Vanessa Fox

7.8K posts

Vanessa Fox banner
Vanessa Fox

Vanessa Fox

@vanessafox

Sign up to learn about the new SEO stuff I'm working on at https://t.co/8RHZhR55P3. https://t.co/cY8ilvNbjR

Seattle, WA เข้าร่วม Mart 2007
597 กำลังติดตาม31.7K ผู้ติดตาม
Vanessa Fox
Vanessa Fox@vanessafox·
Hello all! Looking for a couple of recommendations: a local SEO agency and a freelance writer/editor. Any suggestions?
English
54
2
37
2.4K
Barry Schwartz
Barry Schwartz@rustybrick·
People keep asking if I will be at @brightonseo in San Diego - well, sure, I booked a flight in and out the same day - no need for hotel - see ya there
Barry Schwartz tweet media
English
7
1
17
11.8K
Vanessa Fox
Vanessa Fox@vanessafox·
@KathleenBellMD It seemed like a whole choir was attending somewhere in the audience for sure!
English
0
0
1
65
Kathleen Bell, MD
Kathleen Bell, MD@KathleenBellMD·
Went to Ben Folds concert last night. Best thing was his interaction with the audience who, incidentally, sang better than any audience I ever heard. Must have all done a capella.
English
1
0
3
210
Matt McGee
Matt McGee@mattmcgee·
The "new" Google thing I just discovered has...[Googles]...been around since 2016. 🤪 (And yes, @rustybrick wrote about it then. When I was his "boss" at SEL and likely assigned it to him. 😑)
English
2
0
7
792
Vanessa Fox รีทวีตแล้ว
The New Yorker
The New Yorker@NewYorker·
The curious career of the illustrator Louis Wain tells the story of how our feline friends came in from the alley and took up their place at the hearth. nyer.cm/BH6VQ7l
English
1
11
42
37.9K
Vanessa Fox
Vanessa Fox@vanessafox·
No part of this Google generative AI result is correct. Google, you are making it difficult for me to do deep dive analysis on the Tortured Poets Department!
Vanessa Fox tweet media
English
1
0
4
1.3K
Barry Schwartz
Barry Schwartz@rustybrick·
@vanessafox So it’s Google’s fault our SEOs are to blame? Our team effort?
English
1
1
1
429
Vanessa Fox
Vanessa Fox@vanessafox·
I know I'm not the first one to say this, but has Google's favoring of Reddit in rankings ruined Reddit? The year old Reddit thread that ranks for "best hot tubs" has a 1 day old post linking to an affiliate site. I know, no one is shocked. Sigh.
Vanessa Fox tweet media
English
1
2
14
3K
Vanessa Fox
Vanessa Fox@vanessafox·
@taffyakner Please don't take my rag & bone sweatpant jeans from me!
English
0
0
1
515
Taffy Brodesser-Akner
Taffy Brodesser-Akner@taffyakner·
can't believe what we've allowed jeans to become, guys
English
6
1
37
11.3K
Vanessa Fox
Vanessa Fox@vanessafox·
@Marie_Haynes @dowsonQA Many years ago, I gave a (non-SEO) talk about the tendency of searchers to equate high rankings with best/accurate, when actually those rankings equated with popular. (Google has done lots of work since related to accuracy but the general concept remains true, I think.)
English
0
0
3
158
Marie Haynes
Marie Haynes@Marie_Haynes·
The DOJ vs Google documents are really making me think. So much of the algo seems to be reliant on predicting where the searcher is going to end up, and then using whether or not that prediction was right to keep improving on those predictions. If that's right, the key to ranking is to truly be the result users are likely to choose and be satisfied with.
English
3
0
4
347
Marie Haynes
Marie Haynes@Marie_Haynes·
I think there are lots of great websites that never get a chance to rank. But here's the thing. Let's say I built an offline business -a hamburger restaurant. Everyone who came in told me that my hamburgers were better than McDonald's. Yet, for the majority of people in this market, when they think, "I want a hamburger" they end up getting a burger at McDonald's. If a search engine was trying to choose which of these a person would like to see when they do a search for hamburger they don't base it off of which burger is the best. Rather, they are trying to predict what the searcher is likely to engage with and end their search journey with. And in our silly example, in most cases it's going to be a McDonald's. So then you would argue ok, it makes sense for McDonald's to be first, but my little burger restaurant should still be suggested on the page somewhere because it truly does have the best burgers. The problem is, the search engine can't taste your burgers. They can only learn from the knowledge that is on the web and, as we are learning, the actions people take that indicate whether a search has been successful. You can build something better than Google flights, but unless people are consistently seeking it out and preferring it over Google flights, it makes sense to rank them first.
Øyvind T. Aasheim@oyvindaa

@Marie_Haynes @brodieseo I've built a flight search site that's more flexible than others, and it shows cheaper trips with less CO2-emissions. As it combines flights with trains and buses. Few people know about it - how would they find it when it doesn't rank? - many have told me it's their favorite.

English
7
1
21
8.9K
Vanessa Fox
Vanessa Fox@vanessafox·
@lilyraynyc Speaking of spam, have you seen how spammed Google Trends is lately? These are the rising queries for "engagement rings" (!)
Vanessa Fox tweet mediaVanessa Fox tweet mediaVanessa Fox tweet mediaVanessa Fox tweet media
English
0
0
3
211
Vanessa Fox
Vanessa Fox@vanessafox·
@GregBernhardt4 Yeah, that's really the issue. The use case is that the site needs to do facet value cleanup (duplicates with singular and plural values for instance) and wants to be able to redirect the values being cleaned up. Any way to do this?
English
1
0
1
45
Vanessa Fox
Vanessa Fox@vanessafox·
New Shopify question! When facet values change, how can the original URLs be redirected? Ex: (collections/cat?facet=value becomes collections/cat?facet=valuenew) It seems you can't redirect Shopify URLs that begin with the path /collections? help.shopify.com/en/manual/onli…
English
1
0
2
743
Vanessa Fox
Vanessa Fox@vanessafox·
@watchinthesky Mine do this too! They'll be packed in at one feeder and waiting for a spot while a feeder 10 feet away is empty!
English
0
0
0
38
Daniel Waisberg
Daniel Waisberg@danielwaisberg·
@vanessafox @lilyraynyc You won't start from 16 months. According to our help centre: "Data is collected for a property as soon as anyone adds it in Search Console, even before verification occurs. However, it takes a few days for data to start to accrue for the property." support.google.com/webmasters/ans…
English
1
0
0
173
Lily Ray 😏
Lily Ray 😏@lilyraynyc·
I posted about this a couple of years ago but I forgot what the answer was. Does anyone know why GSC would abruptly skip from January to October in this chart? @danielwaisberg
Lily Ray 😏 tweet mediaLily Ray 😏 tweet mediaLily Ray 😏 tweet media
English
6
0
16
8.9K