GetMeOutOfHere

2.7K posts

GetMeOutOfHere banner
GetMeOutOfHere

GetMeOutOfHere

@SinkingUK

Pro Scottish Independence Cybernat

Glasgow, Scotland Sumali Ocak 2020
375 Sinusundan102 Mga Tagasunod
GetMeOutOfHere nag-retweet
YES Brechin
YES Brechin@BrechinYes2·
Can't have an oil refinery. Can't have a chemical plant. Can't have a Chinese Wind Turbine Plant. Can't have zonal Electricity pricing. Can't hear a whisper from 37 Scots Labour MPs.
English
62
685
1.3K
23.5K
GetMeOutOfHere
GetMeOutOfHere@SinkingUK·
@fhirinn @TheIndyPoet @2351onthelist thousands of jobs in England exist because of Scotland, most whisky is exported via English ports, engineering firms supporting the North sea activities, ports supporting offshore wind in Scottish waters. It will all be localised after Indy. Never factored into the debate
English
1
0
0
17
The Indy Poet
The Indy Poet@TheIndyPoet·
This could upset a few right wingers ..........
The Indy Poet tweet media
English
75
342
853
15K
Mark Zegveldt
Mark Zegveldt@ziggy6769·
The SNP campaigning on fixing the problems they have created over the last 19 years is just laughable and the gullible fall for it. 🙄
English
28
205
1.1K
10.6K
GetMeOutOfHere
GetMeOutOfHere@SinkingUK·
@carolinepenman5 FFS you must be as thick as mince, second vote for SNP is a total waste and will return English parties.
English
0
0
0
8
Caroline Penman
Caroline Penman@carolinepenman5·
Remember when you vote only SNP will protect free university fees all others want you to graduate with an eye watering debt.vote SNP 1 and 2
Iona Fyfe@ionafyfe

Did you know that 16 and 17 year olds and international students living in Scotland can vote? 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🗳️ The Scottish Parliamentary elections are on 7 May. Don't lose your opportunity to exercise your democratic right. Register here → gov.uk/register-to-vo… Deadline to register 11:59pm on 20 April 💌 #Vote #Democracy #Scotland

Arabella, Scotland 🇬🇧 English
43
66
94
3.9K
GetMeOutOfHere
GetMeOutOfHere@SinkingUK·
@CraigMurrayOrg Not above the law, the law just hasn't been used. Coronation oath which is still law says the king must punish wrong doing. It's just a case of calling on the king to do his job (only problem is the king hasn't actually taken the Scottish oath as he is legally required to take)
English
0
0
2
516
Craig Murray
Craig Murray@CraigMurrayOrg·
The incredible case of Mark Hirst continues in the High Court of Edinburgh today. It goes to the heart of the astonishing corruption between the Sturgeon regime in Scotland, and the Crown Office (prosecuting authority). The same corrupt nexus that jailed me. Unbelievably, an earlier hearing found that the police and Crown Office had subjected Mark Hirst to malicious prosecution without good cause - but that the Lord Advocate in Scotland is above the law and cannot be sued. Remember Sturgeon at the time had restored the Lord Advocate position, head of prosecutions, to sit in her Cabinet as a Scottish Govt minister - Swinney has continued this. The judge Lord Lake also found that the immunity of the Lord Advocate from any consequences for malicious prosecution is contrary to the European Convention of Human Rights. In today's hearing - AND THIS IS ABSOLUTELY STUNNING - the Swinney regime is not removing the immunity of the Lord Advocate. The Swinney regime is arguing that the Lord Advocate's immunity to commit deliberate, politically motivated malicious prosecution is not contrary to the European Convention of Human Rights. That is the kind of corruption you are supporting if you vote SNP. Livestream link in reply
Craig Murray tweet media
English
18
237
406
25K
GetMeOutOfHere
GetMeOutOfHere@SinkingUK·
@staylorish England had a moratorium on wind farms so they were built in Scotland, we look at the turbines and they get cheaper power than us. You nit pick on detail when the system is rotten. All power generation should be in public hands for the common good
English
0
0
1
5
Sam Taylor
Sam Taylor@staylorish·
4/ Developers won’t spend the vast sums of money it costs to construct a wind farm unless they are guaranteed a price for the output. And that’s why CfDs (Contracts for Difference) are vital to Scottish renewables - nothing gets built without first securing a CfD.
English
2
3
28
889
Sam Taylor
Sam Taylor@staylorish·
1/ How to demonstrate that John Swinney is not telling the truth about Scotland’s “low-cost” renewables.🧵 First, go to the Ofgem website and download this spreadsheet: ofgem.gov.uk/energy-regulat…
Sam Taylor tweet media
English
10
79
135
15.9K
GetMeOutOfHere nag-retweet
A.M.MacJ
A.M.MacJ@ammacj·
Calmac ferries. Here is Calmac CEO letter to staff, exposing media and politicians on their deception on ferries.👇 Calmac have given media this information but media choose not to report. (via @ProfJWR )
A.M.MacJ tweet mediaA.M.MacJ tweet media
English
38
715
958
38.8K
GetMeOutOfHere nag-retweet
Ramblings from Glasgow 🇵🇸🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿
The brilliant, the formidable Sara Salyers laying bare the actuality of Scotland’s position within the UK. She annihilates the fairy story of voluntary partnership to expose Scotland’s true state, that of Annexation by England. 17 of the best minutes of oratory you’re likely to ever hear on Scotland. Please listen and please repost.
Liberation Scotland Committee@LiberationScot

The voluntary partner narrative, must be torn down, because Scotland, the dependency of England calling itself the UK - Scotland, the non self governing territory - has a route to achieving its right to self determination...That is the one liberation Scotland is now taking with our partners: liberation, decolonization, the restoration of sovereignty to a colonized people grounded in international law and universal human rights.

English
6
198
267
8.8K
GetMeOutOfHere nag-retweet
Sara Salyers
Sara Salyers@SSalyers2·
This is mostly correct. We do want to see the largest possible, pro-independence representation at Holyrood. SNP 1 & 2 defeats that objective. Only both votes indy but SNP 1 and other indy 2 will deliver a supermajority. But that still cannot deliver independence. The 'supermajority' can deliver indy is an error that has gone on for too long. (I'm not sure why.) The facts are these: Under the Scotland Act, Section 31A, (not the Edinburgh Agreement!), the supermajority requirement is strictly limited to amending specific, foundational aspects of the Scottish Parliament's structure, namely: the electoral franchise, the voting system, the number of constituencies, regions, or members. The supermajority power does *not* grant competence over areas reserved to Westminster (Schedule 5 of the 1998 Act). Key areas that remain outside the Scottish Parliament's legislative scope, regardless of any supermajority, include: the UK constitution (including Scottish independence, any referendum on independence or even on a whether the Scottish population wishes to have a referendum), defense, foreign policy, immigration, currency, financial services, broadcasting, and energy. Holyrood IS the Westminster administration in Scotland; it cannot legally redefine itself as something else, change its constitutive identity, and so cannot legally move on any constitutional matter without Westminster permission. It cannot legally declare UDI as that is equivalent to an arm cutting itself off a body and declaring itself a separate entity. UDI must be therefore be declared by a civic convention which elected representatives can join bringing their democratic mandate with them. But UDI without international recognition that Scotland is an occupied territory, (English colony), will result in an officially contested status. That means a limbo, not independence. As Craig Murray keeps explaining, independence is the unopposed recognition of a sovereign state by other states. So let's get the biggest majority we can into Holyrood. but lets also be aware of the steps required after that: 1. Civic convention 2. International recognition that Scotland is occupied, its sovereignty never relinquished or transferred to England and entitled to restoration of its original state and sovereign status 3. A democratic event and declaration of independence by a civic convention following an internationally monitored and recognised referendum (we had a skewed opinion poll in 2014 and nothing more) or a plebiscite. Aside from Westmonster having a Damascus moment and setting us free with tearful apologies, that is the one and only route. And there is so much work for all of us, on every aspect needed to make it happen to mean that no party, organisation or public figures can claim to lead or 'own' the campaign. We can all roll our sleeves up and take ownership together.
Hope Over Fear@hopeoverfear01

1) the SNP cannot “win independence” 2) there will be no referendum. The best chance we have is a strong pro-Yes Supermajority, as defined in the Edinburgh Agreement. How do we achieve that? By using the voting system that exists & NOT making the “BothvotesSNP” mistake again!

English
12
113
148
4.5K
GetMeOutOfHere nag-retweet
Neil Henderson 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿
Polls showing that Reform will achieve 19 seats in Holyrood MAINLY DUE TO BOTHVOTESSNP BUT NOBODY WANTS TO RESEARCH D’HONDT TO GRASP HOW TO MAXIMISE YES SEATS.
English
26
102
167
7.4K
Russell Findlay
Russell Findlay@RussellFindlay1·
Aberdeen Harbour is Britain's oldest business. Having survived Viking raids and Luftwaffe bombing, there's a risk it won't survive the anti-oil and gas policies of the SNP and Labour. dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1…
English
36
17
60
3.6K
GetMeOutOfHere
GetMeOutOfHere@SinkingUK·
@staylorish There are two nuclear power plants that are years behind and billions over budget in England. It would take some going to be worse at delivering power projects than the English.
English
0
0
1
20
Sam Taylor
Sam Taylor@staylorish·
Some seem to think powers over energy would be a stepping stone to Scot Gov nationalising energy. They clearly haven’t been paying attention to the ferries. Who wants an energy provider that delivers no energy for a decade, and then charges you 5x more than you were expecting?
English
14
21
103
2.8K
GetMeOutOfHere nag-retweet
MSM Monitor
MSM Monitor@msm_monitor·
Neither BBC Scotland nor STV have ever shown the video of Unionists demanding the Scottish Govt award the Glen Sannox and Glen Rosa contract to Ferguson Marine. Yep, that's correct. The Unionist parties demanded the contract they now decry as a fiasco be awarded to Fergusons.
English
11
698
1K
30.7K
Homeless Project Scotland 💜🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿
Three times. Three times @JohnSwinney was asked to come and see Scotland’s only night shelter. Three times he refused. Too busy. Too important. Too focused elsewhere. While people are sleeping rough… While people are cold, hungry, and at risk… While volunteers are stepping up where government has failed… He won’t even come and look. This isn’t about a diary. This is about priorities. If you won’t face the reality of homelessness, if you won’t meet the people suffering, if you won’t stand beside those on the frontline… Then you are not leading you are hiding. This isn’t leadership. This is neglect. Power over people. Image over action. Scotland 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 deserves better.
Homeless Project Scotland 💜🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 tweet media
English
134
517
1.2K
20.5K
GetMeOutOfHere nag-retweet
iScot Magazine
iScot Magazine@iScotNews·
@RussellFindlay1 When Ireland took its independence in 1922 - did 'the country' break up? When England dragged Scotland out of the EU against its will - did the EU Break up? Scotland regaining its independence is long overdue.
English
9
83
254
3.1K
GetMeOutOfHere nag-retweet
Sara Salyers
Sara Salyers@SSalyers2·
@SymbolStones @ktb51aduke1 @RafHM And as no British Crown was created, Scotland was simply put under the English Crown, it is still extant as a constitutional instrument. Both crowns exist in fact. This is why Scotland remains a sovereign territorial nation.
English
7
102
221
3.2K
Dave Llewellyn Boom Boom Tel Aviv
Dave Llewellyn Boom Boom Tel Aviv@TheIndyNinja1·
Do you think you should be able to get away with perjury because you're Nicola Sturgeons Chief of Staff. WHY HAS LIZ LLOYD NOT BEEN CHARGED ?
Dave Llewellyn Boom Boom Tel Aviv tweet media
English
6
78
198
3.8K
GetMeOutOfHere nag-retweet
Sara Salyers
Sara Salyers@SSalyers2·
Currently making the case and making allies at the 61st HRC session in Geneva! See below for link to published submission (IPLSA with LS, Jerome Bouquet Elkaim et al.)
Christophe Dorigné-Thomson@thomsonchris

Indictment at the United Nations: A Report Submitted Directly to the UN Secretary-General Now Entered into the UN System Exposes Scotland as a Colony and Places the English Colonial State in the Dock Read the full report by Liberation Scotland and partners on the official UN website documents.un.org/doc/undoc/gen/… A document has now entered the official machinery of the United Nations. Circulated at the United Nations Human Rights Council (61st session), received by the Secretary-General, and registered under UN procedures, this report constitutes far more than an NGO submission. It is an intervention within the normative space of international law itself; and an indictment of the English colonial state. For Scotland as an English colony, it is nothing short of strategic. A Break in the Colonial Narrative For decades, the English colonial state has relied on a carefully constructed fiction. Scotland, the narrative insists, is part of a “voluntary union,” endowed with democratic representation, protected by devolution, fully exercising internal self-determination. It's a colonial lie. This report dismantles that fiction with clinical precision. It identifies Scotland not as a partner, not as a region, but as a territory under colonial sovereignty, explicitly placing it alongside cases such as New Caledonia and French Polynesia. This classification is not rhetorical but analytical, precise, legal, and comparative. It situates Scotland within the global structure of colonial domination. It strips away the British constitutional mythology and replaces it with a framework grounded in international law. Once that shift occurs, everything changes. Devolution Unmasked as Legal Assimilation At the core of the English colonial strategy lies devolution. Presented as a generous transfer of power, it has long been used to argue that Scotland already governs itself. The report exposes this mechanism for what it is. A colonial fraud. The Scotland Act 1998 is described as establishing administrative structures while preserving the overriding authority of the central, colonial English state, constituting a process of legal assimilation designed to negate Scotland’s status as a treaty partner. This is a devastating reframing. Devolution is no longer interpreted as autonomy. It is revealed as a technology of control, a system through which the English colonial centre maintains supremacy while projecting the illusion of self-government. Internal self-determination, in this light, is containment, certainly not liberation. The implication is profound. The English colonial state does not share sovereignty. It absorbs, restructures, subordinates, plunders. The Failure of Internal Self-Determination The report goes further. It demonstrates that systems of internal autonomy, wherever imposed under the authority of the dominant state, remain structurally incapable of delivering genuine self-determination. They operate within what the report identifies as a framework of hegemonic legal pluralism, where the colonised are permitted limited expression only within boundaries defined by the coloniser. Scotland’s constitutional reality is thus aligned with a broader global pattern. From New Caledonia to Okinawa, internal arrangements function not as solutions but as instruments of stabilisation for colonial rule. The conclusion follows with force. External Self-Determination & Decolonisation as the Only Solution The report states unequivocally that external self-determination is the only effective means of guaranteeing the rights of peoples subjected to such structures. This is not a suggestion but a doctrinal position grounded in international and UN law: -Article 1(2) of the UN Charter -The UN General Assembly Resolution 1514 (XV) -The UN General Assembly Resolution 1541 (XV) The implication is unmistakable. @UN @UNGeneva @UN_HRC @UNHumanRights @antonioguterres

English
11
150
207
5.1K