vmal

No we are trying to establish if you have the same morral framework and worldview.

None of the saints used this terminology btw. By this reasoning we r supposed to believe that you believe in two Gods bc that’s what’s implicated by ontological distinction, a distinction in being. This notion contradicts Palamas, Kokkinos, Scholarios, and Eugenikos. It’s heretical.

As I noted back in January in response to Truglia, calling the Orthodox doctrine of atonement “economic theory” or “economic atonement” is superfluous. First, the Orthodox understanding is not a theory but a reality. The various “theories” proposed in Western academic theology may be true insofar as none is absolutised to the exclusion of the others. Second, all confessional Christians affirm that the whole life of Christ is necessary for our salvation, while emphasizing the Passion and Cross as the means by which sin is justly atoned for and forgiven. So to describe the Orthodox view as “economic,” as though Catholic and confessional Protestant accounts are not also fundamentally “economic,” is simply inaccurate. But it (the label) was proposed based off of that false presumption, and on the further mistaken assumption that the atonement accounts found especially in the Russian theological & dogmatic tradition can be reconciled with a theology that denies the contingent necessity of the satisfaction of divine justice & wrath through the Cross.