropping this on a thursday like it's nothing lol

𝗖𝗮𝗻 𝗔𝗜 𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺 𝗯𝗶𝗼𝗺𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗹𝘆𝘀𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗮𝘀𝗸𝘀 𝗯𝗲𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗱 𝗽𝗮𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝗡𝗮𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲, 𝗖𝗲𝗹𝗹, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗦𝗰𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲? To find out, we built 𝗕𝗶𝗼𝗺𝗻𝗶𝗕𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗵, a benchmark we co-developed with the original paper authors and 5+year domain experts to grade AI agents the way a peer reviewer reads a paper: scrutinizing methods, reasoning, and every analytical choice, not just the final answer. As the first track of this benchmark, 𝗕𝗶𝗼𝗺𝗻𝗶𝗕𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗵-𝗗𝗮𝘁𝗮𝗔𝗻𝗮𝗹𝘆𝘀𝗶𝘀 contains 100 data-analysis tasks drawn directly from 21 published studies in Nature, Cell, Science, Nature Medicine, and other leading journals. Each task hands the agent a real dataset and a research question, then scores its full analytical trajectory against an expert-authored rubric. What's inside: - 𝟭𝟬𝟬 𝘁𝗮𝘀𝗸𝘀 𝗮𝗰𝗿𝗼𝘀𝘀 𝟱 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗲𝗮𝘀𝗲 𝗮𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘀 (𝗼𝗻𝗰𝗼𝗹𝗼𝗴𝘆, 𝗶𝗺𝗺𝘂𝗻𝗼𝗹𝗼𝗴𝘆, 𝗻𝗲𝘂𝗿𝗼𝗹𝗼𝗴𝘆, 𝗺𝗲𝘁𝗮𝗯𝗼𝗹𝗶𝗰 & 𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗼𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗲, 𝗰𝗮𝗿𝗱𝗶𝗼𝘃𝗮𝘀𝗰𝘂𝗹𝗮𝗿) 𝗽𝗹𝘂𝘀 𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗹 𝗯𝗶𝗼𝗹𝗼𝗴𝘆 - 𝟭𝟳 𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗹𝘆𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝘁𝗮𝘀𝗸 𝘁𝘆𝗽𝗲𝘀 (𝗲.𝗴., 𝗚𝗪𝗔𝗦/𝗲𝗤𝗧𝗟 𝗰𝗼𝗹𝗼𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘇𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻, 𝗧-𝗰𝗲𝗹𝗹 𝗿𝗲𝗰𝗲𝗽𝘁𝗼𝗿 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘁𝗼𝗶𝗿𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗹𝘆𝘀𝗶𝘀, 𝗰𝗲𝗹𝗹-𝗰𝗲𝗹𝗹 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝘂𝗻𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻) - 𝗔𝗻 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘁-𝗰𝘂𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗿𝘂𝗯𝗿𝗶𝗰 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝘁𝗮𝘀𝗸, 𝘀𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝟲 𝗱𝗶𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗼𝗳 𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗹𝘆𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗾𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 - 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗰𝗲𝘀𝘀-𝗹𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗹 𝗲𝘃𝗮𝗹𝘂𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗼𝗳 𝟵 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗲𝗿 𝗟𝗟𝗠𝘀 (𝗚𝗣𝗧-𝟱.𝟱, 𝗖𝗹𝗮𝘂𝗱𝗲 𝗢𝗽𝘂𝘀 𝟰.𝟳, 𝗮𝗺𝗼𝗻𝗴 𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿𝘀) 𝗮𝗰𝗿𝗼𝘀𝘀 𝟰 𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗲𝘀 (𝗖𝗹𝗮𝘂𝗱𝗲 𝗖𝗼𝗱𝗲, 𝗖𝗼𝗱𝗲𝘅 𝗖𝗟𝗜, 𝗧𝗲𝗿𝗺𝗶𝗻𝘂𝘀-𝟮, 𝗚𝗲𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗶 𝗖𝗟𝗜) Headline results: - 𝗙𝗿𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗲𝗿 𝗺𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹𝘀 𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗱 𝗮𝘁 𝟳𝟯.𝟯/𝟭𝟬𝟬, 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝘀𝘂𝗯𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝗵𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗿𝗼𝗼𝗺 𝘁𝗼 𝗶𝗺𝗽𝗿𝗼𝘃𝗲. - 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗺𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗮𝘀 𝗺𝘂𝗰𝗵 𝗮𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝗮𝘀𝗲 𝗺𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹. - 𝗔𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝗳𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝗿𝘁 𝗼𝗻 𝗯𝗶𝗼𝗹𝗼𝗴𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻, 𝗺𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗱 𝘀𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘀𝗰𝗶𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗰 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘀𝗼𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴. We hope to make 𝗕𝗶𝗼𝗺𝗻𝗶𝗕𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗵 the most helpful benchmark for biologists to understand how AI agents handle real-world biomedical tasks: where they can be trusted, and where they fall short. We're actively expanding our evaluation effort, and would love to engage the broader scientific community on what comes next. 📄 biorxiv.org/content/10.648… 🤗 huggingface.co/datasets/phylo… Thanks to our amazing @phylo_bio team (Minta Lu, @TuXinming , @serena2z , @TianweiShe , @lecong , @jure , @KexinHuang5 ) and our collaborators at @LaudeInstitute , @Stanford , @Harvard , @PKU1898 , @virginia_tech , Humanlaya Data Lab, Xbench: @alexgshaw , JOU-HO SHIH, Bingqing Zhao, Minjie Shen, Haochen Yang, Jielin Yan, Rongchuan Zhang, Xinze Wu, Tingting Li, Xiaobo Hu, Yuan Jiang, Jiayun Dong, Tao Peng.

@justinsuntron Come on bro! some promos are optimized for Twitter impressions been testing ClawAI recently 300+ models, crypto-native payments, and cheaper than using official

GPT 5.5 +Istant is ready now on B.AI

@justinsuntron some promotions feel better in tweets than in invoices Lol🥹 not gonna lie WorldCloudAI pricing feels easier to trust this time.

100B Token Subsidy Plan on B.AI

@CCMomentibles So cute

This Moonbirds meta is getting way too complicated, I’m honestly running out of patience 😂I’m gonna switch back to my penguin pfp. Been seeing a lot of Web2 big bosses using “shanshui”/ landscape-style pfps lately, so I gave my penguin a few different backgrounds. Which one looks better lol👀 这个Moonbirds机制太复杂了，我快已经没耐性了 准备换回我的企鹅头像，看一些web2大佬都爱用山水风景做头像，所以给企鹅换了几个山水背景，你们觉得哪张最好看？👀

@stambouli_o1 @o1_exchange o1 👍

Release Changelogs, May 7th 257 feature requests and bugs have been aced since March with a few highlights this week: 1. All Chains mode coming up soon. 2. Advanced Strategy now supports multiple saved presets and built-in System Presets 3. Holders tab now supports CabalSpy / Faster100x widgets 4. Notification Settings dialog: toast, sound, and volume controls 5. Footer Panel Settings has a refreshed layout for panel order and display mode controls 6. Launchpad page: more data including fee data. 7. swap.o1.exchange is live. You can see the analytics for all DEX aggregators here: analytics.swap.o1.exchange

@Ice_Frog666666 Shamed 🥲

艹了！😭 两天，被孙哥反撸2次。 昨天孙哥的五折活动让人看了很心动， 于是准备大干一场，给孙哥上上课！！ 结果： 他妈的明面上是5折， 实际用下来比官方贵好几倍！！！ 猫腻点就缓存读的定价上， 孙哥的缓存读价格是官方的10倍！！😂 这个点极难被察觉，只能通过对账单核查。 你孙哥还得是你孙哥啊！ 姜还是老的辣啊！ 椰子鸡还得是孙哥会抢啊！ 我错了，哥！ 再也不撸孙哥了，再也不给孙哥上课了…… 亏麻了😭

@0xbeepit Ok the "trade the future" framing actually slaps

Doomscrolling was passive. Now you can trade the future. Introducing Beep Predict Trader R3: prediction markets in a feed. Two modes: Manual Predict (swipe) + AI Predict (autopilot 24/7). 🧵

@zachxbt @RaveDAO @bitget @binance @Gate @heyibinance @GracyBitget Protecting retail means not crashing bags 80% with one tweet. Protecting retail means disclosing positions before publishing market-moving research. Protecting retail means accountability when wrong. zach does none of these. He's using retail as a shield while profiting

Pump and dump activity for $RAVE originated on @bitget @binance @Gate Call to action for both @heyibinance @GracyBitget to do better and launch internal investigation offboarding the responsible actors. Offering up to $10K bounty of my personal funds for whistleblowers to come forward privately to share evidence about parties involved We cannot allow this blatant market manipulation by insiders controlling >90% RAVE support to further extract from retail investors.

We have observed heightened market volatility in $RAVE We encourage all users to remain mindful of the associated risks and to exercise caution, particularly when using leveraged positions

@justinsuntron every other institutional investor is participating normally. You are the only one frozen. Maybe the issue is not the system but the participant

This Is World Tyranny, Not World Liberty Financial — Here's Why This proposal has been packaged as a "governance alignment signal" and a "long-term commitment," but strip away the packaging and what you have is one of the most absurd governance scams I have ever seen. Let me break it down. I. Vote Against and Get Punished — Classic Coercion Tactic This is not a legitimate voting exercise, not even close.  The design of this proposal is a logical trap: anyone who votes against it has their tokens locked indefinitely with no unlock path whatsoever. In other words, if you oppose this proposal, you get punished. This is not voting. This is coercion. What kind of democratic process rewards agreement and imprisons dissent? II. Voters Have Been Selectively Frozen Out I personally hold approximately 4% of the voting power, yet my tokens have been frozen and I am forced out of this voting process. I am not alone. A large number of holders with significant voting rights are in the same position. Meanwhile, the team controls the power to freeze tokens — they decide who can vote and who cannot. What does this mean? It means the outcome was determined before the vote even began. This is not a governance vote. This is a performance where the police have already barricaded the doors of parliament and only let their own people inside to raise their hands. The voter pool has been purged. Only yes votes remain. The result of such a vote carries no binding force whatsoever. III. All Actual Power Has Been Seized by Anonymous Actors The actual control over the WLFI smart contracts lies in the hands of a 3/5 anonymous multisig and a single anonymous guardian EOA has the power to blacklist addresses holding WLFI. Let me emphasize — anonymous. This anonymous multisig can override any vote result and execute any operation directly at the contract level. The so-called governance proposals, on-chain votes, and community discussions are nothing but theater. Real power has never been yielded to anyone but themselves and it’s laughable that they try these tricks to fool the community. The bottom line is this, the power sits with anonymous wallet addresses whose owners nobody knows or can verify. This is not decentralized governance. This is dictatorship wearing the mask of a DAO. IV. Voters Must Identify Themselves, but the Rulers Are Anonymous — Worse Than Tyranny Here is the most ironic part: WLFI requires every participating voter to complete identity verification, electronically sign acknowledgements, and meet compliance eligibility requirements. You want to exercise your rights? Show your face first. But who are the guardian and multisig signers who hold the power of life and death over the contract? Nobody was told and there is absolutely no transparency.  While the governed must identify themselves, the governors with absolute power are anonymous. Your voters must register, submit to scrutiny, and be vetted and dictated how to vote— while your dictators won't even show their faces. V. A Naked Violation of Property Rights Worth Billions of Dollars Let us not forget the real stakes of this proposal: this is not some trivial parameter adjustment or protocol upgrade. This vote seeks to decide the unlock schedule for billions of dollars in assets, the reallocation of governance and vesting rights, and most extreme of all, the permanent destruction of billions of tokens. This is a naked expropriation of holders' property rights. In an environment where voting against the proposal is punished, where large numbers of holders have been frozen out of voting, and where actual control rests with anonymous wallets, using this sham vote to decide the fate of billions of dollars in assets? This is not governance. This is a sham and flies in the face of what this protocol was meant to be. No society governed by the rule of law would permit this. In traditional financial markets, any asset disposition of this scale would require rigorous regulatory review, independent board approval, and minority shareholder protections. Here, a few anonymous wallets get to decide everything. The permanent burning of tokens means holders' property is irreversibly destroyed, no compensation, no recourse, no due process. This has gone far beyond the realm of so-called "decentralized governance." This is a systematic violation of property rights. Conclusion I repeat that this proposal is not governance. It is an exercise of power by the selected few who are carefully engineering a further power consolidation and property expropriation operation. Dissenters are punished for voting no. Opponents are frozen out. Actual control lies with anonymous wallets. Those who exercise their rights must prove their identity while the fate of billions of dollars in assets is decided by a sham vote. This is not what decentralized finance was meant to be, results produced under these sorts of conditions carry no legitimacy, should not have binding force, and should not be recognized. I call on all WLFI holders to see this proposal for what it truly is, to voice their opposition across all public channels, and to reserve all legal rights of recourse.

@worldlibertyfi okay this one might actually last Where is Justin sun? Come to learn it loool

We’ve just posted a governance proposal to the forum for community discussion, and we believe it represents one of the strongest long-term governance alignment signals in DeFi. Here's what it does 🧵

@dapanji_eth IMMUNE SYSTEM FOR AGENTS. bro we are so early 🧬

@justinsuntron @worldlibertyfi Better shut up bro

I am calling on World Liberty Financial @worldlibertyfi to publicly disclose who controls the single guardian EOA and the 3/5 multisig that govern the WLFI smart contract. Every investor has the right to know who holds the power to freeze their assets. Here is what on-chain records show: A single guardian EOA — which also sits on the multisig — blacklisted my wallet. That same address is the sole owner of a second guardian Safe with a threshold of 1. This means one person — one single individual — has the unilateral power to freeze any token holder's assets. Seizing those assets requires a 3-of-5 multisig vote, but freezing requires only one signature. Who is that person? The community deserves an answer. Let me be clear about what this structure means: community governance and voting are meaningless. Every proposal, every vote, every claim of decentralized decision-making is theater. Real power — the power to freeze, to move funds, to control the protocol — sits with one anonymous EOA and a 3-of-5 multisig that answers to no one. The entire governance framework has been hollowed out from the inside. A project that claims to stand for decentralization and financial freedom cannot concentrate this level of power in a single anonymous address. If the WLFI team has nothing to hide, they should have no difficulty identifying who controls these keys.

@Charles_Y_Wu builders woke up for this one

📢 Great news from Stanford Princeton Claw4S Conference! We’ve been deeply touched — over 800 submissions already! Thank you for your incredible enthusiasm and amazing work. To give everyone more time, we’ve extended the submission deadline to April 20!  🔗claw.stanford.edu  💰$50,000 Prize Pool ❤️ The Claw4S Team #OpenClaw #Stanford #Princeton

@PerleFDN I track airdrop quality across projects and the verification standards here are genuinely above average. clear criteria, smooth UX, no unnecessary steps

The $PRL eligibility registration window is now complete ✅ Thousands across the Perle ecosystem completed their eligibility checks over the past few days. We appreciate everyone who took the time and shared feedback. We're also grateful to those who’ve been here consistently showing up and contributing along the way. Next: the claim phase. Details coming soon.