HashingZap ✝️

It might seem more plausible because the mechanism is easier to explain. Crustal displacement is far more complicated and difficult to prove and do in a way normies can understand. But Brazil has a lost civilization in that rainforest. 100km roads and vast city complexes found with lidar technology. So much we dont know about our own past...

@HashZappa Quando conectamos outras disciplinas, o modelo ECDO me parece mais plausível, pelo menos aqui no Brasil. Não faz o menor sentido o Brasil ter sido um polo. Regiões de polo tem solos parecidos

Definitely shelving Ben's model for now. My simulations all use ECDO mechanisms and it doesn't make sense running his scenario on the wrong tilt dynamics. I look forward to diving into true crustal displacement, though. Far more challenging to simulate, but I like challenges. 😆

There is no playing with the inputs tbh. Its calculating real equations, but I get what you mean. I have to shelve his model because I dont have the physics for true crustal displacement. ECDO is simpler because it takes the crust and mantle as one. The boundary is between the core and mantle. I am not butthurt about it, just acknowledging the limitations and putting a follow up on the roadmap. Focusing on ECDO models for now until I feel that is finished. Been a follower of Ben's for a decade or more. I know how he is and, frankly, he was gentle in his criticism compared to when people really piss him off. 😆 I am just going to keep grinding...

@HashZappa I encourage you to keep playing with the inputs. I think you'll get it close. But no one is perfect. In the end, it's all chance. But keep adding to it. More variables. It's exciting to see, the trails and errors and moving forward to a more complete picture.

Hear me out

@BrockRiddickIFB Only one layer is exposed to space?

@MSEdwards30 @OMApproach That is what the timeframe was... but the motion of water was longer than 24 hours.

@HashZappa @OMApproach This happened in 24 hours?

Why does almost every ancient civilization begin with a story of a great flood? Coincidence... or?

@m11_s90661 I think many of those would be created during each event. There was a popular one out where I live that toppled in 2020 during a nearby earthquake after thousands of years on balance.

@HashZappa I would be very interested to see how those large "pedestal/balanced" rocks out west fair in the event. They seem so fragile and not likely to be shaped during one event. Even the whodoos in Bryce.

My favorite simulation to date is the transition from State 2 to State 1 in ECDO theory. The crust would slowly relax over time, but the sea level after over Khafre pyramid after the initial event would be exactly where it should be. 👀

@msmstarr 104 degree tilt is quite strong. Ongoing research for me because I agree with you that Australia has species and humans that survive. There must be something we're not accounting for... Though some of the inland areas seem to have "manageable" inundation depths. 😅

@HashZappa Africa isn't touched at all. But Australia is completely obliterated in this model. Even the Great Dividing Range running down the east of the country. If this has happened in the past, how have Australian flora & fauna (animals) been able to survive? 🤔

@OMApproach Whatever the reason, its looking nefarious.

Do you think DNA tests were designed to trace certain ancient bloodlines of interest, or are they building genetic datasets that could be used for something nefarious, especially when the civilization collapses?

Even if they have heard about it, your acquaintances are likely skeptical of ECDO. As they should be- extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence to quote Carl Sagan. This is the first video installment in a series that I hope will be useful for addressing that skepticism. youtu.be/EPb5_hX-ruw

6,000 years ago? You dont' say... 😎

@OMApproach @MSEdwards30 "Filling a container with dirt from Central Africa and water will generally result in an opaque, murky red, orange, or rusty-brown color."

@MSEdwards30 The Red flood in the 'Destruction of Mankind', is the Geophysical Event...

What's the biggest historical event you think we've been lied to about? Mine is the desertification of the Sahara.

@OMApproach That is a good one. I will select the history of civilization in the Americas.

Two professors have corrected my science on the “mantle heaving” aspect of the pole shift. We know which land will rise and which will fall. I should have seen it sooner, but better late than never. Video coming tonight- be sure to catch it on our YouTube channel around 5/6pm mountain time.

@SunWeatherMan I look forward to seeing this!

Happy to adjust the physics. Everything simulated is using precise calculations. I don't simulate fantasy, but I acknowledge there might be missing physics to what is being calculated. The most common disagreement comes from how the water flows over British Columbia, but if you've driven through Nevada you'll see that the water flow does align with geography there and the reason Canada gets hit harder is due to where North America ends up during the tilt. Here's why the inundation is so much worse there than in, say, Mexico. BC is near the old pole and shifts nearly 50° off the new axis, through the equatorial bulge. Being closer to the old pole creates incredible water height. While Mexico, being closer to the equator, does not have to contend with the force and distance to the equator - making the catastrophic inundation phase MUCH shorter in duration. That said, I am constantly working towards accuracy. I don't claim its 100% accurate. I am merely trying to get this simulation program to a state where I feel great confidence in it. Just sharing my work as I ... work. 😅

@HashZappa I think the angle of attack of the water is gonna come from different direction than the ones that you’ve identified.

Ben says my physics is wrong for his simulation. He's probably correct, since I'm using ECDO mechanisms within the mantle and his theory doesn't involve ECDO at all. I am also unable to add his modeling due to much of it being super theoretical and not well-understood. However, the rotation here is correct. x.com/HashZappa/stat…

@HashZappa @EthicalSkeptic Where's the equator in a 72 degree tilt?

Max water heights during @EthicalSkeptic's ECDO State 1 > State 2 transition. As close as I could get given all the motion involved, anyway. One thing stands out vs. Ben Davidson's model. A 104° tilt is quite a bit more catastrophic than a 72° tilt. Absolute carnage is ECDO... 😳

@BigDTwo @ddd1ms Might as well throw the Golden Gate in for free.

@ddd1ms @HashZappa Finally... oceanfront property in Arizona!

This sim project is wearing me down. I'm going to get the ECDO models out, and then publish the simulation calculation data for community feedback... might be good to get some outside opinions here. Going to take a few nights off from there. I feel like all I think about lately is what might be missing or needs further review etc etc. After 4 months of it, I'm tired. 😂