NoCodeCarlos

So whats the difference between @paper and @pencildev ? And which one should I tried first with Claude Code

@JJEnglert I missed today's event, will there be a recording?

Claude Code: ✅ Creates a whole game with altitude, parallax effect, sounds, animations from a string of prompts ❌ Changes the font color to white after several prompts, CSS ingestion, screenshots, comparisons etc

@CiprianiRanieri mustard-seed.netlify.app

Builders only. Drop your product. I'll give honest feedback.

@CiprianiRanieri hey dude!

I'm 28. -650 followers on x -955+ connections on linkedin -8932 subscribers on youtube (12.1M+ total views) -1265 followers on tiktok - Shipped 10+ projects with Lovable / Claude Code & antigravity Trust the process, and show up each day. If you are into: Ai, tech, start-ups, reply & lets connect.

@CiprianiRanieri Im building Mustard Seed, an app for Catholic parents to share the faith with their kids. mustard-seed.netlify.app

I'm doing this again because yesterday was too good. Tell me what you're building 👇 This time I'll also tell you the ONE thing I'd change about your positioning. Builders helping builders. That's the whole game.

@eve_silb @CiprianiRanieri Hi Eve I tried using your too but my payment got declined and there wasnt any info from the bank to allow it or anything it just got denied

@CiprianiRanieri x.com/eve_silb/statu…

@JJEnglert Not even close to a video producer but I signed up for the webinar

This post is hitting a nerve for a lot of creatives. A lot of my friends are still in the film and creative industries. I used to be too. I totally understand how upsetting it is to see a craft you’ve spent years mastering get changed so quickly by AI. I’m not saying this is automatically the best way. I’m also not saying it works for every type of video. What I am saying is this is a new method that is working for me. And I do think this is where a lot of video production is heading. Maybe not at every level, but I think it will become very common, very fast. So I’d urge you to learn more before rejecting it just because it’s different from how you’ve always done it. This is happening in every industry right now. There are real pros and real cons. And yes, it can be scary. But stay curious. Instead of shutting it down, take time to understand it. See if you actually believe in it. If you do, you can get ahead of the curve. If you don’t, you’ll still have an informed opinion and can keep doing what works for you. Either way, stay curious my friends. We're all in it together.

And we have sound 🔈 Spent the last few early mornings building sound assets for Launch the Capy. Lo-fi jazz that speeds up as you climb made with @suno Rubber band and coin effects made with @elevenlabs Stitched together by Claude Code in seconds.

@thisiskp_ @levelsio 🙋‍♂️ Im taking my shots

Growing up in India I remember how hard it was to acquire a Sony cam corder to make a short film A lot of my friends wanted to be film makers but didn’t have cameras Now everyone has more or less the same kind of camera (quality and zoom etc) and apps on their smart phones Yet very few pause to think they can be mini film makers like how Spielberg or Nolan started their careers .. yet many don’t Unfortunately the specs and skills won’t matter anymore It’s the agency and taste that will matter a lot more .. our job becomes inspiring more people to act on their ideas and take more shots until they find success

If the skill part of making things moves to the AI Then everyone now has access to the same skills So then it's either not about skills anymore and everyone is competing with everyone on equal footing and all of us ending in a perfect competition with close to zero profit So then nobody ends up winning anymor but the AI companies (since we pay them) Or skill is replaced by stuff like ideas, originality, taste, getting users, attention, distribution, audience, capital (who's rich) etc

I know I had a good weekend when I can squeeze in a labor of love. Using Claude Code, I'm building Launch the Capy, a game where you help a Capybara reach the moon. In this session, I experimented with a parallax effect and rendering the game at 60fps; it looks so much better.

@victor_bigfield An iOS game

what are your building this week ?

@eve_silb @pmitu Oh wow I actually need this

@pmitu x.com/eve_silb/statu…

Can you sell me your product in just 3 words?

@designertom Power Ups that you can purchase at the "garage" and "sounds" are coming soon.

@NoCodeCarlos Oh that's fun

hey @designertom — here's Launch the Capy A Capybara dreaming of reaching the moon. Assets from GPT, Canva & Nano Banana, merged in Figma, built with Claude Code + Xcode. Aiming for a fully working iOS game

software is still about thinking software has always been about taking ambiguous human needs and crystallizing them into precise, interlocking systems. the craft is in the breakdown: which abstractions to create, where boundaries should live, how pieces communicate. coding with ai today creates a new trap: the illusion of speed without structure. you can generate code fast, but without clear system architecture – the real boundaries, the actual invariants, the core abstractions – you end up with a pile that works until it doesn't. it's slop because there's no coherent mental model underneath. ai doesn't replace systems thinking – it amplifies the cost of not doing it. if you don't know what you want structurally, ai fills gaps with whatever pattern it's seen most. you get generic solutions to specific problems. coupled code where you needed clean boundaries. three different ways of doing the same thing because you never specified the one way. as Cursor handles longer tasks, the gap between "vaguely right direction" and "precisely understood system" compounds exponentially. when agents execute 100 steps instead of 10, your role becomes more important, not less. the skill shifts from "writing every line" to "holding the system in your head and communicating its essence": - define boundaries – what are the core abstractions? what should this component know? where does state live? - specify invariants – what must always be true? what are the constants and defaults that make the system work? - guide decomposition – how should this break down? what's the natural structure? what's stable vs likely to change? - maintain coherence – as ai generates more code, you ensure it fits the mental model, follows patterns, respects boundaries. this is what great architects and designers do: they don't write every line, but they hold the system design and guide toward coherence. agents are just very fast, very literal team members. the danger is skipping the thinking because ai makes it feel optional. people prompt their way into codebases they don't understand. can't debug because they never designed it. can't extend because there's no structure, just accumulated features. people who think deeply about systems can now move 100x faster. you spend time on the hard problem – understanding what you're building and why – and ai handles mechanical translation. you're not bogged down in syntax, so you stay in the architectural layer longer. the future isn't "ai replaces programmers" or "everyone can code now." it's "people who think clearly about systems build incredibly fast, and people who don't generate slop at scale." the skill becomes: holding complexity, breaking it down cleanly, communicating structure precisely. less syntax, more systems. less implementation, more architecture. less writing code, more designing coherence. humans are great at seeing patterns, understanding tradeoffs, making judgment calls about how things should fit together. ai can't save you from unclear thinking – it just makes unclear thinking run faster.

@DannPetty Check out @raydian_dev !

Designers are getting a world class education on patience and anger management right now because nothing will test your patience more than getting AI to build your designs. It's the smartest dumbest thing in the world.

@gregoryjohn Wow canvas on product?

Vibe Coding 2.0? Zero technical ability needed.

So let me get this straight if Im using Cursor and Im using Anthropic's Claude agent, am I using Claude Code or nah? I feel like Im missing the vibe while at the same time being on the vibe.