Nicholas Higgs

22.2K posts

Nicholas Higgs banner
Nicholas Higgs

Nicholas Higgs

@HiggsDoig

The Palestinian Cause is the rump of Nazism laundered by Soviet propaganda & now espoused as a wedge issue by Islamic supremacists & unthinking Western Leftists

Sydney, New South Wales Sumali Ekim 2023
1.6K Sinusundan979 Mga Tagasunod
Naka-pin na Tweet
Dr David Adler
Dr David Adler@DrDavidAdler1·
PM AT LAKEMBA MOSQUE TODAY Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese today visits the large radical mosque in Lakemba, Sydney. There he is told that Muslim political influence is insufficient. This year the 2026 census will record over 1 million Muslims in Australia for the first time ever (possibly 1.1 million). This has already shifted Australia's foreign policy and overseas experience suggest it will have increasing negative major impacts on local society generally.
English
4
9
15
383
Nicholas Higgs nag-retweet
Dan Burmawi
Dan Burmawi@DanBurmawy·
What’s wrong with Starmer? Why is it so difficult for him to understand that Islam is not like other religions? Hinduism, Judaism, and Christianity do not have a religious mandate to acquire political power and enforce their worldview on the entire society. Why is he so ignorant of the fact that Islamic public celebrations are not religious, but political activism?
English
1K
1.2K
4.4K
64.9K
Nicholas Higgs nag-retweet
Roy K. Altman
Roy K. Altman@RoyKAltman·
In 1918, King Hussein of the Arabs—one of the great heroes of Arab history, the leader of the Arab revolt against the Ottomans along with the British—wrote an op-ed in the Al Qibla newspaper. He says that if the Arabs want the British and the rest of the world to care about their claim to their ancestral land, which they want back now that the Ottomans are gone, then they cannot deny the Zionists’ claim to their ancestral land in the Land of Israel. This isn't me. This is the leader of all the Arabs, King Hussein himself. And he says at the end of the op-ed, and I quote, "The Jews are the original sons of that land." If you don't care about King Hussein, nine months later, on December the 29th of 1918, King Hussein's son, Prince Faisal, who becomes King of Iraq, the first King of Iraq, has a banquet in his honor thrown by a bunch of British dignitaries, along with Lord Rothschild. And he stands up and gives a toast, and at the end of the toast he turns to Lord Rothschild and he says, "We Arabs cannot in good conscience deny the ancestral home of the Jewish people." And he turns to Lord Rothschild and he says, "To my Zionist friends, I say to you, welcome home."
English
15
285
780
21.7K
Nicholas Higgs
Nicholas Higgs@HiggsDoig·
@TimLooker You have yet to give a credible reason why you repeat The Genocide Lie in support of Hamas & here you are lying in support of the theocratic genocidal Islamic regime ayatollahs. Why are you so confused?
English
0
0
8
34
Timothy D Looker OAM
Timothy D Looker OAM@TimLooker·
Not one person, not one politician, not one minister has explained a credible reason why Australia has gone to war against Iran.
English
76
141
725
10.3K
Drew Pavlou 🇦🇺🇺🇸🇺🇦🇹🇼
This video was posted on the official NDIS Instagram page of Borealis NDIS Services in Bankstown Sydney. This business is supposed to look after disabled kids
English
196
752
4.8K
138.1K
Rob Schneider 🇺🇸
Rob Schneider 🇺🇸@RobSchneider·
There is legitimate argument that America’s Wars of intervention have consistently made bad situations far worse; From Obama bombing Libya which disintegrated a society that now has Islamic slave trade, to the removal of Secular leaders like Iraq’s Sadaam Hussein and Syria’s Bashar al-Assad, both replaced by Islamic fundamentalists (terrorists), to the costly disastrous war in Afghanistan, time and time again, a repeat of foreign policy (trillion dollar, 100,000’s of deaths) errors. That said, I cannot in my wildest imagination, conjure up a more despicable, truly evil and murderous regime than the Egyptian Mullahs who have hijacked Iran for 47 years of ruthless occupation, rape and murder.
Masih Alinejad 🏳️@AlinejadMasih

Today, in Iran, in the middle of a war, the regime executed a 19-year-old national wrestling champion for the crime of joining January protests. 💔 After signaling to the world, including President @realDonaldTrump, that they would halt executions of protesters, the regime has done the exact opposite. Three young protesters, Saleh Mohammadi, Mehdi Ghasemi, and Saeed Davoudi, were hanged in Qom after a sham trial. Reports indicate torture. Forced confessions. No access to chosen lawyers. Closed-door proceedings. No right to appeal. I call on @GlobalAthleteHQ to stand with Iranian athletes who are being silenced, imprisoned, and executed simply for raising their voices. This is not just about sports. This is about human dignity.

English
149
358
1.9K
65.1K
Nicholas Higgs nag-retweet
Illia Ponomarenko 🇺🇦
Illia Ponomarenko 🇺🇦@IAPonomarenko·
And in Moscow, mobile internet is being shut down, pickup trucks with machine gunners are appearing on the streets around the Kremlin, and there’s a major scandal involving an ultra-loyal Z-blogger who has openly called for Putin to be tried as a war criminal…
English
32
301
2.5K
81.9K
Nicholas Higgs nag-retweet
Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧
Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧@TRobinsonNewEra·
Mehdi Hassan used Taqiyya, gaslit the public, all to help islamize the UK, then fled to America to do the same thing. He's a degenerate and as dodgy as they come. Keep your eye on him, America.
English
469
5K
24.6K
309.8K
Nicholas Higgs nag-retweet
The Iranian 🇮🇷
The Iranian 🇮🇷@Par_Iranian·
The Islamic Republic of Iran is known for: – Massacring protesters – Public executions (at least 1,500 in 2025) – Hanging LGBTQ+ Iranians – Beating women to death for showing their hair – Raping women as punishment – Torturing and disappearing dissidents – Stoning women for adultery – Lashing women for immodesty – Fining women for wearing nail polish or the color red – Jailing singers, dancers, and filmmakers – Arresting children for social media posts – Holding its own people hostage since 1979 – Hanging teenagers from cranes as public spectacle But because the Iranian regime hates Israel and Jews, the ‘Free Palestine’ crowd will side with this terror regime, instead of supporting the Iranian people.
The Iranian 🇮🇷 tweet media
English
1
79
153
1.6K
Niall Ferguson
Niall Ferguson@nfergus·
The polling in the excellent new @Policy_Exchange report on British Muslims' attitudes is full of sobering data.
Niall Ferguson tweet mediaNiall Ferguson tweet mediaNiall Ferguson tweet media
English
78
213
1.1K
129.1K
Peter Wallace
Peter Wallace@PeterWallaceAU·
I just filled my car and paid $2.80 per litre for diesel. Happy to pay knowing it’s the price of obliterating the Iranian terrorist regime and freeing the people of Iran.
English
2K
1K
6.5K
221.7K
Nicholas Higgs nag-retweet
The Iran Watcher 🇮🇷
The Iran Watcher 🇮🇷@TheIranWatcher·
🚨 Iranians on the ground are actively helping locate regime officials for targeting. Former Israeli National Security Advisor Eyal Hulata says large numbers of Iranians are providing real-time intelligence, not as agents, but as regime opponents after being massacred in recent protests. He described a new dynamic where ordinary Iranians are identifying officials, their movements, and hiding places, feeding that information into Israeli and U.S. intelligence systems. In one example, locals helped identify the location of Basij commander Gholamreza Soleimani and his deputy Seyyed Karishi, who were hiding in a tent in a wooded area before being eliminated. These are the same individuals involved in killing and suppressing Iranians, now being located by Iranians themselves and exposed for targeting. These tips are cross-checked and acted on, showing unprecedented internal cooperation and deep penetration inside Iran.
The Iran Watcher 🇮🇷 tweet media
Iran International English@IranIntl_En

Former Israeli National Security Advisor Eyal Hulata told CNN that large numbers of Iranians on the ground are cooperating with Israel’s campaign—not as recruited agents but as regime opponents who requested assistance after being massacred in protests two months ago, framing the operations as mutual aid for their freedom. "There is intelligence capabilities that are very exquisite and superior both for Israel and the United States. It's not just Israeli intelligence participating in this. And the level of penetration into Iran is significant, by the way," Hulata said. "But there is another element in this, and this is the participation of the Iranian people. The Iranian people themselves understand the magnitude of the opportunity that is here, and they're actively participating in ways that we haven't seen before in providing this kind of information. So some of those targets while they're in hiding are being recognized by the people on the ground, who do understand that this is important for their ability to prevail over time, and they provide ample information about the whereabouts of these officers, about their hiding places, where they're at and then, of course, the intelligence community, either Israeli American, needs to cross check this," he added. "We don't just, you know, bomb without a good understanding of where this is, but we are able to do this when you get those important tips on real time. And the proof at the end is in the list of pictures that you put back there in the screen. It's proven very effective," Hulata added.

English
103
2K
6.2K
219K
Nicholas Higgs
Nicholas Higgs@HiggsDoig·
An important distinction in this analysis and a history lesson, highly recommended:
John Ʌ Konrad V@johnkonrad

“And if the regime survives, Trump loses any chance to control the Strait of Hormuz” This framing is wrong. The President cannot “lose” control of the strait. He can choose not to exercise it. Those are different things. My naval sources confirm the Navy is stretched thin but has significant assets that could deploy on an emergency basis to reopen the strait. The question is not capability. It is risk. Deploying assets currently in reserve or stationed in other theaters removes them from the board if a second crisis erupts elsewhere. That is one risk. Another: ships like the LCS minesweepers carry far fewer defensive systems than a destroyer. How many American sailors are we willing to put in harm’s way to accelerate the timeline by weeks? There are other operational risks as well, and I am convinced the Navy could reopen the strait in a reasonable timeframe by accepting more of them. But there is a more important point that the current debate is missing entirely. The U.S. does not need to sweep the strait to “control” it. What is undeniable is that the U.S. Navy could far more easily and effectively prevent Iranian ships from leaving. This is not hypothetical. There is direct historical precedent. In World War I, Britain faced exactly this problem. Close blockade of German ports had become suicidal. Mines, submarines, torpedoes, and coastal guns made stationing warships near shore too dangerous. So the Admiralty adopted what historians call a “distant blockade”: rather than hovering off enemy harbors, the Royal Navy sealed the English Channel and the northern approaches to the North Sea, intercepting and inspecting merchant ships far from German shores. Britain was careful never to call it a “blockade” officially, precisely to sidestep the legal requirements of the 1856 Paris Declaration. It worked. By war’s end, Germany’s imports had collapsed and hundreds of thousands of civilians starved. The parallel to Hormuz is direct. The U.S. Navy does not need to push minesweepers through a 21-mile contested strait to deny Iran the benefits of maritime commerce. It can stand off at distance in the Gulf of Oman or the Arabian Sea and interdict Iranian-flagged vessels under the belligerent right of visit and search, which is well established under the San Remo Manual and customary international law. Ships carrying Iranian cargo could be hailed, boarded, and diverted. Those that resist inspection can be captured. Enemy merchant vessels can be seized outright. If they attempt to fight back our submarines could sink them. No serious navalist doubts the ability of nuclear subs to sink supertankers. This does not require a declared blockade with all its legal formalities and the danger of occupying the strait. Iran does not “control” the Strait of Hormuz. Iran is selectively permitting Chinese, Turkish, Indian, and Pakistani ships to pass while threatening Western vessels. That is not control. It is a negotiating posture enforced by mines and bluster. The U.S. Navy could shut down every Iranian-flagged vessel on the open ocean tomorrow. Iran cannot do the same to us. Could the United States also force merchant ships to sail through the strait? Operationally, yes. No merchant captain will refuse transit when a SEAL team boards his ship. But this would be legally problematic: the master has an independent duty to his crew and owners under maritime law, and the flag state’s consent matters. I am not saying we should do this. I am saying we could. The bottom line: in no scenario does the United States “lose control” of the strait. The President can surrender the initiative to Iran for political, diplomatic, or legal reasons. But he cannot lose it. The Navy’s ability to impose a distant interdiction on Iranian commerce is not in question. The only question is whether the Commander in Chief orders it.

English
0
0
0
15
Nicholas Higgs nag-retweet
Dan Burmawi
Dan Burmawi@DanBurmawy·
There is no such thing as a “right interpretation” and a “wrong interpretation” in Islam. There is only one supreme interpretation, and that is the life of Muhammad.
English
10
36
208
4.1K
Nicholas Higgs
Nicholas Higgs@HiggsDoig·
Soviet Zionology “a highly effective political tool”. As true today as the 1960s and still just as dishonest.
Mark Rowley@MarkWRowley

THE SOVIET UNION, THE KGB, AND ‘ZIONISM’ The Soviet Union and its successor state, Russia, have a long history of weaponising the term ‘Zionist’ (and ‘Zionism’) as a political tool to disguise antisemitism, attack Israel, and discredit Western influence. This strategy involves equating Zionism with negative ideologies such as Nazism, racism, and imperialism to make it a social taboo and a target for condemnation. WHAT IS ZIONISM? ‘Zionism’ correctly understood, refers simply to the return of Jewish people to ‘Zion’ — one of several names given to Jerusalem and the surrounding lands in which the Jews lived and governed in ancient times. In the late nineteenth century, the idea of returning to those lands shifted from a seemingly intangible ideal and wistful age-old expression of yearning for freedom, to a precise, secular, political movement. The aim of ‘Zionism’ was to reconstitute a Jewish state in the territory the Jews knew as Eretz Yisrael (The Land of Israel), which had been renamed ‘Palestine’ (Syria Palaestina) following the suppression of the final Bar Kokhba revolt by the Roman Emperor Hadrian in the year 135 CE. The renaming was intended to diminish Jewish connection to the land following the revolt, referencing the ancient Aegean enemies of the Jews, the Philistines. The Balfour Declaration, United Nations General Assembly Resolution 181 (II), and a succession of binding instruments of international law from the San Remo Resolution to the League of Nations Mandate for Palestine, had all recognised that the Jews were a distinct people with an unbroken connection to the land and a right to reform their state in some part of that land. ‘Zionism’ therefore was the foundational movement of the modern state of Israel. As such, those determined to erase an autonomous Jewish presence from the Middle East have assessed that if they can succeed in depicting Zionism as something loathsome and unjust, the case for Israel can be dramatically undermined. COLD WAR PROPAGANDA: Following Israel's victory in the 1967 Six-Day War, the Soviet Union launched an intense anti-Israel campaign, which was officially sponsored by the Communist Party and the KGB. Soviet propaganda sought to equate ‘Zionism’ with ‘Nazism’ - arguing that if Zionism is a form of racism, and racism is a form of Nazism, then Zionism is a form of Nazism. ‘ZIONOLOGY’ The Soviets coined ‘Zionology’ to frame their anti-Zionist propaganda as scholarly study, creating a new genre of literature that portrayed Zionists as evil conspirators. UN RESOLUTION 3379: The USSR was instrumental in orchestrating the 1975 UN General Assembly Resolution 3379, which declared Zionism to be “a form of racism and racial discrimination,” a move that mainstreamed the demonisation of the term. DISGUISED ANTISEMITISM: While the Soviet government often claimed to be ‘anti-Zionist’ rather than antisemitic, studies show that in practice, the campaigns were antisemitic, leading to harassment, surveillance, and job loss for Jewish people. MODERN USE: The Kremlin has continued to use these techniques to serve its interests, particularly by fanning antisemitic sentiment and using the ‘anti-Zionist’ narrative to accuse the Ukrainian government (which is led by a Jewish president) of being supported by Zionists. Contemporary antisemites and ‘anti-Zionists’ today employ the definition of Zionism established by the Soviet Union, as it enables the demonisation of Zionism by linking it to Nazism, racism, apartheid, and global conspiracies, transforming it from a national liberation movement into a proxy for "evil". This tactic is considered a "highly effective political tool" that has been used to stir up a wave of anti-Jewish sentiment by hiding it under the guise of ‘geopolitical criticism’ 2021-2025.state.gov/more-than-a-ce….

English
0
0
1
13