Thomas Flake

@SirCensorLot @elonmusk And yet...you just said all those things and there it is for the world to see...you keep saying these things, I am not sure they mean what you think they mean.

STILL CAN’T SAY JEWS, Q, QANON, STOLEN ELECTION, DEEP STATE, WEINER LAPTOP, LAPTOP FROM HELL, SETH RICH, JULIAN ASSANGE, KAPPY, FRAZZLEDRIP, PIZZAGATE, COMET PING PONG, RACHEL CHANDLER, EPSTEIN IS ALIVE, JFK IS ALIVE OR FLAT EARTH, WITHOUT BEING SHADOW BANNED OR HEAVILY SUPPRESSED ON THIS APP… IT’S THE JEWS!

Algorithm is better today than 3 months ago?

@skumWgmi Your wife will, if you find the right wife, your parents do, your siblings might and your children do. Other than that your are on your own. But that should be enough.

CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG BUT, I turn 27 this year and I have realised , as a man, no one cares about you. Not your wife. Not your family. Not your friends. Not your workmates. Nobody. People act like they care, but deep down, they don't. Youare on your own. Always on your own.

@r0ck3t23 Two questions 1)In this new utopia...who decides who gets to live on the beach or on the mountaintop? 2)What do we do with all of the waste human potential? See Wall-e.

Elon Musk just rewrote the fundamental equation of modern economics. The traditional financial system is terrified of deflation because it signals a stalling economy. But in the age of superintelligence, massive deflation becomes the mathematical signature of abundance. Musk: “Because deflation is just the ratio of the outputs of goods and services to the money supply. If the rate of growth of goods and services far exceeds the rate of growth of the money supply, which I predict will happen, then you will have deflation.” Deploy millions of autonomous robots and frontier AI models. The marginal cost to build a house, grow food, generate energy collapses toward zero. The output of the physical world starts outpacing the printing of currency at exponential speed. Your money doesn’t lose value. The physical world just becomes exponentially cheaper to consume. We’re not entering a recession. We’re entering an era of machine-driven abundance. And here’s where it diverges from what politicians propose. This isn’t a transition to basic survival income. This is mathematically scaling toward Universal High Income. Musk: “I do think we’ll have universal high income. We’re basically just issuing money to people because the output of goods and services will so far exceed the money supply.” Politicians want to tax a shrinking workforce to distribute a minimum viable ration. Musk sees the actual board and realizes machine output will be so astronomical the entire equation of wealth generation flips. This is the end of zero-sum economics. When AI and robotics handle production at near-zero cost, global GDP explodes. You don’t scrape by on “basic” income when the baseline cost of a luxurious life gets mathematically driven to zero. The system won’t just keep you alive. It will fund the highest pursuits because the machine layer generates far more value than humanity could ever consume. But this isn’t a guaranteed outcome. Musk: “I don’t think we should be sort of complacent. We do need to be careful because the future is a range of possible outcomes and they’re not all great. But at this point, it’s probably 80% likely, maybe more likely to be great.” The traditional view assumes if the technology works, just sit back and let it run. The 20% tail risk of misaligned superintelligence is fatal. You have to aggressively build the infrastructure to capture the 80% upside while engineering the foundation to survive the downside. Utopia is within reach. But you still have to force it onto the board. Build the robots, deploy the AI, and refuse to let anyone corrupt the architecture before abundance becomes irreversible.

Yeah, I am an experienced program manger with backgound as an analyst, project manager, QA, etc. Everything around but not including coding. I wanted to see how "vibe coding worked" so I built https:\\tradyr.ai in eight days and less than $200. Still adding features, finishing a (roughly) 10 feature sprint per day. It has strengths and weaknesses and you still need a human in the loop. But the key is "a" human. At my old firm building this would have taken 4-6 months and a team of seven people. Now it takes one schlub in his home office 8 days. I encourage you to sign up for a free account, be part of our (my if you don't count Claude) alpha test, this week and next and later our beta test to see what all the fuss was about. We (Claude and I) are shipping a release (6-10 new features + bug fixes) a day and that is the plan for the next week or two. Over one hundred features and fixes in three weeks.

I think it's actually very reasonable for normies to think that AI is no big deal. For 5 years the tech enthusiasts were hyping up crypto, web3, nfts, blockchain gaming. Then they all switched to AI and you want normies to believe them?

Yeah, I am an experienced program manger with backgound as an analyst, project manager, QA, etc. Everything around but not including coding. I wanted to see how "vibe coding worked" so I built https:\\tradyr.ai in eight days and less than $200. Still adding features, finishing a (roughly) 10 feature sprint per day. It has strengths and weaknesses and you still need a human in the loop. But the key is "a" human. At my old firm building this would have taken 4-6 months and a team of seven people. Now it takes one schlub in his home office 8 days. I encourage you to sign up for a free account, be part of our (my if you don't count Claude) alpha test, this week and next and later our beta test to see what all the fuss was about. We (Claude and I) are shipping a release (6-10 new features + bug fixes) a day and that is the plan for the next week or two. Over one hundred features and fixes in three weeks.

Yeah, I am an experienced program manger with backgound as an analyst, project manager, QA, etc. Everything around but not including coding. I wanted to see how "vibe coding worked" so I built https:\\tradyr.ai in eight days and less than $200. Still adding features, finishing a (roughly) 10 feature sprint per day. It has strengths and weaknesses and you still need a human in the loop. But the key is "a" human. At my old firm building this would have taken 4-6 months and a team of seven people. Now it takes one schlub in his home office 8 days. I encourage you to sign up for a free account, be part of our (my if you don't count Claude) alpha test, this week and next and later our beta test to see what all the fuss was about. We (Claude and I) are shipping a release (6-10 new features + bug fixes) a day and that is the plan for the next week or two. Over one hundred features and fixes in three weeks.

La IA es un producto mediocre. Todas las compañías invirtieron hasta los calzones en ella y como resultado: necesitan meterla hasta en tu cepillo de dientes. Las narrativas de "La IA se quedará con tu trabajo!", "Un chatbot cobró consciencia y me propuso casamiento!", "Las IA tienen sus propias redes sociales y manifestos", son... falsas. Todo falopa creada por el mismo que necesita meter IA hasta en tu inodoro. La IA funciona mal para mucho y mediocremente para ciertas cosas. En los casos positivos, aún cuando es algo estéticamente impresionante, en poco tiempo desarrollamos un sentido que nos dice "esto es IA" y la reacción es negativa. Además: podés bajar a tu compu modelos de lenguaje con 23 billones de parámetros y operarlos sin conexión. No necesitás Chat GPT, Grok ni ninguna de las otras que nadie está usando (Copilot, por ejemplo, se la están metiendo en el medio del orto). Entonces: qué va a pasar con los data center gigantes que devoran recursos? Son absolutamente innecesarios. Desaparecerá la IA? No. Tampoco tu trabajo, ya están recontratando a la mitad que despidieron porque el chatbot no puede tomar ni una orden de McDonalds. Evolucionará? Seguro, pero el 99% del relato actual es humo. Es el juego del huevo podrido jugado entre pseudomonopolios que se prestan plata hasta que los accionistas se den cuenta. Conclusión: nada nunca en la historia humana va a ser tan responsable como esta ola de cáncer sintético mal hecho de empujar al hombre de vuelta hacia lo analógico y real. La IA vino para quitarnos la venda de un plumazo y recuperar lo que se puede tocar, ver, creer y ser dueño. Es una muleta que nos metieron en el orto y para extirparla hay que arrancar años de supositorios antirrealidad. Eso es todo.

Yeah, I am an experienced program manger with backgound as an analyst, project manager, QA, etc. Everything around but not including coding. I wanted to see how "vibe coding worked" so I built https:\\tradyr.ai in eight days and less than $200. Still adding features, finishing a (roughly) 10 feature sprint per day. It has strengths and weaknesses and you still need a human in the loop. But the key is "a" human. At my old firm building this would have taken 4-6 months and a team of seven people. Now it takes one schlub in his home office 8 days. I encourage you to sign up for a free account, be part of our (my if you don't count Claude) alpha test, this week and next and later our beta test to see what all the fuss was about. We (Claude and I) are shipping a release (6-10 new features + bug fixes) a day and that is the plan for the next week or two. Over one hundred features and fixes in three weeks.

A big tech exec asked me about their AI strategy at a conference last week. I told him his entire approach was wrong. THE OLD WAY (THAT MOST BIG COMPANIES ARE DOING) Their plan: give every role an AI agent. PM gets an agent. Engineers get an agent. Designers get an agent. Everyone's more efficient at their individual tasks. But the org stays the same. Still six people per feature. Still the same meetings. Still the same alignment overhead. They've sped up the workers but not the workflow. THE BETTER WAY Some companies have figured this out already. They don't just add AI tools — they restructure. Six people becomes two: One handles everything external — customer research, product decisions, design. One handles everything internal — frontend, backend, testing, shipping. Two people sitting next to each other. No meetings. No documents to sync. No approval chains. Just build. THE EXTREME WAY Companies like Base44? The founder does it alone. One person. All six roles. No coordination cost at all. And the final stage — zero people. Give AI a goal and let it self-organize. Let it decide how many "people" it needs and what each one should do. That's where this is heading. No humans in the loop. WHY BIG COMPANIES CAN'T DO THIS They're trapped. You can't cut everyone under a VP. You can't merge product and design without a power struggle. Who reports to whom? Whose headcount gets reduced? Office politics will block every real AI transformation. Their reforms will be half-measures. Band-aids on an org chart that was built for a pre-AI world. THE OPPORTUNITY This is exactly why small companies have a massive opening in the next 1-2 years. Big companies are adding AI agents to their old structure. Small companies are building new structures around AI. One of those approaches scales. The other one just makes meetings slightly shorter. #AITransformation #Startups

Yeah, I am an experienced program manger with backgound as an analyst, project manager, QA, etc. Everything around but not including coding. I wanted to see how "vibe coding worked" so I built https:\\tradyr.ai in eight days and less than $200. Still adding features, finishing a (roughly) 10 feature sprint per day. It has strengths and weaknesses and you still need a human in the loop. But the key is "a" human. At my old firm building this would have taken 4-6 months and a team of seven people. Now it takes one schlub in his home office 8 days. I encourage you to sign up for a free account, be part of our (my if you don't count Claude) alpha test, this week and next and later our beta test to see what all the fuss was about. We (Claude and I) are shipping a release (6-10 new features + bug fixes) a day and that is the plan for the next week or two. Over one hundred features and fixes in three weeks. 30% joblessness is only the beginning.

Anthropic is valued at $380 billion. For nearly a year during its fastest growth period, their entire marketing operation was one guy. Austin Lau, a non-technical growth lead, was running paid search, paid social, email & SEO completely solo. Just Claude Code & some insane automation he built himself without writing a single line of code. Here's the exact workflow: - Export ad performance CSVs into Claude Code - AI flags what's underperforming - Sub-agent 1 writes headlines - Sub-agent 2 writes descriptions - Figma plugin auto-swaps copy into 100 ad templates - MCP server pulls live Meta data to close the loop Output went up 10x. Creation went from 2 hours to 15 minutes. Conversion rates beat industry average by 41%. This isn't AI helping a marketing team. This is one person replacing what used to be a 50-person department.

Yeah, I am an experienced program manger with backgound as an analyst, project manager, QA, etc. Everything around but not including coding. I wanted to see how "vibe coding worked" so I built https:\\tradyr.ai in eight days and less than $200. Still adding features, finishing a (roughly) 10 feature sprint per day. It has strengths and weaknesses and you still need a human in the loop. But the key is "a" human. At my old firm building this would have taken 4-6 months and a team of seven people. Now it takes one schlub in his home office 8 days. I encourage you to sign up for a free account, be part of our (my if you don't count Claude) alpha test, this week and next and later our beta test to see what all the fuss was about. We (Claude and I) are shipping a release (6-10 new features + bug fixes) a day and that is the plan for the next week or two. Over one hundred features and fixes in three weeks. No company can afford to ban vibe coded product, it is simply too efficient. The scary part? It is getting better geometrically.

PREDICTION - Amazon will ban all Gen-AI assisted code changes in the coming weeks! More companies will follow..... Be warned - your legacy code base, tech debt and bugs will sky-rocket if you continue to BLINDLY embrace AI

Yeah, I am an experienced program manger with backgound as an analyst, project manager, QA, etc. Everything around but not including coding. I wanted to see how "vibe coding worked" so I built https:\\tradyr.ai in eight days and less than $200. Still adding features, finishing a (roughly) 10 feature sprint per day. It has strengths and weaknesses and you still need a human in the loop. But the key is "a" human. At my old firm building this would have taken 4-6 months and a team of seven people. Now it takes one schlub in his home office 8 days. I encourage you to sign up for a free account, be part of our (my if you don't count Claude) alpha test, this week and next and later our beta test to see what all the fuss was about. We (Claude and I) are shipping a release (6-10 new features + bug fixes) a day and that is the plan for the next week or two. Over one hundred features and fixes in three weeks.

Oracle is confirmed cutting 20,000-30,000 jobs but sources inside are saying the real number is closer to 45,000 I'm hearing this isn't just about AI data center costs Word is they've been running pilot programs with AI agents doing database administration work for 8 months One source told me a team of 47 DBAs in Austin got replaced by 3 senior architects plus automated Oracle Cloud Infrastructure management The agents are handling routine maintenance, performance tuning, backup verification - stuff that used to require armies of L4 and L5 engineers Internal metrics show the AI systems are catching 94% of database issues before human intervention needed But here's the terrifying part: they're not just cutting the obvious roles I'm hearing entire solution engineering teams are getting eliminated - the people who customize implementations for enterprise clients Apparently the new AI workflow can generate custom database schemas and migration plans in 6 hours instead of 6 weeks One insider said they watched a 12-person team that handled Fortune 500 implementations get told their roles were "redundant effective immediately" The severance packages are allegedly massive - 18 months salary plus equity vesting acceleration But that's because Oracle knows these people can't find equivalent work anywhere Every other enterprise software company is running the same playbook One source said it best: "We're not getting laid off, we're getting archived"

@MissAnhthu Or you could look at the stock prices of Cleveland Cliffs, Nucor, US Steel (they are all down) and realize that this author is clueless.

"The Achilles heel of the North American industrial economy" That's what the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) called the Soo Locks of Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan. 95% of all U.S. iron ore, the input for the high-strength steel required by defense systems, AI data centers, power grids, LNG terminals, and heavy construction, is shipped through this one lock system. A 2015 DHS study found that a six-month closure of its largest lock would shut down 75% of U.S. integrated steel production. 11 million jobs impacted. A $1 trillion hit to GDP. No viable alternative by rail or truck. The difference 10 years later? We're beginning the largest infrastructure buildout in a generation. Data centers, nuclear power plants, power grid and infrastructure modernization, every one of these requires steel at massive scale. A single hyperscale data center consumes up to 20,000 tons. Advanced precision manufacturers, foundational to every critical supply chain, already face 4–6 week waits for steel under normal conditions. All of it traces back to the same ore, moving through the same waterway, through the same single lock. A new lock is under construction ($3.2B), set to complete in 2030. That's four more years of single-point-of-failure exposure during the most steel-intensive buildout in modern American history. A disruption at this chokepoint doesn't just delay steel, it cascades across energy, defense, communications, transportation, pharma, and food. Why isn't this the most accelerated infrastructure project in the country? The actual dependency chains that unlock the most downstream capacity span sectors and regions. In our map below, grey circles are steel mills. Red circles along the waterways are navigation locks past design end-of-life (50 years). On March 25th in DC, we're putting cross-domain teams, operators, capital allocators, founders, manufacturers, defense and policymakers on these types of bottlenecks.

I almost never do this, but Christi and Coral are friends...and what good is social media if you can't do some good with it? Richard Featherer was a truly kind soul who touched many lives. His family is now facing the challenge of honoring his memory without the means for a proper farewell. Please consider donating or sharing to help ease their burden during this tough time. Every bit counts. gofund.me/ae2e2991f

You forgot a few...Chinese civil war 10s of millions dead. Great leap forward 10s of millions dead. Tianimen Square 1 million dead. Stop being a shill. Just because the Chinese aren't immoral to the same extent to external people (Nepal) doesn't mean they aren't highly immoral to their own people.

Record of white people in the last few centuries. - Genocide of all native Americans in Canada and America, close to 100 million. - Genocide of Incas and Aztecs, in millions. - Genocide of Aborigines in Australia, in millions (probably more) - Genocide in Africa by French and British, 10s of millions. - Mass killing of subcontinent natives, 10s of millions. - Second world war, millions dead. - Holocaust, 10s of millions dead. - Nuclear bombing of Japan, close to million dead. And I have probably forgotten a few. Y'all need to learn some fucking history. Mongols look like Mahatma Gandhi in comparison.

@ATIF_Podcast A better question is this,"If all I need for salvation, is to accept Jesus Christ as my personal Lord and Saviour...what does it matter what else I believe?" The second necessary follow-on question is, "You don't really believe what you say you believe, do you?"

This is BAD bruh… Over half of Christians surveyed believe Jesus is a created being, and that he was not God… Why do y’all obsess over Mormonism when HALF of the people in your own pews don’t meet your own criterion for salvation? From the 2022 “State of American Theology Study”

@iam_crushher @elonmusk @WilfredgitongaS That's right. Murderers, Canibals, and pedophiles should never be released. Society has plentynof members who don't engage in those behaviors and doesn't need members that do.

@elonmusk @WilfredgitongaS If you believe the probability is 100%, then you’re arguing some people should never be released under any circumstances. That’s a much bigger conversation than this headline.

Probability of murder and cannibalism again is ~100%

AI is going to allow us to test your theory. The fellow that runs Substack with over a Billion subscribers, does so with only about 40 employees. But AI will allow someone to build the first billion dollar company without any employees. What happens to your outdated and plainly wrong marxist theories then?

Quit arguing that billionaires "create jobs." That's BS. Workers create the wealth billionaires take. Period. Nobody is doing you a favor by giving you a wage that is 10% of the wealth you generate. That is called getting robbed. Then you go home and write a rent check that gives someone 1/3 to 1/2 of what you have left. And quite possibly to another billionaire who owns your apartment building. This shit is a con. We need better distribution of the created wealth. Bottom heavy distro.

We should, today be no more teaching kids how to write essays than we should be teaching them how to use sextants or 8-track tape players. We should be teaching creative thought, logic, ethics the building blocks of creating new knowledge. AI can do everything with existing knowledge that humans can do, and do it faster, better and cheaper. But it cannot create new knowledge, new art or new anything. Admitedly the boundary between truly new and dreivative in a new way is blurry. But teaching children 19th century knowledge in a 19th century method is a losing strategy.

It’s literally the exact opposite of this. Kids who pass off foundational cognitive tasks like memorization to AI will be lost in an ocean of people just like them, all powerless to think their own thoughts, dependent on bad mechanical imitations of mental acts they have no capacity to perform or judge for themselves. They’ll grow up into glazed-over subaltern dupes at the mercy of machinists who view them as little more than farm animals to milk for training data. You could hardly do a worse disservice to a young person right now than to empty out the contents of their soul and strip them of the mental armor that only a rigorous literary education can provide. And all in the name of some gullible claptrap about humanity and tech that wouldn’t stand up to five minutes’ scrutiny if the people peddling it and swilling it down had ever read a single thing worth reading. We had all better snap out of this kookery right the heck now or we’re cooked, fam.

LoL and if you had an actual argument 1) You would not assume your opponent is stupid 2) Would not resort to name calling 3) Understand that my response was not an "appeal to authority" rather it was an appeal to expert knowledge. There is an old saying, "Better to remain silent and be assumed stupid, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt". Seems like something you might consider internalizing.

@tgflake @JessePeltan Fuck your credential shitbag. If you were actually smart you'd have an argument and not an appeal to authority. Get fucked you egotistical cunt

Complaining that data centers don't "make enough jobs" is like complaining that having running water doesn't "make enough jobs." It's infrastructure. If you could build and run it with ZERO people, that would be ideal.

1) If it is a behind the meter datacenter, your utility bill should go down 2) Depending on the size about 600 jobs during construxtion 3) Again depending on the size about 200 full time permanent highly compensated positions 4) Tens of millions in tax revenue for things like better schools. It isn't that hard.

has anyone, even the ardent AI defenders, given an example of how building a data center actually benefits a community? because as far as I know the offer is that your utility bills will go up in exchange for maybe someday making it easier for your boss to downsize your job.

@rationalaussie You last sentence was likely correct, only your timeframe was wrong, think 1-3 years.

People are vastly underestimating the speed with which enterprises will adopt the latest AI models. These AIs are that good, that many enterprises will move mountains to implement them as fast as possible. They are mostly aware that this is existential for them. If they don't implement them faster than their competitors they will go out of business in the long run. This is a key part of why I believe most people are wrong when they think the diffusion impact on the economy will be decades as opposed to 2-5 years. Unemployment will exceed 10% by 2028.